He pointed out that more than half of all money transactions are already processed electronically, with the rise of cryptocurrencies, and payment systems like PayPal, Zelle, and digital wallets.
The global elite and banking lobby want a digital cashless system because this will give them even more control over us. Global bankers want to monitor and control every single transaction, while destroying real world currencies so they can issue money that doesn’t exist, creating impossible financial burdens for the masses, all the while accumulating extraordinary real wealth and power for themselves.
Populations relying on a fully digital cashless grid will be incredibly vulnerable in times of crisis. A terrorist or military attack, or even a storm or power outage, would mean the end of a functional economy. Payments would stop, the economy would grind to a halt, and life as we know it would end.
A new, desperate climate would take hold, with entire populations left vulnerable and helpless, completely under the control of their government and the shadowy elites pulling the strings.
Why would Western governments ban cash when there are such disastrous consequences for humanity waiting just around the corner?
Because the shadowy elites and their banking cartels want us to be easily manipulated, cowed and controlled.
Businesses, and even entire countries like Sweden, have already jumped on the movement to end the era of cash, disrupting the hard currency that has underpinned modern economies.
Yahoo report: Non-cash transactions are forecast to grow by a compounded annualized growth rate of 12.7% through 2021, according to a 2018 study produced by BNP Paribas and Capgemini. Those vast volumes put financial intermediaries in a prime position to benefit from processing those transactions.
The banking sector has “already digitized,” Moynihan said on Wednesday. “The business has moved digitally and it will continue to move that way. It’s just figuring out how to add the value.”
I looked into that, but I noticed they are trying to take the guns away in Australia, how is that working out for the elite dip shits?
Of course they do! There's nothing to back their fiat money, fiat debt, may as well. Folks will have a choice whether they take the chip they'll need soon, surely won't be me. Thanks for the post, sharing.
The stunning admission comes from a 2015 UN document entitled, “Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”
Americanthinker.com reports: In the 1960s, an informed but naïve undergraduate, I was walking across the campus of the University of Pennsylvania with the Chairman of the Chemistry Department, Prof. Charles C. Price. He told me that he was president of the United World Federalists, and asked if I knew what that organization was. When I said that I did not, he replied that they believed in a one-world government that would grow out of the United Nations. I was nonplussed as I had never heard anyone suggest that idea before. To me, the United Nations was a benevolent organization dedicated to pressuring the world community in the direction of peace, and to operating charitable programs to help the struggling, impoverished peoples of the world. I imagined the UN as a kind of United Way on a worldwide scale.
How would Prof. Price’s vision of a new world government emerge? Although there was a socialistic thread in its founding document, the United Nations was formed based on a vision of human rights presented in the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (UDHR) which placed the concept of rights at the forefront for the progress of the world body. And rights are the mainstay for uplifting human freedom and the dignity of the individual. The UDHR document followed many amazing documents that presented rights as the central concept of the post-feudal world: the English Declaration (or Bill) of Rights of 1689, the U.S. Declaration of Independence with its important and forceful assertion of inalienable natural rights, the powerful U.S. Bill of Rights enacted in 1791, and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (1789).
The word “rights” With Dead Baby Parts- appears in almost every sentence of the 1869-word UN document. The document is literally obsessed with rights, and one must assume they are likewise obsessed with the rights successes as manifested in the United Kingdom, the U.S., and France. However, there are some deviations from the rights usage we are all familiar with. In Article 3, Instead of the inalienable rights of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” found in our Declaration of Independence, the UN declares everyone’s right to “life, liberty and security of person.” Are they implying that security will bring happiness? Or are they implying that happiness is too ephemeral a value, and too Western? Perhaps more mundane survival goals are needed by most of the world.
We see a reprise of items from our Bill of Rights such as condemnation of cruel and unusual punishment (Article 5), due process (Articles 6,7,8,9, 10, 11, 14, 17), illegal search and seizure (Article 12), and freedom of speech and assembly (Articles 19,20). But there are new rights introduced which, as early as 1945, were pointing the way towards intervention by the UN in the daily lives of people throughout the world. Throughout the document, they assert the right to food, clothing, medical care, social services, unemployment and disability benefits, child care, and free education, plus the right to “full development of the personality,” (imagine, the UN says I have the right to be me) and the “right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community… and to enjoy the arts” (we each have the right to enjoy a painting or a movie). However, they do not state the right to appear on the “Tonight Show” or “Saturday Night Live”, so there were limits to their largesse.
In 2015, seventy years after their original rights-based document, the UN took a giant step towards the global government that was only hinted at in their first organizing document. They issued a document entitled “Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” This document has 91 numbered sections of the UN’s program for world government. The UDHR is only referenced once in the entire document in Article 19. Unlike the original “mother document” that was under 1900 words, this document is 14,883 words. The 91 items are addressing issues under the five headings of People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace, and Partnership. Additionally, the document provides 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to improve life on the planet.
What is meant by the term “sustainable?” The most often quoted definition comes from the UN World Commission on Environment and Development: “sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” The earlier ideas and ideals of rights, freedom, equality, and justice are subsumed under meeting of needs and an explicit environmentalism which emphasizes preventing the depletion of scarce planetary resources. Of course, the takeoff is the Marxist axiom that society should be organized around the idea of “from each according to his ability to each according to his needs.” Thus, Marxism is implicit in sustainability, but is nuanced by its alliance with seemingly scientific adjustments and goals related to environmentalism. A technical jargon is welded to Marxist intentionality to produce a sense of fittingness and modern progress.
The entire “Transforming Our World” document is cast in a stream of consciousness of pious platitudes for a utopian future. It is an outsize utopian dream. Five of the 17 items pertain to the environment. There are goals for the cities, for women, for the poor, and even for life under the water. Absolutely no sphere of human activity is exempt from control by the UN. The key word of course is no longer “rights” except the oblique reference in Article 19. In fact, this writer did not see the word rights even once in this document even though that word appeared in practically every sentence of the original UN document.
The one-worlders of the 1950s and early 1960s are now in the UN driver’s seat, and they have made their move. The overlay of Marxist talk about “meeting needs” has moved to center stage. The UN has assigned itself a time frame for moving forward in its plan for planetary hegemony.
This projected transformation detailing (yet without details) a new world order of environmental responsibility and a significant reduction of poverty and hunger never speaks to the practical dimension of vast manipulations of people by cynical leaders and ignorant bureaucrats who hold their positions through terrorism and bribery. They never discuss incompetence and corruption, twin brothers in the family of venality. The document portrays a sincere world where all those in power want to help humanity despite the daily evidence of the selfishness, corruption, murderous intents, devilish manipulations, thefts, personal immoralities, hatreds, and utter depravity of many governmental leaders in every country in the world, and among the leaders of business as well. Is not the Agenda for Sustainable Development itself one of those devilish manipulations?
The sustainability ideal is not wedded to a Christian worldview; instead, individual liberty is submerged in a scientifically determined collectivist mindset with final decisions in the hands of the devilish, all-knowing Big Brothers. The relevance of the individual is downplayed. It is being put forward by a UN that is no longer pro-western, a much larger body than existed in 1945. Will you accept it, or is it time, more than ever before, to begin rethinking our membership in that unsustainable body?
Josh Sigurdson talks with author and economic analyst John Sneisen about the countless examples of the fall of cash as globalists plot out a future global cashless society. As the US M0 (cash and coin in circulation) trends show, there is an unusual downtrend of cash and coin in circulation in the United States. This follows India's recent grab of 86% of their cash and coin in circulation as they place strict regulations banning black markets (free markets) within the country, pushing countless people to the streets. The Indian cash grab led many top globalist elites at Davos to call for a U.S. cashless society. Recently added to this line of examples, the Centre For International Governance (CIGI) has urged G20 countries to create a central bank blockchain consortium and go cashless. All this as the IMF pushes the idea of adding centrally planned cashless currency into the SDR (Special Drawing Rights) basket, thus creating a world cashless currency.
This is not decentralized Bitcoin we're talking about! When your money's in the bank, it's not yours, it's the bank's. If ALL of your transactions go through the bank with a centrally planned cashless currency, your money is NEVER yours, it's always the banks. The big banksters and central planning manipulators claim cashless is a great way to stop corruption and tax evaders. Of course they use these excuses to enslave the populace in debt as this is just another crazy step up from fiat paper currency which is printed out of thin air, devaluing the currency, creating debt and inflation, the hidden tax.
This also stops people from doing a bank run when there's no physical currency to obtain in a crash. As G. Edward Griffin recently told us at World Alternative Media, "A cashless society is the ultimate globalist endgame." First there was a gold backed, centrally planned currency (the gold standard) where the central banks printed more paper than they had physical gold. This eventually led to the massive debt accumulating fiat currency in the 1970s under Nixon which U.S. citizens have to this day. Faith, nothing more. Nothing physical. Nothing to preserve value.
Now the globalists are planning out the cashless system in order to be able to completely control our every financial move and enslave us in debt completely, forcing the populace into absolute servitude. John Sneisen went into Kenneth Rogoff's book "The Curse Of Cash" which was praised by none other than Ben Bernanke. The book is horrifying as they promote the move towards a cashless society, how it will be rolled out and their views on why it should be rolled out. The charts and slides included are alarming to say the least. This isn't just the end of sound money, this is the end of any remaining financial freedom as we know it. This is the precipice of the cliff we've been heading towards for so long. At the bottom is absolute financial tyranny on a level we've never seen. The choice in the end is yours. Inform yourselves or fall with everyone else as the populace is shepherded by the state and the banks off that precipice. Now is not the time to lay apathetic.
Stay tuned for more from WAM!