Syrian Rebels tell AP reporter they mishandled chemical weapons, causing accident

Militants tell AP reporter they mishandled Saudi-supplied chemical weapons, causing accident

Syrian rebels in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta have admitted to Associated Press correspondent Dale Gavlak that they were responsible for last week’s chemical weapons incident which western powers have blamed on Bashar Al-Assad’s forces, revealing that the casualties were the result of an accident caused by rebels mishandling chemical weapons provided to them by Saudi Arabia.

Image: YouTube

“From numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families….many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the (deadly) gas attack,” writes Gavlak. (back up version here).

Rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to handle the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears as though the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the Al-Qaeda offshoot Jabhat al-Nusra.

“We were very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of the fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions,” one militant named ‘J’ told Gavlak.

His claims are echoed by another female fighter named ‘K’, who told Gavlak, “They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them. We didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons.”

Abu Abdel-Moneim, the father of an opposition rebel, also told Gavlak, “My son came to me two weeks ago asking what I thought the weapons were that he had been asked to carry,” describing them as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.” The father names the Saudi militant who provided the weapons as Abu Ayesha.

According to Abdel-Moneim, the weapons exploded inside a tunnel, killing 12 rebels.

“More than a dozen rebels interviewed reported that their salaries came from the Saudi government,” writes Gavlak.

If accurate, this story could completely derail the United States’ rush to attack Syria which has been founded on the “undeniable” justification that Assad was behind the chemical weapons attack. Dale Gavlak’s credibility is very impressive. He has been a Middle East correspondent for the Associated Press for two decades and has also worked for National Public Radio (NPR) and written articles for BBC News.

The website on which the story originally appeared - Mint Press (which is currently down as a result of huge traffic it is attracting to the article) is a legitimate media organization based in Minnesota. The Minnesota Post did a profile on them last year.

Saudi Arabia’s alleged role in providing rebels, whom they have vehemently backed at every turn, with chemical weapons, is no surprise given the revelations earlier this week that the Saudis threatened Russia with terror attacks at next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi unless they abandoned support for the Syrian President.

“I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us,” Prince Bandar allegedly told Vladimir Putin, the Telegraph reports.

The Obama administration is set to present its intelligence findings today in an effort prove that Assad’s forces were behind last week’s attack, despite American officials admitting to the New York Times that there is no “smoking gun” that directly links President Assad to the attack.

US intelligence officials also told the Associated Press that the intelligence proving Assad’s culpability is “no slam dunk.”

As we reported earlier this week, intercepted intelligence revealed that the Syrian Defense Ministry was making “panicked” phone calls to Syria’s chemical weapons department demanding answers in the hours after the attack, suggesting that it was not ordered by Assad’s forces.

UPDATE: Associated Press contacted us to confirm that Dave Gavlak is an AP correspondent, but that her story was not published under the banner of the Associated Press. We didn’t claim this was the case, we merely pointed to Gavlak’s credentials to stress that she is a credible source, being not only an AP correspondent, but also having written for PBS, BBC and Salon.com.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

 

Views: 5414

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sooooo, the Israeli version of the CIA, Mossad, told the CIA, who told the US President, that Mossad agents embeded in the rebel groups, knew for certain that Assad ordered this attack.

  The Mossad was founded in 1927 by the Rothschilds, who the Mossad and Israel answer to or no dinner, limos, etc.. The CIA is the American Vatican military. All CIA directors have been members of The Knights of Malta, which answers to the pope.

All over some Mossad LIES.

the Brits knew this already, hence why they opted out ;)

“More than a dozen rebels interviewed reported that their salaries came from the Saudi government..." If we EVER really cared about stopping terrorism,human rights and right actions, etc. we would have severed our relationship with SA along time ago.

Earlier this week, the president said that the US intelligence community would release a report justifying any action taken by the US against Assad. The report, released Friday at the same time as Kerry’s address, concluded that the US government “assesses with high confidence that the Syrian government carried out a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus suburbs on August 21, 2013.”

Our high confidence assessment is the strongest position that the US intelligence community can take short of confirmation,” the report reads in part. “We will continue to seek additional information to close gaps in our understanding of what took place.”

http://rt.com/usa/obama-announce-syria-strike-226/

US intel assessment based on ‘terrorist lies’ and ‘media hype’ – Syrian Foreign Ministry

Its true too, sorta. US intel is based on, and creates, the terrorist lies and media hype.

Yeah, the same old crap like when Bush used bogus Intel from the Office of Special Plans. A division he created within the CIA for the sole purpose of creating lies for war in Iraq.

Yeah, same crap. Glad our alternative media engine is starting to be able to neuter their stunts, tricks, and conspiracies before they pull some million dead Iraqi stuff again.

RSS

VeryBarryCare

"24 or more hours of member activity http://12160.info/m"

Report an Issue


SteveNancy Haas IIIMarcus Stewart and 17 more joined 12160

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Forum

Explanation from Wikipedia required

Started by Not mainstreamer in Conspiracy Theories. Last reply by Leigh James 8 hours ago. 12 Replies

stat graphs

Started by James μολὼν λαβέ in Current News/Events. Last reply by James μολὼν λαβέ 14 hours ago. 1 Reply

Pot Kills?

Started by Site *ADMINS* in Current News/Events. Last reply by Spydaman13 19 hours ago. 4 Replies

Badge

Loading…

© 2014   Created by James μολὼν λαβέ.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2014 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted