Why did the the Catholic church remove the expression “the world order” from the transcript of yesterday’s speech by Cardinal Sodomo – I’m sorry, make that Cardinal Sodano?
Robert Moynihan, the very mainstream “Inside the Vatican” correspondent, was so perplexed by this bizarre act of censorship that he spent 637 words analyzing it yesterday. Here is an extract from Moynihan’s “Inside the Vatican Letter #44“:
Anyway, this evening, I was not going to send out a letter, and then, reading the Italian press, I came across an odd little item, which caught my attention. I am always interested in “little” details like this. As they say, “the devil is in the details.“ Ok, here is the story. Below is a link to a website where I read a curious comment from a reader. The reader says that the official text of the homily of Cardinal Sodano today is incorrect, in that it omits two words that Sodano actually spoke when he gave the homily. What were those two words? The commenter says they were: “world order” (“ordine mondiale”). Here is the comment in Italian: “Strano, il testo ufficiale dell` omelia del card. Sodano non corrisponde a ciò che ha detto in Basilica, e che ho ascoltato, le parole ‘ordine mondiale,’ che del resto mi avevano colpita e lasciata estereffatta, sono sparite.” ["Strange, the official text of the homily of Cardinal Sodano does not correspond to what he said in the Basilica, and what I myself heard, the words 'world order,' which moreover struck me and left me terrified, have disappeared."] Link: Oggi Sodano, otto anni fa Ratzinger i toni dell’omelia pre-Conclave... Then, as I continued to read the Italian press, I came across an Italian journalist who also heard the same thing, and then published it this way: “Gli ultimi Pontefici sono stati artefici di tante iniziative benefiche anche verso i popoli e la comunità internazionale, promovendo senza sosta la giustizia e la pace e l’ordine mondiale – ha proseguito Sodano – preghiamo perché il futuro Papa possa continuare quest’incessante opera a livello mondiale”. In other words, writing his article, this journalist had quoted Sodano’s speech with those two words included — even though those words are not in the official text distributed by the Vatican. He did this, evidently, because he heard the words. Here is a link to that report: Sodano: “Preghiamo che Dio conceda un Papa dal cuore generoso” Curious, I wondered: Did Sodano use those words, or not? Just a little question, really. What had he actually said? So, I started looking at videos of the homily. And I found that, yes, it was true. Sodano did use those words. Here is the video of the homily:
If you go to 10 minutes and 30 seconds, up to 10 minutes 45 seconds, you will hear the passage in question. Sodano says: “che gli ultimi pontifici sono stati artefici di tante iniziative di benefiche, verso i singoli, verso i popoli, verso la communita internazionale, promovendo la pace, la giustizia, l’ordine mondiale…” In English: “the last pontiffs have been artificers of very many beneficial initiatives, toward individuals, toward peoples, toward the international community, promoting peace, justice, the world order.” But, in the official text as distributed by the Vatican, the words “world order” do not appear.
Moynihan doesn’t come right out and state which “devil” is hidden in these details. After all, he has a job as Vatican correspondent to protect.
But here at VT we are unencumbered by such niceties.
So let’s just blurt it on out: Cardinal Sodano – who has been implicated in not only covering up the Vatican’s sex abuse scandal of the century, but also in standing “in solidarity” with Maciel, the Vatican’s worst pedophile criminal ever – inserted a little “nod and a wink” towards his New World Order colleagues, the “sexual freemasons.” And the Vatican censors removed it.
So who, exactly, are these “sexual freemasons” of the New World Order?
For a clue, let’s turn to Moynihan’s Letter #42, in which he quotes a woman he considers a reliable source, about an “attempt to thwart Benedict’s plan” to chase the gay crime lobby, a.k.a. the sexual freemasons, out of the church:
“They may try (to thwart Benedict’s clean-up),” she said. “There will be the various lobbies and groups. One is the group around Cardinal Sodano — Re, Ruini, Sardi, Sandri — they are sometimes called “Sodane con Maciel” for “Sodale con Maciel” (“in solidarity with Maciel”). They resisted Scicluna’s exposure, on Ratzinger’s orders, of the activities of Maciel.
Who is this “Father Maciel” that Cardinal Sodano stands in solidarity with?
Only the Vatican’s worst serial-pedophile criminal and swindler of the 20th century…maybe of all time.
Maybe instead of “Sodane con Maciel” it should be “Sodomy con Maciel.”
The Church admits that Maciel, the Vatican’s leading fundraiser of the post-WWII era, molested “less than 100″ children. Those are just the ones we know about.
Maciel had illegitimate children by various women around the world, under various fake identities…and molested them. He told one of his mistresses that he was a CIA agent. That way she wouldn’t ask too many questions.
The church knew about Maciel’s sexual and financial hijinks for many years, and did nothing…except accuse Maciel’s victims of lying.
And the leader of the cover-up was Cardinal Sodano. The “New World Order”-loving Dean of the College of Cardinals, Angelo Sodano, repeatedly pressured Popes – including John Paul II (whom he apparently “owned”) and Benedict XVI (whom he apparently did not) to cover up the crimes of Maciel.
This, it now appears, is the main reason Pope Benedict resigned. After seeing the results of the thorough investigation he had demanded, and learning that Sodano and other high-level Vatican officials were implicated in the New World Order “gay mafia” of “sexual freemasonry,” Benedict figured the only chance he had at cleaning house was to take the drastic step of resigning. That way, a new Pope could appoint a new College of Cardinals…and throw out Sodano and the whole “gay mafia” of New World Order sexual freemasons.
The expression “sexual freemasonry,” by the way, is not mine. I got it from Robert Moynihan himself, quoting don Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, author of E Satana si fece trino (“And Satan Made Himself Triune,” 2011):
“I have experience in seminary where seven or eight out of 10 seminarians were gay, and the last two were kicked out for being too ‘orthodox’ and ‘normal.’ This is repeated in many seminaries. Those who advance are homosexuals. It is a sexual freemasonry, and it extends into the Vatican itself.
“If I say, along with Joseph Ratzinger in his famous meditations on Good Friday in 2005, that there is filth in the Church, and there is filth, I do not think I am lacking in charity,” don Ariel continued. “I think I am being charitable. I believe that charity passes by means of truth and justice.”
How does this “sexual freemasonry” relate to the New World Order?
The New World Order is a long-term, multi-generational project of a radical group that has infiltrated and risen to the top of freemasonry AND the Catholic Church…among other institutions. This radical group is sometimes termed “the Illuminati,” since it traces its roots to the Rothschild-funded Illuminati wing of freemasonry founded by defrocked priest Adam Weishaupt in the late 18th century.
Contrary to what certain “debunkers” would have you believe, the Illuminati is very much alive and well. Read about my interview with an Illuminati whistleblowerhere, and listen to the interview:
These people hate religion in general, and the Catholic Church in particular. They are radical secularists. They call their project the “New World Order” for three reasons:
1) It would be “new” because it would be the first society in history not governed by religion.
2) It would be “new” because it would be the first government in history to control the entire world – i.e. a “world order.”
3) It would be a New World order because it would be governed from the New World, i.e. North America…specifically, from Washington DC, whose layout and architecture is one big maze of freemasonic symbolism. (For the short, entertaining, misleading version, see Dan Brown’s The Lost Symbol.)
Though they hate religion, the New World Order “sexual freemasons” have a religion of their own. It is called SATANISM.
They parody the Catholic mass in their black masses, which sometimes involve human sacrifice. 9/11 was one such black mass, as Tom Breidenbach and S.K. Bain have explained.
Of course, some would say their “satanic religion” is not really a religion at all. It is a strategy of using symbolism and ritual in an attempt to destroy all real religions.
The Illuminati plan to destroy all existing human societies and religions uses “sexual freemasonry” as its methodology. Societies are corrupted by pornography, prostitution, and ubiquitous sexual messages. And individuals, as they climb higher in power hierarchies, are led into temptation, filmed, and blackmailed…and thereby recruited into the sexual freemasonic project.
The Finders of Lost Children use their child sex slave victims to ensnare up-and-coming politicians, businessmen, academics, and other rising stars. They invite their targets to parties, offer alcohol and cocaine, and then lead them into a bedroom where a child sex slave awaits. The activities are filmed, and the target is a “made man” for life.The “sexual freemasons” of the New World Order control all of the big American institutions. That is why it was impossible to prosecute them, even when many were exposed in theFranklin Scandal.
That is why stories about their outrageous activities, such as orgies with child-slave prostitutes in the White House, get suppressed.And that is why President George W. Bush was, according to former NSA officer Wayne Madsen, able to set up a live-streaming closed-circuit TV system in the White House so he and his pals could jerk off to the sex torture, sodomization of children in front of their parents, and similar activities at Abu Ghraib – activities that were ordered and orchestrated by the sexual freemasons.
Will Pope Benedict, by all accounts a well-meaning man, be able to orchestrate a housecleaning at the Vatican? Will the sexual freemasons ever be purged from the institutions they currently dominate?
Maybe the best way to do that would be simultaneous religious revolutions in all countries. After all, the Islamic Revolution did succeed in chasing the sexual freemasons out of Iran. The few who remain have to hide deep underground, fearing for their lives. As well they should.
Chasing them all down the street and lynching them doesn’t sound like a bad idea at all.