"Save the Internet" News, Censorship and Solutions

Information

What you need to know about the FCC's new net neutrality proposal

Dusting off old regulations won't protect free, open Internet

The Internet is and will continue to be an indispensable part of the lives of Floridians and all Americans. As we grow more dependent on it for everyday tasks, ensuring fair and open Internet access will continue to be a priority.

In the early days of the Internet, Congress and regulators intentionally left the Internet free from burdensome regulation. This bipartisan decision to keep government’s hands off the Internet has been responsible for leaps in innovation and investment – making America a global leader in broadband development. Revolutionary ways to connect with other people around the world online; billion dollar smart phone applications; near-instantaneous Internet speeds; the list of truly life-altering innovations goes on and on.

No one disagrees that the Internet should be free and open. The president’s plan just does not accomplish that goal.

We have all benefitted from a system that incentivizes broadband providers to be the fastest and most reliable consumer access to the Internet.

Over the last six years, however, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has tried to assert more control over this valuable American resource. The courts have already overturned two sets of FCC rules, but this so-called “independent agency” is poised to vote this week on its most aggressive rules yet.

At the urging of President Obama, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler submitted a proposal that included more drastic changes and regulations than ever before. This government takeover of the Internet follows the President’s position that reclassification of broadband services to Title II common carrier status – which were originally designed and implemented to protect against 1930s monopolies– is the only option.

Dusting off regulations from the Roosevelt-era will not protect a free and open Internet. They will not benefit consumers. They will not spur innovation. They will not encourage a young entrepreneur to develop a new innovative app, or a company to develop new “smart” appliances.

Consumers – yes, you, reader – will be most hurt by this proposal. A whole host of new regulations and years of uncertainty will come. Even worse, this plan opens the door to billions of dollars in new fees on your Internet service, while putting nearly $45 Billion of new investments at risk over the next five years.

Do you like streaming live sports or network TV on your computer or mobile device? The agreements that allow you to do that quickly and reliably will now be subject to new, untested regulations. This unknown regulatory landscape is likely to reduce future investments in services that many consumers rely upon.

Small businesses across the country are also put in jeopardy from these rules. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/02/26/net-neutrality-debate-dusting-off-old-regulations-wont-protect-free-open/

Location: 12160mods
Members: 166
Latest Activity: Feb 2, 2019

Favorite

35 members favorited this

"LEAKED! Here's The White House's Draft Cybersecurity Executive Order"

Earlier this week, we wrote about how the White House was working on an executive order to act as a "stand in" for cybersecurity legislation that has so far failed to pass Congress (CISPA passed in the House, but a different effort, the Cybersecurity Act, failed in the Senate, and it would have been difficult to get the two houses aligned anyway). Last weekend Jason Miller from Federal News Radio wrote about a draft he saw... but failed to share the actual draft. We got our hands on a draft (and confirmed what it was with multiple sources) and wanted to share it, as these kinds of things deserve public scrutiny and discussion. It's embedded below. As expected, it does have elements of the Lieberman/Collins bill (to the extent that the White House actually can do things without legislation). It's also incredibly vague. The specific requirements for government agencies are left wide open to interpretation. For example, the State Dept. should engage other governments about protecting infrastructure. Well, duh. As expected, most stuff focuses on Homeland Security and its responsibilities to investigate a variety of different cybersecurity issues -- but, again, it's left pretty vague.

There is, as expected, plans concerning information sharing -- but again, they're left pretty empty on specifics. It talks about an "information exchange framework." Unfortunately, it does not appear to highlight privacy or civil liberties concerns in discussing the information sharing stuff. That seems like a pretty big problem. Homeland Security is tasked with coming up with a way to share information, pulling on some existing efforts, but nowhere do they call out how to make sure these information exchange programs don't lead to massive privacy violations, despite the President's earlier promises that any cybersecurity efforts would take into account privacy and civil liberties.

Mike Masnick

techdirt.com

Discussion Forum

HOW TO KEEP YOUR CHATS TRULY PRIVATE WITH SIGNAL

Started by Central Scrutinizer May 2, 2017. 0 Replies 2 Favorites

LEAKED NSA MALWARE THREATENS WINDOWS USERS AROUND THE WORLD

Started by Central Scrutinizer Apr 14, 2017. 0 Replies 1 Favorite

ICANN is now planning to take over domain privacy providers, a plan driven by the people who brought you SOPA

Started by Central Scrutinizer Jun 28, 2015. 0 Replies 0 Favorites

Internet access “not a necessity or human right,” says FCC Republican

Started by Central Scrutinizer Jun 28, 2015. 0 Replies 0 Favorites

Do you have an iPhone, iPad or an Android phone? Help RBN win $20,000! No money Involved!

Started by Central Scrutinizer Jan 6, 2014. 0 Replies 2 Favorites

SOPA rides again: USA’s secret TPP treaty outlaws phone jailbreaks and unlocking, introduces crazy copyright law

Started by truth. Last reply by mystery Nov 19, 2013. 1 Reply 0 Favorites

NSA pays tech companies millions to engineer backdoors into encryption protocols

Started by guest_blog Sep 13, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites

MPAA Gets Its Wish: Court Basically Says It Can File Bogus DMCA Takedowns Without Concern For Fair Use

Started by truth Sep 12, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites

Verizon's diabolical plan to turn the Web into pay-per-view

Started by truth. Last reply by mystery Sep 12, 2013. 1 Reply 0 Favorites

NSA leaks hint Microsoft may have lied about Skype security

Started by truth. Last reply by truth Jun 13, 2013. 1 Reply 0 Favorites

What Is TPP? It’s the Biggest Global Threat to the Internet Since ACTA

Started by Central Scrutinizer Apr 30, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites

GOOGLE Complies With Government Requests for User Data 88% of the Time

Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by Central Scrutinizer Jan 24, 2013. 2 Replies 1 Favorite

Copyright Bill Could Let Publishers Charge for Excerpts in Germany

Started by truth Jan 14, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites

Google starts watching what you do off the Internet too

Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by DTOM Dec 21, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Favorites

AUSTRALIA ABANDONS MANDATORY INTERNET FILTER PLAN

Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by Lawrence Edward Calcutt Nov 9, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Favorites

View All

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of "Save the Internet" News, Censorship and Solutions to add comments!

Comment by guest_blog on August 19, 2011 at 5:18pm

How to Prevent People from Tracking You on the Internet

source: http://www.wikihow.com/Prevent-People-from-Tracking-You-on-the-Inte...

Misti
added this

The internet was built for convenience; not for security. If you surf the internet as much as an average person capable of accessing it, chances are you have many people tracking your browsing habits in the form of spyware, scripts, and maybe even through a camera! With this kind of information, a person from anywhere on the planet can figure out who you are, where you live and much more personal information.

http://www.wikihow.com/Prevent-People-from-Tracking-You-on-the-Inte...

http://imperialtwilight.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/internet-survei...

Comment by truth on July 19, 2011 at 11:04pm: 16 alleged Anonymous hackers arrested by FBI in symbolic move; real...

Comment by truth on July 12, 2011 at 6:24pm: The Copyright Lobby Absolutely Loves Child Pornography http://torrentfreak.com/the-copyright-lobby-absolutely-loves-child-...

Comment by truth on July 8, 2011 at 6:01pm: Google Skynet takes on Facebook social networking http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/google-skynet-takes-on

Comment by Russell S.Wyllie on July 1, 2011 at 1:45pm: Last night at exactly 12:00am GMT (British Time) the internet went dead. I waited half an hour, trying to access the web- the 'Talk-Talk' network came back online at approximately 12:30am

It felt kinda strange- not the usual router crash or PC lockup.

I had a sense that something was going on other than 'maintenance'...

I wonder what my network provider has become part of...and what they're planning next.

Comment by Tula on June 23, 2011 at 11:54am: Well, they are shutting Alex 1 Channel but he is going legal with ? 3 warnings...your fried and they shut Truthtube TV

Comment by truth on June 23, 2011 at 10:52am: sorry dont know Tula, maybe thoraxe knows

Comment by Tula on June 23, 2011 at 10:26am: Copyright issues is the way they are trying to shut down my channel...Is MIRRORING Illegal? Let me know!

Comment by truth on June 23, 2011 at 10:22am: Your Facebook writings could come back to haunt you.

Comment by Robert Carobene on May 27, 2011 at 10:58pm: The Internet should remain free and open like it was intended to do. I think Pc makers and softwares companies and Internet companies would lose alot of money if this was done and people stopped using the Internet!