Illuminati Use Women to Destroy Men
“You’re not dangerous,” I told Garry. “A man has a right to be master of his domain. Quit beating yourself up.”
by Henry Makow, Ph.D.
“The mutual relations between the two sexes seems to us to be at least as important as the mutual relations of any two governments in the world.” – Thomas Babington Macaulay – Historian & British Secretary of State for War, 1840
When I was young, there was a saying: “Behind every successful man is a woman.”
Women used to empower men. How? By accepting their leadership. By being First Mate to their Captain.
Women benefited from this arrangement. In marriage, they shared in the fruits of a man’s achievements.
The Illuminati realized that this process can work both ways. Instead of empowering men, women can emasculate them by challenging their power. By teaching women to usurp male power, the Illuminati created a new breed of feckless males incapable of concerted political action. Divide and Conquer.
Recently, I saw close up how this process works. A friend, “Garry,” is broken up because his common-law wife left him. The split came after a “domestic assault.” He pushed her. She wasn’t hurt but she might have been scared. She called the police.
As a result, they were physically separated by law, and the relationship ended. I don’t like this policy but it does end a lot of dysfunctional relationships.
A DYSFUNCTIONAL COUPLE
She had the power. He felt guilty for being resentful and angry about it. He was sorry for pushing her and thought his anger was a terrible thing. This reflects his indoctrination. His striking out was a natural result of an untenable situation.
He related a Jane Goodall documentary about chimpanzees. The male chimps sometime go haywire, screaming and yelling and throwing things. The women and children cower in fear. Then the storm passes and they’re all nurturing and welcoming again. He felt that as a male, he was like the chimps. He had this evil demon within him.
“You’ve got it all wrong,” I said. “Those male chimps were asserting their dominance. Once they did that, they could go back to being loving husbands and fathers. Don’t believe what the counselors tell you. You’re not dangerous. A man has a right to be master of his domain. Quit beating yourself up.”
Garry had felt he had no home. His ex insisted that her 20-something daughter live with them. She had her way in spite of Garry’s objections. This daughter made sure everyone was miserable if she was, which was most of the time. It was Garry’s house. The woman and daughter lived rent-free.
Garry had needed to be firm at the outset. “Neither of you will live here.” Instead he went to a men’s group called “Evolve” to learn to “deal with his anger.” There it was all “shame and blame” the man. He needed to control his anger and be more accommodating.
He was so impressed that he got his ex to attend the women’s chapter of the same government-funded agency. There the message was designed to empower women. “Women are an oppressed minority. Rise up against those evil males.” (This is typical Communist ‘consciousness raising’ i.e. indoctrination.)
His ex became very argumentative, especially when drinking. After their enforced separation, she had him arrested for driving by to look at his house.
To her credit, she eventually moved out. But all the furniture was hers. She had forced him to get rid of his. Now he’s rattling around an empty house trying to rebuild his life. He let his friendships lapse.
Garry is a mild mannered and capable 55-year-old man. But when he related what his ex had done, his body language was that of a child. Any man who is ruled by a woman becomes a child or a woman.
CONCLUSION
You probably know someone like Garry. If you don’t, get a movie called “Flannel Pajamas.” The writer-director Jeff Lipsky tells the story of his marriage. Compare Jeff at the beginning and the end. At the beginning, he is powerful and generous. At the end, he is a mouse. He gave away his power and now she didn’t love him any more. Women lose interest in men who try to buy their love, or love in a self-negating way.
Heterosexual relationships are about the exchange of female (worldly) power for male power expressed as love. Men want power. Women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two, sealed by exclusive sex.
The Illuminati have sabotaged this exchange by exaggerating woman’s power and diminishing man’s. Men are brainwashed to think romance and sex are the sin qua non for happiness. Many become paralyzed, unable to approach a desirable woman. Too late they learn the real benefit to a man of a woman is exaggerated by a factor of five.
Paradoxically, this return to reality enables a man to secure female companionship. To their credit, woman are attracted to men with self respect.
Heterosexual relationships are about a man getting a woman to do what he wants. This is called “courtship” i.e. proving that his aims are worth supporting and he will protect and nurture her.
When he earns this trust (tantamount to her love,) she surrenders her worldly power to him. This is the heterosexual contract: power for love. (Of course, the contract is voided if he doesn’t keep his end of the bargain. i.e. love. Thus he will consult her. Depending on mutual rapport and competence, power might be divided or delegated.)
Men should project power and never show weakness. They should establish their authority from the get-go. A woman can have power or love. But she can’t have both. This is the litmus test. If she doesn’t agree, move on. You’ll save yourself a lifetime of grief.
–
See my book “Cruel Hoax” for more on feminism and heterosexuality. It has been published in Japan and is being published in Germany, South Korea and Croatia.
by Henry Makow, Ph.D.
“The mutual relations between the two sexes seems to us to be at least as important as the mutual relations of any two governments in the world.” – Thomas Babington Macaulay – Historian & British Secretary of State for War, 1840
When I was young, there was a saying: “Behind every successful man is a woman.”
Women used to empower men. How? By accepting their leadership. By being First Mate to their Captain.
Women benefited from this arrangement. In marriage, they shared in the fruits of a man’s achievements.
The Illuminati realized that this process can work both ways. Instead of empowering men, women can emasculate them by challenging their power. By teaching women to usurp male power, the Illuminati created a new breed of feckless males incapable of concerted political action. Divide and Conquer.
Recently, I saw close up how this process works. A friend, “Garry,” is broken up because his common-law wife left him. The split came after a “domestic assault.” He pushed her. She wasn’t hurt but she might have been scared. She called the police.
As a result, they were physically separated by law, and the relationship ended. I don’t like this policy but it does end a lot of dysfunctional relationships.
A DYSFUNCTIONAL COUPLE
She had the power. He felt guilty for being resentful and angry about it. He was sorry for pushing her and thought his anger was a terrible thing. This reflects his indoctrination. His striking out was a natural result of an untenable situation.
He related a Jane Goodall documentary about chimpanzees. The male chimps sometime go haywire, screaming and yelling and throwing things. The women and children cower in fear. Then the storm passes and they’re all nurturing and welcoming again. He felt that as a male, he was like the chimps. He had this evil demon within him.
“You’ve got it all wrong,” I said. “Those male chimps were asserting their dominance. Once they did that, they could go back to being loving husbands and fathers. Don’t believe what the counselors tell you. You’re not dangerous. A man has a right to be master of his domain. Quit beating yourself up.”
Garry had felt he had no home. His ex insisted that her 20-something daughter live with them. She had her way in spite of Garry’s objections. This daughter made sure everyone was miserable if she was, which was most of the time. It was Garry’s house. The woman and daughter lived rent-free.
Garry had needed to be firm at the outset. “Neither of you will live here.” Instead he went to a men’s group called “Evolve” to learn to “deal with his anger.” There it was all “shame and blame” the man. He needed to control his anger and be more accommodating.
He was so impressed that he got his ex to attend the women’s chapter of the same government-funded agency. There the message was designed to empower women. “Women are an oppressed minority. Rise up against those evil males.” (This is typical Communist ‘consciousness raising’ i.e. indoctrination.)
His ex became very argumentative, especially when drinking. After their enforced separation, she had him arrested for driving by to look at his house.
To her credit, she eventually moved out. But all the furniture was hers. She had forced him to get rid of his. Now he’s rattling around an empty house trying to rebuild his life. He let his friendships lapse.
Garry is a mild mannered and capable 55-year-old man. But when he related what his ex had done, his body language was that of a child. Any man who is ruled by a woman becomes a child or a woman.
CONCLUSION
You probably know someone like Garry. If you don’t, get a movie called “Flannel Pajamas.” The writer-director Jeff Lipsky tells the story of his marriage. Compare Jeff at the beginning and the end. At the beginning, he is powerful and generous. At the end, he is a mouse. He gave away his power and now she didn’t love him any more. Women lose interest in men who try to buy their love, or love in a self-negating way.
Heterosexual relationships are about the exchange of female (worldly) power for male power expressed as love. Men want power. Women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two, sealed by exclusive sex.
The Illuminati have sabotaged this exchange by exaggerating woman’s power and diminishing man’s. Men are brainwashed to think romance and sex are the sin qua non for happiness. Many become paralyzed, unable to approach a desirable woman. Too late they learn the real benefit to a man of a woman is exaggerated by a factor of five.
Paradoxically, this return to reality enables a man to secure female companionship. To their credit, woman are attracted to men with self respect.
Heterosexual relationships are about a man getting a woman to do what he wants. This is called “courtship” i.e. proving that his aims are worth supporting and he will protect and nurture her.
When he earns this trust (tantamount to her love,) she surrenders her worldly power to him. This is the heterosexual contract: power for love. (Of course, the contract is voided if he doesn’t keep his end of the bargain. i.e. love. Thus he will consult her. Depending on mutual rapport and competence, power might be divided or delegated.)
Men should project power and never show weakness. They should establish their authority from the get-go. A woman can have power or love. But she can’t have both. This is the litmus test. If she doesn’t agree, move on. You’ll save yourself a lifetime of grief.
–
See my book “Cruel Hoax” for more on feminism and heterosexuality. It has been published in Japan and is being published in Germany, South Korea and Croatia.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by graeme sutherland on
-
Good article... I remember seeing the Aaron Russo Interview with NWO Rothchild (you tube) and he admitted with a laugh,to Aaron that "they had caused & created the whole feminist movement to get woman into work & paying taxes and undermine proper parenthood for children & fill the all the divorce courts in the land with divorcing couples" all in one typicaly subtle satanic action!
-
-
Permalink Reply by Robert Carobene on
-
I know and I wonder if that is why at 41 I cannot find a woman since they are busy with their careers seems like love takes a backseat to family life. I could be wrong but I wonder?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Nikki on
-
I think we'll see more of this. Men's pride and ego are intertwined with their work and if there's no jobs, it's a big blow to one's self esteem. This will be the cause of many relationhsip and family breakups. it's already happening. Since 2008 I've noticed a lot of murder-suicides and it always seems to involve people who were having financial problems.
-
-
-
Well Nelson Rockefeller in 1969 said that they did womans lib for two purposes one destroy family life and second was to collect double taxed from the women working now! Take the taxes from two salaries instead of one in a family!
-
-
Permalink Reply by Anthony Kimbrough on
-
Plus one. By both parents out of the home, kids then could be "taught" and pretty much parented by the school system. IE: them. Slowly the education system was taken away from local to state to federal mandates. I'm not bashing homosexuals here but truth of the matter is promoting homosexuality is the newest addition. Couples can't reproduce... yet. Both parents working, then add homework, extra curricular activities, and whatever time a parent has to teach children is now gone.
-
-
-
Well the stats speak for themselves......
Divorce rates were under 5% up to the 1950s.... now its about 52 %.... Modern ( TRENDY) men are so in touch with their femine sides they have lost their masculinity & power in the home & the justice system.
Woman on the other hand are way too macho, fiercely independant & laddish, (swearing, spitting arguing etc is the norm now) they have lost their grace mystique gentleness & feminine charm. Neither sex is happy about the modern way, society is lost & disconnected & our children's generation will certainly be worse as at least we generally had the traditional loving family upbringing ie, a balanced mum & Dad & love & laughter in the home!
-
-
-
This video compares how it was in the 50s and 60s compared to now. It explains how much better life was when a family could do well on one income.
Distinguished law scholar Elizabeth Warren teaches contract law, bankruptcy, and commercial law at Harvard Law School. She is an outspoken critic of America's credit economy, which she has linked to the continuing rise in bankruptcy among the middle-class.
As Warren discusses a possible collapse of the middle-class, this AlterNet article, written by former economist David Korten for YES! Magazine, discusses the rise of Wall Street, which has its roots in the institutions of Empire that began some 5,000 years ago.
Replacing Wall Street with a New Economy, based on locally owned businesses devoted to serving their communities, may be one of the only solutions to stop impending social and environmental collapse.
-
-
-
Thank you.... I am watching it as we speak! ;)
-
-
-
It seems these days that most newly weds get a divorce I know two marriages from say that are doing good the others well not so good divorced or separated. Its all part o0f their plan and also couples that are dating break up and get back together and break up. Seems like relationships = complication most of the time. Its all been planned by design this way!
-
-
Permalink Reply by Tara on
-
Where is self ownership in all this? It seems to me that a person could easily use, "it's all the Illuminati's fault" or point the finger at a man/woman or whomever you believe is the cause of your troubles instead of taking responsiblity over your own life.
We can run around and blame the Illuminati, the opposite sex, a race, religion, institution, ect for our shortcomings and ills our whole lives, but don't we as human beings make choices for ourselves including choosing a mate? Does anybody physically force you to be or act in a certain way? Could it be that WE'VE allowed ourselves to be manipulated, brainwashed and moreover oppressed by the powers that be? Isn't this our own fault for allowing someone else to take power over our lives instead of empowering ourselves.
Instead of pointing the finger at somebody else we should be looking in the mirror and giving ourselves the finger because we've allowed ourselves to fall prey to division tactics by the NWO and this includes the divide between men and women and the overwhelming divorce rate nowadays. We are our own worst enemies at times.
We are the change we've been looking for. The answer stares back at you in the mirror every morning as you put on your makeup or give yourself a shave.
-
-
-
Yes I think its our fault but we have been like pre conditioned to be the way we are. Thats why its important to expose all of this and get people to be like the way it was back generations ago if thats possible.
Nwo divides and conquers and using this tactic they get what they want. To basically destroy family life, we are our worse enemies at times!
-
-
Permalink Reply by Maria De Wind on
-
Kudos!
-
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
"So far, there are 14 comments here for the video about Iran's influence on Generation Z and…"
Rebuilding Khazaria
"Perhaps Russia and Ukraine should Rebuild the Tartarian Empire. Then game over. "
"This is Why the outlier countries Must Stand Up And Fight Them Off on all fronts at all times. For…"
Dr. Aseem Malhotra's Explosive Court Testimony on COVID "Vaccines"(UPDATED)
Doctor Malhotra drops arsenal of truth bombs on Helsinki. A spectacular display. Here are few snip…See More
© 2024 Created by truth.
Powered by
