Hey James, I don't think 5g is the main culprit but  I do think it triggers something in a weakened body maybe depleting air intake finishing off the kill. Who knows what these turds are really up to. I just thought a heads up was needed to the dangers of this so called "technology" as knowledge is power.

 Steve

steve - Well, the safety studies are limited to thermal effects caused by RF energy, which I am sure is a criteria that is lacking. However, if it really doesn't transmit that far, and oxygen stops it, I'm not sure how it can affect us.

Hey James, I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed but I follow my gut feeling as I stumble through life. I have never owned a cell phone, I don't use microwave or Teflon cookware. I don't use aluminum pots or pans and I damn sure don't trust the gubberment. There has to be a logical reason these 5g boxes are going up everywhere with very little space in between them and it's not for our benefit.

 Steve

As far as being smart, I am NOT credentialed, by the way, and I've never had a day of college. I do have that form of autism which allowed me to breeze through college biology texts at age nine, though. I can think of a few possibilities for a mechanism of harm by 5G waves, I suppose, but they are a stretch. It all depends exactly how deep it penetrates, but what as defined by tests is that it doesn't go deeper than "the outer layers of skin". And if it did, it would be fairly obvious. The test equipment necessary to determine that is not very exotic, or expensive. In any case, there are what they term "C fibers" in the skin. Unmyelinated nerve fibers. It was discovered in the past few years that there are specific ones which conduct the positive feelings of massage to the brain. There are also "Pacinian Corpuscles", which are sensitive to vibration. In addition, the Brits at one time figured out a way to take EEG and EKG readings from across the room, as the electromagetic fields that the body produces which register those project that far. So maybe when you are exposed to 60 GHz fields, your own fields interact with those. Like your fields are acting as an antenna, and there is (perhaps) a transaction.

Cell phones, smart meters, wi fi and microwave ovens are another matter. Those do penetrate deeply and they do have measurable thermal effects. Which I think is the mechanism behind cancer formation, by way of chronic irritation. I think one danger there that mainstream medicine hasn't picked up on, is that humans have a protein called Cryptochrome. Animals have it too, and it is the means by which some animals use to navigate by means of the Earth's magnetic field. I think probably microwaves of the cell phone, etc., wavelength act on that protein. And thereby have a harmful effect on brain function. Your brain has about a billion nanoscale particles of ferrite (magnetic rust) as well, and those could possibly be acted upon by penetrating microwaves. It depends on if they are connected to anything. Possibly they may act on vesicles, tiny packets of neurotransmitter chemicals like dopamine, serotonin, GABA or acetylcholine. Causing them to release these chemicals in an untowards manner. I base that on extensive experiments that I, Dr. Alex Thomas and Dr. Michael Persinger have done with low power time-varying complex magnetic fields applied to the brain. And educated guesswork.

Very Interestink! I don't see any connection with 5G and the man made coronavirus.

The Chinese have wanted to take our land, looking for ways to kill off all the people in the US without destroying the land or infrastructure, a deadly virus could be one way to accomplish that, opps it got out of there lab and it's killing them, no where near as good as the black plague.

As far as 5G that is similar to smart meters, it could have an cumulative effect, like all the crap in our food. the slow kill..

Hey James, What's your take on this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oY5SReQ2Kqc

MAC, 5G is not similar to smart meters. 5G needs to have transmitters every few tens of feet, whereas smart meters can broadcast a few miles. You understand? 5g doesn't have the ass, the torque, to penetrate your body. Cell phones and smart meters and wifi do. Cell phones are a shotgun shell loaded with BBs, 5G is you throwing a BB at someone. Like I said, it may well have some negative effects, but I can't fathom how. And thank goodness if I'm right, huh?

steve - see my reply to MAC. All this stuff about it being the resonant frequency of oxygen doesn't matter. It doesn't change any properties of oxygen in a lasting manner. The moment the oxygen molecule is inside your body, it is exactly the same as any oxygen without 5G. Wifi, cell phones and smart meters emit electromagnetic radiation that penetrates all the way through your body. It interacts with your cells, DNA, etc. 5G does not.

King of cups - I don't see how it can affect your immune system if the outer layers of your skin stop it. The immune system that protects you from viruses is in the deepest part of your body, in the upper respiratory tract. And they're not lying about how deep it goes, because it would be too easy for anyone to find out.

King of Cups - He says there's evidence, but that always means data is interpreted. I mean, I suppose something affected in the outer two or three millimeters of skin could affect the rest of the body robustly, but I would have to see what evidence they're talking about. I will look into it. Thanks for the references. Sometimes, however, correlation really does not equal causation. "Evidence" could be theoretical, effects on living or dead cells in a petri dish, or animal or human parts in a flask, or live animal tests, and these often do not turn out to be applicable to human beings. Not even all human tests turn out to be widely applicable. And for at least several years, any scientific paper has about a 50% chance of being credible. There are often statistical mistakes in scientific papers, poor method, corporate bias, etc. Then there's "publish or die". You've seen the type of people colleges have been turning out since 2001. Did you notice much of your reference lumps other forms of wireless in with 5G?

I even tried turning the whole thing on it's head and looking at it from the point of view of the effects on the virus. However, if anything, it should be bad for Covid. It's stopped by oxygen, which means the energy is transferred to the oxygen molecules. This would be very temporary and the energy would bleed off into the environment as thermal noise. Almost instantaneously. It is not nearly enough power to break the molecule, O2 into monoatomic oxygen. However, such an O2 molecule that is in a higher energy state should be more reactive. Viruses don't like oxygen, especially oxygen that's more reactive.

The skin is mainly a physical barrier against pathogens and toxins, and a heat regulation system. It has to be replaced constantly, so it's heavily vascular, and innervated so you can sense pain and therefore minimize damage. But it's not a big player in metabolic processes. I know there are systems of biochemical cascades that I don't know about,  and also that nobody has characterized. Like I said, I'll look into it. I'm not highly educated in RF, and not in that area of bioelectromagnetics because other than the negative health effects from cell phones, microwave oven leakage, and the like, there isn't much of interest as far as what I'm trying to accomplish. But it doesn't take much to understand that the negative effects from other forms of wireless can not be manifested by 5G. Not in nearly the same way. Like I said, it would have to be one hell of an exotic mechanism. And subtle.

Thanks James you broke that down on a level I can understand. BBs Shotgun got it...

Interesting that Nick Mulvaney commented publicly that the Coronavirus has been weaponized politically to accuse Trump, who has already taken stern measures look bad. After he gave his speech the media reports of a single case in California by a patient who has head no contact with anyone entering the US from affected areas abroad. I think there is way more to this shit than we are being told. Now on the radio they're trying to compare it to the Spanish Flu that killed millions because the authorities were too late in exercising precautionary measures! 

King of cups - Yes, but as I keep saying, to affect the body robustly, it would have to get in to the body, which it doesn't. That kind of test is not in question. There are too many people who understand these things, the equipment for doing those tests is too widespread, and there is pre-existing information (long before 5G) about how far and deep these signals propagate. I myself automatically distrust anything that is important to govt and industry. In almost all cases, if they want it, it's bad for us, and it's level of importance to them can be said to describe how bad it is for us. Again, I could be wrong, this is just one of those cases where I feel very much that I'm right. Certainly, it isn't natural. It's not part of the environment we were designed to live in.

But I can say without any doubt is that 5G is NOT responsible for the effects attributed to the virus (as in - there is no virus, it's just 5G alone which is causing the effects), which is now a somewhat widespread opinion in circles like ours, and often presented as factual. That was the intent and meaning of my blog post.

Doc - Indeed. That's the really disheartening aspect, it's not a debate about the veracity of one of two conflicting sources of info. The authorities control all the info as to the virus. I think due to modern sanitation in Western countries, and chlorination of water, it will be much less bad in the US, simply because we have hot and cold running water everywhere, and soap, and we use them all the time to clean our bodies, where we prepare food, etc. In many countries in the world, it's customary to bathe only once a week (I've heard that about Brazil), or even more sparsely. In China, their water is so polluted that 90% is not clean enough even for industrial use (see below video). Not a good situation when you have so many people. And they DO get grease for cooking out of the sewers. In India, of course, they defecate in the streets, just anywhere, and I've seen many pics on 4chan of people there bathing in filthy pools of water with much trash floating on top, or in the sewer. Not to mention the Ganges river. If a household has a death, and they are too poor for a funeral, they just leave the body in the street for dogs to eat, or dump it in the river from which they draw drinking water (yes, really). I would keep in mind the graphic concerning vaccines, where deaths in the US from disease dropped off abruptly with the advent of modern sanitation, before vaccines were mandatory.  And of course Africa is going to be a catastrophe if it takes hold there as well, due to their not being very cleanly. Most all of the plastic in the oceans comes from Asia and Africa. That's a measure of their care about all kinds of sanitation.

K O C - I will look into it too, as well as your references. If I'm wrong, I'll post the evidence. I don't have a problem changing my views to suit the facts. Funny how people have a problem with doing that. You can, of course, post any reference that shows negative health effects from 5G frequencies. However, if it shows effects on neurons, see if it specifies if they were in a petri dish. If it just says a type of neuron, then they were, unshielded by bone and other tissue. And consider, if it's a study on mice or rats, a few milimeters depth is into their brain tissue,  unlike with our heads. And so on. It should be, of course, specific to 50 - 60 GHz, not just "wireless". These are places to search:

Pubmed

Bioelectromagnetics Journal (Wiley publishers)

Journal of the American Medical Society

EurekAlert!

ArXiv.org - May be something in here

Physorg

suggested search terms: 5G, 5G effects, 5G health, 5G cancer, 5G thermal effects, 5G mutation, 5G teratology (birth defects), and replace 5G with 50 or 60 GHz in the previous suggestions.. Just looking for "5G" in the last three links will give a lot of articles having nothing to do with biological effects. 

Dr. Francis Boyle Creator Of BioWeapons Act Says Coronavirus Is Biological Warfare Weapon

Source

Haven't forgot about this. Worked over every day this week, so  need to recuperate, for one day.

So far, I've found this -