Eliminate freedom by IMPOSING A CASHLESS SOCIETY where the only money is ELECTRONIC.
by 14300
Feb 10, 2014
The "Money Changers" Serenade: A New Plot Hatches - Eliminate the freedom by IMPOSING A CASHLESS SOCIETY where the only money is ELECTRONIC.November 30, 2013 by Paul Craig Roberts
<Go to link at end of article for full article.>
November 30, 2013 by Paul Craig Roberts
<Go to link at end of article for full article.>
Snip .. Summers has a fix for this: eliminate the freedom by "imposing a cashless society" where the only money is "electronic".
As electronic money cannot be hoarded except in bank deposits, penalties can be imposed that force unproductive savings into consumption.
Former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, a protege of Treasury Secretaries Rubin and Summers, has received his reward for continuing the Rubin-Summers-Paulson policy of supporting the “banks too big to fail” at the expense of the economy and American people.
Former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, a protege of Treasury Secretaries Rubin and Summers, has received his reward for continuing the Rubin-Summers-Paulson policy of supporting the “banks too big to fail” at the expense of the economy and American people.
The symbiotic relationship between presidents and bankers has continued ever since.
The same small clique continues to wield financial power.
From the Treasury - Geithner went to the Council on Foreign Relations and from there to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). From there he was appointed president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, where he worked to make banks more profitable by allowing higher ratios of debt to capital, thus contributing to the financial crisis.
Rubin, a 26-year veteran of Goldman Sachs, was rewarded by Citibank for his service to the banks while Treasury Secretary with a $50 million compensation package in 2008 and $126,000,000 between 1999 and 2009.
When a person becomes a Treasury official it is made clear that the choice is between serving the banks and becoming rich or trying to serve the public and becoming poor. Few make the latter choice.
As MIchael Hudson has informed us, the goal of the financial sector has always been to convert all income, from corporate profits to government tax revenues, to the service of debt.
From the Treasury - Geithner went to the Council on Foreign Relations and from there to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). From there he was appointed president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, where he worked to make banks more profitable by allowing higher ratios of debt to capital, thus contributing to the financial crisis.
Rubin, a 26-year veteran of Goldman Sachs, was rewarded by Citibank for his service to the banks while Treasury Secretary with a $50 million compensation package in 2008 and $126,000,000 between 1999 and 2009.
When a person becomes a Treasury official it is made clear that the choice is between serving the banks and becoming rich or trying to serve the public and becoming poor. Few make the latter choice.
As MIchael Hudson has informed us, the goal of the financial sector has always been to convert all income, from corporate profits to government tax revenues, to the service of debt.
From the bankers standpoint,
the more debt the richer the bankers.
Rubin, Summers, Paulson, Geithner, and now banker Treasury Secretary Jack Lew faithfully serve this goal.
The Federal Reserve describes its policy of Quantitative Easing — the creation of new money with which the Fed purchases Treasury debt and mortgage backed securities — as a low interest rate policy in order to stimulate employment and economic growth.
In contrast, I have exposed QE as a scheme for pumping profits into the banks and boosting their balance sheets.
The Federal Reserve describes its policy of Quantitative Easing — the creation of new money with which the Fed purchases Treasury debt and mortgage backed securities — as a low interest rate policy in order to stimulate employment and economic growth.
In contrast, I have exposed QE as a scheme for pumping profits into the banks and boosting their balance sheets.
The real purpose of QE is to drive up the prices of the debt-related derivatives on the banks’ books, thus keeping the banks with solvent balance sheets.
Writing in the Wall Street Journal (“Confessions of a Quantitative Easer,” November 11, 2013), Andrew Huszar confirms my explanation to be the correct one. Huszar is the Federal Reserve official who implemented the policy of QE. He resigned when he realized that the real purposes of QE was to drive up the prices of the banks’ holdings of debt instruments, to provide the banks with trillions of dollars at zero cost with which to lend and speculate, and to provide the banks with “fat commissions from brokering most of the Fed’s QE transactions.”
Writing in the Wall Street Journal (“Confessions of a Quantitative Easer,” November 11, 2013), Andrew Huszar confirms my explanation to be the correct one. Huszar is the Federal Reserve official who implemented the policy of QE. He resigned when he realized that the real purposes of QE was to drive up the prices of the banks’ holdings of debt instruments, to provide the banks with trillions of dollars at zero cost with which to lend and speculate, and to provide the banks with “fat commissions from brokering most of the Fed’s QE transactions.”
At the IMF Research Conference on November 8, 2013, former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers presented a PLAN to "EXPAND THE CON GAME".
Summers says that it is not enough merely to give the banks interest free money. More should be done for the banks. Instead of being paid interest on their bank deposits, people should be penalized for keeping their money in banks instead of spending it.
To sell this NEW RIP-OFF SCHEME, Summers has conjured up an explanation based on the crude and discredited Keynesianism of the 1940s that explained the Great Depression as a problem caused by too much savings. Instead of spending their money, people hoarded it, thus causing aggregate demand and employment to fall.
Summers says that it is not enough merely to give the banks interest free money. More should be done for the banks. Instead of being paid interest on their bank deposits, people should be penalized for keeping their money in banks instead of spending it.
To sell this NEW RIP-OFF SCHEME, Summers has conjured up an explanation based on the crude and discredited Keynesianism of the 1940s that explained the Great Depression as a problem caused by too much savings. Instead of spending their money, people hoarded it, thus causing aggregate demand and employment to fall.
If people save more than investors invest, the saved money will not find its way back into the economy, and output and employment will fall.
How to fix this? The way to fix it, Summers says, is to charge people for saving money. To avoid the charges, people would spend the money, thus reducing savings to the level of investment and restoring full employment.
Summers acknowledges that the problem with his solution is that people would take their money out of banks and hoard it in cash holdings. In other words, the cash form of money provides consumers with a freedom to save that holds down consumption and prevents full employment.
Summers has a fix for this: eliminate the freedom by imposing a cashless society
How to fix this? The way to fix it, Summers says, is to charge people for saving money. To avoid the charges, people would spend the money, thus reducing savings to the level of investment and restoring full employment.
Summers acknowledges that the problem with his solution is that people would take their money out of banks and hoard it in cash holdings. In other words, the cash form of money provides consumers with a freedom to save that holds down consumption and prevents full employment.
Summers has a fix for this: eliminate the freedom by imposing a cashless society
where the only money is electronic.
As electronic money cannot be hoarded except in bank deposits, penalties can be imposed that force unproductive savings into consumption.
This column first appeared as a Trend Alert, Trends Research Institute
source http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
This column first appeared as a Trend Alert, Trends Research Institute
source http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
Labels: Cashless Society, IMF, Larry Summers
Not mainstreamer
Paul Craig Roberts is ok. He was an insider, but defected. There are things he cannot say. He is never spesific about what the Elite is. It becomes "the banksters", "neocons", "criminals" or something like that ... all possible names. When you are an insider money is secondary (money is no problem in any case). What matters is the whole future of a People - the common cause. (Freemasonry is not about learning the money game, it is about being loyal)
Feb 10, 2014