David Lynn Coffelt

Male

Profile Information:

Please indicate why you want to join 12160? (N.B - Your application will be automatically rejected if you answer with less than 12 words and / or provide a noncoherent answer)

www.spousaldiscrminationcoverup.com

Do you agree with our rules ? http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/site-ning-terms-of-service (copy and paste link to read)

yes

Would you be willing to donate a few hours or a few dollars to 12160 site projects each week?

From time to time I will attempt to donate some time on projects. With the above link you can see where all of my time is going. You may then review my timeline of these atrocities. If you care to you may share any of this with your readers
WHISTLE BLOWER & COLOR OF LAW VIOLATIONS BY COLORADO JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE


TIMELINE OF ILLEGAL EVENTS OF STATE OFFICIALS CONTINUED ATTEMPT TO COVER UP ILLEGAL TERMINATION BY COLORADO CENTRAL STATION CASINO / ISLE OF CAPRI WHO COMMITTED SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 24-34-402 (h) (I)


JUST FOLLOW “WHO HAS ALL THE MONEY” TO FIND OUT WHY, WHEN, WHERE AND HOW THIS INJUSTICE WAS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE ON WITH NO CHARGES FILED


www.spousaldiscriminationcoverup.com


Mr. Coffelt FILED SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION CHARGES WITH DORA / COLORADO DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS / EEOC / OSHA AFTER HE WAS ILLEGALLY TERMINATED WITH MANUFACTURED HEARSAY EVIDENCE AFTER HIS WIFE, WHO WAS DIAGNOSED WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, FORCED TO BREATHE DIESEL FUMES 10 HOURS A DAY AND HAD TO CALL OSHA TO INVESTIGATE.

NAMED AGENCIES FILED SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION CHARGES ON BEHALF OF Mr. Coffelt. THESE CHARGES WERE ILLEGALLY DISMISSED 19 MONTHS LATER WITH NO FACTS OF LAW, EVIDENCE OR PROOF OTHER THAN PERJURED HEARSAY WRITTEN STATEMENTS SUBMITTED BY RESPONDENT AND ACCEPTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF DORA. DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AS WELL AS U.S. & STATE CONSTITUTION

Mr. Coffelt APPEALED THIS DENIAL WITH SUBMITTED SIGNED WITNESS STATEMENTS. HIS APPEAL IS ACCEPTED AS TIMELY WITH WEIGHTED EVIDENCE WITH WRITTEN NOTICE Mr. Coffelt WILL BE ALLOWED TO ATTEND A SPECIAL HEARING TO PRESENT HIS CASE TO THE FULL COLORADO DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSIONER

DORA / COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION DID NOT FOLLOW THROUGH TO HONOR SAID APPEAL THAT WAS GRANTED TO Mr. Coffelt; DORA INSTEAD ILLEGALLY DISMISSED CHARGES CLAIMING THE COMMISSION REVIEWED Mr. Coffelt’S APPEAL EVEN THOUGH Mr. Coffelt’S WAS NOT PRESENT TO REFUTE HEARSAY EVIDENCE ON FILE BY RESPONDENT; NOR WAS Mr. Coffelt INFORMED WHO THE MEMBERS OF THIS COMMISSION WERE WHO ILLEGALLY DISMISSED THESE CHARGES WITH NO DUE PROCESS



OCT 16, 2014 – AFTER SEVERAL YEARS OF BEING LEAD DOWN DIFFERENT RABBIT HOLES BY STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES; WHO ARE HERE TO PROTECT A CITIZEN OF HIS UNALIENABLE RIGHTS FROM GOVERNMENT TYRANNY AND CORPORATE FRAUD IN HIS INVESTIGATION Mr. Coffelt WAS LEAD DOWN ONE DEAD END TO ANOTHER OVER AND OVER AGAIN WITH THE GOVERNMENT FULLY AWARE OF THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS IN THEIR CONTINUED ATTEMPT HOPING Mr. Coffelt WOULD FINALLY GIVE UP.

Mr. Coffelt DILIGENTLY TOOK NOTES THROUGH HIS ENTIRE INVESTIGATION, COMPLETED HIS OWN DUE DILIGENCE, CONTINUALLY MOVED FORWARD UNTIL HE WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE THIS JIGSAW OF THAT ALLOWED HIM TO UNCOVER ALL OF THIS GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION, WHEN IT HAPPENED, HOW AND BY WHOM

WITH Mr. Coffelt HAD VISITED ONE LAWLESS AGENCY TO ANOTHER TO REPORT THESE CRIMES THAT WERE COMMITTED WHEN HE EVENTUALLY WAS INVITED TO THE OFFICES OF DORA TO MEET WITH A MR. JONATHAN WILSON, CURRENT INVESTIGATOR FOR DORA. WHEN Mr. Coffelt WAS FINALLY ABLE TO REVIEW THE EVIDENCE IN HIS FILE IS WHEN Mr. Coffelt HIT THE JACKPOT. THE EVIDENCE IN FILE WAS PROVIDED UNCOVERED ALL OF THE HOW, WHAT WHEN WHERE AND HOW WITH THE ACE IN THE HOLE; WHICH HAD INITIATED ALL OF THIS GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION TO BEGIN WITH

Mr. Coffelt WAS NOW ABLE TO LOOK AT ALL OF THE EVIDENCE THAT WAS ALWAYS WITHHELD FROM HIM TO WHICH Mr. Coffelt WAS ABLE TO PIECE TOGETHER AND UNCOVERED THIS MASSIVE FRAUD AND COLLUSION THAT WAS COMMITTED BY RESPONDENT’S ATTORNEY; WITH THE DIRECTOR OF DORA PRIOR TO Mr. Coffelt BEING FORCED TO FILE THIS CIVIL ACTION IN A DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THE 90 DAYS ALLOCATED IN ORDER TO FIND ANY REMEDY.

IN FILE WERE ILLEGAL UNSIGNED DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED TO; AND ACCEPTED BY DORA FROM THE RESPONDENT’S ATTORNEY; MARK BARNES, ESQ. WHO FILED AN OBJECTION TO DORA IN DEFAULT WITH HIS SIGNED THEORY AND CONCLUSION WHY AN APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE HONORED BY SUBMITTED UNSIGNED; ILLEGAL DOCUMENTS TO THE DIRECTOR OF DORA; WHO USED THESE DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE; WHICH WAS WITHHELD FROM Mr. Coffelt; WHO THEN DISMISSED SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION CHARGES; WHICH WAS BASED ON ILLEGAL EVIDENCE SUBMITTED ON RECORD



THROUGH Mr. Coffelt INVESTIGATION, HE THEN UNCOVERED FRAUD ON THE COURT COMMITTED BY AN ILLEGAL JUDGE WHO HAS NEVER TAKEN HIS DISTRICT JUDGE’S OATH OF OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY LAW, WHO WAS SITTING ON THE BENCH ACTING AS AN IMPOSTER WITH NO JUDICIAL AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER

AFTER Mr. Coffelt UNCOVERED THIS ILLEGAL JUDGE HAD HIS COUNTY OATH OF OFFICE ON FILE WITH THE SOS SINCE 1007, WAS FORGED 3.5 YEARS LATER ON THE BACK OF HIS COUNTY OATH OF OFFICE IN JULY, 2010 CERTIFYING THIS IMPOSTER IS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE. THIS FORGERY WAS COMMITTED BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE’S OFFICE WHO ACKNOWLEDGES THIS ILLEGAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE’S OATH WAS FORGED BY THEIR OFFICE. Mr. Coffelt ONLY FOUND THIS FORGERY AFER THIS ILLEGAL OATH OF OFFICE WAS MAILED TO Mr. Coffelt BY DEBORAH GEORGE, CLERK OF THE COURT

THIS FORGERY THAT IS ADMITTED BY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE IS SELF EVIDENCE; ADMITTED BY THE SOS WHO ALL ALONG PLAYED A HUGE PART IN THIS FORGERY AND COVERUP. ALL STATE OFFICIALS WERE ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 42 - U.S.C. 1983 & 1985. EVERY STATE OFFICIAL COMMITTED CONSPIRACY TO DENY Mr. Coffelt DUE PROCESS BY IGNORING THEIR OATHS BY FORGING DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 18, U.S.C. 505 & 506; FELONIES BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FORGING A GOVERNMENT SEAL

ALL EVIDENCE IS ON RECORD & REPORTED TO COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, DENVER DA, IST JUDICIAL DA, 1ST JUDICIAL CHIEF JUSTICE, JUDICIAL COMMISSION, SENATOR, LEGISLATURE, CONGRESSMAN & THE FBI


ALL EVIDENCE FOR & ON THE RECORD AS FOLLOWS:


MAY 2001 - David Lynn Coffelt AND WIFE, Marcia Ann Coffelt WERE EMPLOYED BY COLORADO CENTRAL STATION CASINO / ISLE OF CAPRI

2. OCT 2003 - Mrs. Coffelt IS DIAGNOSED WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

3. NOV 2003 – Mrs. Coffelt IS PROVIDED ACCOMMODATIONS - NEW POSITION AS DISPATCH (WALKIE TALKIE WITH PC DATA ENTRY OF ALL CASINO PAYOUTS)

4. JAN 2004 – Mrs. Coffelt’s WORK LOCATION IS CHANGED TO A SMALL CONFINED OFFICE IN THE CELLAR & FORCED TO BREATHING DIESEL FUMES 10 HOURS A DAY

5. JAN 2004 – APRIL 2004 – Mrs. Coffelt REPEATEDLY REQUESTED HER WORK STATION TO BE RELOCATED – MANAGEMENT CONTINUED TO DENY THIS ADA REQUEST

6. MARCH, 2004 – Mr. Coffelt ADVISES Mrs. Coffelt TO FILE A COMPLAINT WITH OSHA; Mrs. Coffelt CONTACTS OSHA; FILE COMPLAINT

7. APRIL 27, 2004 – OSHA INITIATES INVESTIGATION ON PROPERTY; OSHA TESTED AIR QUALITY IN Mrs. Coffelt’s WORK LOCATION IN SLOT OFFICE

8. MAY 5, 2004 – OSHA COMPLETES THEIR INVESTIGATION – TESTING EQUIPMENT OSHA USED TO TEST AIR QUALITY CANNOT TEST FOR DIESEL; PER OSHA

9. MAY 5, 2004 – HR DIRECTOR BILL WALL SUBMITS MANUFACTURED FABRICATED STATEMENTS TO DOL / DORA / CCRD / EEOC ON Mr. Coffelt’s ILLEGAL TERMINATION

10. MAY 12, 2004 – I, David Lynn Coffelt WAS ILLEGALLY TERMINATED FROM COLORADO CENTRAL STATION CASINO / ISLE OF CAPRI STATING. TERMINATION NOTICE ON FILE STATES AS FACT David Lynn Coffelt COMMITTED A GAMING VIOLATION ON MAY 5, 2004 – EXACT SAME DAY OSHA COMPLETED THEIR INVESTIGATION

11. MAY 13, 2004 – Mr. Coffelt CALLS COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF GAMING - MEETS WITH GAMING OFFICE KLAUSE; KLAUSE INFORMS Mr. Coffelt THAT NO GAMING VIOLATION WAS REPORTED TO GAMING AS REQUIRED BY STATUTE

12. JUNE, 2004 – Mr. Coffelt FILES SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION CHARGES WITH CCRD / DORA / EEOC / OSHA

13. JUNE 6, 2003 – Mr. Coffelt’S ILLEGAL TERMINATION & SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION CHARGES PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 24-34-402 (h)(I) IS PROVEN ON RECORD WITH SUBMITTED DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE & SIGNED WITNESS’S STATEMENTS; ALL ON RECORD WITH DORA / EEOC / OSHA / COLORADO DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS
14. NOV 8, 2004 – EMPLOYER IS CHARGED BY DORA / CCRD / EEOC WITH VIOLATIONS OF SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 24-34-402 (h)(I) AND TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT.

15. DEC 30, 2005 – DORA / CCRD ILLEGALLY DISMISSED CHARGES WITH NO FACTS OF LAW, PROOF OR EVIDENCE; CCRD DIRECTOR’S DETERMINATION DENIES DUE PROCESS

16. JAN 9, 2006 – Mr. Coffelt FILED AN APPEAL TO CCRD / DORA

17. JAN 18, 2006 - DORA ACCEPTS Mr. Coffelt’s APPEAL AS FILED TIMELY WITH WEIGHTED EVIDENCE – IN Mr. Coffelt’s APPEAL, HE SUBMITTED 7 SIGNED CREDIBLE WITNESS’S STATEMENTS; Mr. Coffelt INFORMED HE WILL BE ABLE TO PRESENT HIS APPEAL IN PERSON AT A SPECIAL HEARING SET TO BE HELD ON JAN 27, 2006 TO ALLOW HE FULL COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION TO REVIEW ALL EVIDENCE FILED

18. JAN 26, 2006 (UNCOVERED OCT 16, 2013) MARK BARNES, ESQ, ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT SUBMITTED HIS OBJECTION STATEMENT IN DEFAULT ON JAN 26, 2006. OBJECTION TO APPEAL HEARING WAS DUE NO LATER THAN JAN 25, 2006. MARK BARNES SUBMITTED ILLEGAL UNSIGNED DOCUMENTS WITH A LETTER ON HIS THEORY OF LAW ANNOUNCING “HIS CONCLUSION” WHY THE ALREADY ACCEPTED HEARING SHOULD BE DISMISSED – Mr. Coffelt WAS NEVER PRESENTED THESE ILLEGAL DOCUMENTS TO REFUTE – AGAIN, DENIED DUE PROCESS

19. JAN 27, 2006 - DORA ILLEGALLY DENIED Mr. Coffelt’s APPEAL WITH NO FACTS OF LAW, PROOF OR EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE THAT WAS SUBMITTED BY Mr. Coffelt WAS NEVER INVESTIGATED & NO WITNESSES WERE EVER CALLED TO CROSS EXAMINE ON APPEAL.

20. JAN 27, 2006 – DORA ISSES Mr. Coffelt A RIGHT TO SUE LETTER – Mr. Coffelt MUST FILE IN A DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 90 DAYS

21. FEB 6, 2006 – Mr. Coffelt FAXED OVER REQUEST TO RON HOUSER, DIRECTOR OF EEOC FOR WEIGHTED REVIEW OF DORA / CCRD’S DISMISSAL ALLOWED BY LAW

22. FEB 7, 2006 – Me. & Mrs. Coffelt MEETS WITH MR. RONALD HOUSER AT THE OFFICES OF EEOC – DENVER – MR. HOUSER INFORMS Mr. Coffelt HE HAS NO JURISDICTION

23. FEB 2006 - Mr. Coffelt RETAINED ATTORNEY STEFAN KAZMIERSKI – PAYS KAZMIERSKI A $3000 RETAINER.

24. MAY 4, 2006 – Mr. Coffelt PAID FILING FEE AND JURY DEMAND IN GILPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT 2006CV322

25. JAN 2008 – Mr. & Mrs. Coffelt ARE REQUIRED TO ATTEND DEPOSITIONS ORDERED BY THE RESPONDENT. WITHOUT Mr. Coffelt’S AWARENESS OF PRE-TRIAL AND LEGAL PROCESSES, HIS ATTORNEY; MR. KAZMIERSKI DID NOT SUBPOENA DORA’S FILE & NEVER ORDERED ANY INTERROGATORIES OR DEPOSITIONS IN SUPPORT OF Mr. Coffelt, NOR OBJECTED WITH THE PERJURED WITNESS STATEMENTS WHO TOOK THE STAND FOR THE RESPONDENT.

26. MARCH 2008 – JURY SELECTION

27. MARCH 2008 - JUDGE FREDERICK BARKER ROGERS PRESIDES, RULES JURY WILL NOT HEAR SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION CHARGE – WRONGFUL TERMINATION IS ONLY CHARGE PRESENTED TO JURY – Mr. Coffelt AGAIN IS DENIED DUE PROCESS

28. APRIL 2008 - 3 DAY TRIAL – CASE IS DISMISSED BY JURY – BASED ON RIGHT TO WORK STATUTES IN COLORADO. Mr. Coffelt ASKED FOR AN APPEAL; HE WAS REFUSED THIS APPEAL REQUEST BY KAZMIESKI WHO STATED “IT’S YOUR WORD AGAINST THEIRS”

29. APRIL 2008 – ATTORNEY STEFAN KAZMIERSKI CALLED Mr. Coffelt EVERY NIGHT FOR 3 WEEKS INFORMING Mr. Coffelt HE HAS TO SIGN OFF OR THE OTHER SIDE IS GOIING TO COME AFTER HIM FOR LEGAL FEES. – Mr. Coffelt UNDER DURESS SIGNED THE RELEASE AS THE CONTINUED PHONE CALLS UPSET Mrs. Coffelt

30. Mr. Coffelt INITIATES HIS OWN INVESTIGATION TO FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENED, WHEN AND HOW

31. JULY 13, 2010 - Mr. Coffelt INQUIRIES AT THE OFFICES OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE LEAD TO THE FOLLOWING:


32. JULY 13, 2O10 – Mr. Coffelt REQUESTED CERTIFIED COPY OF FREDERIC BARKER ROGERS’ OATH OF OFFICE. THIS CERTIFIED DOCUMENT SIGNED AND SEALED BY SOS CIVIL SERVANT SHARIE A MAZUR ATTEST JUDGE ROGERS HAS NOT TAKEN AN OATH OF OFFICE AS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE IN THE STATE OF COLORADO AS REQUIRED BY LAW.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​US CONSTITUTION, ART III, Section 1 – ALL JUDGES SHALL HOLD THEIR OFFICE IN GOOD BEHAVIOR, CO CONSTITUTION, ART XII SECTION 8,9,10. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MUST TAKE AN OATH OF OFFICE AND FILE IT WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE. JUDGE FREDERICK BARKER ROGERS DID NEITHER, OFFICE IS VACANT, ANYTHING RULED ON IS VOID BY PROCESS OF LAW

33. JULY 13, 2010 – Mr. Coffelt FILED SECRETARY OF STATE’S CERTIFIED DOCUMENT WITH ARAPAHOE CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE AS A PUBLIC RECORD. FILED ON RECORD IS FACT FREDERIC BARKER ROGERS HAS NO OATH OF OFFICE AS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ON FILE WITH SOS – ROGERS HAS NO JUDICIAL AUTHORITY AS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE BY LAW

34. SEPT 3, 2010 - Mr. Coffelt SUBMITS TO GILPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CERTIFIED COPY FROM COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE ATTESTING FREDERIC BARKER ROGERS HAD NO JUDICIAL AUTHORITY. Mr. Coffelt REQUESTED A NEW TRIAL WITH A REAL JUDGE ON THE BENCH; CC: JUDICIAL COMMISSION, 1ST DISTRICT CHIEF JUSTICE R. BROOKE JACKSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL SUTHERLAND, IST JUDICIAL DA’S OFFICE, GILPIN COUNTY SHERIFF

35. SEPT 30, 2010 – DEBORAH GEORGE, CLERK OF THE GILPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT MAILED TO Mr. Coffelt FREDERIC BARKER ROGERS FORGED COUNTY OATH OF OFFICE STATING ROGERS CANNOT REPLY TO AN EX-PARTE PARTY, “FOR YOUR RECORDS AND INFORMATION, I HAVE ENCLOSED TWO CHIEF JUDGE DIRECTIVES REGARDING JUDGE ROGERS’ APPOINTMENT” ENCLOSED WITH THE ROGERS’ COUNTY OATH OF OFFICE IS A CHIEF JUDGE ORDER, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, STATE OF COLORADO, OF ROGERS’ TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT TO SIT AS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DATED JAN 20, 2004 – EXPIRED JAN 20 2006 – TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT GOOD FOR TWO YEARS BY STATUTE

36. OCT 15, 2010 – CHIEF JUSTICE R. BROOKE JACKSON LETTER TO Mr. Coffelt ACKNOWLEDGE’S ROGERS HAS NO OATH OF OFFICE AS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ON FILE WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE. JUDGE JACKSON RESPONDS TO Mr. Coffelt HE WAS REPRESENTED BY LEGAL COUNSEL REFERENCING THAT Mr. Coffelt OR HIS ATTORNEY NEVER QUESTIONED JUDGE ROGERS’ STATUS. JUDGE JACKSON STIPULATES HE HIMSELF APPOINTED ROGERS AS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE UNDER CHIEF JUDGE DIRECTIVE 95-01 DATED JAN 23, 2010 - WORTHLESS DOCUMENT ….COURT CASE WAS IN 2008
THERE IS NO DISTRICT JUDGE OATH OF OFFICE FOR FREDERIC BARKER ROGERS EVER ADMINISTERED AND FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE AS REQUITED BY LAW - COLORADO CONSTITUTION ART XII, SECTION 8,9,10

37. SEPT 13, 2010 WILLIAM CAMPBELL – JUDICIAL COMMISSION REPLIES ROGERS DID NOT BREAK ANY OF THE CANONS – REALLY? HOW ABOUT MOST OF THE CANONS WERE VIOLATED? ROGERS NEVER HAD ANY JUDICIAL AUTHORITY AT ANY TIME IN THE STATE OF COLORADO AS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE BY LAW; CERTIFIED BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE’S OFFICE

38. MAY 7. 2012 - TWO YEARS LATER - Mr. Coffelt UNCOVERS (SOS FORGED ROGERS THE BACK SIDE OF JUDGE ROGERS’ COUNTY OATH TAKEN JAN 8, 2007, FAXED BY GILPIN COUNTY COURT TO SOS ON FEBRUARY 9, 2007, RECEIVED AND TIME STAMPED BY SECRETARY OF STATE ON FEBRUARY 10, 2007 – ON THE BACK OF ROGERS COUNTY OATH OFFICE IS A FORGED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE BY A SHERRY A MAZUR, DATED JULY 9, 2010 - 3.5 YEARS AFTER ROGERS’ COUNTY OATH OF OFFICE WAS ADMINISTERED, CERTIFYING ROGERS, FREDERIC IS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE IN GILPIN COUNTY – FRAUD FORGERY UNDER U.S.C.TITLE 18 505 – 506

39. MAY 8, 2012 – Mr. Coffelt IMMEDIATELY REPORTS THIS COMMITTED FRAUD AND MEETS PERSONALLY WITH MICHAEL WATKINS, BUSINESS MANAGER FOR SECRETARY OF STATE – WATKINS’ RESPONDS TO Mr. Coffelt THAT HE WILL CONTACT Mr. Coffelt BY THE END OF THE FOLLOWING DAY MAY 9, 2012 – WATKINS NEVER CONTACTS Mr. Coffelt AS PROMISED

40. MAY 18, 2012 – Mr. Coffelt FILES FORMAL COMPLAINT ONLINE WITH THE COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL SUTHERLAND’S OFFICE

41. MAY 21, 2012 – ATTORNEY GENERAL RESPONDS THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION

42. MAY 25, 2012 – Mr. Coffelt FILED COLOR OF LAW COMPLAINT WITH FBI – DENVER

43. JUNE 2, 2012 – Mr. & Mrs. Coffelt ARE INTERVIEWED BY EVAN KWIATKOWSKI, SR INVESTIGATOR FOR THE DENVER DA. – OFFICER KWIATKOWSKI & Mr. Coffelt KNOW OF EACH OTHER AS MR. KWIATKOWSKI WAS A PRIOR GAMING OFFICER.


SENIOR INVESTIGATOR KWIATKOWSKI ASKED TO SEE THE FORGED OATH OF OFFICE Mr. Coffelt CLAIMED HE HAD STATING THIS DOCUMENT IS ALL HE IS LEGALLY ABLE TO REVIEW. WHEN Mr. Coffelt PRESENTED ROGERS’ CERTIFIED FORGED OATH OF OFFICE TO THE DA; DEBRA SHAMPANIER, ECONOMIC CRIME SPECIALIST INFORMS THE Coffelt’s “THIS TYPE OF CRIME IS ON THE BOTTOM OF OUR BARREL, AND WHO KNOWS IF WE WOULD EVER GET TO IT, WE ARE BUSY CHASING THE BAD GUYS”. Mr, Coffelt LEFT THIS EVIDENCE WITH DA FOR 2 MO

44. JUNE 5, 2012 – Mr. Coffelt WENT DIRECTLY TO THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT DA’S OFFICE IN GOLDEN, COLORADO - MEETS WITH DAVID DECHANT, SPECIAL INVESTIGATOR. Mr. Coffelt INFORMS DAVID DECHANT OF HIS CIVIL CASE HELD IN GILPIN COUNTY; INFORMED DECHANT THERE IS A JUDGE WHO HAS NO DISTRICT COURT OATH OF OFFICE. DAVID DECHANT STATE’S “YOUR TALKING ABOUT JUDGE ROGERS. FROM THIS POINT FORWARD WE WILL NOT BE DISCUSSING JUDGE ROGERS, GOT IT”. DAVID DECHANT THEN WALKS OFF REFUSING TO TAKE Mr. Coffelt’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

45. SEPT 5, 2012 – FBI AGENT KIMBERLY MILKA PERSONALLY SHOWS UP AT THE Coffelt’S RESIDENT WITH US MARSHALL PAUL OTTO TO INQUIRE ABOUT A COMPLAINT Mr. Coffelt FILED WITH THE FBI - DENVER OFFICE – MILKA AND OTTO INTERVIEWS THE Coffelt’S FOR 2.5 HRS

46. SEPT 5, 2012 – FBI AGENT MILKA WISHES TO RECEIVE COPIES OF Mr. Coffelt’s EVIDENCE. Mr. Coffelt CONTACTS DEBRA SHAMPANIER FROM THE DENVER DA TO ASK HER TO TURN Mr.Coffelt’s EVIDENCE OVER TO FBI AGENT MILKA

47. SEPT 6, 2012 – Mr. Coffelt RECEIVES PHONE CALL FROM DENVER DA STATING THEY HANDED Mr. Coffelt’s EVIDENCE OVER TO FBI AGENT MILKA. DA HAD Mr. Coffelt’S EVIDENCE IN THEIR POSSESSION AS OF THEIR INITIAL MEETING OF JULY 2, 2012

48. SEPT 24, 2012 – Mr. Coffelt CALLS FBI AGENT MILKA TO INQUIRE WHERE SHE IS IN HER INVESTIGATION; MILKA INFORMS Mr. Coffelt SHE MET WITH DENVER DA LAST THURSDAY, WE HAVE ANOTHER MEETING THIS THURSDAY (SEPT 27, 2012)

49. OCT – DEC 2012 Mr. Coffelt LEAVES SEVERAL MESSAGES WITH FBI AGENT MILKA TO INQUIRE WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP – MILKA IGNORES ALL OF Mr. Coffelt’S CALLS

50. JAN 2013 – Mr. Coffelt CALLS AGENT MILKA TO LET HER KNOW SHE HAS HIS EVIDENCE AND HE WANTS IT BACK – AGEND MILKA CALLED BACK IMMEDIATELY TO INFORM Mr. Coffelt HE CAN STOP BY AND PICK UP HIS EVIDENCE

51. SUBMITTED AS STATE’S EVIDENCE FOR THE STATE Mr. Coffelt’s COLORADO DRIVERS LICENSE PICTURE LISTING HIM AS THE NATIONAL MARKETING DIRECTOR FOR RUSA (RESTORE AMERICA) THE ONLY NATIONAL MARKETING POSITION Mr. Coffelt HAS OR EVER HAD IS WITH HIS CURRENT EMPLOYER, HOME ADVISOR FOR THE PAST 6.7 YEARS. Mr. Coffelt POSITION IS AS A NATIONAL SENIOR ONLINE MARKETING CONSULTANT.

64. JULY 1 AND JULY 9, 2013 – Mr. Coffelt SENT CERTIFIED RECEIPT TO DENVER FBI ASKING FOR CLOSURE ON HIS COLOR OF LAW COMPLAINT – NO RESPONSE

65. DEC 16, 2013 – Mr. Coffelt CALLS DENVER FBI REQUESTING A RETURNED CALL TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE STATUS OF HIS COMPLAINT – WAS INFORMED “SOMEONE WILL CALL YOU BACK”…NEVER HAVE

66. DEC 16, 2013 – Mr. Coffelt EMAILED TO DEBRA SHAMPANIER, ECONOMIC CRIME SPECIALIST FOR DENVER DA TO FILE CHARGES AGAINST SHERRY A. MAZUR OF THE SOS WHO INITIATED THIS NIGHTMARE BY FORGING ROGERS OATH OF OFFICE IN 2010; WHICH WAS NOT UNCOVERED UNTIL MAY 7, 2012. MS. SHAMPANIER RESPONDS THAT STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS EXPIRED. THIS IS A CRIMINAL MATTER

FOR NEWS INTERVIEWS OR INVESTIGATION, PLEASE CONTACT Mr. Coffelt AT 720.206.8717 OR davecoffelt@comcast.net

Comment Wall: