Bringing our government under control starting with the states. I wrote this to the Governor of California

Feb 8, 2013

Feel free to use any part of this you want to, if you want to, and make sure to use your own state constitution and state oaths of office.

Governor Brown:

Let me remind you of the lawfully required and LEGALLY binding Oath of Office you took. There are many unlawful laws, bills, oath breakers, acts of treason, etc that you have not stopped as per the assigned and sworn duty of enforcement of lawful laws assigned to California's Governor. Below is a list of these, and the applicable laws that you and state Attorney General should have been enforcing, banning, or nullifying. Why haven't you? (caps are mine)

As for as any gun regulation: one construction that is indefensible would be "the right to arms only covers members of a well-regulated militia." This is indefensible for the reason given by Judge Cooley (listed below): “only the government can create a well-regulated militia, and hence a right limited to such a group would be of no value as a check upon government.” That individual’s have the right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of: Aymette v. State - "to keep in awe those who are in power (listed below, plus others confirming it).”

Firearm permit systems: How does the concept of making a check upon government abuses contingent upon obtaining a governmental permit make sense? It is unlikely to have been within the contemplation of the Framers since the main purpose of the Second Amendment was to make sure that the people were armed enough to protect themselves from government tyranny (Framer and other quotes below).

The same goes for registering firearms. There is little to be said for registration as a crime-fighting tool, but it does hand the government a convenient list of which citizen owns which firearms would certainly undermine any purpose of deterring tyranny. So if you are aiding and abetting the takeover of our nation, our state that would be treason. If you are not, why have/are you not enforced/ing these laws?

“A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny gun ownership….” Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

Ca Constitution Art 20 Misc Subjects, Sec 3:

"I, ______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I WILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, foreign and DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.

"And I DO FURTHER SWEAR (or affirm) THAT I DO NOT ADVOCATE, NOR AM I A MEMBER OF ANY PARTY OR ORGANIZATION, POLITICAL OR OTHER-WISE, THAT NOW ADVOCATES THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY force or violence OR OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS; THAT WITHIN THE FIVE YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE TAKING OF THIS OATH (or affirmation) I HAVE NOT BEEN A MEMBER OF ANY PARTY OR ORGANIZATION, POLITICAL OR OTHER-WISE, THAT ADVOCATED THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY force or violence OR OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS:

________________________________________________________________

(If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions") and that during such time as I hold the office of ______________________________________________ I WILL NOT ADVOCATE NOT BECOME (name of office) A MEMBER OF ANY PARTY OR ORGANIZATION, political or otherwise, THAT ADVOCATES THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY force or violence or OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS."

It is not just a political offense to not keep the oath of office, it is both a criminal and a civil offense; plus it makes the oath breaker no longer meet the lawful requirements of the office or position that you are occupying. The laws that apply starting with criminal:

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order that further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.

5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office.

5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law,

5 U.S.C. 7311 WHICH EXPLICITLY MAKES IT A FEDERAL CRIMINAL OFFENSE FOR ANYONE EMPLOYED IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO “ADVOCATE THE OVERTHROW OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT”.

18 U.S.C. 1918 PROVIDES PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF THE OATH OF OFFICE described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 WHICH INCLUDE: (1) REMOVAL FROM OFFICE and; (2) confinement or a fine.

The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311.

Executive Order 10450 provision SPECIFIES IT IS A VIOLATION OF 5 U.S.C. 7311 FOR ANY PERSON TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE TO ADVOCATE “THE ALTERATION… OF THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES BY UNCONSTITUTIONAL MEANS.”

OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT IS DEFINED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. THUS, ACCORDING TO EXECUTIVE ORDER 10450 (AND THEREFORE 5 U.S. 7311) ANY ACT TAKEN BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WHO HAVE TAKEN THE OATH OF OFFICE PRESCRIBED BY 5 U.S.C. 3331 WHICH ALTERS THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT OTHER THEN BY AMENDMENT, IS A CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF 5 U.S.C. 7311.

The three branches of our government, the military, all law enforcement, THE HEADS OF THE STATES, ALL FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ARE REQUIRED TO TAKE AN OATH TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE US CONSTITUTION AND NOT AN INDIVIDUAL LEADER, RULER, OFFICE, OR ENTITY. Once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge.

Preamble to the Bill of Rights:

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, IN ORDER TO PREVENT MISCONSTRUCTION OR ABUSE OF ITS POWERS, THAT FURTHER DECLARATORY AND RESTRICTIVE CLAUSES SHOULD BE ADDED: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

Note: These amendments form what is known as the "Bill of Rights." This is the definition the framers used when the made the Bill of Rights. The Founders used the word "unalienable" as defined by William Blackstone in his “Commentaries on the Laws of England”, 1:93.

The Bill of Rights are "Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and therefore called natural rights, such as life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, NO HUMAN LEGISLATURE HAS THE POWER TO ABRIDGE OR DESTROY THEM, UNLESS THE OWNER SHALL HIMSELF COMMIT SOME ACT THAT AMOUNTS TO A FORFEITURE."

Inalienable rights: "a right according to natural law, a right that cannot be taken away, denied, or transferred". "Protected from being removed or taken away" ...

Or if you prefer

Unalienable: "Not to be separated, given away, or taken away." "Inalienable or unalienable refers to that which cannot be given away or taken away."

Domestic Enemies of the USA defined (FBI website 2009): "Domestic enemies pursue legislation, programs against the powers of the US Constitution. They work on destroying and weakening the Rights of the People guaranteed by the Constitution. Plus they create laws, amendments, bills, executive orders that go against the restraint on the three branches of our government by the Constitution. They are also those who support those in action, or by inaction; vote, voice, money, etc who are going against or trying to weaken the US Constitution and the Peoples written guarantee of the protection of those Rights."

You, and the rest of the California government took a lawfully required legally binding oath to "support and defend the US Constitution and the state Constitution" from domestic enemies, not just foreign ones.

Diane Feinstein needs to be immediately removed from office – as the law requires, then arrested and subsequently prosecuted for breaking her lawfully required and legally binding Oath of Office to the State of California and to the Constitution of the United States of America. Furthermore, the oath(s) are a requirement of office, and must be kept to continue to meet the requirements and to be able to lawfully remain in the office. Breaking the oath of office is both a criminal and civil offense, not only a political offense. It is YOUR duty as Governor of the state of California that you carry out that law immediately.

I, and many others, have noticed that you as per your lawfully required and legally binding oath and the requirements of the US Constitution and California Constitution have not moved to nullify and/or ban these unconstitutional and unlawful acts/bills/executive orders/etc against all US citizens, the citizens of the state of California: Patriot Act, NDAA, UN’s Agenda 21, Feinstein’s Bill against the 2nd Amendment, Warrant-less spying/tracking/searches/etc, TSA in airports/bus stations/train stations /on our roads/at stadiums/etc, nor Obamacare (Health Care Bill) – which requires the microchipping of all US citizens, plus a create and support a private army paid for by any citizens who are forced to use Obamacare (I suspect, like most, you have not read it)) - which are against the US Constitution/Bill of Rights limitations put on those serving in the federal government; and are against the US Constitution plus California’s State Constitution, which the state's executive branch sworn duties are to defend, support and enforce.

Nor have you moved to stop Obama and his administration from planned and carried out murder, which he is calling "assassination powers" that he gave himself - usurpation. There are no laws in the USA that allows for "assassination powers". Whatever name he gives them, it is First Degree Murder, plain and simple. Why have you not moved on that, as is your sworn duty?

Why not? Please answer in the Sacramento Bee, and on all corporate and alternative media outlying why you are not upholding the lawful and legally binding oath of office and are not removing Feinstein and arresting and prosecuting her, plus other oath breakers as YOU are required to do by law.

Plus why you are not banning or nullifying those unconstitutional, hence unlawful acts, bills, executive orders as your position requires.

Why you are not moving against Obama, Panetta, Dempsey for Treason where they declared that they gave authority OVER the USA and the US Military to the UN. That they declared that they get their authority from the UN, NOT from the US Constitution or the USA which is the only legitimate and lawful authority here in the USA. Plus for various other criminal and civil offenses he and his administration have committed as you are required to do by sworn oath and the duties of the position you hold. Why you are not levying Murder in the First Degree charges against Obama and those involved in the “assassination meetings”.

Multiple precedent cases in the USA abide where individuals have been held accountable and prosecuted for not taking the Oath, not keeping the Oath, and decisions that an oath taker made to follow or enforce an unlawful order.

The civil offense for not keeping the oath of office as required:

Article VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

The Constitution of the United States of America IS the Supreme Law of this land, NOT those who serve within the federal government.

The first law statute of the United States of America, enacted in the first session of the First Congress on 1 June 1789, was Statute 1, Chapter 1: an act to regulate the time and manner of administering certain oaths, which established the oath required by civil and military officials to support the Constitution.

The wording of the Presidential Oath was established in the Constitution in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8.

‘Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”’

The Framers placed the presidential Oath of Office after the beginning clauses setting forth the organization of the executive department, and before the ending clauses that specify the contours of the President's assigned power. The President takes the oath after he assumes the office but before he executes it. The location and phrasing of the Oath of Office Clause strongly suggest that it is not empowering, but that it is limiting - the clause limits how the President's "executive power" is to be exercised.

The requirement for all Federal and State Civil officers to give their solemn and binding Oath is established in Article VI, Section 1, Clause 4.

They are bound by their Oath to support the US Constitution, and should they abrogate their Oath by their acts or inaction, are subject to charges of impeachment and censure - political remedy for a political offense; and/or civil and criminal charges.

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge.

SOLEMN: “Legally binding, Common legal phrase indicating that an agreement has been consciously made, and certain actions are now either required or prohibited. The other requirement for an agreement or contract to be considered legally binding is consideration – both parties must knowingly understand what they are agreeing to”.

BOUND: “Being under legal or moral obligation; to constitute the boundary or limit of; to set a limit to; confine”

LEGALLY BINDING: Common legal phrase. Lawful action, such as an agreement consciously agreed to by two or more entities, establishing lawful accountability. Both parties must knowingly understand what they are agreeing to is the other requirement to legally establish an agreement or contract.

CONSIDERATION: “Consideration in a contract is a bargained for exchange of acts or forbearance of an act.”

REQUIRE, REQUIREMENT, REQUIRED: Mandated under a law or by an authoritative entity. "To claim or ask for by right and authority; That which is required; a thing demanded or obligatory; something demanded or imposed as an obligation."

CONTRACT: “An agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law.”

The Framers placed the requirement for the “Oaths of Office” in the Constitution, the supreme law of this land. These Oaths are to function as “checks” on the powers of the federal government and protect us from usurpations.

Each Branch of the federal government has “the check of the Oath” on the other two branches. THE STATES, WHOSE OFFICIALS ALSO TAKE THE OATH OFF OFFICE, HAVE THE SAME CHECK ON ALL THREE BRANCHES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. And “We the People”, the “original fountain of all legitimate authority” (Federalist 22), have the Right to overrule violations of the Constitution by elected and appointed officials.

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary says for “Constitution”: “…In free states, the constitution is paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature, limiting and controlling its power; and in the United States, the legislature is created, and its powers designated, by the constitution.”

If any Branch fails to obey the “supreme Law”, then, in order to preserve the Rule of Law, the other Branches, or failing that, the States or the people, must overrule them”.

Title 18 United States Code Section 926 (Federal law Gun Control Act of 1968) makes it a federal felony for anyone to require a gun registration list of ANY kind IF AT ANY TIME SAID LIST IN ANY WAY CAN or will BE USED AS A GUN CONFISCATION LIST.

Now I am going to remind you of the California Constitution which you swore to uphold, and then the treason laws.

California State Constitution

Art 1 Dec Of Rights, Sec 1: All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and DEFENDING LIFE AND LIBERTY, acquiring, POSSESSING, and PROTECTING PROPERTY, and PURSUING AND OBTAINING SAFETY, happiness, and PRIVACY.

Art 1 Dec Of Rights, Sec 13: The RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO BE SECURE IN THEIR PERSONS, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable seizures and searches may not be violated; and a warrant may not issue except on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons and things to be seized.

Violations of this are:

Feinstein’s 2013 Gun Control proposal
UN”s Agenda 21
NDAA
Patriot Act
Warrantless Searches, Tracking, Spying, etc
Gun Control laws, not including regulating concealed carry, weapons to weak to deter military invasion, or usurpation by government domestic enemies
TSA Searches at airports, bus stations, train stations, public and private roadways
Etc

Art 1 Dec Of Rights, Sec 18: Treason against the State consists only in levying war against it, ADHERING TO ITS ENEMIES, or giving them aid and comfort. A person may not be convicted of treason except on the evidence of two witnesses to the same overt act or by confession in open court.

UN's Agenda 21 – supporting and implementing it, covering up for companies and government agencies that support and implement it
Support for UN laws, military forces on USA soil, in California
Any action, bill, law, etc by any person, group, company, corporation, political group, etc that would change our legitimate government by unconstitutional means.

Art 1 Dec Of Rights, Sec 26: The provisions of this Constitution are mandatory and prohibitory, unless by express words they are declared to be otherwise.

Art 3 State Of California, Sec 1: The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.

Art 5 Exec, Sec 1: The supreme executive power of this State is vested in the Governor. THE GOVERNOR SHALL SEE THAT THE LAW IS FAITHFULLY EXECUTED.

That includes quelling Treason, stopping unconstitutional actions by those in the federal and California government, arresting and prosecuting oath breakers within the California state government and those who represent the state of California in the federal government.

That includes investigating, and prosecuting companies, government agencies, and individuals that are supporting treasonous, and foreign schemes like UN's Agenda 21,
Banning or Nullifying NDAA, Patriot Act, Warrant less Searches, Spying, Tracking, etc within the state of California
Not allowing gun control as per Second Amendment, US Constitution
That includes investigating Election Fraud perpetuated within California, and prosecuting those involved at ANY level
That includes investigating any and all agencies, corporations, individuals, and groups supporting and implementing UN’s Agenda 21 for treason against the USA and against the state of California, be they private, state, or federal agencies.
That includes going after Oath breakers and those who commit(ed) treason in the Federal Government whose powers are limited, listed, and defined by the US Constitution – our legitimate government.

§ US President’s were NOT given the power to pardon those who commit treason. Obama pardoned Bush of war crimes, murder, and various other criminal and civil offenses he committed, but he cannot pardon treason.

Art 5 Exec, Sec 7: The Governor is COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF A MILITIA THAT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR BY STATUTE. The Governor may call it forth to execute the law. (Why is there not a training schedule posted for all able-bodied citizens to train for the militia?)

That includes quelling Treason, stopping unconstitutional actions by those in the federal government, removing from office and arresting oath breakers within the California state government and those who represent the state of California in the federal government
That includes investigating, and prosecuting any and all agencies, companies, government agencies, corporations, groups, and individuals that are supporting treasonous schemes like Agenda 21, etc within the state of California
That includes investigating Election Fraud perpetuated within California, and prosecuting those involved at ANY level

Art 5 Exec Sec 13: Subject to the powers and duties of the Governor, the Attorney General shall be the chief law officer of the State. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO SEE THAT THE LAWS OF THE STATE ARE UNIFORMLY AND ADEQUATELY ENFORCED…

Art 7 Public Officers And Employees: SEC. 9. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Constitution, NO PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHICH ADVOCATES THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE STATE BY force or violence or OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS or WHO ADVOCATES THE SUPPORT OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT AGAINST THE UNITED STATES in the event of hostilities shall:

(a) HOLD ANY OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT UNDER THIS STATE, including but not limited to the University of California, or with any county, city or county, city, district, political subdivision, authority, board, bureau, commission or other public agency of this State; or

(b) Receive any exemption from any tax imposed by this State or any county, city or county, city, district, political subdivision, authority, board, bureau, commission or other public agency of this State.

The Legislature shall enact such laws as may be necessary to enforce the provisions of this section. Yet these have been ignored:

Support of the UN takeover of California and the USA through UN’s Agenda 21 – changing our government by unconstitutional means - treason
Patriot Act – changing our government by unconstitutional means - treason
NDAA – changing our government by unconstitutional means – treason
FCC allowing and supporting a Media cartel; yet the head nor the first four layers beneath are not being investigated
Warrant less Searches, Spying, Tracking, etc within the state of California

Diane Feinstein’s 2013 Gun Control which changes the US Constitution, specifically Bill of Rights, Amendment 2 through unconstitutional means.
Diane Feinstein not keeping her oath of Office to the State of California which once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge. A criminal, civil, and political offense.
Diane Feinstein not keeping the legally required Oath of Office to the US Constitution which once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge. A criminal, civil, and political offense.
Other Oath Breakers

Art 9 EDU. Sec 1: A general diffusion of knowledge and intelligence being essential to the preservation of the rights and liberties of the people, the Legislature shall encourage by all suitable means the promotion of intellectual, scientific, moral, and agricultural improvement. [Plus support and defend the US Constitution, First Amendment and the Preamble to the Bill of Rights] Yet:

Almost 100% of the mainstream media is owned by seven companies: Disney, NewsCorp, TimeWarner, CBS, Viacom, NBCUniversal, and Sony. They control everything: movies, television, all the major newspapers and news, and even music record labels.

When one company dominates an industry, it is a monopoly. When a handful of companies cooperatively dominate an industry, it is a “Cartel.” This is what we have with our corporately owned ‘mainstream’ media - an elite group that is cooperatively and covertly controlling everything that comes through our television, radio, newspaper, and theater.

Supreme Court, Red Lion v. FCC, 1969: “It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the Government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.”

The amendments of the Constitution are not to be submitted to a vote. This means they must be left alone, the federal government, state governments do not have the lawful power to pass laws concerning these natural rights; EXCEPT Congress can pass any law on any item concerning the places under its jurisdiction (D.C., Federal areas and buildings, military bases, etc).

Remember, it is YOUR sworn duty to see that the enforcement of laws outside of federal jurisdiction that allow the subjugation of the American people to unlawful laws, bills, executive orders, etc which our government leaders know do NOT and CANNOT apply to citizens within the states not used here against them in California.

Bill of Rights

Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The six protections against government encroachment are:

1. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion

2. Congress shall make no law prohibiting the exercise of religion

3. Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech

4. Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of the press

5. Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people peacefully to assemble

6. Congress shall make no law abridging the right to petition the government for a redress of grievance.

Amendment II: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654

Breaks the militia down in three groups.

The organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia,
The unorganized militia and
The regular army.

It further states: The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy. (Anyone who can be in the military can be in the Militia, so women are no longer excluded)

Richard Henry Lee, Senator, 1st Congress: "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."

Richard Henry Lee, Senator, 1st Congress: "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves ... and include all men capable of bearing arms."

John Adams, 2nd US President: "You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe”

Samuel Adams, Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State": "And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; …".

George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788: "I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."

Amendment III: No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The government limitations stated in this amendment are:

1. The citizens are to be secure in their person, home, papers, and property, from unreasonable searches and seizure.

a. Basically “We the People” have the privacy to go about their lives without worrying whether the government will invade them. This amendment was to ensure that the government does not trespass on the people nor take anything from the people without following correct legal procedure.

2. The government is restrained from taking either person or property without first getting a warrant, and only after proving probable cause.

a. This, however, is only valid if the judge issuing the warrant is honest. There have been cases in which corrupt judges have signed blank warrants, and the details are not filled in until after serving the warrant.

Amendment V: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII: In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The Ninth Amendment states that the citizens of the United States have more rights than just those enumerated (listed) in the Constitution, and the government is forbidden to deny us those rights.

1. Any “freedom” enjoyed by the people and those upheld by the Supreme Court, such as privacy, travel, presumption of innocence, etc, are all rights not listed but are still unalienable rights.

2. We have the “right” to be free from federal harassment.

a. When our country was first started, and for nearly a century thereafter, the Federal government had virtually NO dealings with the average citizen

i. This shows that it is another unalienable right not listed.

Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Madison specified in Federalist 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former (fed gov) will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

Art IV Sec 2, the 14th says, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States"

Treason:

Clause 2 of Article VI of the Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

The Constitution of the United States of America IS the Supreme Law of this land, NOT those who serve within the federal government.

Title 18 US code section 2381 - Treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

· Those who implement(ed/ing) and/or assisting/assisted in the cover-up and implementation of UN’s Agenda 21
· Those who implement(ed/ing) and/or assisting/assisted in the cover-up of Fast and Furious
· Those who implement(ed/ing) and/or assisting/assisted in the cover-up of Benghazi
· UN military forces on US soil
· UN “overseeing” US Elections
· Corporations, businesses, government bureaucracies, individuals assisting, supporting, implementing UN’s Agenda 21

18 USC § 2382 - Misprision of treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

The Senate – those that were there at the hearing where Panetta and Dempsey declared treason; congress; and Boehner - letter from Obama where he declared treason; Holder, Pelosi, H. Clinton, and the rest of that administration. Don't forget that both Bush's, and B. Clinton administrations also committed treason and need arrest and prosecution.

18 USC § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States OR THE LAWS THEREOF, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

All laws MUST be in “pursuance thereof the US Constitution” or are “null and void”.

18 USC § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy: If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

· Fast and Furious - Press Releases about it in EARLY 2009, David Ogden the talking head for Obama;
· Benghazi, arming terrorists including the terrorists blamed for 9/11.
· Giving the UN, a foreign entity, 'authority' over the USA –
· Using UN, a foreign entity, laws,
· UN, a foreign entity, here to 'monitor' OUR USA elections,
· UN, a foreign entity, taxing US citizens,
· UN , a foreign entity, Military on USA soil
· Giving the UN 'authority' over the USA, over the US Military - Obama, Panetta, Dempsey. UN & NATO with the assistance of this administration, the Bush administration, the Clinton administration, the Bush 1 administration...
o The UN does NOT have any lawful authority over the USA, nor does anyone serving in any branch of our legitimate government have the lawful power to give them any authority over the USA - Not to decide OUR gun laws, tax us, watch our elections, use our natural resources, put Agenda 21 here in the USA, use our military and any of "our" Generals, etc. Any representatives who assist or allow it are committing treason - Panetta, Dempsey, and Obama & his administration, Holder, plus H. Clinton, J.Napolitano, David Ogden, N. Pelosi, etc - who said they do NOT represent the USA, they represent the UN.
o Obama said in a letter to Boehner, Panetta and Dempsey in front of the senate - on video.
o Foreign laws and Shariah laws being used in US courts
· Implementing UN laws within the USA
· Implementing taxes of US citizens and those legally allowed to be here to be paid to the UN
· UN’s Agenda 21
· Patriot Act
· NDAA
. Warrantless Searches, Tracking Spying of any type, etc
· TSA in our airports, train stations, bus stations, on our roads, at sporting events, etc

18 USC § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy: Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof... assassination of any officer of any such government; or

· That would be "change" and using propaganda, lies, misinformation, and a *corporate media cartel.

Almost 100% of the mainstream media is owned by seven companies: Disney, NewsCorp, TimeWarner, CBS, Viacom, NBCUniversal, and Sony. They control everything: movies, television, all the major newspapers and news, and even music record labels.

When one company dominates an industry, it is a monopoly. When a handful of companies cooperatively dominate an industry, it is a “Cartel.” This is what we have with our mainstream media - an elite group that is cooperatively and covertly controlling everything that comes through our television, radio, newspaper, and theater.

“It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the Government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.” Supreme Court, Red Lion v. FCC, 1969}

Manipulating mainstream information to distort, misinform, and outright lie or keep from the public information in order to "shape" public opinion to destroy the US Constitution, our legitimate gov is treason. If it was decided to change it, it must be based on legitimate information, not deceit, lies, propaganda, distortions, election fraud, etc being done here as was done in Germany.

18 USC § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy: Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

18 USC § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy: Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof...

That would be "change" and using propaganda, lies, misinformation, and a *corporate media cartel to limit and distort information.

Almost 100% of the mainstream media is owned by seven companies: Disney, NewsCorp, TimeWarner, CBS, Viacom, NBCUniversal, and Sony. They control everything: movies, television, all the major newspapers and news, and even music record labels.

“It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the Government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.” Supreme Court, Red Lion v. FCC, 1969}

Manipulating public opinion to destroy the US Constitution, our legitimate gov is treason.

· Giving the UN 'authority' over the USA, over the US Military - Obama, Panetta, Dempsey. UN & NATO with the assistance of this administration, the Bush administration, the Clinton administration, the Bush 1 administration...
o The UN does NOT have any authority over the USA, nor does anyone serving in any branch of our legitimate government have the power to give them any authority over the USA - Not to decide OUR gun laws, tax us, watch our elections, use our natural resources, put Agenda 21 here in the USA, use our military and any of "our" Generals, etc. Any representatives who assist or allow it are committing treason - that would be Panetta, Dempsey, and Obama & his adminstration, Holder, plus H. Clinton, J.Napolitano, David Ogden, N. Pelosi, etc - who said they do NOT represent the USA, they represent the UN.
o Obama said in a letter to Boehner, Panetta and Dempsey in front of the senate - on video.
o Foreign laws and Shariah laws being used in US courts
· Implementing UN laws within the USA
· Implementing taxes of US citizens and those legally allowed to be here to be paid to the UN
· UN’s Agenda 21
· Patriot Act
· NDAA
· Warrantless Searches, Tracking Spying of any type, etc
· TSA in our airports, train stations bus stations, on our roads, at sporting events, etc

U.S. Supreme Court, NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425, STATE OF TENNESSEE Filed May 10, 1886

“…An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

George Washington, Farewell Address: "If in the opinion of the people … but let there be no change by usurpation; for though this in one instance may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed."

Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of the United States: "On every question of construction (of the Constitution) let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

"The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution."

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

James Madison, Federalist 43. Inscribed in the Madison Memorial Hall, Library of Congress James Madison Memorial Building: "...the safety and happiness of society are the objects at which all political institutions aim, and to which all such institutions must be sacrificed."

James Madison, Federalist Papers 46: "They must be told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone, and that it will not depend merely on the comparative ambition or address of the different governments, whether either, or which of them, will be able to enlarge its sphere of jurisdiction at the expense of the other."

Richard Henry Lee, Senator, 1st Congress: "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."

"A militia… are in fact the people themselves ... and include all men capable of bearing arms."

Abraham Lincoln: "We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution."

Samuel Adams: "And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; …".

The Supreme Court has cited St. George Tucker - a lawyer, Revolutionary War militia officer, legal scholar, and later a U.S. District Court judge - in the major cases of virtually every Supreme Court era. He wrote of the Second Amendment:

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and this without any qualification as to their condition or degree, as is the case in the British government.”

“This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty... The right of self-defense is the first law of nature…”

"The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people;…"

William Rawle, wrote "A View of the Constitution of the United States of America" which was a constitutional law textbook at West Point and other institutions. Rawle was a respected constitutional authority and an early commentator who actually voted to ratify the Bill of Rights:

“The prohibition is general. No clause in the constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretence by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both”.

“neither the states nor the national government has legitimate authority to disarm its citizens”.

Justice Story, Supreme Court Associate Justice in 1833, "Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States". Regarding the Second Amendment, he wrote:

The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.’

Cockrum v. State: “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.”

Tench Coxe wrote: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves... Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American...The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people”.

“As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow-citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.”

Hamilton: “When will the time arrive that the federal government can raise and maintain an army capable of erecting a despotism over the great body of the people of an immense empire, who are in a situation, through the medium of their State governments, to take measures for their own defense, with all the celerity, regularity, and system of independent nations? The apprehension may be considered as a disease, for which there can be found no cure in the resources of argument and reasoning”.

Daniel Webster: “Where is it written in the Constitution, in what article or section is it contained, that you may take children from their parents and parents from their children, and compel them to fight the battles of any war in which the folly and wickedness of the government may engage itself? Under what concealment has this power lain hidden… Who will show me any Constitutional injunction which makes it the duty of the American people to surrender everything valuable in life, and even life, itself, whenever the purposes of an ambitious and mischievous government may require it?”

Patrick Henry: “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."

Justice Robert H. Jackson, Chief of Counsel for the United States, Nuremberg Trials: “It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error”.

Ronald Reagan: “The NRA believes America's laws were made to be obeyed and that our Constitutional liberties are just as important today as 200 years ago. And by the way, the Constitution does not say Government shall decree the right to keep and bear arms. The Constitution says 'The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Senator Hubert H. Humphrey: "Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms.... The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America but which historically has proven to be always possible.”

Andrew Jackson, Farewell Address: "But you must remember, my fellow citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing. It behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the Federal Government."

Glenn Harlan Reynolds: “The purpose of the right to bear arms is twofold; to allow individuals to protect themselves and their families, and to ensure a body of armed citizenry from which a militia could be drawn, whether that militia’s role was to protect the nation, or to protect the people from a tyrannical government.”

Malcolm Wallop, former U.S. Sen.: "The ruling class doesn't care about public safety. Having made it very difficult for States and localities to police themselves, having left ordinary citizens with no choice but to protect themselves as best they can, they now try to take our guns away. In fact they blame us and our guns for crime. This is so wrong that it cannot be an honest mistake."

The U.S. Supreme Court, Cohens v. Virginia, 1821: “Although the Federalist Papers were written prior to the drafting of the Bill of Rights (but after the Constitution was sent to the states for ratification), the passages quoted, above, help explain the relationships that were understood between a well-regulated militia, the people, their governments, and the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment did not declare or establish any new rights or novel principles”.

U.S. v. Emerson, 46 F.Supp.2d 598, N.D.Tex. 1999: "Collective rights theorists argue that addition of the subordinate clause qualifies the rest of the amendment by placing a limitation on the people's right to bear arms. However, if the amendment truly meant what collective rights advocates propose, then the text would read "[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the States to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." However, that is not what the framers of the amendment drafted. The plain language of the amendment, without attenuate inferences therefrom, shows that the function of the subordinate clause was not to qualify the right, but instead to show why it must be protected. The right exists independent of the existence of the militia. If this right were not protected, the existence of the militia, and consequently the security of the state, would be jeopardized."

Nunn vs. State: 'The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right.

An armed populace, organized into a well regulated militia, was a good way to defend the country without a large professional army and that it would give the people the ability to defend their liberties if the government ever became tyrannical. Not for self-protection, not for hunting, not even to protect from foreign invaders. Simply that the people, the militia, be able to wrest power from a government, overtly or insidiously, removing power from the people. Every political figure knows that to impose the governments will on the people you must disarm them."

Thomas M. Cooley (1824-1898), Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court and author of the leading nineteenth-century works on constitutional law:

"The right is general. It may be supposed from the phraseology of this provision that the right to keep and bear arms was only guaranteed to the militia; but this would be an interpretation not warranted by the intent. The militia, as has been explained elsewhere, consists of those persons who, under the laws, are liable to the performance of military duty, and are officered and enrolled for service when called upon.... If the right were limited to those enrolled, the purpose of the guarantee might be defeated altogether by the action or the neglect to act of the government it was meant to hold in check. The meaning of the provision undoubtedly is, that the people, from whom the militia must be taken, shall have the right to keep and bear arms, and they need no permission or regulation of law for the purpose. But this enables the government to have a well regulated militia; for to bear arms implies something more than mere keeping; it implies the learning to handle and use them in a way that makes those who keep them ready for their efficient use; in other words, it implies the right to meet for voluntary discipline in arms, observing in so doing the laws of public order"

Judge Cooley: “ … there is an individual right, meant to buttress the militia, but not limited to its enrolled members – since the government may define who is in the militia, and thus the right would have no value against abusive government if so limited. To argue that the result is that only militia activities are covered is to lapse into the collective right approach. If one takes this definition, the civic right concept in practice would resemble the "hybrid" individual right, recognized in Aymette v. State. Presumably, that a legislature can outlaw weapons that have no militia/military function. It can proscribe brass knuckles and billy clubs because militia functions do not contemplate bludgeoning tyrants, insurrectionaries, or criminals. Conversely, outlawing machine guns, assault rifles, .50 caliber rifles, and the like would involve infringement of the right's very core because the people are the militia.

A government could likely restrict concealed carry because concealment has no particular link to political resistance, but it could not restrict open carry or use.”

One of the traditional purposes of the militia is law enforcement -"to execute the Laws of the Union." Law enforcement was most likely the most frequent use of the militia…

The Bill of Rights is the immunities of citizens of the United States, as are many unlisted natural rights of the people as pointed out in the 9^th Amendment.

Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion . . ..

Please be aware that this is being sent to every congressperson, senator, California Sheriff's, and to other state's sheriff's, to the Governors of the other states, every media that I can get to post it, and various other groups and agencies that are supporting and defending our nation remaining under its legitimate government. I am also letting other people use this a form as ‘template’ that they can insert their own state constitution and required oath, plus Governors name into.

Sincerely

MAC

most excellent !

Feb 10, 2013

2 members favorited this

Bringing our government under control starting with the states. I wrote this to the Governor of California

MAC