Photo of a Starving Girl in Yemen Prompts Facebook to Remove Posts of Article

For a few hours after The New York Times published an article about conflict and hunger in Yemen, Facebook temporarily removed posts from readers who had tried to share the report on the social platform.

At issue was a photograph of a starving child.

The article included several images of emaciated children. Some were crying. Some were listless. One, a 7-year-old girl named Amal, was shown gazing to the side, with flesh so paper-thin that her collarbone and rib cage were plainly visible. Tens of thousands of readers shared the article on Facebook, but some got a message notifying them that the post was not in line with Facebook’s community standards.

Facebook had addressed the issue by Friday night.

“As our community standards explain, we don’t allow nude images of children on Facebook, but we know this is an important image of global significance,” a spokeswoman said in an emailed statement. “We’re restoring the posts we removed on this basis.”

The article highlighted the suffering of Yemeni civilians amid a devastating war pitting Houthi rebels and their allies against a Saudi-led coalition whose campaign of airstrikes, which are aided by American-supplied bombs and intelligence, have killed thousands of civilians. Economic warfare has worsened the despair for many Yemeni families, and the country is at risk of a catastrophic famine. The conflict began more than three years ago, and it received more attention when the killing of a Saudi dissident, Jamal Khashoggi, led to outrage and turned a spotlight on Saudi actions in the region.

In another article on Friday, New York Times editors explained why they decided to publish the photos of the starving children.

“They are brutal,” it said. “But they are also brutally honest. They reveal the horror that is Yemen today. You may choose not to look at them. But we thought you should be the ones to decide.”

When Jarjieh Fang, a graduate student in Washington, saw the article about Yemen around noon on Friday, he found the photographs shocking. “I thought it would be something worth sharing, to sort of jolt people to start paying attention to what’s going on in Yemen,” he said.

He posted a link to the article on his Facebook page, and couple hours later, he got a notification. His post had been taken down, and there was a message from Facebook.

“On Facebook, we don’t allow offers of sexual services, solicitation of sexual material, threats or depictions of sexual violence, threats to share intimate images or any sexual content involving minors,” it said.

Image
After Jarjieh Fang posted a link to a New York Times article about Yemen on his Facebook page, he received a message about the social media company’s standards.CreditJarjieh Fang

Dozens of people complained about similar issues on social media or in emails to the journalists who originally reported the story. But it is unclear how many people were affected. Tens of thousands of people shared the story on Facebook, and many posts — including the one on The New York Times’ own Facebook page — were not taken down.

The experience left Mr. Fang confused about Facebook’s policies. “I was disappointed when it was taken down so quickly, and that something so important was being scrubbed from people’s News Feeds,” he said.

Facebook uses a combination of algorithms, employees and flags from users to screen for content that may need to be removed. The company did not have information about the number of people whose posts were removed on Friday.

“We’re glad to hear that Facebook has reversed itself on this issue,” said Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for The New York Times. “It’s incredibly disappointing to think that this story would be blocked in violation of their community guidelines. The job of journalists is to bear witness and give voice to those who otherwise would not be heard.

“This story is a stunning example of exactly that kind of work, from some of the very few journalists who are on the ground detailing the unfolding humanitarian crisis in Yemen. Denying any readers access to the story is wrong.”

Facebook’s temporary removal of the posts on Friday recalled a similar episode in 2016, when the social media company temporarily took down a post featuring a Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph from the Vietnam War. It shows a 9-year-old girl, Phan Thi Kim Phuc, fleeing napalm bombs in 1972.

And in 2015, Facebook had to revise its community standards after photos of women breast-feeding were removed from its pages.

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

James Roberts posted blog posts
33 minutes ago
James Roberts posted a status
1 hour ago
James Roberts posted a status
1 hour ago
James Roberts posted a status
1 hour ago
Diana commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

Should Not Run

"JR, You're right, she's already the Queen per CNN.  lol"
1 hour ago
Phyllis Maka's 2 blog posts were featured
1 hour ago
James Roberts commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

Should Not Run

""91% of those polled said Hillary should not run, because she already won last time! We owe…"
2 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Diana's photo
2 hours ago
Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
2 hours ago
Charles Cox favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post Facts on Fraud: the Gold Confiscation Bail-Out in FDR's Own Words
3 hours ago
Charles Cox favorited cheeki kea's photo
3 hours ago
Diana replied to Diana's discussion Baltimore Wants To Sue Gun Makers Over Gang Violence
"They could also prosecute criminals, but that isn't how a liberal city works. "
3 hours ago
Diana favorited Phyllis Maka's blog post The British Nazi Communists(LIZARDS-Military Industrial Complex) Takeover of America(humanity)
3 hours ago
Diana posted photos
3 hours ago
Diana's 2 discussions were featured
3 hours ago
Diana posted discussions
3 hours ago
Diana commented on James Roberts's blog post Queen sacks Prince Andrew, No More Official Public Appearnces, Strips Him of £249,000 "Salary" Over Epstein
3 hours ago
Diana favorited James Roberts's blog post Queen sacks Prince Andrew, No More Official Public Appearnces, Strips Him of £249,000 "Salary" Over Epstein
3 hours ago
James Roberts's blog post was featured

Queen Sacks Prince Andrew, No More Official Public Appearnces, Strips Him of £249,000 "Salary" Over Epstein

Will wonders never cease? Must have damaged the public image of the royal family more than the…See More
3 hours ago
James Roberts commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

shop.donaldjtrump.com

"Phil Brown 8 months ago Adam Schiff. Fitting description. likes: 53"
3 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted