CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES WANTS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO PREDICT CHILD ABUSE

SOURCE: ACTIVIST POST

By Nicholas West

Predictive technology is exploding. The arrival of Big Data initiatives by government, as well as a massive industry of data brokers is not only putting privacy at risk, but is offering those with access to the information unprecedented ways to micromanage our lives.

Over the last few years, I’ve covered the arrival of full-on pre-crime police tech (both public and secret) that is beginning to target potential hotspots for crime, as well as to put certain individuals on lists created by artificial intelligence to identify supposed future criminals.

I’ve also covered trends in predictive medicine that have controversially strayed into the field of mental health, painting an algorithmic picture of people who are prime candidates for some form of potential intervention. These measures are often touted as both humanitarian as well as economically prudent, as health professionals and insurers are able to utilize the near constant stream of information provided by Big Data.

 

But predictive child abuse?

I suppose we shouldn’t be shocked when we begin accelerating out of control down the slippery slope. The UK just happens to be one of the world leaders at the moment for greasing the skids. According to a new report by The Guardian, we clearly see how a variety of social concerns can combine with the “obligation” of government to cut costs wherever possible. The result could be a truly dystopian scenario of entrusting the welfare of children to computers.

Local authorities – which face spiralling demand and an £800m funding shortfall – are beginning to ask whether big data could help to identify vulnerable children.

Could a computer program flag a problem family, identify a potential victim and prevent another Baby P or Victoria Climbié?

Years ago, such questions would have been the stuff of science fiction; now they are the stuff of science fact.

Bristol is one place experimenting with these new capabilities, and grappling with the moral and ethical questions that come with them.

We can also see how parallel trends in data collection can quickly spill over into every area of human life. This is a principle reason why Activist Post has been harping on this topic for a decade. The Guardian specifically equates (in theory of course) consumer behavior with flagging potential victims for abuse.

Machine learning systems built to mine massive amounts of personal data have long been used to predict customer behaviour in the private sector.

Computer programs assess how likely we are to default on a loan, or how much risk we pose to an insurance provider.

Designers of a predictive model have to identify an “outcome variable”, which indicates the presence of the factor they are trying to predict.

For child safeguarding, that might be a child entering the care system.

They then attempt to identify characteristics commonly found in children who enter the care system. Once these have been identified, the model can be run against large datasets to find other individuals who share the same characteristics.

Now, it’s beyond the scope of this article, but child protection services themselves are vastly documented to put children at risk for abuse. So the idea that data extrapolated from that flawed system should inform the wider world about the people who wind up there seems like a very bad idea. I offer this example to show how supposedly accurate computer systems can wind up with bad data from which to draw their conclusions.

In fact, this is precisely the concern that has been voiced by experts in the field who have urged caution when applying algorithms to social systems rather than, say, raw data like consumer purchases and other far more easily tracked metrics. (Please see: “Predictive Algorithms Are No Better At Telling The Future Than A C...). Nearly every application of predictive analytics I’ve come across performs somewhere in the 80% range. I’m sure that the other 20% of families flagged as potential child abusers — and are then dragged through hell because of it — will be happy that it’s all for “the greater good.”

Here is what The Guardian uncovered about how technology is supposed to “safeguard” children.

They include history of domestic abuse, youth offending and truancy.

More surprising indicators such as rent arrears and health data were initially considered but excluded from the final model. In the case of both Thurrock, a council in Essex, and the London borough of Hackney, families can be flagged to social workers as potential candidates for the Troubled Families programme. Through this scheme councils receive grants from central government for helping households with long-term difficulties such as unemployment.

And, by the way, here is the transparency that the public can expect if this is ever fully implemented:

There is no national oversight of predictive analytics systems by central government, resulting in vastly different approaches to transparency by different authorities. Thurrock council published a privacy impact assessment on its website, though it is not clear whether this has raised any real awareness of the scheme among residents.

Hackney council has also published a privacy notice in the past. However, a separate privacy impact assessment, released in response to a freedom of information request earlier this year, stated: “Data subjects will not be informed, informing the data subjects would be likely to prejudice the interventions this project is designed to identify.” Hackney refused to tell the Guardian what datasets it was using for its predictive model.

Those in the U.S. shouldn’t let their guard down on this topic either. In 2016, PBS wrote a very long and informative article, “Can Big Data Save These Children?” where we can see how this already has been pursued by foster care in Pennsylvania.

To keep kids out of foster care, to intervene and shore up families before they collapse, requires the ability to predict a child’s future. A crystal ball. Cherna found his solution in the form of a data model created by an economist half a world away. New Zealand economist Rhema Vaithianathan built two computer models that can predict a child’s likelihood of entering foster care.

One predicts at birth the chances that a child will be abused or neglected and ultimately end up in foster care. The model does this by weighing a number of factors: Among them, does the child live with one or both parents? Has the family undergone prior child welfare investigations? Does the family receive public benefits? The second model uses similar information but activates only when a call is placed about a child’s safety. But – and this is critical – that call often doesn’t come until after the abuse has occurred.

What could go wrong?

“The worst case scenario is that the score is just reflecting the prejudices or beliefs of whoever scored the algorithm,” he said. “It’s very important that these things be transparent so they can be scrutinized by the public and experts.”

But is this really the current path we are on?

Nicholas West writes for Activist Post. Support us at Patreon for as little as $1 per month. Support us atPatreon. Follow us on MindsSteemitSoMeeBitChuteFacebook and Twitter. Ready for solutions? Subscribe to our premium newsletter Counter Markets.

Image Credit: PBS.org

SHARE THIS ARTICLE...

Views: 55

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by richard J Lacy on September 22, 2018 at 9:51am

Somebody take a paddle to this idea, and it's proponents!

Comment by Chris of the family Masters on September 20, 2018 at 3:03pm

De-register your child, easy fix.

Latest Activity

Dr. Frederick Meekins posted a blog post

Diversity Fanatics Manipulate History Not For Education But To Advance Agenda Narrative

There is no pleasing diversity fanatics.These subversives constantly harp the shortcomings of the past in the hopes of disgusting the otherwise undiscerning into going along with the pending revolution to collapse what remains of America's…See More
54 minutes ago
Diana posted a blog post

Never Forget: CAIR's Dirty Deeds

The Council on American-Islamic Relations is having a banner month. The militant Muslim group never lets a crisis go to waste. That means Americans should beware. When unappeasable CAIR is ascendant, our free speech rights, religious liberty and…See More
1 hour ago
Deep Space posted videos
1 hour ago
cheeki kea replied to Chris of the family Masters's discussion Missouri Senate Bans All Federal Gun Control Laws in 23-10 Vote
"Big thumbs up to Missouri.  I won't be calling my pirates though, just the gun shop to see whats still left in stock. In case they close down next week. "
2 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on Raz Putin's video
Thumbnail

NewsReal #30: Christchurch Massacre - Don't Fall For The Manipulation

"I have just watched this, and wow these guys are good. They are genuine and fully engage in factual  missions that back up their statements, opinions and concluded findings. They cover the concepts behind false flags and deep state operations.…"
2 hours ago
cheeki kea favorited Raz Putin's video
2 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters posted a video
4 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters replied to Chris of the family Masters's discussion Missouri Senate Bans All Federal Gun Control Laws in 23-10 Vote
"The action symbolize Missouri being a state of the union, not the incorporated version. Now we need to push others to do the same. Call your pirates and remind them the oath they took, citing Missouri vote."
6 hours ago
dogitydog favorited Diana's photo
7 hours ago
dogitydog commented on Diana's photo
Thumbnail

sarsour_the_terrorist

"Linda Sarsour can kiss my pasty white ass, but only if she uses some kind of protection that would protect my ass from her lips."
7 hours ago
dogitydog favorited Chris of the family Masters's discussion Missouri Senate Bans All Federal Gun Control Laws in 23-10 Vote
7 hours ago
dogitydog replied to Chris of the family Masters's discussion Missouri Senate Bans All Federal Gun Control Laws in 23-10 Vote
"Missouri actually has real politicians doing their actual duty to protect the rights of the citizens and living up to the oath they took to protect and uphold the constitution! Just when I thought there wasn't a single politician that had not…"
7 hours ago
dogitydog replied to Raz Putin's discussion Natural News: "Fifteenth century ritualistic sacrifice of 140 children resembles modern-day infanticide at New York abortion clinics"
"Who's up for a cozy bedtime story? Alrighty then! Grab the kids and gather around.   Once upon a time there was this elite group of people satan's spawn that amounted to about .01% of the population and they appointed…"
7 hours ago
Deep Space posted a blog post

Beto O’Rourke Has Psychopathic Serial Murderer Fantasies

Beto O’Rourke Has Psychopathic Serial Murderer Fantasies3/19/19Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke is in deep trouble.The man most famous for losing to Ted Cruz is now running for president, but his campaign is already on the rocks.And this massive…See More
8 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters posted blog posts
8 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters posted a discussion

Missouri Senate Bans All Federal Gun Control Laws in 23-10 Vote

Missouri may have just made the most monumental step towards freedom and individual liberty since the signing of the Bill of Rights. In a 23-10 vote by Missouri’s state senate, the state passed a bill that would nullify ALL Federal gun laws and…See More
9 hours ago

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted