Monsanto, enemy of organic farmers and anti-GMO advocates alike, will likely be allowed to conduct its own environmental studies as part of a two-year USDA experiment. But there is no good that can possibly come of an experiment where the company behind nearly every genetically modified crop in our daily diets is allowed to decide whether its products are causing any environmental harm. And Monsanto isn't the only biotech company that will be permitted to police itself.
As it stands, the USDA is responsible for assessing environmental impacts of new GMO crops. The agency has been lax about this, to say the least. In 2005, the USDA gave Monsanto the go-ahead to unleash its sugar beets before preparing an Environmental Impact Statement. This decision triggered a judge to rule that Monsanto sugar beet seedlings should be ripped from the ground.
Because the USDA is so bad at doing its job on time, the agency decided to see if anyone else was prepared to do its EIS work instead. And so it looks like the USDA will at least temporarily hand over environmental impact responsibilities to the biotech companies behind GMO crops. The pilot program will allow these companies to conduct their own environmental assessments of crops or outsource the work to contractors.
The USDA won't actually admit that it's bad at performing its duties--instead, the agency claims that the move will make the environmental reporting process more timely, efficient, and cost-effective, according to the Federal Register (PDF). No knock on Monsanto, which is surely made up of great, honest people, but if the company has a vested interest in getting one of its crops deregulated, why wouldn't it try to fudge the numbers on an environmental review? And why wouldn't its hired contractors do the same? If this wasn't so dangerous, it would be funny.
"A common thing they do, is get city funding to repair buildings around the downtown area that have become slum apartments. The people have to move out for repairs, many go homeless. The tear into the building, say it has to be condemned and they…"
"Not gonna buy the 800,000 thing without some better evidence but the difference with the head is easy to explain. The idea is that it used to be a lions head but that one of the Pharaohs had it re-carved either because that Pharaoh just wanted his…"
"~You're the Ca$h ! get it, and you better damn well be "HaPpY" about it, Show it ! -for Our Wellbeing~ ........"How much cash ?" said the confused 'citizen'. A average of "Four point seven million each"…"
"QV /GV 3 year valuations wind this up, to the top of hill. They wave their wand and suddenly, out of nowhere comes another 300. grand worth of "improvements" value, and they will do it to all your neighbours as well. few complain, in the…"