Progressives and the Ron Paul fallacies by Glenn Greenwald

Excerpt from http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/progressives_and_the_ron_paul_falla...

The Ron Paul candidacy, for so many reasons, spawns pervasive political confusion — both unintended and deliberate. Yesterday, The Nation‘s long-time liberal publisher, Katrina vanden Heuvel, wrote this on Twitter:

That’s fairly remarkable: here’s the Publisher of The Nation praising Ron Paul not on ancillary political topics but central ones (“ending preemptive wars & challenging bipartisan elite consensus” on foreign policy), and going even further and expressing general happiness that he’s in the presidential race. Despite this observation, Katrina vanden Heuvel — needless to say — does not support and will never vote for Ron Paul (indeed, in subsequent tweets, she condemned his newsletters as “despicable”). But the point that she’s making is important, if not too subtle for the with-us-or-against-us ethos that dominates the protracted presidential campaign: even though I don’t support him for President, Ron Paul is the only major candidate from either party advocating crucial views on vital issues that need to be heard, and so his candidacy generates important benefits.

Whatever else one wants to say, it is indisputably true that Ron Paul is the only political figure with any sort of a national platform — certainly the only major presidential candidate in either party — who advocates policy views on issues that liberals and progressives have long flamboyantly claimed are both compelling and crucial. The converse is equally true: the candidate supported by liberals and progressives and for whom most will vote — Barack Obama — advocates views on these issues (indeed, has taken action on these issues) that liberals and progressives have long claimed to find repellent, even evil.

As Matt Stoller argued in a genuinely brilliant essay on the history of progressivism and the Democratic Party which I cannot recommend highly enough: “the anger [Paul] inspires comes not from his positions, but from the tensions that modern American liberals bear within their own worldview.” Ron Paul’s candidacy is a mirror held up in front of the face of America’s Democratic Party and its progressive wing, and the image that is reflected is an ugly one; more to the point, it’s one they do not want to see because it so violently conflicts with their desired self-perception.

The thing I loathe most about election season is reflected in the central fallacy that drives progressive discussion the minute “Ron Paul” is mentioned. As soon as his candidacy is discussed, progressives will reflexively point to a slew of positions he holds that are anathema to liberalism and odious in their own right and then say: how can you support someone who holds this awful, destructive position? The premise here — the game that’s being played — is that if you can identify some heinous views that a certain candidate holds, then it means they are beyond the pale, that no Decent Person should even consider praising any part of their candidacy.

The fallacy in this reasoning is glaring. The candidate supported by progressives — President Obama — himself holds heinous views on a slew of critical issues and himself has done heinous things with the power he has been vested. He has slaughtered civilians — Muslim children by the dozens — not once or twice, but continuously in numerous nations with dronescluster bombs and other forms of attack. He has sought to overturn a global ban on cluster bombs. He has institutionalized the power of Presidents — in secret and with no checks — to target American citizens for assassination-by-CIA, far from any battlefield. He has waged an unprecedented war against whistleblowers, the protection of which was once a liberal shibboleth. He rendered permanently irrelevant the War Powers Resolution, a crown jewel in the list of post-Vietnam liberal accomplishments, and thus enshrined the power of Presidents to wage war even in the face of a Congressional vote against it. His obsession with secrecy is so extreme that it has become darkly laughable in its manifestations, and he even worked to amend the Freedom of Information Act (another crown jewel of liberal legislative successes) when compliance became inconvenient.

He has entrenched for a generation the once-reviled, once-radical Bush/Cheney Terrorism powers of indefinite detention, military commissions, and the state secret privilege as a weapon to immunize political leaders from the rule of law. He has shielded Bush era criminals from every last form of accountability. He has vigorously prosecuted the cruel and supremely racist War on Drugs, including those parts he vowed during the campaign to relinquish — a war which devastates minority communities and encages and converts into felons huge numbers of minority youth for no good reason. He has empowered thieving bankers through the Wall Street bailout, Fed secrecy, efforts to shield mortgage defrauders from prosecution, and the appointment of an endless roster of former Goldman, Sachs executives and lobbyists. He’s brought the nation to a full-on Cold War and a covert hot war with Iran, on the brink of far greater hostilities. He has made the U.S. as subservient as ever to the destructive agenda of the right-wing Israeli government. His support for some of the Arab world’s most repressive regimes is as strong as ever.

Read the whole thing.

Views: 130

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Glenn on January 2, 2012 at 4:02pm

I couldn't agree with rtaylortitle more!

Comment by rtaylortitle on January 2, 2012 at 8:17am

nd it light of everything Obama has foisted on this nation, you liberals and progressives will STILL vote for him!  I find that outstanding when you have a man, Ron Paul, who practically mirrors what you suggest are your political/economic tenets.  Sounds schizophrenic to me.

"Destroying the New World Order"

Latest Activity

Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
1 hour ago
Doc Vega posted a blog post
1 hour ago
Burbia commented on James T. Kirk's video
1 hour ago
Burbia commented on James T. Kirk's video
2 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Chris of the family Masters's photo
Thumbnail

Economy of Rich

"Stop immoral scarcity and start paying people proper amount of money. In turn, our spending will…"
2 hours ago
oldranger_68 commented on James T. Kirk's video
Thumbnail

Candace Owens Powerful Migrant Detention Center Rant Showing lavish conditions

"Now...What in the hell are we being this GD nice to a bunch of lawbreakers for?  "
3 hours ago
oldranger_68 commented on James T. Kirk's video
3 hours ago
oldranger_68 favorited James T. Kirk's video
3 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on Diana's blog post "Ruh Roh" This Is Who's Running Against AOC
"AOC is a clown act and so are the Democrats!"
3 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on Diana's blog post "Ruh Roh" This Is Who's Running Against AOC
"I never had a problem with the Irish and I know they got a bum deal but do did Austrians like my…"
3 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters posted a blog post

Acid and Alkaline Foods: The Real Story

by Robert G. Smith, PhD and Andrew W. Saul(OMNS July 18, 2019) Alkalizing foods are sometimes…See More
4 hours ago
James T. Kirk posted videos
5 hours ago
James T. Kirk posted a status
6 hours ago
Diana commented on Diana's blog post "Ruh Roh" This Is Who's Running Against AOC
"Her company addresses the lack of minorities in media, not just blacks.  The 14th District is…"
9 hours ago
James T. Kirk posted a blog post

The Ultimate Chicken Meat Processing Guide for Preppers

The Ultimate Chicken Meat Processing Guide for PreppersBy Giurgi C.July 18, 2019 07:09Dressing a…See More
9 hours ago
James T. Kirk posted a status
"HILARIOUS: OUTRAGE MOB Targets Marvel's Scarlett Jo & Chris Pratt https://www.bitchute.com/video/AEIioScVUuw/"
9 hours ago

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted