That's right, I'm challenging a well held belief that the Rothschilds control the globe. That, my friends, is pure fiction, absolute nonsense and a well heeled fraud perpetrated on YOU. In fact, if you believe that the Rothschilds are behind what takes place on this globe you've been duped.

While the internet has forced many people to focus exclusively on the Rothschilds, the real culprits, the most dangerous people on the planet are walking away with the store.

I won't dispute that the Rothschilds held a certain sway with global events through the 1900s and in fact almost all of the 20th century and before but anyone who thinks these people are the men behind the curtain, the Oz controlling the world, hasn't been paying close attention to the real global machinations. The Rothschilds are not the men behind the curtain. Not by a long shot.

But they are the boogeyman that everyone's focused on. And that's why the real culprits are able to get away with murder. No one pays them any mind. We're all focused on the wrong guys. People are going to argue this point with me until they're blue in the face. That's OK, they said the world was flat for a long time too.

The real players generally remain unnamed. They like it like that. They probably laugh at us when they see us discussing the Rothschilds and their control of the globe. They're probably choking on their tears when they see us discussing the Illuminati and naming the Rothschilds as the leader of this Lucifer worshiping monstrosity. If you think the global elite worship Lucifer, well, I won't even give that any flight. It's a fantasy. If you believe it you're well beyond any help.

No, the real culprits are well-educated business and corporate executives whose names are not common knowledge, whose names aren't discussed regularly, whose names remain relatively unknown.

Worse, many of us are focused on the 'dollar crash' that's anticipated soon and my own opinion is that that is a fraud also. The dollar IS NOT going to crash. Not even. People think the elite are going to crash the dollar to facilitate global government. Well, let me tell you, they don't have to crash the dollar to facilitate global government. All they have to do is facilitate global government. Who's going to stop them? You? They're already doing it. You're too late if you think you're going to stop it.

The people that do control the globe are competing for the remaining resources and while they're obscured by corporate names and nondescript positions on various boards, we'll name a few here, OK? I mean, where does the control really lie? It lies with those able to bend perception that's where. The trend setters. The opinion makers. The people that tell you what to think. These men are on the boards of the major media outlets AND the components of the military/industrial complex, BOTH.

The Controllers - The Global Dominance Group and Information Control

A long thread of sociological research documents the existence of a dominant ruling class in the US, which sets policy and determines national political priorities. C. Wright Mills, in his 1956 book The Power Elite, documented how World War II solidified a trinity of power in the US that comprised corporate, military and government elites in a centralized power structure working in unison through “higher circles” of contact and agreement. This power has grown through the Cold War and, after 9/11, the Global War on Terror. This is the power we should fear and this is the power that controls the globe, not the Rothschilds.

At present, the global dominance agenda includes penetration into the boardrooms of the corporate media in the US. Only 118 people comprise the membership on the boards of director of the ten big media giants. These 118 individuals in turn sit on the corporate boards of 288 national and international corporations. Four of the top 10 media corporations share board of director positions with the major defense contractors including:

William Kennard: New York Times, Carlyle Group

Douglas Warner III, GE (NBC), Bechtel

John Bryson: Disney (ABC), Boeing

Alwyn Lewis: Disney (ABC), Halliburton

Douglas McCorkindale: Gannett, Lockheed-Martin.

Given an interlocked media network of connections with defense and other economic sectors, big media in the United States effectively represent the interests of corporate America and corporate America with the military is the controller of global events. Media critic and historian Norman Solomon described the close financial and social links between the boards of large media-related corporations and Washington’s foreign-policy establishment: “One way or another, a military-industrial complex now extends to much of corporate media.” The Homeland Security Act Title II Section 201(d)(5) provides an example of the interlocked military-industrial-media complex. This Act specifically asks the directorate to “develop a comprehensive plan for securing the key resources and critical infrastructure of the United States including information technology and telecommunications systems (including satellites) emergency preparedness communications systems.”

The media elite, a key component of the Higher Circle Policy Elite in the US, are the watchdogs of acceptable ideological messages, the controllers of news and information content, and the decision makers regarding media resources. Their goal is to create symbiotic global news distribution in a deliberate attempt to control the news and information available to society. The two most prominent methods used to accomplish this task are censorship and propaganda. These tools are then used to forward the military/corporate agenda which is war for resource acquisition for profit.

Sometimes the sensationalist and narrow media coverage of news is blamed upon the need to meet a low level of public taste and thereby capture the eyes of a sufficient market to lure advertisers and to make a profit. But another goal of cornering the marketplace on what news and views will be aired is also prominent. Billionaire Rupert Murdoch loses $50 million a year on the NY Post, billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife loses $2 to $3 million a year on the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, billionaire Philip Anschutz loses around $5 million a year on The Weekly Standard, and billionaire Sun Myung Moon has lost $2 to $3 billion on The Washington Times. The losses in supporting conservative media are part of a strategy of ideological control. They also buy bulk quantities of ultra-conservative books bringing them to the top of the NY Times bestseller list and then give away copies to “subscribers” to their websites and publications. They fund conservative “think tanks” like Heritage and Cato with hundreds of millions of dollars a year. All this buys them respectability and a megaphone. Even though William Kristol’s publication, the Standard, is a money-loser, his association with it has often gotten him on TV talk shows and a column with The New York Times. Sponsorships of groups like Grover Norquist’s anti-tax “Americans for Tax Reform” regularly get people like him front-and-center in any debate on taxation in the United States. This has contributed to extensive tax cuts for the wealthy and the most unfair tax laws of any industrialized country – all found acceptable by a public relying upon sound-bites about the dangers of ‘big government.’ Hence media corporation officials and others in the health care, energy and weapons industries remain wealthier than ordinary people can imagine. Their expenditures for molding opinion are better understood as investments in a conservative public ideology.


By the time of the Gulf War in 1991, retired colonels, generals and admirals had become mainstays in network TV studios during wartime. Language such as “collateral damage” and “smart bombs” flowed effortlessly between journalists and military men, who shared perspectives on the occasionally mentioned but more rarely seen civilians killed by U.S. firepower. This clearly foreshadowed the structure of “embedded” reporting in the second Iraq War, where mainstream corporate journalists literally lived with the troops and had to submit all reports for military review. A related militarization of news studies by Diane Farsetta at the Center for Media Democracy documented a related introduction of bias. These investigations showed Pentagon propaganda penetration on mainstream corporate news in the guise of retired Generals as “experts” or pundits who turned out to be nothing more than paid shills for government war policy. This is how the real controllers of the power facilitate their plans and Rothschild has nothing to do with it.

The problem then becomes more complex. What happens to a society that begins to believe such lies as truth? The run up to the 2003 war in Iraq concerning weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) is a case in point. It illustrates the power of propaganda in creating not only public support for an ill-begotten war, but also reduces the possibility of a peace movement, even when fueled by the truth, to stop a war based on falsehoods. The current war in Iraq was the most globally protested war in recorded history. This did nothing to stop it and has done little to end it even under a Democratic president who promised such on the campaign trail. The candidate of “hope and change,” with peace groups in tow, has proven to be dependent upon the same interests in foreign policy that got the US into war in the first place.

All of these people are the movers and shakers that are responsible for US global policy and if you think Rothschild has a hand in US global foreign policy you've got another thing coming. And if you think there's anything stronger than the US juggernaut that's moving forward to establish global government, you've got another thing coming.

While everyone is focused on the Rothschilds the real culprits are robbing the warehouse.

Like everything else on the planet, this move towards global government is centered and controlled by interests right here in the US.

If you're going to argue against my position here please do so with facts and text or don't bother. I don't want to watch videos or look at charts conceived by who knows who. Just because you post something doesn't make it true.