The End of Entropy: A Look at Our Entropic World and the Evidence Supporting How We Could Change This

The End of Entropy:

A Look at Our Entropic World and the Evidence Supporting How We Could Change This

by Amaterasu Solar

Entropy… That measure of disorder that increases as energy is dissipated into unusable forms effects many aspects of our present human condition. It is easy to grasp the principle as it pertains directly to heat. We see the energy of a fire heat our food, but we also can see a great deal of heat going out unused and unusable. This extra heat can be seen as increasing the disorder, as the molecules affected move more rapidly and more disorderedly. A more difficult aspect to see is the entropy inherent in our social structure.

In Jeremy Rifkin’s seminal work Entropy, published in 1980, he does an excellent job of demonstrating that, because energy is at the base of life, itself, entropy can ripple through society, creating disorder even as we try to clamp down and control the order of things. In fact, he paints a very grim picture of what we can expect as we consume more and more energy, explaining that fascist tendencies are most likely to crop up in the efforts to overcome entropy in our society. Today we see more and more signs of encroaching fascism.

The reason why energy and its entropy are tied in to our social structures is made clear by Rifkin in his work (p. 89):

… Every time we add our labor to a product or perform a service we expend energy and increase the overall entropy of the environment. Every time we exchange money for a product or a service, the legal tender we use represents payment for previous energy that we expend. Money, after all, is nothing more than stored energy credits.

If money is merely the accounting of the available energy, it becomes clear that should an energy source come along that has the properties of being effectively infinite, available from anywhere, and negentropic (from “negative entropy”), the need for money dissipates. “Infinite money” has no social application.

In fact, because of our limited available energy and the money system developed to account for it, it is clear why we have a “power” elite, as well as poverty and exploitation. Rifkin explains (p. 57):

Energy is the basis of human culture, just as it is the basis of life. Therefore, power in every society ultimately belongs to whoever controls the exosomatic [external] instruments that are used to transform, exchange, and discard energy. Class divisions, exploitations, privilege, and poverty are all determined by how a society’s energy flow line is set up. Those who control the exosomatic instruments control the energy flow line. They determine how the work in society will be divided up and how the economic rewards will be allocated among various groups and constituencies.

Given this, it becomes clear that if such an infinite, available, negentropic source of energy were to be introduced, power over others would give way to individual autonomous power over self but no others. This can be seen as a major shift in Consciousness on this planet.

This all sounds hypothetical, a waste of time to contemplate even, to the average individual who has been told that we are stuck with the many entropic sources of energy we presently use (which also are sources we have to pay for). “Where is this miracle source?” they might ask.

And here is where I bring up the “Dark” Energy that is now heralded all over science shows about physics and cosmology. This energy, which has been called “radiant energy” and “cosmic rays” (Tesla), “orgone” (Wilhelm Reich), “Zero Point Energy,” and many others, is pervading space. It is within you and within me, around all of us, and is present anywhere we go. Interestingly, though we are told of this energy (usually as “Dark” Energy), no mainstream media (MSM) outlet has asked the most logical question: Can we extract this energy in usable form?

In fact, back in the 1950’s, the science of electrogravitics was being discussed openly in the aerospace literature, an industry that was studying electrogravitics at all the major players: Martin, Convair, Lear, Raytheon, Sperry, and many others. The discussion vanished in the latter part of that decade; it just wasn’t discussed anymore, despite the fact that so many companies had been drawn into the electrogravitics arena. Reports were that, “They want it secret for now.” Electrogravitics could draw on this energy and create overunity – free energy, in other words. So why was this a threat?

The reasons for these occurrences – that the media never ask if we can draw on the Dark Energy, that electrogravitics became highly classified – become clear when we look at the fact that those presently in power would have to give up their power over others (having already power over themselves). From the perspective of those few, they would “lose.”

Such an energy source would represent, at least, a virtually infinite source that is available to all. Any attribution of a negentropic aspect comes from reports from a number of sources suggesting that cold, not heat, is the defining characteristic of drawing on this source. These reports and the surrounding research and data have surely been suppressed – at least to the extent of not reporting on it and never, ever asking whether we can get something usable from “Dark” Energy. It would be a naïve position at best to expect the present power elite to ignore and NOT suppress and disparage any efforts to develop this source in usable form.

And so, it would appear that we have had methods of extracting usable forms of energy from the “Dark” Energy pool, called the plenum (opposite of “vacuum,” from a root which means “empty” – “plenum” means “full”) for at least 100 years (Tesla seems to have developed such methods). And we might conclude that the power elite wish to remain in their place of power over others, else they would have released the means to extract usable energy to the public. (There is strong evidence of suppression of many “free” energy devices, from hydrogen-from-water devices through magnetic devices, as well as the Plenum Energy methods.)

The question now becomes, what would happen if we had this energy available to all of us? The answer depends on how we, as a planetary society, approach the matter.

Since we’re examining society, it helps to understand that it moves and emerges in fractal expressions from a relatively small seed set of parameters. Up until now, the fractal seeds of all societies in history have included scarcity of energy (which is reflected in the scarcity of goods and money), and thus we see emerging greed, conspiracy, poverty, power elite, wage slavery and many other ills. If we look for a seed that gives an overarching structure for a society’s development in the advent of having such a source of energy available, and take advantage of what media we can to raise awareness to the tipping point of the goals and precepts we define, the society that fractalizes out of that seed will be strong, healthy, and unrestrictive – provided the seed is geared to that end.

The key things that must be addressed are:

A code of conduct
Our approach to the Earth and how we bring forth the abundance she has to give
How open we will be on code and programs for our machines
How necessary work gets done
How we communicate and identify the primary issues
What focus in life should be stressed

If we seed our society with a code of conduct, calling to the fore the three Laws – which are:

Do not willfully harm or kill another Being
Do not willfully take or damage another Being’s property
Do not willfully defraud another Being

this sets one parameter of the seed to ethics.

If we insist that all farming be organic – in its true sense, and not some trumped up legal definition – our food will grow ever better. If we insist that mining is done with a conscious awareness for retaining beauty and structure, our impact will be small and repairable. If we insist that manufacturing be done such that it is free of pollutants, our planet will remain healthy and abundant. If we are using the Plenum Energy, the energy we use will be clean (and fracture drilling, oil pumping, coal mining, rain forest clearing and other nasty behaviors and consequences associated with petrofuels will be eliminated). If we set this parameter of the seed with the drive to be thoughtful of our planet, our planet will thrive.

If we demand open-source in all technology, we remove fears of machines “taking over.” Code can be looked at, published on the web – and better code will be worked out by those whose bliss it is to program things. A distrust of proprietary code (or any other hidden thing) should be promoted. Such a setting in this parameter of the seed will bring forth the best we can create.

By creating robots to do all the necessary work no one (or not enough people) wants to, we release ourselves to do what we enjoy – we are released from slavery, having cast it off onto our machines. This seed parameter is one only now available to humanity. Never before in our history have we had the option to create mechanical slaves for every “dirty job.” Therefore, it, along with the addition of a negentropic energy source, will provide a frame for unique emergence, a new societal framework, a new consciousness.

With a central website, in forum style, to address major issues – divided into local sections, regional sections and global sections, with “votes” at a certain level elevating the problems and solutions to the next level to be voted on by a greater number – we can collectively coordinate to solve the issues of this planet. Social responsibility will be seen as spending 15 minutes a day (or more) reviewing the issues on this site. This seed parameter will see an emergence of human unity as a race and as a planet.

Setting a focus of fulfilling one’s own bliss, exchanging the “work ethic” for a Betterment Ethic, will see very much happier people, and far better results of efforts made – a job is done far better by someone who loves to do it than by one who feels compelled against their main desire. No job will be required to live well, but any job one wants to do is open to be done. I quote again from Rifkin’s Entropy (p. 210) to illustrate the differences between the scarcity paradigm and the new abundance paradigm, as it relates to work:

… [T]he authoritarian structure of the workplace robs the individual worker of a chance to join in a community with his fellows to make decisions and develop his talents. Unable to join with others to explore his potential and creativity, the individual is forced to retreat into a shell in which he has neither meaningful rights nor responsibilities at his work. All he is left with is a job, a place to make money, and a degrading environment to which he must submit, eight hours of every day.

Thus we can see how a seed parameter of encouraging one to follow one’s bliss – since in this new paradigm one can – uplifts each one of us and increases the value of consciousness in society.

Having described the seed, how might it be expected to manifest? One of the first products that is likely to be seen are “power boxes,” which will be sold, initially. These would be units that had a mechanism to draw on the Plenum Energy and outlets to plug in our air conditioners, stoves, heaters, refrigerators, freezers, and so forth. This would allow us to move anywhere and bring our comfort items with us. We could “go camping” and still have our amenities, and many will. Eventually these items will each have their own units within.

As the cost of energy is removed from the production line at every stage, things will become less and less expensive, and at some point, will be given freely.

Other observables will include:

Money falling into disuse
Motivation from the heart as opposed to profit
“Greed” becomes meaningless
Peace
Abundance for everyone
Elimination of corruption
Power over others supplanted by power over self
Elimination of GMO’s
Great reduction in violence
Creative pursuits increased greatly
A healed planet
Reduced or eliminated hoarding
Value placed on human-created art, textiles and products
Focus on cures, not patentable chemicals that sicken for profit motive
Human interaction with only those whose company is enjoyable (reduced social friction)
Robotic stewardship of the planet
Increased love and compassion
Greatly reduced stress
Wondrous works
“Live and let live” behavior
Most “laws” become unnecessary
Corporate power eliminated
Products made to last – no “planned obsolescence”
Waste reduced to virtually nil
Food nutrition increased for all
One’s reputation becomes the “coin” one uses
Personal responsibility for one’s own behavior
Spiritual growth
Slavery (outright or wage-slavery) abolished
Human dignity encouraged
Increase in charitable behavior
Self autonomy
Things are done because someone cares – from raising children to caring for others

From this list, it is clear that many issues we now face will be solved. Wealth will be measured in richness of character, rather than in deposits to a bank account. And we will spend our time doing what we like to do, being with the people we like and share interests with. Inventions, rather than being suppressed, will burgeon, and the “Star Trek universe” may be within our grasp, with things like transporters and replicators emerging.

And spiritual growth and communication will be encouraged as we find a greater amount of our time available to pursue the exploration of our inner dimension.

And though this is not a solution to every issue arising from human interaction – we will always have our personal disagreements – the overall health of society will skyrocket. Yes, we may still argue with others over the smaller issues in our lives, and some may choose to behave violently, but the numbers of occurrences will drop to a level we would consider statistically insignificant. Definitely a vast improvement over what we see today.

When you consider what I present here, ask yourself these questions:

Does this threaten a pet vision – passing laws, say, to solve a problem you see, or a view of striking it rich – that you have of your future? Does this scare you? Do you look for reasons that it won’t work? (All you envision as barrier issues – are scarcity paradigm views…)

Then ask yourself why working towards what I present here won’t solve the issue you want to solve, why you wouldn’t be rich in what I show to you, why it wouldn’t fulfill your idea of heaven, why you are afraid, and/or why you look for reasons it won’t work – rather than apply the proactive will to make this happen.

If we each choose to create this, since we have all it would take, consciously co-creating towards this goal, what I present would happen. It would take enough of us reaching a tipping point before it would all be downhill, and you may choose your future behavior. Speak for abundance, or reduce the chances that this will ever happen by keeping silent.

In closing, I recommend any who work for someone else and also are privy to information (such as methods of extracting usable energy from the plenum) give strong consideration to coming forth with what is known. In the end, you and all of us will be better off – and even today’s power elite will retain their life style, if not their power over us.

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by cheeki kea on April 25, 2020 at 7:10am: That's a fair bit of info to digest Amaterasu, I haven't seen any free energy arrive yet. There's power converted from hydro, sola, wind, thermal, and maybe sea, but it's provided at big cost - and a constant supply at any one time can't be guaranteed. I do think it's possible to limit our use of money and snap the chains of the Banking elites and tax grabbers where it herts, to the benefit of ourselves. ( simply declining their offers of loans is a big disincentive for them, or refusing to adhere to insurance conditions, or telling them to recall your loan then watching them not do it, refusing to pay counter transaction fees and telling them remove name in capitals from eftpos cards etc, are all actions I have taken to success to achieve control over them. As well as taking my money out of the bank )

Comment by Amaterasu Solar on August 14, 2013 at 4:38pm: Hon... I am severely mathematically challenged. I see a bunch of squigglies... [shrug]

I can add, subtract, multiply and divide...

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on August 14, 2013 at 12:07pm

Helmholtz equation, used in Comm sat setups as well

An elliptic partial differential equation given by where is a scalar function and is the scalar Laplacian, or

where is a vector function and is the vector Laplacian

Comment by truth on August 14, 2013 at 11:58am: fyi Amaterasu Solar Interview - The Voice of Humanity - UCY.TV http://ning.it/19TKGf9

Comment by Amaterasu Solar on August 14, 2013 at 11:44am: I am unfamiliar with the Helmholtz equation, so I'm not sure how it relates to social entropy - which is what I discuss here.

The concept that We will use up everything is likely based on the model of money-as-debt We are living in where We have to ever go further into debt to sustain the money supply, which in turn demands things like planned obsolescence - which accounts for vast amounts of waste - and consumerism. Rather, society can become "stagnant" in any economic sense, and it won't mater. Currency will be social: reputation, appreciation, thanks, lauds, love, admiration, name recognition, fame, Self-satisfaction.

Without the need for money, planned obsolescence becomes a detriment, food can be distributed fresh and organic to all, eliminating all the tons of food waste a month as things go bad before sale.

And it's not a "technological fix" I offer. Energy is the foundation of Our exchange-to-survive economic model. This is a new economic model based on adding what money represents in effectively infinite amounts. It ends poverty, wage/debt slavery, removes the psychopaths who have matriculated to the top of the money/power heap (as will always happen in a money system), levels the field to an egalitarian system rather than a hierarchical system.

Also... I am not "develop[ing] the theory." It is a PLAN, not a theory, and is fully developed. [smile]

Comment by Adam Cherson on August 13, 2013 at 3:06pm: Interesting discussion by Amaterasu Solar. I would like to raise to points for your consideration as you develop the theory. Keep in mind that when I refer to 'free' energy it is not in the economic sense of energy costing nothing, but in the physical sense of energy available to do work.

1) There is an equation attributed to Helmholtz that says: A=U-TS, where A is free energy, U is internal energy, T is temperature and S is entropy. I find this equation to be as important as E=MC^2 (in fact E=MC^2 could perhaps substitute for the U; I leave that to the physicists to hammer out). Anyhow, this equation expresses not only the entire environmental challenge facing humanity (which is that S is increasing faster and faster), but also encapsulates what Amaterasu is saying, I believe. Amaterasu is suggesting a technology where A= U and there is either no entropy to deduct (or even a positive amount of negentropy to add?). The only limitation here would be the base amount of U and since the Sun keeps injecting new U things would remain balanced for a very long time. However, energy generation is not the only source of entropy and thus my next point.

2) There is an implication of unlimited energy that may have been addressed elsewhere on the blog, and I think has been discussed in the wider world from time to time and that is this: unlimited, cost-free energy could pose a problem to biodiversity and other depletable resources and therefore the amount of free energy (in the physical sense) could still be threatened. The paradox here is that once energy limitations are removed from the system and productivity/expansion/growth are unrestrained, a number of other limitations, or other forms of entropy, would quickly arise to take energy's place. I suppose one could argue that unlimited energy would allow any other limitation to be overcome, but I'm not sure if this is true due to the time factors involved in the creation of biodiversity and natural resources. Instead there could be a situation of having unlimited, cost-free energy and nothing that could be done with all that energy due to the exhaustion of other necessary inputs to both life on Earth and technological production. To return to the equation, this would mean that in spite of a negentropic U to A technology, the S could still be growing faster than the U is growing, leading once again to the same environmental challenges faced today.

3) I guess what I am saying is that energy is not the only factor in the Helmholtz equation. There are other causes for increases in S and that these causes need to be also addressed in planning for the future. I suppose it is conceivable that this new negentropic technology could be reversing the entropy from other causes in which case I say: ole! Absent that I would warn against putting all the eggs in the basket of this one technological fix.

Comment by Amaterasu Solar on November 2, 2012 at 12:35pm: @ Ken Brodeur More and more are awaking to the implications of free energy on Human society and the monetary system used to account for meaningful energy expended. I am out spreading this information, contacting organizations, tweeting, emailing... All help towards that end is appreciated, and in the end, Humanity will be grateful. [smile]

Thank You for Your appreciation and factual information.

Comment by Ken Brodeur on November 2, 2012 at 12:06pm: Way to go Amaterasu Solar! It is also little known, that Thomas Edison, who helped Tesla by offering him a job at his laboratories, was working on individual powerplants for the home. Menlo Park, the home of Edison's laboratories, was burned to the ground and Edison never again pursued powerplants for individuals. It is circumstantial evidence to point to Morgan and his banker friends that they destroyed Menlo Park and wanted to control energy in the form of powerplants which would distribute energy to homes. Never before in human history was a powersystem centralized as such. Power in historical terms came from fire for warmth, cooking and building so the need for resources such as wood was an individual effort and economy. It may have been controlled, like not gleening from the King's Forest, but never to the extent of Electric Companies.

Between such ideas as Thorium Nuclear Reactors, Water Engines, Wind mills, etc, there has been and hopefully will be such developments in the near future to return energy production to the home and business.

Obviously, our current paradigm is unsustainable and will change, for the good or bad of the humankind. I am an eternal optimist, the only question for me is how many of us are heading for the sustainable outcome you and I see?