writer takes a broader perspective. That broader being one addressing the importance of enforcing adherence to the the Rule of Law and Due Process; both of which are not only statutory requirements but Constitutional and Natural Law Rights of every person. (Before we go farther, this writer asserts that he would write the same article if theroles of the parties were reversed.) This article is a follow up to the latest hearing relating to this matter from January 10, 2014 and a call to action for the upcoming January 27, 2014 hearing for Lawyer Michelle
MacDonald.

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Martin Luther King Jr.,

[The next round in this battle against injustice occurs, Monday, January 27, 2014 at 9 AM Dakota County District Court, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN. State of
Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota, Court file no. 19HA-CR-13-2934]

Let us begin with an intellectual and emotional appetizer
intended to make you non-lawyer types hungry for the rest of the story.

Imagine finding yourself in this scenario, you and your
spouse have been married nearly 20 years. You have built a successful
business and have five children. To settle the Divorce, you agree to
take the family home of 14 years and have custody of your 5 children
while letting your spouse have parenting time, the business, and other
properties.

Somewhere along the line your spouse sits you and the 5
children down at the table with a gun and says either “you are going to
kill everyone” or “you are only going to kill yourself”.

More than a year after the divorce is settled, you find
out about a hearing that you were not party to. With no evidentiary
hearing or finding of fact, Sheriffs inform you must be out of the house
and cannot tell the children why. You drop the children off at school
and go home and pack only the one bag that the Sheriff’s deputy will let
you pack. Everything else is lost to you. The children are to be taken
care of by an undisclosed third party. And you leave your home of 14
years.

A year later, during a hearing to restore the divorce
agreement and regain custody of the children, your lawyer is arrested
during the hearing for reasons yet unknown and you are told to leave, as
obviously the hearing will not continue. You take the files and other
property left in the court room so they do not become “lost”. You later
learn that after you left, the Judge resumed the hearing with your lawyer in handcuffs, without glasses, shoes, files or a client….

Later you find that the children are back with your spouse, but two of them have run away and not been seen in months.

That should be enough to get your attention and peak your interest.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.

Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

With that literary appetizer consumed, this writer hopes that
the reader will find this writer’s perspective unique and thought
provoking enough to be moved to action.

This writer sat in the Federal Court room in St. Paul, MN on January 10, 2014 and heard Judge Susan
Richard Nelson ask Lawyer Michelle McDonald to produce Case Law
Citations from the Federal 8th Circuit Court. As this writer listened,
the following thought began to take root in this writers mind:

• Can anyone wearing black robes arbitrarily deprive any US citizen of their Unalienable Natural Law Rights?

And with that thought, this writer set about answering
this question using this thought process from one of his favorite
recurring tweets:

• You know those neat tricks & observations they use to
  catch the bad guys in major media and Hollywood shows? You need to start
  using them on your government.

@DMashak on Twitter (abbreviations & truncations removed)

And so we begin to use those neat tricks and observations to try to make sense of what has transpired and how Federal Judge Susan Richard Nelson should rule. In the case of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, the facts of interest to this writer are....

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/GHVbMEQ35j

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact
your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of
repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the
local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if
this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still
likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training
junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same
“livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our
#Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money
for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time
without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of
our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.