Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on July 19, 2014 at 5:04pm

The purpose seems to be to discredit alternative media as crackpots by joining alternative media and posting as crackpots ("madman")

In this case 12160 is used as sosial proof for being alternative media "commentators"

They pose as crackpots => 12160 are crackpots

Gaza war

... there are all kind of stats, but I don't want to go into that ... who killed who [?] ... no no no [?]

There are conflicting "stats" about who killed who in Gaza .... rubbish all the way

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ragnarok on July 19, 2014 at 6:48pm

Just to say it short. Point is that MANY NOT ALL of these 'alternative media' and so-called 'investigative journalists' never comes out side their small 4 wall confinement using only undocumented and/or manipulated make believe pseudo news articles to make their own gibberish articles that unfortunately creates internet sensationalism on some sites and which in the bigger picture totally discredits the people who just want to show a bigger picture without imprinting their own ideas/agendas onto their readers/followers and/or making easy bucks feeding of naivetivity. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on July 19, 2014 at 10:03pm

They talk gibberish

(it is not real alternativists who talk gibberish)

Daniel: Just to say it short. Point is that MANY NOT ALL of these 'alternative media' and so-called 'investigative journalists' never comes out side their small 4 wall confinement using only undocumented and/or manipulated make believe pseudo news articles ..

??

First we are told alternativists lack contact "with reality" .. now this

Have you any example of real bloggers talking gibberish?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ragnarok on July 20, 2014 at 6:26am

Look im saying the exact same thing in both posts just different words of choice. All roads leads to Rome.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on July 20, 2014 at 7:21am

Point is that MANY NOT ALL of these 'alternative media' and so-called 'investigative journalists'  ...  to make their own gibberish articles 

"many [?] not all"

[?] should be what?

The "real" investigative journalists are those who are paid to do a job and sacked if conclusions are not political correct?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ragnarok on July 20, 2014 at 7:29am

To carve it out in platinum it means A FEW ARE NOT time wasters. But only a few.! 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on July 20, 2014 at 7:34am

Because what they say has been said before (true), or because what they say is crap?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ragnarok on July 20, 2014 at 7:53am

I  will leave that question unanswered.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on July 20, 2014 at 8:14am

ok

Daniel Nielsen http://12160.info/forum/topics/heya-do-many-of-you-ats?commentId=26...

... attention whores, mental cases who just makes silly paranoid stories up and link it to whatever they hear, ...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ragnarok on July 20, 2014 at 8:41am

The old broken record.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on July 20, 2014 at 8:57am

I am listening to an intelligent attention whore with lots of paranoid stories

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEV5AFFcZ-s

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ragnarok on July 20, 2014 at 9:14am

A smart dude feeding of people who unfortunately dont know any better than by giving him their hard earned cash to tell them what the want to hear.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page