This is a teaser for an article that I posted on my Blog
MINNESOTA JUDICIAL REFORM
AND ACCOUNTABILITY. It includes Proposed Legislation that I have sent to my Minnesota US 6th District Representative, Michele Bachmann. In my humble opinion, this should be the single most important issue of the 2012 Elections.
Upon reading my article and proposed legislation, I believe you will reach the same conclusion that I have: Sovereign Immunity is a fraud. It was not provided for in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. It results from a deliberate and fraudulent Judicial Interpretation to the 11th Amendment. Sovereign Immunity is what prevents WE THE PEOPLE from suing and holding accountable our Elected Officials, Judges, Government and Government Agencies and Government Bureaucrats. For we rank and file citizens, the political party that you belong to should not be a consideration in supporting this proposed legislation. After reading my article, I believe you will be as angry and motivated for this proposed reform as I am.
If Upon reading this, you find yourself in agreement with my assessment and proposed Legislation Please contact
Representative Michele Bachmann at the following voice and fax numbers.
Washington D.C. Office 103 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515
Phone:
(202) 225-2331 Fax:
(202) 225-6475 Woodbury Office 6043 Hudson Rd, Suite 330 Woodbury, MN 55125
Phone:
651-731-5400 Fax:
651-731-6650 St. Cloud/Waite Park Office 110 2nd Street S, Suite 232 Waite Park, MN 56387
Phone:
320-253-5931 Fax:
320-240-6905 LEGAL EVIL? In their own words - Revised and Updated to include Pro... With the US Judiciary's reputation for integrity and honesty firmly embedded in the minds of WE THE PEOPLE, what standing does any single Citizen have to challenge their reputations? To overcome this handicap, I will use the American Legal System’s own words to expose the true nature of their integrity and character.
Let us begin with the words of former FBI director J Edgar Hoover:
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.''
Next, I am going to use the words of Judges themselves. Judges allege that they reach conclusions by citing existing case law aka previous rulings of judges.
In my research on immunity for Judges and States, I was astonished and dismayed to learn the liberties the Judges had taken, and leaps of logic they had used, to interpret and write case law and rules in their favor.
The first cases I will cite are:
Wiggins v Hess (1976, CA8 Mo) 531 F2d 920
"Judicial immunity applies even when judge acts maliciously and corruptly; judge loses his immunity from liability for damages in violation of 42 USCS &1983 ONLY if he acts in clear absence of jurisdiction."
and:
Holloway v Walker (1985, CA5 Tex) 765 F2d 517
"Judges absolute immunity from suit under 42 USCS & 1983 for actions take under jurisdiction is not avoided by allegation that the acts are performed pursuant to bribe or conspiracy."......
To read the rest of the story and the proposed reform bill for free please click here:
Minnesota Judicial Reform and Accountability
Those were my thoughts.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
DON MASHAK'S CHALLENGE TO ALL USA POLITICAL PARTIES!
Don Mashak | Facebook
Don Mashak - Quora
Don Mashak - Examiner.com
Don Mashak (dmashak) - Digg
Don Mashak's Minnesota 10th Judicial District Free Press