Listen / Download mp3

Here’s a picture worth more than a thousand words.  The picture on the left is Black and White and looks like an execution about to happen.  The picture on the right is Black and White – it looks like a rescue.  The whole picture, in living color, is a lot more ambiguous, but it is true.  Context is everything.  Sometimes truth is harder to figure out than simple Black and White Left/Right false constructs.  Free men and women, however, given good information, will figure things out for themselves.

Somebody a lot smarter than me once pointed out that if you don't stand for something; you'll fall for anything.  Free men and women (the Greek word for that is "liberal") stand for something.  This past weekend has been very busy for psychopaths creating "False Flags." 

• Case Study: Syria
• Case study:  LAX shootings

Our guest for this episode is Ziad Amin Abu Fadel of  Syrian Perspective.  Co-hosts are Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, and Brandon Turbeville. Occupy Syria reached out to OASN Occupy America for support.  This episode began on our twitter feed, one of the new features here in Version 3.0 (check it out on the right hand side of the page, about half way down.)  Fake action, False Reaction - that is what a false flag operation does.

Duck - Decoy Paradigm

Duck Hunters use decoys - smart ducks learn that decoys equal predators.  If you see a fake action, expect a false reaction.  Try not to pay much further attention to the decoy, once you spot it  - because that is what a decoy is for.  Lets pay attention to this decoy just to get used to being able to spot it.

The LAX shooting makes a great example.  We'll call this X (for unknown) LAX (LAX is the abbreviation for the airport, or X-LAX.  You just knew what was coming because it is the same lame, proven-reliable act we all have seem too many times.  It would be laughable, except psychopaths kill real people when they make jokes.  The other 96% of the population doesn't think killing people is funny - it just stinks.

Just as real ducks get better and better at spotting decoys, (and learn to avoid them,) decoys have to get more and more complex to keep being effective.  Complexity, however, leads to things going wrong.  One big X-LAX  screwup was getting caught at trying to discredit the media (see poison well.)  Some media reports said the shooter was a TSA employee.  Independent journalists could document and confirm these unknowns.  Other independent "journalists" quickly "discredit" these "reports."  They, in turn, prove to be discredited.  The ducks are adapting, quicker than the predators.

Episode Co-host Brandon Turbeville wrote 11 Signs of a False Flag: think of it as a "Decoy Checklist. During the episode, he was about to talk about "Sign 3" when we lost communications. 

"1. High Profile Event: The first question to ask would be “Is this a high profile incident?” The answer, of course, is fairly obvious. If an attack takes place at the World Trade Center complex causing the buildings to explode and collapse, or if it takes place at the White House, or Pentagon, it is clearly high profile. Thus, the location can be factored in. In other circumstances, however, the act itself may be the major factor such as the case in Sandy Hook Elementary School, a nationally unimportant location but a horrific act that made national news nonetheless. The most important factor, of course, is media attention. Regardless of location or the act, if the media picks up the story and runs it simultaneously on all major mainstream channels, the incident can be considered a “high profile event.”

"2. Changing Stories: In informed researching circles, it is well-known that the information that comes out shortly after the event is usually the most reliable. This is not to discount the existence of confusion related to panicked reports coming from eyewitnesses and the like. However, the information coming out early on has not yet been subjected to the top-down media revision that will inevitably take place as the story becomes molded to fit the narrative pushed by the individuals who either directed the attack at the higher levels or at least have connections with those who are able to control the manner in which various media outlets report the event.

"For instance, in times of false flag attacks, the initial reports may point to 5 gunmen. Very shortly after, reports may only mention two. Only a few hours after the attack, however, all references to more than one gunmen are removed entirely, with only the “lone gunman” story remaining. Any other mention of additional gunmen after this point is ridiculed as “conspiracy theory.”

"3. Simultaneous Drills: One hallmark of the false flag operation is the running of drills shortly before or during the actual attack. Many times, these drills will involve the actual sequence of events that takes place during the real life attack . These drills have been present on large scale false flags such as 9/11 as well as smaller scale attacks like the Aurora shooting.

"For instance, as Webster Tarpley documents in his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made In USA, at least 46 drills were underway in the months leading up to 9/11 and on the morning of the attack. These 46 drills were all directly related to the events which took place on 9/11 in some way or other.[1] Likewise, the 7/7 bombings in London were running drills of exactly the same scenario that was occurring at exactly the same times and locations.

"Although one reason may take precedence over the other depending on the nature and purpose of the operation drills are used by false flag operators for at least two reasons. One such purpose is the creation of intentional confusion if the drill is taking place during the actual attack. The other, more effective aspect, however, is using the drill as a cloak to plan the attack or even “go live” when it comes time to launch the event. Even more so, it gives the individuals who are involved in the planning of the event an element of cover, especially with the military/intelligence agency’s tight chain of command structure and need-to-know basis. If a loyal military officer or intelligence agent stumbles upon the planning of the attack, that individual can always be told that what he has witnessed is nothing more than the planning of a training exercise. This deniability continues all the way through to the actual “going live” of the drill. After the completion of the false flag attack, Coincidence Theory is used to explain away the tragic results.[2]

more @ http://occupyamericasocialnetwork.com/article/occupy-false-flag-101