by Walter Williams

Let’s think about whether all acts of Congress deserve our respect and obedience. Suppose Congress enacted a law – and the Supreme Court ruled it constitutional – requiring American families to attend church services at least three times a month. Should we obey such a law? Suppose Congress, acting under the Constitution’s commerce clause, enacted a law requiring motorists to get eight hours of sleep before driving on interstate highways. Its justification might be that drowsy motorists risk highway accidents and accidents affect interstate commerce. Suppose you were a jury member during the 1850s and a free person were on trial for assisting a runaway slave, in clear violation of the Fugitive Slave Act. Would you vote to convict and punish?

A moral person would find each one of those laws either morally repugnant or to be a clear violation of our Constitution. You say, “Williams, you’re wrong this time. In 1859, in Ableman v. Booth, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 constitutional.” That court decision, as well as some others in our past, makes my case. Moral people can’t rely solely on the courts to establish what’s right or wrong. Slavery is immoral; therefore, any laws that support slavery are also immoral. In the words of Thomas Jefferson, “to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions (is) a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Soon, the Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of Obamacare, euphemistically titled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. There is absolutely no constitutional authority for Congress to force any American to enter into a contract to buy any good or service. But if the court rules that Obamacare is constitutional, what should we do?

Continue reading: http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/should-we-obey-all-laws/

Views: 708

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Q: Should we obey all laws?

A: Only the ones that are legal

If it's not written in the Supreme Law of the Land (Constitution, Bill of Rights) then it shouldn't apply because some bureaucratic law makers cited a precedent for ruling in a court proceeding. 

Legal is a subjective abstraction. Asking me what is legal is like asking a person what is cool, or what is good. If legal is defined by that which is written into law, or ascribed to law, from that standpoint I would say, subjectively, that which is legal is not inherently lawful :p

Lol high five brother.

Mala en se and Mala prohibita are very different animals. All law, lawful or not, carries force with it.

Law, if not enforceable is impotent. Legal is only a state of moral consience on ethics or beliefs. The Criminal Justice System is only a theory but has the trappings of fact. If you don't get caught then it is not illegal.....:) Semper Fi

Just a little fun for me......:)

I like your sense of 'fun'. It carries the weight of reality with it.

well...You might obey, migrate or stand up, express your dissent and fight for your rights...

"I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do." Robert A. Heinlein

just in case no one has brought this to every ones attention! the FEDS have no power to effect anyone in the USA unless you have perhaps some interstate business. the CONGRESS has no direct control over anyone. what they have power over is to regulate. what they have done is make people believe that the FEDS may regulate everyone within the USA. this is a BS rumor and brainwashing! mostly thru the hmmmm, GOV. schools, and the MASS MAIN STREAM MEDIA! Most of the laws we all live with are state LAWS, not federal laws. FACT: there is no such thing as a FEDERAL LAW, they are all regulations! [C.F.R.= CODE of FEDERAL REGULATIONS] COME BEFORE THE STATUTES ARE ENACTED! {and anyone that would attempt to argue that, please just go away, cause you simply dont have a clue}

and NATHAN: what you say is so very true, the GOV. cannot get into legally, any legal binding contract, but this what they have been doing. the USSC has ruled that GOV. cannot get into in any form a contract that they are not a party to. now you tell me if a court may do this if the LEGAL CONTRACT was not brought before the COURT. no Court has jurisdiction over all contracts as they are created, this is insane! if a CONTRACT is not contested, the COURT can only legally stay out of, cause the COURT has not been a party to it. in most contracts, there are two parties and no outside person...etc. may make themselves a party to it, not even the COURT, not even the GOV.

no not illegal ones

RSS

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's photo
3 hours ago
Less Prone commented on rlionhearted_3's photo
Thumbnail

What the fuck?

"When will the perverts picked out of the government and positions of power for thorough…"
3 hours ago
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post The Re-Evaluation of our Current Reality
4 hours ago
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post Former Naval Physicist and Photo Analyst Bruce Maccabee’s Wife Sees Alien Predator!
4 hours ago
Doc Vega's 6 blog posts were featured
4 hours ago
cheeki kea's blog post was featured
4 hours ago
james will's 2 blog posts were featured
4 hours ago
Less Prone left a comment for Роман
"Welcome on board. Your input is welcome, but could you provide a translation in…"
4 hours ago
Less Prone left a comment for Tina Sullivan
"Did you lose the password= As far as I know we have changed nothing her. Continue as Sullivan."
4 hours ago
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Death of an F-106 Pilot in Pursuit of the Unknown

 The year in between 1970 and 1972 on July 14 on a single night when a series of events led to the…See More
13 hours ago
Tina Sullivan left a comment for Less Prone
"Hey, buddy!  You're right, I can't get into my account!  "
18 hours ago
rlionhearted_3 posted photos
21 hours ago
Doc Vega posted a blog post

The Re-Evaluation of our Current Reality

 Surprisingly, there has been talk of mankind being enveloped in an artificial reality for decades…See More
yesterday
tjdavis posted videos
Wednesday
Sandy posted a video

Source: Havana Syndrome investigation is "a massive CIA cover-up" | 60 Minutes

For years, the U.S. government has doubted the stories of those suffering from AHI, commonly called Havana Syndrome. Now, victims hope that reports of a newl...
Wednesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Regrets That Cling to Me

Talking with my shadow in the nightI know it sounds contriteA vacuum without the lightThe silence…See More
Monday
tjdavis posted a photo
Monday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Reality Is now Becoming Unhinged

 Let’s take a trip down the modern-day rabbit hole we call everyday news and events, but on a more…See More
Sunday
cheeki kea commented on Sandy's video
Thumbnail

Ghislaine Maxwell & The Secret "Shadow" 9/11 Commission? | John Kiriakou

"You tuber Sabby Sabs sums up and joins dots. Don't miss this one."
Sunday
Doc Vega posted a blog post
Mar 5

© 2026   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted