Source

Most people are familiar with traditional weapons of mass destruction such biological weapons, nuclear weapons and chemical weapons. The point of all such weapons of mass destruction is to inflict a large number of casualties on civilian populations as a way to cripple a nation into political or military submission.

When it comes to actually deploying weapons of mass destruction (WMDs)
against civilian populations, no country has murdered more innocent
civilians than the United States of America through its bombing of two
Japanese cities during World War II. (This isn't rhetoric, it's an
historical fact.)

Atomic bombs were very visible WMDs deployed in World War II as a way to force the empire of Japan to surrender to
western forces. Since that time, full-scale nuclear weapons have never
again been used directly on civilian targets, meaning the United States
of America maintains the distinction of being the only nation in the
history of human civilization to have dropped atomic weapons on
civilian populations.

It begs the question: If national leaders believe dropping atomic weapons on civilian populations is justified,
what other weapons might they feel justified in unleashing upon
civilian populations?

Weapons of Mass Prescription

What if a nation wanted to reduce its own civilian population but do it covertly? One way to accomplish that would be to slowly poison the civilian population through exposure to toxic chemicals, heavy metals, hormone-disrupting molecules and nerve toxins.

And as any terrorist can tell you, the most covert way to accomplish that would be to inject such chemicals into the everyday products that
people routinely consume: Water, food, personal care products and
medicines. I even published a cartoon with this theme a couple of years
ago: http://www.naturalnews.com/021880_w...

Here's another interesting fact: If you examine what's in the water, food,
products and medicines sold across North America, you'll discover a
dangerous assortment of chemicals that, taken together, could quite
reasonably be considered weapons of mass destruction.

Interestingly, the fluoride dumped into public water supplies was originally an
offshoot of the enrichment processing facilities for uranium to be used
in nuclear weapons. These days, however, fluoride is usually just the
toxic waste from fertilizer manufacturing factories or the waste from
smokestack scrubbers of coal-fired power plants. Either way, it's not
good for your teeth: The entire fluoride agenda largely a convenient,
low-cost way to dispose of industrial waste chemicals while calling it
a public health program.

Antibacterial soaps derive their antibacterial properties from chemicals that are molecularly quite similar to the infamous Agent Orange used in the Vietnam War. And yet these products are openly marketed for use by children.

Similarly, children and adults continue to be poisoned by heavy metals like mercury thanks to the highly toxic practices of modern dentistry -- an industry
which astoundingly has still failed to admit to the obvious toxicity of
a heavy metal its practitioners continue to install in people's mouths
as "silver fillings" (which actually contain more mercury than silver).

There are hormone-disrupting chemicals in most of the plastics used in the
processed food industry -- especially canned soups which are often
highly toxic for a variety of other reasons. MSG and other nervous
system destroyers are used throughout the food supply in soups, snack
foods, salad dressings, flavorings and dips.

These are all chemical assaults of one kind or another, but the greatest assault on
the minds and bodies of western consumers comes in the form of pharmaceutical chemicals. That's why I call them 'Weapons of Mass Prescription.'

Destroy any nation by destroying the health of its citizens

If you want to destroy any nation, simply unleash Big Pharma into its
medical system. Within just two generations, its people will suffer
widespread organ damage, sharp decline in cognitive function and
rampant degenerative disease brought on by the side effects of everyday
pharmaceuticals.


Antidepressants, for example, cause diabetes and obesity. Cancer drugs cause neurological disorders. Some arthritis drugs
actually promote arthritis! And don't even get me started with the
neurotoxicity of the chemicals used in vaccines...

Virtually all pharmaceuticals cause nutritional deficiencies. Most of them also contribute to long-term organ damage that affects the
liver, heart, brain and kidneys. Pharmaceuticals are synthetic
chemicals which are inherently incompatible with human biology.
Whatever "therapeutic effects" appear to be present from
pharmaceuticals are really just poisoning side effects that temporarily appear to be therapeutic but are actually disruptive to human biology.

Many pharmaceuticals are, in fact, blatant poisons to begin with. Popular
blood-thinning drugs, which are usually just rebranded warfarin chemicals, are molecularly identical to rat poison. (Warfarin is actually used as rat poison. It's true. This is not an urban legend.)

Chemotherapy chemicals are extremely poisonous, and cancer patients frequently die
from the toxicity of these drugs. Those who don't die often suffer from
"chemo brain" -- a severe loss of cognitive function routinely
experienced by victims of chemotherapy.

Poisoning the environment with chemical weapons

Meanwhile, the sheer quantity of prescription medications being used on civilian populations is resulting in the mass contamination of public water supplies with HRT drugs, painkiller drugs, cholesterol medications and other Big Pharma chemicals. (http://www.naturalnews.com/025994.html) It's so bad now that even the fish that swim near major cities are contaminated with medications. (http://www.naturalnews.com/025933_p...)

At some point, all the chemical contamination with pharmaceuticals brings the obvious question to mind: Are Big Pharma's drugs actually Weapons of Mass Destruction?

Is the U.S. civilian population being targeted in a covert chemical war that accomplishes the same thing as dropping bombs on Hiroshima, only
more slowly and quietly?

And if so, what would be the purpose of such a chemical war on the American people?

Reshaping the human gene pool -- clever!

Population control is the obvious answer... not only because pharmaceuticals kill so many people but also because pharmaceuticals cause widespread infertility. By dumping so many chemicals onto civilian populations, the population
can be reduced in the long term through chemically-induced infertility.

Now here's an interesting aspect of this: If all these mainstream consumer
chemicals cause infertility, they're only causing it among those
mainstream consumers who are careless enough with their own health to
keep eating, drinking and swallowing all these synthetic chemicals in
the first place. And that means this "population control" measure, if
it actually does exist, is theoretically causing the greatest
infertility in those who have the least ability to make good decisions
about their own genetic health. It's potentially a way to achieve a
significant shift in the gene pool of the human race by eliminating the
genetic futures of those who are stupid enough to poison their own
bodies (and therefore compromise their own genetic code) through mass
exposure to synthetic chemicals.

As I've often said, there are a huge number of people in western nations right now (such as the USA,
Canada, UK, etc.) who are collectively winning the Darwin Award
by removing themselves from the human gene pool. And pharmaceuticals,
it turns out, are the perfect WMDs to allow those who most deserve to
be removed from the human gene pool to accomplish exactly that.

The future of the human race belongs solely to those who can protect the integrity of their genetic code.

People who eat, drink and consume large quantities of synthetic chemicals and
dangerous prescription medications are demonstrating that they are not
qualified to participate in the gene pool of the human race.