WTC7 - ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
A complete Empirically Verifiable Scientific Method Driven Graphical Target System
Analysis and Conclusion arrived at by Process of Elimination.
 

The empirically established fact (see link below) that WTC7 was destroyed by energetic materials having been physically transported inside the building at some point prior to its destruction immediately shines a bright spotlight on literally the ones on the planet who could possibly have carried out a covert domestic operation of that magnitude in that building (and by extension the rest of the events that day)…. the only ones who had exclusive carte blanche 24/7 access to all parts of the highly secured building…. the only ones who had ready access to the quantity and quality of energetic materials required…. and the only ones who could possibly have defeated the high level security systems in and around the building in order to allow in personnel/assets with the necessary expertise in the effective use of said energetic materials.

The undeniable fact of the matter is that the Department of Defense/Central Intelligence Agency (Richard Meyers, George Tenet, their aides, personell and assets) are literally the only ones on the planet that could have done it.

And just as one needn’t be Isaac Newton to see there is no other possible explanation for the observed behavior of WTC7 other than energetic materials having been physically transported inside the building, one needn’t be Sherlock Holmes to see there is no other possible explanation as to who could have done it since the building was in perpetual 24/7 lock down for many years as a highly secured government facility…. it’s elementary.

My (inhaling deeply) complete iron clad definitively conclusive prima facie open and shut case top to bottom empirically verifiable scientific method driven graphical target system analysis and conclusion arrived at by process of elimination that solves the whole thing with complete certainty scientifically and also criminally beyond any reasonable doubt all in a single post continues to stand empirically unassailed in any way shape or form now for well over a year and coming up on 50,000 views over at the Cambridge University sponsored science forum TheNakedScientists.

To date and with almost 50,000 views now, not one member new or old, not one moderator, not one podcast or other staff member at the TheNakedScientists or Cambridge University, particularly Dr. Alan Calverd PhD (physics) but also including Dr. Christopher Smith PhD (neuroscience) along with several others there well qualified to judge the analysis (actually anyone who got through the eighth grade with passing marks is fully qualified to evaluate it) has even managed to directly address it let alone break it or point out any error in it at all by simply copying and pasting one of the simple easy to understand animations along with a bit of accompanying descriptive text that says anything like.... "This animation and accompanying descriptive text is incorrect, the scenario would not play out as depicted/described in the analysis and here's why...." followed by any sort of cogently stated elucidation of any percieved error or needed correction that would tend to negatively impact the veracity of any element of the analysis or the inescapable conclusion it quite naturally arrives at.

It's not hard to see why really when one thinks about it. Proponents of the official narrative can't really confirm it or deny it without getting into trouble. In other words.... anyone who confirms the veracity of the analysis instantly falls into the "conspiracy theorist" category.... this they absolutely will not do. And anyone who denies the veracity of the analysis must point out some error.... this they absolutely can not do. They literally can not address it one way or the other.

An empirically forged Excalibur, quenched in an ocean of contemplation, much sharper than Occams Razor, unbreakably tempered by the scientific method and stuck fast in the solid stone of Newtons Law....

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=49603.msg44...