Orwellian Ireland

Home


Their Agenda for society


Mind/Brain programming


Race


Who are they?


Bibliography/ video and audio links

Who are the Illuminati and what is their agenda?
The 'Illuminati'? What exactly are US 'conspiracy theorists' talking about when they mention this group, who are they and what are they planning? This article is an attempt to answer that question although I wish to point out that this is only an opinion, I have no proof of these statements, or anything very substantial to back up the list of names given, but I think giving one's opinion is an important function of political discourse in a democratic society and is protected, and should be protected, by the traditions and laws of the land. Anybody can just listen to the links given on the Illuminati and make up their own mind and of course it goes without saying that I do not agree with everything explained in those links.

So what are people referring to anyway when they talk about the Illuminati? Well this is just a general name that arrived in the late 18th century for the organisation of the various Occult groups that existed at that time. By Occult groups we simply mean those who follow a kind of anti-Christian religion e.g. Satanists and Luciferians etc. So we are talking about a large (they probably number in the millions, certainly hundreds of thousands, and are organised all across the world) disparate collection of groups who co-operate, sometimes loosely, because they are all aiming to destroy the Christian heritage of the world and to usher in a new 'paradise' on earth, where they would be dictators in what is now known as the New World Order. To understand its structure just look at the Christian religion and imagine if you had a smaller version of that then that's what the Occult world looks like. Hence, in the Christian world, you have various denominations which might have close or loose links to a centralised body, like the way that the Church of England or Orthodox Churches might sometimes recognise or cooperate with the Vatican, but they are really only united by an overall aim to further the Christian word as outlined in the gospel etc and can be identified by the use of universal Christian symbols like the cross, books like the Bible and prayers like the Our Father. That's then how you can identify Occult groups, by the same use of particular symbols and books, and the basic unity they have is simply that they are aiming for this destruction of normal civilisation and its supplanting by the NWO.

The Illuminati word arose when a person called Adam Weishupt founded a particular secret society on May the first 1776 that drew up a specific plan to destroy all nation states, all religions, all marks of normal civilisation, and all private property. You can read more about the progress of this 'conspiracy' by reading this book by a French Jesuit writing in 1798: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memoirs_Illustrating_the_History_of_Ja... . Anyway that's the basic allegation that's made in these 'conspiracy theories', that that secret society is still in existence and still working to undermine the sovereignty of all independent states, all religions and all private property. As well as Weishupt, some personalities associated with this group include Voltaire, Frederick the Great, Caliostro, Mazzini, Marx, Palmerston, Lemmi - a late 19th century Italian politician -, a mid 19th century American General called Pike, and Aleister Crowley, who was involved in the Anarchist Movement among many other things.

The overall philosophy that is said to motivate the 'Illuminati' is easy to understand, its simply the opposite of what the traditional Christian religions believe or believed in. In other words if you take the 10 commandments, or whatever, and reversed them then that's what this group believes in! And this is not an accident, these groups are very far from being atheists or non believers in the importance of the Bible etc, they are simply taking every reference from there to Lucifer and Our Lord and are making sure to further the former's aims and frustrate the latter's! This can even extend to a close reading of the Book of Revelation in order to help to create the state where their hero, the Antichrist, can come into the world.

Illuminati's Agenda for Society

The progress of this 'conspiracy', if you like, is where the Illuminati is said to exert its influence through the media and educational systems to further its aims of bringing about the NWO. The best description of this process seems to have been given by a former KGB officer called Yuri Bezmenov, because the techniques used by this 'conspiracy' seem to be very similar to old USSR techniques. What he described is that you can brainwash the general public in a country to assist or acclimatise themselves to losing their independence - remember that's the aim of the NWO, each country has to agree to surrender its sovereignty as part of bringing about a one world government - by following this three step process:
a) You enter into a long 20 year or so process of stripping out the morals in the general public - he calls that 'demoralisation' - in order to help to create a population who have a kind of blank slate that these people can then write on, so to speak. This stage takes a long time because the education system is one of the important elements of it and you have to wait for the generation that you educated to come into political power. I will describe this in more detail below.
b) Then you have 2 or 3 years of a more obviously destabilised state of society. You see its important to understand that during the above phase its easier to accomplish it if the general public are kind of asleep, entertained by sport etc and feeling that there is no great political 'conspiracy' working on their society. Then for the second phase you reverse this somewhat and you create divisions and confusion in the country. Bezmenov particularly gives the example of labour relations, during this period you create divisions between employers and employees so that it seems as if the country and society cannot hold together at all.
c) The third phase was named, with deliberate irony, by the KGB as 'normalisation'. This just means that you roll in the tanks from the foreign country to take over and now run the country with an order that seemed to be impossible when it was independent.

This long term brainwashing process, that he described as the first phase, is a bit complicated but maybe could be explained if we take a kind of hypothetical, fictional, analogy. Ok imagine the scene in Cambodia after the Khmer Rouge took over. You have nearly all the population housed in Communist re-education camps, listening to Communist propaganda broadcast over loud speakers and guards patrolling the perimeters etc. Now say you have been given an assignment by the Khmer Rouge govt. You are called in as some hotshot New York PR guru and your mission, should you choose to accept it , is to assist the govt. in brainwashing the Cambodian public. It is explained to you that you need to use the education system in the camps, and what is broadcast over the media and those loud speakers, in order to mould the population to be more amenable to the Cambodian govt. The Khmer Rouge minister could explain it to you like this: "currently we need to have guards with machine guns placed around these camps in order to keep the people in and make them work for us etc. We want you to brainwash the people so that they will stay in their camps, go to work, and basically do what we tell them to do, without the necessity for guards etc."

Ok fair enough, now how are you going to do that? You see if you think about it what you are trying to do is mould the sense of right and wrong of your population. Currently the people do not think that working for the Khmer Rouge and following their instructions is 'right', they have their own version of what is right and wrong and they only follow the govts instructions because they have to, because the guards with the machine guns compel them to. Your job is to find out what is it that gives them their current sense of right and wrong, get rid of it from the population, and then supplant it with a sense that following the govt's - the Khmer Rouge's - instructions to the letter is what is 'right'.

Its easy enough to figure out where they get their current sense of right and wrong, maybe from three specific sources:
a) From their religion, so this must be got rid of straight away. You need to get those media outlets to mock their religion all the time and water down or abolish religion from the educational system. Bezmenov, at the end of one of the lectures, specifically stated that religion was the great opponent of this process, its imperative to strip out that first.
b) From their families. Obviously their parents might inculcate a value system into their children, so actually you need to abolish the family structures if you can. It would be better if parents split up, or you have widespread illegitimacy, or even had children raised by the state.
c) From local community structures which might foster a given 'code' of ethics. So if you can mess that up, create new communities where strangers try to live together and 'regenerate' old communities by separating old neighbours, that might be the way to go. You can promote that on a global scale too by fostering widespread immigration and emigration.

If you can rid people of this previous sense of right and wrong then you are ready to implant a new sense of right and wrong, the one that gets people to follow the Khmer Rouge's instructions without question. So how are you going to do this, what's the plan anyway? Well how about this, how about creating a kind of 'cult of the law'. Now the law at this time in Cambodia is simply the instructions that the Khmer Rouge have drawn up to control their people. The law states that the general public must stay in those camps and work for the Khmer Rouge. Hence if people just follow the law blindly they will be following the Khmer Rouge's instructions, which is the brainwashing that the Khmer Rouge asked you to implant in people. So say you hype up the whole majesty of the law. Maybe you could broadcast soap operas where the arcane workings of the law are described in great depth, which would give the law greater prestige and status and also disguise the reality that the modern Cambodian law is just the Khmer Rouge's instructions, they abolished the old legal rights and customs and made new modern laws in all areas which just embodied their dictatorial instructions for the general public. (Btw one helpful thing about the latter process, the process of getting rid of old rights like that, is to create a kind of 'cult of change' so that the general public would automatically look on as old fashioned the old rights and clamour for a 'modern' reworking of the law.) So that's one way that you could brainwash the general public to follow blindly this corrupt government's instructions and you can now collect your check with a job well done!

That then is something like the process that is alleged to be occurring in modern society. So maybe you, O reader!, have also been brainwashed like this? You think not? Not you surely, you are above all that? lol. Maybe you are an atheist who doesn't believe in all that religious 'hocus pocus'? Did you ever stop to think that maybe you are a product of the fact that detailed comprehensive teaching of theology was stripped out of the school curriculum in Ireland in the mid70s, maybe if you knew the details that underlined the old religious principles you wouldn't be as dismissive of them? Did you ever stop to think about the portrayal of religion in the modern media? I just saw the film 'The name of the Rose' sometime ago and it is very striking how much the monks were deformed ugly looking people, as opposed to the heroes who were, bizarrely and unhistorically, standing up for laughter and learning that the church was supposed to be trying to suppress. How many portrayals like that does one see in films and does that subliminally influence people? Look at the question of supplanting the 'cult of the law': how many soap operas or TV series have been created recently which go into the details of legal proceedings and which could be subliminally implanting that as a sense of 'right and wrong' in people? I can think of 'Law and Order', 'Boston Legal', 'Judge John Deed' and actually countless others that have grown up in the last 15 years or so. Think about the OJ Simpson trial, admittedly it was a newsworthy topic but is it not remarkable that it was broadcast live for about a year on television all over the world?
Anyway that kind of process is what it is said the 'Illuminati' are promoting in modern day society.

Mind/Brain Programming

One complicated topic that is tied in with this cult is the question of the creation of multiple personalities and mind/brain programming. I am just describing this technology here because if you follow some of the Illuminati links in the bibliography you won't know what the people are talking about otherwise. This is a very complex and secret technology that it is said this cult uses on its members.

The simplest way to understand all that is to look upon the mind as working like a computer. The basic, 'low level', 'brain' that a computer has is the BIOS, which in turn controls and co-ordinates all the various parts of the computer like the hard drive, internet connection, etc. But it itself is a small 'brain' if you like, it only feeds the information in and out to the hard drive where all the big serious computer programmes are. When you talk about the great memory capacity of the computer or the big mathematical calculations or automation etc you are referring to the hard drive which is the much bigger and comprehensive part of the computer, but nonetheless is 'inferior' if you like to the BIOS. The latter is the essential 'commander' of the system as it were, and the computer can work, in a limited sense, without the hard drive but not without the BIOS. Also since the BIOS works at this low level, theoretically anyway, programmes running on the BIOS, like clock functions etc, work faster than the hard drive ones because they can run in a purer simpler state, before the overhang of running the hard drive kicks in and which delays things somewhat.

Anyway apparently the Occult world discovered that the human brain works a little like that. What they aimed to do was to access the low level brain functions, the BIOS equivalent of the brain, and in using that they could develop 'purer' faster brain functions like great strength and a photographic memory etc. Also if you could access the mind at this 'core' level you could even install the brain's equivalent of a new hard drive, a new personality, creating people with multiple personalities and which helps greatly in preserving the cult's secrets. The question is how do you access the 'BIOS' of the mind while the normal mind is still functioning? There are various ways:
a) Hypnosis. That's what the hypnotist is doing, as you can see in TV shows etc, the hypnotist dulls the main brain into a kind of sleep state and instead speaks directly to the 'BIOS' of the brain and gives it simple instructions. So hence the person can be instructed to act like a monkey etc, and this primitive brain state will know enough to be able to act out this monkey state but not know enough to realise that this is a foolish thing to do on a stage.
b) Trauma. You know the phrase 'scared out of you wits'? Well that seems to be a recognition of a kind of state where, if you don't die or faint, you sort of 'lose your mind' when you are very scared or in great pain. In that state you can talk to and give messages to the primitive brain just like under hypnosis.
c) There are various other tricks and drugs etc that can be used. For example if you are in a state where your senses are not being used then you might enter into this semi-hypnotic state e.g. if you were placed floating in a water tank, where you have a feeling of weightlessness, where it was permanently dark and silent so you couldn't use your hearing or sight senses, and where you have some kind of all round rubber body suit so that you couldn't use your sense of touch. Also another trick could be if you permanently hold a person's eyes open and flash across the eye very quickly some kind of information, it might be absorbed by the primitive brain and bypass the main brain. This is because the BIOS of the brain, as it were, can read faster than the main brain. The same could be tried by speeding up the playing of recorded sounds of voices speaking to the victim, because again the 'primitive brain' can pick up and hear things which are said too fast to be absorbed by the main brain.

In any case that's the general outlines of this enormously complicated subject which you can read a bit more of here if you like: http://www.politics.ie/current-affairs/35952-hypnosis-deliberately-... .

Race

This is an important subject tied up with the 'conspirators' agenda. I think that an over emphasis on the horrors of WWII should not be allowed to disguise the fact that race is a very important component of society. The structure and cohesion of any country rests to a very large extent on the racial characteristics of the people in that country. Look at it this way, if you planted a thousand people of old English stock on some deserted island somewhere you would notice that the island would begin to resemble England after a few years even if the inhabitants had never actually lived in England! You can see examples of that kind of thing happening all over the world in the outposts of the old Empire, you see in practice a lot of what makes a society tick is in the genes of the people. These genetic characteristics are in turn important to the conspirators as they judge how societies will react to the creation of a NWO.

The point is that some races have a kind of 'superiority complex' and some have the opposite, obviously an 'inferiority complex'. So what happens is that races with the former are more likely to be determined opponents of the NWO, because in their sense of 'superiority' they feel that they know best how to run a country and don't want to be told how to do things by a world government, whereas the other type are more likely to accept the wisdom that would be handed down to them by this international institution and world media, they would not feel confident enough to go against a kind of world consensus in favour of the NWO. Its obvious that this 'superiority complex' tends to be held by the white races of North Western Europe, say the White Anglo Saxon Protestant, French, Dutch and Swiss peoples, and an 'inferiority complex' of some type is usually felt by nearly all other races, especially the non white ones. Before I am accused of being 'racist' I should point out that I am Irish and I think a lot of this 'inferiority complex' is quite characteristic of Irish people, as it is among many of the Latin races that the Irish resemble, and even a little bit among the Eastern European races e.g. if you follow Russian history you can see how much the Russians tended to look up to the French in the 19th century and to the US, bizarrely I know, in the 20th century, so showing this inferiority complex. The English, on the other hand, never seemed to feel any place is as good as England, or any language as good as English, and the WASP type Americans feel much the same way!

Of course this is a general attitude, its not a reflection of people's intelligence or a reflection of the truth of a country's superiority, during some eras and in some matters England is not a superior country but try telling them that (especially if you could speak to them in the 19th century say)! Whereas in Ireland 'an Irish solution to an Irish problem' is a political insult, its a way of laughing at a given policy. If you approach some government TD or Minister, especially a Fianna Fáil one who supposedly represent a kind of 'purer' Irish nationalism, with a proposed policy in a given area they will ask where this policy has been done before. In other words unless it has been done before in the UK or the US or wherever then they don't want to know, there is no way they would implement a policy before those countries. Its remarkable too how many Irish literary or art figures got recognition of their genius in places like the UK and the US, in many cases Irish people wouldn't acknowledge their merit at all until they were applauded abroad.

This then has political significance. Take the recent Lisbon II referendum for example. In practice when you are trying to persuade a person to oppose the EU you have a big problem because at the end of the day Irish people look up to these foreign institutions. They imagine that the clever well organised countries of Europe couldn't be cooking up something that could be that terrible, it must be better than the banjaxed country Irish people have messed up here etc. The inferiority complex helps to sell the supra-national institution to the country, and this is the model that the 'conspirators' see as being used to create their NWO. The French and the Dutch on the other hand (as would the English if they were ever asked) solidly turned down the new EU constitution, they had the confidence to see the thing on its merits, they weren't swayed by the inferiority complex.

You see if we ever have a proposal to create a new world government I think it would look like the creation of the League of Nations, or the United Nations, or the convening of Vatican II. In all these cases you had a huge outpouring of joy expressed in the international media, and among international statesmen, about how this was a great step to further international peace and co-operation among peoples - and religions in the case of the oecumenical thrust of Vatican II - etc. That is what the creation of the NWO will look like and you have to ask how will the different races and countries react to that. When the League of Nations was created as far as I know no country really objected to it except the US which shocked everybody by throwing out the proposal in the US Senate. The only country to doggedly oppose joining the UN for decades, as opposed to those countries who were forbidden from joining, was Switzerland. As regards Vatican II the first country to show a lack of enthusiasm for the media generated hype was England, where the English Catholics immediately negotiated a special opt out from the new liturgy. Then afterwards opposition to Vatican II started up and blossomed in France, and French speaking Switzerland, and the US. In all these cases you will find that the governments representing the non WASP or North Western European races clamoured to get involved with what the international media said was great. They just went with the flow, and this 'inferiority complex' is a large part of the reason for that.

Which brings us to the 'conspirators' agenda with respect to race. For them its simple, for the above mentioned reason, they want to crush those white races that have this 'superiority complex'. Actually they want to breed them out of existence. So we do have a racial war if you like and its simply a war against white people, but particularly the English, American, French, and North West European races in general. You can see it in the elevation of the African American race in the US, the huge immigration of other races into all the main white countries, and the fall of the white regimes in Africa and India etc.

Again I think that people should look at this rationally and see the agenda without being swayed by media name calling etc. The thing is too that these 'conspirators' themselves are genuinely racist in that they look upon their group as a kind of master race and only allow arranged marriages among their 'elite' families. Maybe this is why they take such an interest in the world races and are so keen to alter their makeup.

Who are 'they' exactly?

It is obviously very difficult to figure out who 'they' are in the case of Irish public figures but it may be possible to identify some of them if you judge people by the following criteria:
1) See if a particular person or group follows the agenda of the 'conspirators'. I would suggest there are maybe four basic threads to the agenda of this group, which were described earlier:
a) They want to break down community structures by e.g. hyping up 'stranger danger' among young people and danger on the roads - the main figure here being Gay Byrne, who also of course had earlier a very powerful role in the Irish media - and passive smoking so that nobody can frequent pubs and get to know their neighbours; help to destroy local rural communities by abolishing hunts; and the necessity to destroy old urban communities via 'urban regeneration'.
b) Destroy families, so you get much vague talk about being tolerant towards 'new' and varied family structures, same sex marriages, and also social welfare geared to encourage family breakdown - houses allocated first to unmarried mothers etc -, the new referendum to increase state power to break up families via vague rights given to children etc etc.
c) Destroy faith in the nation state, so at all times knock Irish people's capacity to manage anything, go on about Irish corruption (and don't talk about the much more serious levels of EU corruption, or the corruption endemic in the states where most immigrants to Ireland come from, like Eastern Europe, Nigeria and Brazil etc). Also sponsor the immigration flow to destroy the Irish sense of identity, and take a whack at the Irish language and maybe even the GAA - which is now plagued by strikes seemingly sponsored by this new players group.
d) Obviously a process of 'demoralisation' means more than anything else the stripping out of religious faith in people, and the media campaign on that front is in full swing.
e) Discredit private enterprise in order to persuade people to embrace a Communist style system, which would basically be slavery where everything would be controlled by a corrupt state and nobody would be able to own anything or do anything without it's permission etc. (Btw this process of 'demoralisation' is further described at: http://www.indymedia.ie/article/84203#comment221629 .)

Then clearly what you do is see if this agenda is being suspiciously fostered by given people or groups. Btw at times you have to forget what people 'say' but rather what they actually 'do', as Ministers etc, in order to see if they follow this agenda. Unfortunately they can easily say one thing and do the opposite. No question this is not an exact science, but still you can sometimes see where some people are pushing a given agenda, or being only half hearted in opposing one.

2) Watch out for vagueness in statements etc. Believe it or not I think this is the best way to identify the real crooks. Look at Bertie Ahern for example, a very intelligent person he was nonetheless famous for his waffling, not accidentally I would suggest. Another figure famous for his waffling, and a 'media darling', was Brian Lenihan senior who had a suspicious longevity at the very high ranks of Fianna Fáil. (I think his son and namesake is quite deliberately bankrupting Ireland as part of this 'conspiracy'.) You see what is happening here is that the powers that be want to move you in a given direction, but gently because they know that if you could see the full picture you would reject it. Take for example this statement by Peter Sutherland:
"We have to learn that our identity has to be adapted to recognize that we are becoming, and will be, a society with others in it. It is a big challenge...We have a challenge to change people's mentality. And it's a European challenge."
Of course what he wants is for Irish people to abandon their sense of Irish identity in response to the immigration inflow, but he cannot say that explicitly because most people would reject that. So instead its mood music that sounds like vague mush but nonetheless sets the subliminal tone going in the direction he wants. That's the kind of vague unspecific talk that is the real sign of these conspirators.

In fact sometimes whole institutions or causes can get caught up in a kind of spiral of unspecific language and vague generalities, sometimes appealing to mushy human emotions like 'world peace' or 'love', e.g. Communists, especially in the former USSR, Freemasons, the Catholic Church post Vatican II, and now the EU eurobabbling! You can see the same kind of vague language used by all these groups and that is always a sign of a group in the throes of these conspirators.

3) Publicity. This is the next big way to identify these gangsters. As a general rule, they only allow the oxygen of publicity to descend on their own group. Therefore when there are any public discussions or debates its important that both parties to the debate are part of this group, because otherwise a non conspirator could get some publicity. Hence you can be sure that Declan Ganley etc are members of this clique. In fact this group wouldn't take any political step without making sure that they have a tame opposition drawn up to soak up the publicity for opposing their policies. As examples of controlled opposition I would include David McWilliams, as a white knight who saw the problem with staying in the euro, Kevin Myers, as an opponent of the immigration inflow, John Waters, in highlighting the nightmare that goes on in the family courts, David Quinn, defending the Catholic position, even imho Jim Corr as the standard bearer for 'conspiracy theorists'. So if you are trying to figure out if so and so a person is legit, basically if they have an ongoing column in a major newspaper, or are on TV a lot, 9 times out of 10 you can be sure they are not legit. Its not 10 out of 10, its not a perfect way of identifying people, but its pretty good!
Btw they know that people are becoming more suspicious of 'media darlings' so sometimes they vary it. They can engineer some heavy duty sneering or slander in the mass media against one of their own people, to give the person credibility among groups who are suspicious of the media. A classic example I think is Declan Ganley.

4) Sometimes people involved in the Occult can actually use symbols or phrases that can identify them as such .e.g. there is the well known horned hand signal, also the Churchillian V shape; the black and red colour combination; symbols like triangles, eye shapes, pyramids and stars, both upright and inverted; and phrases and concepts like revolution, or reincarnation, and words that relate to that like butterflies - because they are transformed from caterpillars - and phoenixes.
I know a lot of people will not believe that this is any use in identifying corrupt people or groups but consider for example the current symbols used by Irish political parties and see how they have evolved over the last few years. Fine Gael's has now become a pure star, Fianna Fail's is like an inverted triangle and the Labour party emblems are big into this black and red thing. Look at the various media organs: Foxnews, CNN, Time Magazine, BBC 24 News Channel, NewsTalk, and the Vincent Browne show all seem to use black and red now, a coincidence?

Anyway to abide by my own rules in steering away from vagueness and generality!, I think it would be better to list here my thoughts anyway on what people in Irish public life are consciously co-operating in this 'conspiracy':

Politicians
The Andrews, Mulcahy, Childers, Bruton and especially the Lenihan families. Also the Leslie family of Glaslough.

Bertie Ahern, certainly our most corrupt Taoiseach, Dermot Ahern, Noel Dempsey - second only to the Lenihan clan in his importance and malign influence -, Mary Hanafin, Micheál Martin, Dr James McDaid, Dr Rory O'Hanlon, Dick Roche, Dr Martin Mansergh, Albert Reynolds, Seán Ardagh.
Eoghan Harris (obviously a very powerful person, he, and his wife Anne, have had great influence over the big organs of the Irish media from the 70s on, particularly RTE and then the Sunday Independent, Irelands largest selling newspaper. He entered on the scene with John Bruton before he became Taoiseach, with Mary Robinson, before she became President, and now Bertie Ahern), Labhrás Ó Murchú, Paschal Mooney, Eoin Ryan, Mary McAleese, Dr Patrick Hillery, Charlie McCreevy.
Finian McGrath, Feargal Quinn, Shane Ross, Declan Ganley, Joe Higgins, Richard Boyd Barrett, Dr Kieran Allen.

Mary Harney, Desmond O'Malley, Pat Cox, Michael McDowell.

Eamonn Gilmore, Liz McManus, Pat Rabitte, Proinsias de Rossa, Michael D Higgins, Ruari Quinn, Joe Costello, Ivana Bacik, Alex White, Mary Robinson, Fergus Finlay, Dick Spring, Dermot Lacey.

George Lee, Olivia Mitchell, Michael Noonan, Dr James Reilly, Alan Shatter, Enda Kenny, Dr Garret Fitzgerald, Alan Dukes, Peter Sutherland - arguably the most powerful of them all -, Paschal Donohoe, Dr Liam Twomey, Jim Higgins, Ivan Yates, Mary Banotti, Nora Owen.

John Gormley, Eamonn Ryan, Trevor Sargent, Deirdre de Burca.

Ian Paisley, Gerry Adams, Martin McGuinness, Mary Lou McDonald, Eamonn McCann.

Journalists
Vincent Browne, Charlie Bird, David McWilliams, George Hook, Kevin Myers, Matt Cooper, Frank Dunlop, Geraldine Kennedy, Emily O'Reilly, Fintan O'Toole, David Quinn, Brendan O'Connor, Gay Byrne, Pat Kenny, Gerry Ryan, Sean O'Rourke, Sam Smyth, Emer O'Kelly, Paul Williams, John Waters, Ray d'Arcy, Shane Dunphy, Eamon Delaney, Michael Clifford.

Clerics
Fr Brian d'Arcy C.P., Archbishop Diarmuid Martin

Businessmen
Ben Dunne

So hence an awful lot of what is going on is just a puppet show played out in the mass media between these secretly co-operating figures. For example this whole mallarkey about Deirdre de Burca and Trevor Sargent is simply an attempt - by all groups - to put credibility back into the Green party, by showing them as containing at least some upright honest people (which is why Village magazine is calling it a Greenwash, meaning a whitewash of the Green party). This is because some aspects of the Green agenda are valuable to the powers that be and they cannot have the whole concept discredited by the disillusionment felt by nearly all Irish people towards the Green party.

As regards historical figures I would certainly exclude Griffith and include Collins, de Valera and Lemass as consciously co-operating with this 'conspiracy'. Btw just to clarify again what I mean by co-operating: I think, and remember this is only my opinion, that all the above listed figures are either consciously co-operating with an Occult agenda, and knowing that it is an Occult movement, or are pawns to the 'conspiracy' in the sense of being on retainers from US, UK or EU intelligence, or are co-operating in a mistaken view that they are furthering some other 'good' cause like a secret Communist clique, or Fianna Fáil people acting like a kind of secret society. Its always possible that some groups, like old Workers Party members, continued to pursue a Communist agenda after the Cold War thinking it was in the best interests of Ireland. In fact this kind of Communist subversion is very similar to Occult thinking, as you can see in the lectures of Yuri Bezmenov for example, but some people might not realise that. I am not saying that the above people are unwitting dupes - except in the sense of the Communist and Fianna Fáil groups maybe -, I am saying they are wittingly corrupt, the unwitting dupes in politics and the media are all the rest of them!lol

Also internationally its usually felt that Woodrow Wilson was the first 20th century US President that was in 'their' pocket, and all the rest of them since him. Similarly its often felt that all 20th century UK Prime Ministers were also like this with the possible exception of Austen Chamberlain, and, very likely, Harold Wilson. As regards the Papacy most people who have studied this would include all the Popes in that category since Pope John XXIII, who convened Vatican II, with the exception of Pope John Paul I.

Well that's it, such anyway are my thoughts on what people are getting at when they refer to the 'conspiracy' working in modern Ireland.


Bibliography

If you want to find out more about this powerful cult you might like to listen to some of these links, which are mainly video or audio recordings. Btw if you are looking for some easy to follow videos I recommend you start with Norman Dodd, Aaron Russo and then maybe Stanley Monteith. After you get some knowledge of all this then you are ready for the rest of them! Its just that you might find some of this stuff difficult to follow otherwise...

Researchers into the Illuminati Cult

Abbé Augustin Barruel S.J. (1741-1820),
was a famous Jesuit researcher into the Illuminati and their involvement in the French Revolution. He wrote a large work on what he said was the real history of the Revolution (i.e. that it was these Occult globalists, working to destroy all nation states and all religions, who conspired to bring about the whole tragedy) which was translated into English by Robert Clifford and published in 1798-1799. This book, called Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism, - and a similiar book by John Robison called Proofs of a Conspiracy - created quite a stir at the time and attracted many admiring comments, like these words from the famous Irish philosopher, Edmund Burke:
"I cannot easily express to you how much I am instructed and delighted by the first volume of your History of Jacobinism....the whole of the wonderful narrative [noted for] the most judicial regularity and exactness...I forgot to say, that I have known myself, personally, five of your principal conspirators; and I can undertake to say from my own certain knowledge, that as far back as the year 1773, they were busy in the plot you have so well described, and in the manner, and on the principle you have so truly represented. To this I can speak as a witness."
The four volumes of the English translation are available online at
Part 1, Antichristian Conspiracy: http://books.google.com/books?id=jCQPAAAAIAAJ;
Part 2, The Antimonarchical Conspiracy: http://books.google.com/books?id=v-wvAAAAMAAJ;
Part 3, Antisocial Conspiracy: http://books.google.com/books?id=fewvAAAAMAAJ ;
Part 4, Antisocial Conspiracy, Historical Part: http://books.google.com/books?id=pBMPAAAAIAAJ .

Edith Starr Miller, Lady Queenborough (1887-1933),

the daughter of a New York industrialist called William Starr Miller, married Lord Queenborough in 1921 and lived most of her life as a New York socialite. Her book Occult Theocrasy provides one of the best synopses of the various Occult groups and Secret Societies of her day and through history: http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2007/02/125034.pdf . One interesting quote she highlighted was from the Illuminati entry in Larousse's French Encyclopedia of 1866-70:
"The Illuminati did not disappear after the last century. They are still to be found in Germany, England and Russia where they have formed a queer sect in which castration is one of the features of initiation. The taste for the supernatural, the passion of the marvellous constantly urge these mentally unbalanced men in whom the imagination is fanaticised, to throw themselves into the fantastic visions which constitute Illuminism."

Nesta Webster (1876-1960)

was probably the leading authority on the Occult and the Illuminati for a number of decades either side of WWI. Born into upper class England at Trent Park stately home she travelled the world visiting Singapore, Japan, India etc while young. At first she traced the movement of world events to a kind of international communist influence but then she realised that the real power was wielded by Secret Societies of the Occult, as described in her book Secret Societies and Subversive Movements: http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Nesta.H.Webster/Secret.Societies... . Its interesting too to see some of the criticism she had to deal with at the time:
"But what is the main charge brought against us? Like Robison and Barruel, we are accused of raising a false alarm, of creating a bogey, or of being the victims of an obsession. Up to a point this is comprehensible. Whilst on the Continent the importance of secret societies is taken as a matter of course and the libraries of foreign capitals teem with books on the question, people in this country really imagine that secret societies are things of the past—articles to this effect appeared quite recently in two leading London newspapers—whilst practically nothing of any value has been written about them in our language during the last hundred years. Hence ideas that are commonplaces on the Continent here appear sensational and extravagant. The mind of the Englishman does not readily accept anything he cannot see or even sometimes anything he can see which is unprecedented in his experience, so that like the West American farmer, confronted for the first time by the sight of a giraffe, his impulse is to cry out angrily: "I don't believe it!"
But whilst making all allowance for honest ignorance and incredulity, it is impossible not to recognize a certain method in the manner in which the cry of "obsession" or "bogey" is raised. For it will be noticed that people who specialize on other subjects are not described as "obsessed." We did not hear, for example, that the late Professor Einstein had Relativity "on the brain" because he wrote and lectured exclusively on this question, nor do we hear it suggested that Mr. Howard Carter is obsessed with the idea of Tutankhamen and that it would be well if he were to set out for the South Pole by way of a change. Again, all those who warn the world concerning eventualities they conceive to be a danger are not accused of creating bogeys. Thus although Lord Roberts was denounced as a scaremonger for urging the country to prepare for defence against a design openly avowed by Germany both in speech and print, and in 1921 the Duke of Northumberland was declared the victim of a delusion for believing in the existence of a plot against the British Empire which had been proclaimed in a thousand revolutionary harangues and pamphlets. People who, without bothering to produce a shred of documentary evidence, had sounded the alarm on the menace of "French Imperialism" and asserted that our former Allies were engaged in building a vast fleet of aeroplanes in order to attack our coasts. They were not held to be either scaremongers or insane. On the contrary, although some of these same people were proved by events to have been completely wrong in their prognostications at the beginning of the Great War, they are still regarded as oracles and sometimes even described as "thinking for half Europe.""


Commander William Guy Carr (1895-1959),

served in both world wars, on a submarine in WWI and as the Naval Control Officer for the St Lawrence during WWII, had many contacts at a senior level of Canadian Intelligence for which he also worked. He gave this lecture to an audience in Chicago in 1957:

http://www.archive.org/details/PawnsInTheGameLecture .
His book Pawns in the Game is also available online here: http://ia350642.us.archive.org/1/items/PawnsInTheGame/Carr.-.Pawns.... .

Myron Fagan (1887-1972),

a playwright in New York and Hollywood, recorded this account as a vinyl record in 1967/8:

http://www.archive.org/details/MyronFagan-TheIlluminatiAndTheCounci... .
A Transcript of that record can be read at this site: http://www.awakeandarise.org/article/MyronFagan.htm . He got interested in this subject while watching what he felt was the Communist takeover of Hollywood and which he later ascribed to the Illuminati. He had a very long career as a playwright and had even met George Bernard Shaw while working on Broadway. Actually Shaw was involved with a play that in later years Fagan reckoned was part of the Illuminati conspiracy.

G. Edward Griffin,

started as a child actor, in insurance, and later a radio announcer in Detroit before he embarked on a political and film producing career. He was also a writer for Wallace's vice presidential candidate during the 1968 election. Pretty incredibly he has been researching this issue since 1959 and is still giving interviews on the subject in 2009! In 1972 he brought out this video called "The Capitalist Conspiracy" which raises the prospect that US politics, at least, is dominated by the cult known as the Illuminati:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbxYuXiDwEs

Professor Antony C. Sutton (1925-2002),

born in London he was an academic author of many books who studied in Southampton, in Germany, in UCLA, was a Professor of Economics at Cal State in LA, and finally was a Research Fellow with the Hoover Institute attached to Stanford University. Here are a few quotes from an interview and article by him:
"Is the 'name' of the German group [from which the Skull and Bones group was/is an American branch] known?

Almost certainly Illuminati.

Some people say that there are other 'cells'; what do you think?

There are many other secret societies. I've only looked at S&B. Unfortunately no historian will keep his job if he tries to explore conspiracy...this is taboo for the American Historical Association.

On Skull and Bone's influencing John Dewey and Horace Mann; are there good source materials to follow that story?

Depends what you want to find. You could explore the 10(?) volume works of Dewey... outrageous Hegelianism, the state is supreme, the individual merely a pawn to be trained. This is the basis of our 'educational system"...or you could go and explore the members of S&B who brought the system to the US. This trained "sausage mind" outlook has thoroughly permeated our universities--that's why we have the peer review system...we are all supposed to think alike and find the same answers. This political correctness garbage is another step to total thought control.
...
What do you see for the future?

Chaos, confusion and ultimately a battle between the individual and the State. The individual is the stronger; and will win. The state is a fiction sanctified by Hegel and his followers to CONTROL the individual. Sooner or later people will wake up. First we have to dump the trap of right and left, this is a Hegelian trap to divide and control. The battle is not between right and left; it is between us and them. The message is getting through...The spirit of God is within us as individuals. Skull & Bones represents death. It has no life spirit and pretends that the State "is the march of God on earth". The thinking of immature juveniles, deadly and destructive and has almost totally infected Washington. What to do? Find yourself and then go to work.....tell your friends and put out the message. The answer is within you.
...
So who or what is the State? Obviously it's a self-appointed elite. It is interesting that Fichte, who developed these ideas before Hegel, was a freemason, almost certainly Illuminati, and certainly was promoted by the Illuminati. For example, Johann Wolfgang Goethe (Abaris in the Illuminati code) pushed Fichte for an appointment at Jena University.

Furthermore, the Illuminati principle that the end justifies the means, a principle that Quigley scores as immoral and used by both The Group [Millner / Rhodes Round Table] and The Order, is rooted in Hegel.
...
Most of us believe the State exists to serve the individual, not vice versa. The Order believes the opposite to most of us. ...
This manipulation of "left" and "right" on the domestic front is duplicated in the international field where "left" and "right" political structures are artificially constructed and collapsed in the drive for a one-world synthesis.

College textbooks present war and revolution as more or less accidental results of conflicting forces. The decay of political negotiation into physical conflict comes about, according to these books, after valiant efforts to avoid war. Unfortunately, this is nonsense. War is always a deliberate creative act by individuals.

Western textbooks also have gigantic gaps. For example, after World War II the Tribunals set up to investigate Nazi war criminals were careful to censor any materials recording Western assistance to Hitler. By the same token, Western textbooks on Soviet economic development omit any description of the economic and financial aid given to the 1917 Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western firms and banks.

Revolution is always recorded as a spontaneous event by the politically or economically deprived against an autocratic state. Never in Western textbooks will you find the evidence that revolutions need finance and the source of the finance in many cases traces back to Wall Street.

Consequently it can be argued that our Western history is every bit as distorted, censored, and largely useless as that of Hitler's Germany or the soviet Union or Communist China. No western foundation will award grants to investigate such topics, few Western academics can "survive" by researching such theses and certainly no major publisher will easily accept manuscripts reflecting such arguments." (http://www.illuminati-news.com/2007/0701c.htm and http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_sutton.html)
An 1980 interview with Dr Stanley Monteith mainly about US govt support for Communism:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6244851259954264539#
Interviewed here talking particularly about the Skull and Bones Order, which, as pointed out above, he said was probably a US cell of the Illuminati:


https://www.youtube.com/v/KRzPOL9wGBk
Finally a 1975 lecture by him can be heard here:


https://www.youtube.com/v/1-KtjSdowss

Eustace Mullins (1923-2010),

was a veteran of the USAF during WWII who got interested in this kind of politics after meeting the poet Ezra Pound. He is particularly famous for his work on the origins and ownership of the US Federal Reserve system. Here he is speaking in Canada in 2000:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKEGxy7xFvM


https://www.youtube.com/v/5xNP-04L79Q
There is another interview here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Jy8QgEpXhE

Dr Rabbi Marvin Antelman,

a Jewish author who wrote about the alliance between the Illuminati and two sects within Judaism in his 1974 book To Eliminate the Opiate, as you can read here: http://www.rense.com/general20/rabb.htm . These two groups are the Frankists and the Sabbatians, as he states on p.256 of his book:
"the Sabbatian cults are well documented in the Encyclopedia Judaica and in the writings of distinguished Israeli academics including the late Professor Y. Tishbi, Yehuda Liebes and Yaacov Katz. In a nutshell, these groups practised incest, adultery and homosexuality. They conspired with the Illuminati with goals of destroying all religions and fusing all nations into one."
He was interviewed on Israel National Radio as you can hear at the third clip on this site:

http://www.archive.org/details/TheSatanicCultThatRulesTheWorld
(3rd clip). He admits that many of the families involved in this cult are indeed of Jewish origin, but states that they have been excommunicated from the Jewish faith by virtue of various decrees by important Jewish religious councils.

Norman Dodd,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7373201783240489827# .
previously a New York banker during the Depression - an era he describes - was the chief investigator for a 1950s Congressional Inquiry into the endowment foundations in the US i.e. Carnegie, Ford, Guggenheim etc. As such this account doesn't include references to the Occult but if you are looking for 'proofs of a conspiracy', as it were, this 1982 interview is an amazing insight into the way that these foundations seized control over US education, and used it to pursue Communist aims.

Piers Compton, was for 14 years the Literary editor of the Catholic newspaper called The Universe. An old tape recording of an interview with him was broadcast on the 6th of December 2008 on BBC Radio 4's Archive Hour in a programme called The King and Dr Cannon where Compton says that King Edward VIII was influenced by "the leader of black magic in England". You can read some more about him from the dustjacket of his 1974 book on General Gordon:
"Piers Compton's first book was published before he was twenty. Since then he has spent his life writing, but he has interspersed this with a remarkable number of sidelines. He was a copywriter and "ideas man" for American humour strips and films; was a "ghost writer" for eminent medical specialists; he spent five years on the stage in London and the provinces, and acted in the last of the silent films. After becoming a Catholic he tried his vocation at monasteries in England and France; he was a political propagandist for different Parties in turn (and says, as a result, "wild horses would never drag me to a polling booth."); he soldiered abroad in anti-Communist causes. For several years he was Literary Editor of the Catholic weekly 'The Universe'. His biographical studies, in which the military element has been marked, have always aimed at presenting popular but authentic historical reconstruction. He is at present working on a book dealing with Victorian social life. Piers Compton is married, has a son Blaise and a young daughter Venetia, and lives at Marlow, Bucks."
In any case he wrote a book outlining what he felt was the whole story of the Illuminati takeover of the Vatican, based presumably on information known to the Catholic journalists in Rome. You can read the whole book online at this site: http://www.catholicvoice.co.uk/brokencross/ and here is a quote from it:
"It was during the pontificate of Pius XII that a number of priests then working in the Vatican became aware that all was not well beneath the surface. For a strange kind of influence not to their liking was making itself felt, and this they traced to a group who had come into prominence as experts, advisers, and specialists, who surrounded the Pope so closely that he was spoken of, half humorously, as being their prisoner. But those priests who were more seriously concerned set up a chain of investigation, both here and in America, where their spokesman was Father Eustace Eilers, a member of the Passionist Congregation of Birmingham, Alabama. This led to establishing the fact that the Illuminati were making themselves felt in Rome, by means of specially trained infiltrators who came from near the place in Germany where Adam Weishaupt had boasted of his plan to reduce the Vatican to a hollow shell. That the hand of the Illuminati was certainly involved became clearer when Fr. Eilers, who announced that he was publishing those facts, was suddenly found dead, presumably one of those sudden heart attacks that, when dealing with secret societies, so often precede promised revelations."
Dr Adrian H. Krieg

is another researcher who has written a book called "Vale: The Illuminati and its Plans for the Future'. He is originally from Switzerland but immigrated into the US with his father a long time ago as businessmen and inventors in the general area of handtools and mechanical engineering. He is very well acquainted with the realities of business and politics at a high level in the US and this has informed his view that this Occult group is the real holder of power in the US. He started out on this journey when he was asked by a business association, on nuclear energy actually, that he was a member of, to investigate the environmental movement. You can see a youtube video by him here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCIW6AjtRd8 .
You can hear a number of other interviews with him at this site: http://www.thebyteshow.com/Dr.AdrianKrieg.html .

Dr Henry Makow

is a Canadian author of Jewish descent who has written very extensively on the Occult including two books entitled "Illuminati: The Cult that Hijacked the World" and "Illuminati 2: Deceit and Seduction." He is very much an expert on the whole question of social engineeering, as outlined above, which he describes on his very popular website at www.savethemales.ca . You can hear an interview with him at:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiZWUiNyGt4 .
Among other things, he is actually the inventor of the boardgame 'Scruples'.

Greg Hallett

is a New Zealand researcher who leaks information that he gets from intelligence contacts in that country. These sources have emphasised the Occult goings on of the elite in politics and intelligence, especially in the former British Empire. A few quotes from his books:
"The Freemasonry goals are to:
1. Destroy all sovereignties, monarchies and cultures.
2. Destroy all national boundaries and patriotism.
3. Promote an homogenised collective that does not tolerate individual expression.
4. Enforce absolute conformity from the controlling establishment.
5. Ensure recurring wars keep people working for dignity.
6. Destroy the concept of man as soul with higher purpose. Humans are to be treated as merely evolved animals having no spiritual nature.
7. Remove the concept of God and replace the supernatural with rational scientific ways of solving human problems.
8. Dissolve all traditional family structures.
9. Ensure all children belong to the State and not to individual families.
10. Promote a One World Order (as of 1891) via ‘order out of chaos’.
11. Promote a world republic based on humanism with a media ban on anything that is not humanistic (i.e. mass genocide, human failings, crop failings and crop destruction).
12. Use the poor to kill the rich, and once the new authoritarian rich are in power, kill the poor, the educated and the dissident.
13. Kill all but one of the revolutionaries – the Freemason/Tavistock British agent Koba (Stalin)."
(Greg Hallett, Stalin's British Training p.49.)
He is interviewed here by Dr. James Fetzer:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr9s1CRt64k .

Jack Otto (1942-2007)

had a popular radio show on the Republic Broadcasting Network in the US. Here he gives a long detailed lecture (in January 2007, before he died that summer) on the Illuminati:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66zOgVAnIgE .

Yuri Bezmenov,

http://www.archive.org/details/KgbPsycologicalWarfareSubversionCont... ,
defected from the KGB in India in the 70s and while his talk, recorded in LA in 1985, isn't on the Occult as such it does describe the Communist subversion of society, which works like the Occult and he says is currently practised on the US:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLsi0Ialvxk,
and


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCE2iexnOuc.

William H. McIlhany,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEldxmX5874&feature=related .
a long time researcher and author on this topic, as you can read here in a transcript of a seminar of his given on the 4th of April 1987 in Santa Monica which was called Evidence of a Master Conspiracy: http://home.earthlink.net/~whm/download.txt . He also interviewed Christopher Story for his McIlhany Report as you can see on the youtube video.

Christopher Story,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jug-W-DKcms .
as mentioned above, a long time researcher on the Illuminati, was based among the financial community in the City of London. He published Golitsyn's later works and was also the editor of some influential journals which were widely read among the financial elite worldwide. Last year he gave this lecture which was later broadcast on national television in the UK, BBC5. He was a graduate of Eton and Christ Church Oxford, an economic adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and an extensive writer about the occult, e.g. here is a quote from one of his articles of early 2008:
"FINANCIAL AID TO SOCIALIST AND COMMUNIST REVOLUTIONARIES In 1987-88 (and probably for longer) Mrs Clinton served as Director and Chairwoman of the Board of Directors of the New World Foundation, another Agency revolutionary agitprop entity, which had earned a notorious reputation for being among the ‘most liberal’ (which in America for some reason means ‘socialist’ or ‘Communist’) entities in the United States – dedicated to the activist support of ‘progressive organizations’, as Mrs Clinton herself wrote in the Foreword to the entity’s Annual Report for 1987-88. In 1988 the New World Foundation (the name of which refers to the ‘New World’ these brainwashed revolutionary ‘Useful Idiots’ all think they are creating on behalf of their 'friend' Lucifer, not to the Western Hemisphere) made a grant to CISPES (Committee in Support of the People of El Salvador) founded in New York City in 1980 by Farid Handal, brother of El Salvador’s Communist Party chief, Shafik Handal. That illustrates the true political orientation of this woman, who comes from Jewish immigrant stock originally from Russia. The ‘New World Order’ that the revolutionaries espouse should of course be renamed the ‘New World Disorder’ for the straightforward reason that these people, who are controlled by or who are devotees of a Dark Force who is the author of lies and confusion, cannot create ‘order’, because their only ultimate product is death (both spiritual and physical). One need only contemplate the satanic death and destruction that Bush II and his Nazi-Trotskyite neocons have inflicted on Iraq, and wish to inflict upon Iran, to be reminded that their agenda is chaos and disorder, even though their Tavistock-style brainwashing convinces them that they possess the answer to every problem in the world. This is the mindset, for public consumption, at any rate, of Mrs Hillary Jezebel Rodomski Clinton." ( www.worldreports.org/news/116_clinton_pa...derworld_connections )
Unfortunately he has recently died in controversial circumstances as can be read here: http://www.realirishpolitics.org/forum/41-conspiracy-corner/1600-wa... .

Dr John Coleman,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=170819614143019768# .
who was working for MI6 in Angola when he tripped across this cult and later did decades of research on it in the British Library, gave this lecture on the subject.

Fr Andrew O'Brien,

originally from Cork then of the Philippines and later resided at the HQ of the Columban fathers at Dalgan Park Co. Meath, recorded 8 cassette tapes on this subject in 1992/3 called "Build Youself an Ark":
http://www.archive.org/details/DeepUnderstandingOfTheNewWorldOrderC... .
He died in 2008 as you can read here: http://www.columban.com/obit_andy_obrien.html .

Fritz Springmeier,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1255450352571045347
probably the most famous researcher on this subject, authored a number of important books on this topic and also gave some details on it in this 1997 lecture at the Global Science Conference at Tampa Florida. Also see his interview by Jeff Contrares on the TV show There4Iam in Austin Texas:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1058372349704594335 .
He has written, with Cisco Wheeler, the two standard books on the above mentioned mind/brain 'programming' called "The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave", available at: http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/illuminati_formula_m... , and "Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula", online at: http://www.whale.to/b/sp/springmeier.html .

Serge Monast,


Franc maçonerie mondiale et pouvoir
Uploaded by Alone-Imio-eveil-de-lame.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ko1v_franc-maconerie-mondiale-et... ,
was another famous writer on the Illuminati who unfortunately has died in mysterious circumstances. He was a French Canadian journalist that you can see, speaking in French, in this video. He was also interviewed by Canadian radio in 1995:


Serge Monast interview ''À voir absolument''
Uploaded by Anarchy322. - News videos from around the world.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xb08u1_serge-monast-interview-a-vo... .
He leaked a number of very curious documents from the Occult, particularly the perplexing 'Project Blue Beam' report available here: http://www.amightywind.com/rapture/bluebeam.htm .

Dr Stanley Monteith,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8098064883375662340
a Californian medical doctor who became interested in this subject when he read a book called 'The Invisible Government', written by an ex FBI agent in the early 60s, gave this lecture in the 90s.

Anthony J Hilder,

a leading figure in film and music production in Hollywood - he even acted with people like Lee Marvin - produced Myron Fagan's recordings in the 60s and is still producing films and books on this question of the Illuminati, as you can see in an interview with him here: http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=107684882578680, and in an 1993 video here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6565738119734078040# .
He was also interviewed by Mark Dice at:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7675026120083836670# .

David Livingstone,

is a Canadian historian who has attempted to try and piece together the truth from the Occult myths about the origins of the Illuminati, as he describes in this interview:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaxDiFJZo68 .
His website is at http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/ .


Whistle blowers who accidentally tripped across the Illuminati

George Washington Hunt,

http://www.archive.org/details/GeorgeHunt-TheNewWorldBankReligionAn... .
a businessman, and ex Naval officer, who accidentally attended the World Wilderness Conference in Colorado in 1987.

Aaron Russo,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5420753830426590918# .
a film producer who did films like 'Trading Places', and who was befriended by Nick Rockefeller. He also ran for Governor of Nevada and got 30% of the vote.

Paul A Drockton,

tripped across the Illuminati while working for an insurance company in Utah, as he describes here: http://moneyteachers.org/Response.htm . He has a radio show here: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pdrocktonma1/page/4 .

Ted Gunderson,

who conducted the interview below with Susan Ford, is a former distinguished FBI officer who was in charge of their Dallas and then later Los Angeles office.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzYbimuYUwA
This is a lecture by Gunderson in which he describes how he came across Satanism and describes the story of the Illuminati:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc8QONCmUUw . Another lecture was given by him here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5r3HELQBXI

Anthony Santamaria, from Melbourne, interviewed at about 14 minutes in on the Paul Drockton Radio Show 17/03/2010: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pdrocktonma1/2010/03/17/the-paul-drock... . He tripped across this kind of organisation when his son was abused by Satanists.

Linda Wiegand,
a charity worker in Conneticut, felt the power of Satanic groups as she attempted to save her children from her ex-husband who was in the Occult. She is introduced here by Ted Gunderson during one of his lectures on the Illuminati:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erssL66a1Es
The lecture is continued here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XD6SgeG3qk .
Her case is further described here: http://www.rense.com/political/childabusecase.htm .


Illuminati whistle blowers

Roger Morneau

describes on video, in considerable detail, how he joined this group - it is obviously this organisation although he doesn't use the name 'Illuminati' - in Montreal in 1946: https://www.youtube.com/rogermorneau#p/u/9/0CLAye_rEik.

Mike Warnke


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG_w-uElGbM .
- who elsewhere identifies the group he was in as the Illuminati - was interviewed on this 20/20 TV show broadcast on ABC in October 1985. His wrote about his experiences in the Illuminati in his book "The Satan Seller" (Plainfield New Jersey, 1972): Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/Satan-Seller-Mike-Warnke/dp/0882700960/ . He stated in 1993 that when he submitted the original manuscript to the publishers it was decided that it would be slightly changed "by myself and the editors in a conscious attempt by us to protect people that could have been hurt and to keep the book from being used as a 'how to' reference for those seeking ways to get involved in Satanism." But in any case he stands by its accuracy and asserts that nothing should cloud "the facts from being the facts" ( http://mikewarnke.org/PDF/Tribunalhearing.pdf ).

John Todd,

of the Collins Illuminati family, broke off from a senior position in the Occult in the 70s which is when he recorded these lectures:

http://www.archive.org/details/JohnToddFormerIlluminatiOccultMember... ,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8102723686161066292
and

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4797172096740150104# .

Doc Marquis,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTGADyAUhEM .
left the Illuminati in 1979 and later gave this lecture on the subject.

Mrs Edna Elaine Moses née Knost, as well as her friend and co-author of two books Dr Rebecca Brown, was interviewed in profile, as 'Elaine', by Geraldo Rivera on the Geraldo show entitled "Satanic Cults and Children", broadcast on ABC on the 19th of November 1987. You can read an extract from one of the above books, He Came To Set the Captives Free, here where she describes the coven she was in and its links to the Illuminati: http://www.mt.net/~watcher/bluey.html .

Bill Schnoebelen

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7672003660947890622 .
left this cult in 1984, as he describes in this lecture: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2134284036772812990 . This speech reflects the American style of up front religious expressions, which I know might not be to everybody's tastes, but if you persist in listening to this it does explain, clearly and in some detail, the usual thinking of Occultists.

Cisco Wheeler,

in an interview by Wayne Morris on the 11th Jan 1998: http://educate-yourself.org/mc/ciscowheelerinterview11jan98.shtml . Wayne Morris also interviewed Fritz Springmeier, who helped Cisco Wheeler leave the occult, as can be read here: http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/springmeier_intervie... .

Carol Rutz

wrote an article on this, informed by her own experiences, called A Nation Betrayed which has been digitized and put on youtube:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuO2ygP_OGo .
She also went into some of the details of the mind/brain programming used on her at a conference in August 2003 at Windsor Locks, CT: http://ritualabuse.us/smart-conference/conf03/healing-from-ritual-a... .

Neil Brick


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knSAmGobbD8 .
is another survivor who has gone through these experiences in an Illuminati/Satanic family. He gave some insight into his experiences in 1995: http://ritualabuse.us/2008/10/issue-1-march-1995/ , in 2000: http://web.archive.org/web/20031009235857/http://hometown.aol.com/s... and 2001: http://ritualabuse.us/smart-conference/conf2001/my-most-recent-memo... .

Susan Ford,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1496118956250582828#
using the pseudonym Brice Taylor, was from an Illuminati family as she relates in her book Thanks for the Memories: http://enjoyingthejourney.blogspot.com/2007/11/susan-ford-brice-tay... . She was 'programmed' as a sex slave among the elite as she describes on camera in this lecture, and in an 1998 interview with Ted Gunderson:


https://www.youtube.com/v/G_c7JTADT_k .

'Svali',

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8914798423780824846
who started leaving this cult in San Diego in 1992, was interviewed here by Dr Greg Syzmanski on the Investigative Journal. She is also interviewed here:http://educate-yourself.org/mc/mcsvaliinterviewpt1.shtml . She was a mind/brain 'programmer' in the Illuminati as she describes in her valuable online book here: http://www.suite101.com/articles.cfm/ritual_abuse .

David Marr,

has given his life story in some detail here: www.danofisrael.com/id33.html">http://web.archive.org/web/20070827103158/www.danofisrael.com/id33.html . He states that he is a member of an Illuminati family, an unacknowledged member of the Orange royal family of the Netherlands. The amazing thing about this case is that he also uses a public persona known as Anthony de Mare, a well known concert pianist that you can see in concert here if you like:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnUp_CRrBkY .
He states that his brilliance as a musician is down to the 'programming' he received.

Christopher Charles Tanner,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gE_5fjoY9VA .
Ontario, known as 'The Sandman' and creator of a group called 'the swallows', states that he is a member of the Illuminati and provides some, very brief, information here.

'Mary Anne', interviewed by Dr Henry Makow: http://www.henrymakow.com/broadcasts/Makow_1_092108maryanne.mp3 .

Giulio Tremonti,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olkU_dSjNU0
the Minister of Economy and Finance in the Italian government, has recently talked about the modern Illuminati in a number of interviews e.g. the above video and


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUSfFl62y_E .
He clearly must know about this cult from the inside because he is a member of the usual organisations, Bildergers, Aspen Institute etc.


These three interviews are by people who claim to be current members of the Illuminati:

'Druwydion Pendragon'


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tXtPTQFpdU .
of Georgia in the USA.

Gabriel Lopez de Rojas,


Gabriel Lopez de Rojas GrandMaster of the Illuminati Order
Uploaded by networkofvideos. - News videos hot off the press.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xa895v_gabriel-lopez-de-rojas-gran... .
of Barcelona, who obviously did not found the Illuminati but is nonetheless listed as a senior member of the OTO, an allied organisation.

Interview with an anonymous member


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwDeryGqFIM .
from Germany on OccultoTV.


Testimony from victims of the type of mind/brain 'programming' described above:

Duncan O'Finioan,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pU2cvFpJ5k .
who is not saying he was in the Occult but that he was nonetheless given this kind of brain/mind programming. He was given the same kind of treatment that this Occult group practice but in his case by the US military and CIA.

Lynn Moss-Sharman


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q-7-MiAau4 ,
interviewed on camera here, and in a radio interview she says that her story is also tied into the question of Satanic families and the ongoing abuse: http://www.raven1.net/lynmoss.htm .

Claudia Mullen,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=het0FIAtH3M .
interviewed in March 1995 in Washingon D.C. by the President's Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.

Christina Denicola,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXDASDDrDkM .
was also interviewed by the above mentioned committee.

Blanche Chavoustie, who was also interviewed by Wayne Morris for his radio program: http://www.whale.to/b/chavoustie.html .

Some of the victims of this technology, and a few of their therapists and lawyers, prepared a video to highlight their case which you can see here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StNc7Bt3QzI .
There you can hear the short testimonies of Kathy Lewis, from Ontario, Susan Benson, from Detroit, Chuck Davenport, from Michigan, Kathleen Sullivan, from Reading Pennsylvania, who gives her account in more detail here: http://web.archive.org/web/20030104000255/members.aol.com/smartnews... , Terry Barker, from Toronto and Becky McDonald, from Pittsburgh.

Robert Logie, one of Cameron's Canadian patients that successfully sued the CIA and so proved their support for this mind 'programming' phenonomon, interviewed here in 2008: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDEwm0WEmuo .


A couple of interesting miscellaneous links:

The Illuminati on facebook by Steve Wesley Thomas of Cornwall: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=12449 , and the follow up story is at: http://www.henrymakow.com/tracking_the_illuminati_2.html .

A number of unusual transcripts of tapes were made by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan in 1988 and are his recollection of a speech given to the Pittsburg Pediatric Society on March 20th 1969 by Dr. Richard Day, Professor of Pediatrics at Mount Sinai Medical School in New York and described as an insider of "The Order". The full list of tapes is available here: http://ideam.net/search-results.php?id=29822&pg=0A and a transcript of the tapes is available at: http://100777.com/node/19 .

The cards from the Illuminati board game released in 1995: http://grou.ps/et/photos/person/ucxejmrwgxqmphbmf . Some people think that the author of this game had some inside knowledge into this cult because it came out long before 9/11 yet contains images that seem to predict the Twin Towers and Pentagon attacks. If you are trying to follow the meaning of these cards bear in mind that this cult is supposed to control all political movements (e.g. environmental ones, protest or 'weird' ones, conservative and liberal movements etc) and, in the game at any rate, uses various tricks to boost these organisations or combine these groups for various 'goals'.

In 2010 a number of emails were sent, ultimately, to the website of Dr Henry Makow by an Australian using the name of Aloysius Fozsdyke. He claims to be a member of a very powerful Occult group in Australia called the Alpha Lodge. While obviously this information is all very anonymous its nonetheless not impossible that a member of one of these groups might like to boast of their 'achievements'. You can the whole text here: http://oireland.tripod.com/satanism.html.

Home


Back to top


Their Agenda for society


Mind/Brain programming


Race


Who are they?


Bibliography/ video and audio links