The Inorganic Recovery
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
http://mises.org/story/3700


There is something affected, something not believable, something agitpropish, about all the cheers for the glorious economic recovery we are supposed to be experiencing. Even some of the recovery's biggest boosters don't quite believe it.

I'm thinking of the reporter on National Public Radio a few days ago who, at the end of a segment, offered a passing warning that the bust did not come to an "organic" end, but rather was artificially stopped by government intervention.

That's an intriguing admission, suggesting that not even this reporter really believes the hype. I certainly don't believe it. In fact, I seriously doubt that even the champions of this great fakeroo believe it.

What that reporter hinted at is the crucial difference between a recovery that comes from within the structure of the market economy and one that is imposed from without. The former is sustainable, a basis for growth in the future. The latter is not sustainable. It lasts only so long as the stimulus lasts.

The most conspicuous problem remains unemployment, which is nearing double digits in the official data, while unofficial data, even from Fed economists, hint that the reality is closer to 16 percent. Among the youth, the rate is 25 percent and growing.

Month after month, the press announces the "good news" that unemployment is not as high as expected. And yet if you look at the trend line, we are in an uninterrupted climb in job losses of a scale we have not seen in our lifetimes.

To be sure, this is only a symptom. When an economy goes from boom to bust, a bout of job losses is inevitable. The losses can even suggest a good trend, as people leave jobs in failing sectors to enter jobs in the healthy sectors. Policy should not attempt to stop this trend.

What is of concern here is the timing. The problem keeps getting worse, which suggests that in fact the bust has not played itself out entirely. And this is backed by other trends.

Let's first talk about housing statistics, which are off the cliff. Consider housing starts. Over a year, they have crashed from a height of 1.8 million per month to 390 thousand per month. The latest rebound looks like a blip on the radar screen.

The July numbers on foreclosures are the worst we've seen, and the third new record in five months. Already 2.9 million homes have been foreclosed on, and there are probably at least that many still on the chopping block. Banks are reluctant to do the deed because foreclosures devastate their books, so they delay as long as possible.

There is also the sleeping giant of commercial real estate, which rose as much as residential housing, tripling loaned dollars in the course of a mere 10 years. But there has not yet been a crash here. Looking at the numbers, one gets the impression of a high-flying jet about to run out of gas.

And when you broaden the perspective past housing, to the whole of domestic investment, it looks like an Olympic high dive with no end in sight. In fact, ten years of investment has been effectively reverted. We stand today where we stood in 1999.

Investment is a very important piece of data for assessing our future, because it is always forward looking. In this case, there doesn't seem to be progress in the future at all. Even from the point at which this figure turns, we have another few years before real economic growth returns.

Why do matters in the financial sector look better? This is wholly a consequence of trillions in artificial stimulus, a market rejiggered and falsified through money creation, partial nationalization, and bailouts. These do not last.

A few months ago, many people were worrying about the inflationary future that is suggested by the astonishing increase in phony bank reserves over the last year. Today, however, the tune has changed. Bernanke is now being heralded as the great genius of our times.

What this suggests is that no efforts are going to be undertaken to suck the phoniness out of the system. The new reserves are going to stay in the system, and every effort will be taken to convert the reserves into real money supply increases. And if that actually happens, you had better hold on for a wild, inflationary ride.

Do I even need to mention the federal budget problems? Revenues continue to collapse as government spending soars, creating a gigantic hole in the budget at a time when the pressure for more spending is cranked up by the recession. There is no talk of budget cuts. We are entering uncharted territory.

A year ago this month, the whole country was in agreement that we had been living an illusion for the previous ten years and that the prosperity we thought we were enjoying was not sustainable. There was no dissent on this point. Even Obama admitted it. Today, the illusion is even more egregious than it was, and yet people are once again embracing it as if it will not end.



The policy response to the downturn has been one of the most shortsighted and economically irrational in the entire history of mankind. Why did they do it? It's all for the politics of the short term.

The entire economic structure has been phonied up in order to make a success of the Obama cult. This is the driving motivation, alongside the obvious desire on the part of financial and banking big shots for a bailout.

Please clip and save this column; reread it 18 months from now. In the meantime, don't be among those who believe that the government has discovered the secret of prosperity in the offices of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

Views: 25

Replies to This Discussion

I don't like the idea that a school of economics
can create a brand and sell itself as 'The Solution'.
Sometimes I felt that Dr. Paul may just be trapped in it.
Can anyone explain why is Webster Tarpley wrong
and Von Mises followers right?
They're really not "selling themselves" as a "solution". Rather, they are a school of economist yes. So, as a school, they have many people whom stand in different areas of a subject, in this case economics. No one is trying to sell a solution, but rather giving and coming up with ideas and philosophies on possible ways to fix the problem. Also, it helps that most of the Economist at Von Mises are well educated in the field of math in all it's forms. So, when you have people who actually study the man sides of and processes of economics and how math works with economy, they'll usually try to pitch some kind of a solution based on their credentials. And that's really all the people at Von Mises are trying to do, not "sell you a solution", but instead, hope to open your eyes and mind to solutions that make sense economically, mathematically, and just common knowledge. I don't know where the Webster Tarpely comparison came from, so I'm not even going to go there.

RSS

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted a blog post
Thursday
Burbia commented on TommyD's group The Chuckle Hut
"The Warriors is one of my favorite movies. I couldn't help but laugh at this spoof."
Thursday
Doc Vega posted a photo
Wednesday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Are the End Times Drawing Near?
"cheeki kea, You might want to see predictions made by Robert Welch in 1957 and 1974 stating that…"
Wednesday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Are the End Times Drawing Near?
"cheeki kea, good points. We have a world full of twisted allied agendas that seem contradictory,…"
Wednesday
Sandy posted a video

Ghislaine Maxwell & The Secret "Shadow" 9/11 Commission? | John Kiriakou

In this gripping excerpt from the Julien Dorey podcast, former CIA officer and whistleblower John Kiriakou reacts to a leaked email from 2003. The document r...
Tuesday
cheeki kea left a comment for Holyroller
"Greetings to you Holyroller very awesome you've joined up with us all. I know you'll find…"
Tuesday
cheeki kea commented on Doc Vega's blog post Are the End Times Drawing Near?
"Yes it's a sad and sorry situation we see evolving here. On one front and it's a large…"
Tuesday
Doc Vega commented on tjdavis's video
Thumbnail

When the Communists Take Over America!...Famous 1957 Anti-Communist Movie

"I remember this when I was a little seeing it on TV years after it was filmed and it scared me even…"
Tuesday
tjdavis posted a video

When the Communists Take Over America!...Famous 1957 Anti-Communist Movie

Starring Jack Webb and Robert Conrad, this 1957 movie by the United States Armed Forces Information Agency is perhaps the best known anti-communist movie eve...
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Are the End Times Drawing Near?

Are we seeing the gradual fulfillment of the Battle of Armageddon? Think of it. The US and Israel…See More
Monday
Holyroller is now a member of 12160 Social Network
Monday
tjdavis posted a blog post
Mar 1
Sandy posted photos
Mar 1
Burbia posted a video

Catherine Fitts: Epstein, CIA Black Budget, the Control Grid, and the Banks’ Role in War

Programmable digital currency is the final piece of the global control grid that’s finally snapping into place. Catherine Austin Fitts on how to defeat it. C...
Feb 27
Евеліна posted a status
"цікаво, воно цитатами виділяє, як моє особливе "я""
Feb 27
Евеліна posted a status
"на роботі, сонце світить, потрібно перепочити."
Feb 27
Евеліна posted a blog post

Ключові слова в тексті: як органічно їх вписати в статтю

Що таке ключові слова і чому вони важливіКлючові слова — це слова або фрази, які користувачі…See More
Feb 27
Евеліна is now a member of 12160 Social Network
Feb 26
Burbia left a comment for pohonemas33 team
"Quit promoting gambling on another site"
Feb 26

© 2026   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted