The Inorganic Recovery
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
http://mises.org/story/3700


There is something affected, something not believable, something agitpropish, about all the cheers for the glorious economic recovery we are supposed to be experiencing. Even some of the recovery's biggest boosters don't quite believe it.

I'm thinking of the reporter on National Public Radio a few days ago who, at the end of a segment, offered a passing warning that the bust did not come to an "organic" end, but rather was artificially stopped by government intervention.

That's an intriguing admission, suggesting that not even this reporter really believes the hype. I certainly don't believe it. In fact, I seriously doubt that even the champions of this great fakeroo believe it.

What that reporter hinted at is the crucial difference between a recovery that comes from within the structure of the market economy and one that is imposed from without. The former is sustainable, a basis for growth in the future. The latter is not sustainable. It lasts only so long as the stimulus lasts.

The most conspicuous problem remains unemployment, which is nearing double digits in the official data, while unofficial data, even from Fed economists, hint that the reality is closer to 16 percent. Among the youth, the rate is 25 percent and growing.

Month after month, the press announces the "good news" that unemployment is not as high as expected. And yet if you look at the trend line, we are in an uninterrupted climb in job losses of a scale we have not seen in our lifetimes.

To be sure, this is only a symptom. When an economy goes from boom to bust, a bout of job losses is inevitable. The losses can even suggest a good trend, as people leave jobs in failing sectors to enter jobs in the healthy sectors. Policy should not attempt to stop this trend.

What is of concern here is the timing. The problem keeps getting worse, which suggests that in fact the bust has not played itself out entirely. And this is backed by other trends.

Let's first talk about housing statistics, which are off the cliff. Consider housing starts. Over a year, they have crashed from a height of 1.8 million per month to 390 thousand per month. The latest rebound looks like a blip on the radar screen.

The July numbers on foreclosures are the worst we've seen, and the third new record in five months. Already 2.9 million homes have been foreclosed on, and there are probably at least that many still on the chopping block. Banks are reluctant to do the deed because foreclosures devastate their books, so they delay as long as possible.

There is also the sleeping giant of commercial real estate, which rose as much as residential housing, tripling loaned dollars in the course of a mere 10 years. But there has not yet been a crash here. Looking at the numbers, one gets the impression of a high-flying jet about to run out of gas.

And when you broaden the perspective past housing, to the whole of domestic investment, it looks like an Olympic high dive with no end in sight. In fact, ten years of investment has been effectively reverted. We stand today where we stood in 1999.

Investment is a very important piece of data for assessing our future, because it is always forward looking. In this case, there doesn't seem to be progress in the future at all. Even from the point at which this figure turns, we have another few years before real economic growth returns.

Why do matters in the financial sector look better? This is wholly a consequence of trillions in artificial stimulus, a market rejiggered and falsified through money creation, partial nationalization, and bailouts. These do not last.

A few months ago, many people were worrying about the inflationary future that is suggested by the astonishing increase in phony bank reserves over the last year. Today, however, the tune has changed. Bernanke is now being heralded as the great genius of our times.

What this suggests is that no efforts are going to be undertaken to suck the phoniness out of the system. The new reserves are going to stay in the system, and every effort will be taken to convert the reserves into real money supply increases. And if that actually happens, you had better hold on for a wild, inflationary ride.

Do I even need to mention the federal budget problems? Revenues continue to collapse as government spending soars, creating a gigantic hole in the budget at a time when the pressure for more spending is cranked up by the recession. There is no talk of budget cuts. We are entering uncharted territory.

A year ago this month, the whole country was in agreement that we had been living an illusion for the previous ten years and that the prosperity we thought we were enjoying was not sustainable. There was no dissent on this point. Even Obama admitted it. Today, the illusion is even more egregious than it was, and yet people are once again embracing it as if it will not end.



The policy response to the downturn has been one of the most shortsighted and economically irrational in the entire history of mankind. Why did they do it? It's all for the politics of the short term.

The entire economic structure has been phonied up in order to make a success of the Obama cult. This is the driving motivation, alongside the obvious desire on the part of financial and banking big shots for a bailout.

Please clip and save this column; reread it 18 months from now. In the meantime, don't be among those who believe that the government has discovered the secret of prosperity in the offices of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

Views: 25

Replies to This Discussion

I don't like the idea that a school of economics
can create a brand and sell itself as 'The Solution'.
Sometimes I felt that Dr. Paul may just be trapped in it.
Can anyone explain why is Webster Tarpley wrong
and Von Mises followers right?
They're really not "selling themselves" as a "solution". Rather, they are a school of economist yes. So, as a school, they have many people whom stand in different areas of a subject, in this case economics. No one is trying to sell a solution, but rather giving and coming up with ideas and philosophies on possible ways to fix the problem. Also, it helps that most of the Economist at Von Mises are well educated in the field of math in all it's forms. So, when you have people who actually study the man sides of and processes of economics and how math works with economy, they'll usually try to pitch some kind of a solution based on their credentials. And that's really all the people at Von Mises are trying to do, not "sell you a solution", but instead, hope to open your eyes and mind to solutions that make sense economically, mathematically, and just common knowledge. I don't know where the Webster Tarpely comparison came from, so I'm not even going to go there.

RSS

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

cheeki kea posted a photo
5 hours ago
Doc Vega posted a blog post
7 hours ago
Doc Vega posted blog posts
yesterday
tjdavis posted a photo
Tuesday
james will posted blog posts
Tuesday
Less Prone favorited Sandy's video
Tuesday
Doc Vega's 5 blog posts were featured
Tuesday
tjdavis's 4 blog posts were featured
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

What was the Significance of the F-94 C and What role in History?

 It’s July 19, 1952 over White House forbidden airspace and Captain William Patterson observes…See More
Sunday
tjdavis posted a video

FLUORIDEGATE: An American Tragedy. a film by Dr. David Kennedy

FLUORIDEGATE: An American Tragedy, is a feature documentary that reveals the tragedy of how government, industry and trade associations protect and promote a...
Dec 20
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Rendezvous With The Unknown

Rendezvous With the Unknown Chapter I It was about 9:00 am when I received a text on my phone from…See More
Dec 20
cheeki kea replied to cheeki kea's discussion Tartaria
"ah ha - a Tartarian cuisine component lurks inside good old Tartar Sauce. Who would have thought.…"
Dec 20
tjdavis posted a blog post
Dec 19
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Shadows in the Wind

If you think that life is but a game you can winYou’re just a shadow in the windConveniently…See More
Dec 19
Doc Vega posted a blog post
Dec 18
tjdavis posted a photo
Dec 17
james will is now a member of 12160 Social Network
Dec 17
Burbia replied to cheeki kea's discussion Tartaria
Dec 17
Burbia posted a video

Mossad: we create a pretend world, we are a global production company... the world is our stage

60 Minutes interviews alleged Mossad agent"we create a pretend world, we are a global production company......the world is our stage."_______________________...
Dec 17
Doc Vega posted a blog post

The Alvin II Encounter: Was There A Living Dinosaur Involved?

The year is 1965 in the Caribbean islands at a 5-thousand-foot depth in the dark Atlantic waters.…See More
Dec 16

© 2025   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted