2013 ruling. you can’t patent DNA unless the mRNA is changed… then you are not human, you are owned, and you don’t have human rights.

n a 2013 court case Pathology v Myriad Genetics, Inc, in the United States, the Supreme Court ruled that human DNA cannot be patented because it was “a product of nature.” But at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that if a human genome were changed by mRNA vaccines (which are currently being used), then the genome can be patented.

This means that everyone who has received the vaccine is now technically “patented” and something that is patented is “proprietary” and falls under the definition of “transhumans.” Those people who are legally identified as ‘transhuman’ do not have access to Human Rights or any rights granted by the State.

This is because they are not classified as 100% organic or human. Therefore, technically anyone who has this vaccine could no longer have access to human rights. There have been some legal documents discussing this recently so clarification should be available soon.

https://www.genomeweb.com/diagnostics/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-gene-patents-allows-patenting-synthetic-dna#.YMxvSJMzYWo