Chris of the family Masters, [27.10.21 18:10] [Forwarded from Chris of the family Masters] The Clearfield Doctrine As featured on the “Sovereign Soul Collective” on the Telegram channel and, hand copied for your benefit.
16 May 2021
“Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes, or in the case in Australia, plastic fiat notes issued by the Rothschild owned and privately controlled Reserve Bank of Australia, RBA] and securities, cheques are concerned .... For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from Government.”
Clearfield Trust Co. V United States, 318 U.S., 363 – 371 (1942)
“What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then the Government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation.
As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon whom the demands for specific performance are made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get to the court to enforce its demands, called statutes.”
The Clearfield Doctrine
by Chris of the family Masters
Oct 27, 2021
Chris of the family Masters, [27.10.21 18:10]
[Forwarded from Chris of the family Masters]
The Clearfield Doctrine As featured on the “Sovereign Soul Collective” on the Telegram channel
and, hand copied for your benefit.
16 May 2021
“Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes, or in the case in Australia, plastic fiat notes issued by the Rothschild owned and privately controlled Reserve Bank of Australia, RBA] and securities, cheques are concerned .... For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from Government.”
Clearfield Trust Co. V United States,
318 U.S.,
363 – 371 (1942)
“What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then the Government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation.
As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon whom the demands for specific performance are made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get to the court to enforce its demands, called statutes.”