I've been kicked off most sites for publishing the laws.

How many of you are aware the the LAWFULLY REQUIRED Oath of Office is Legally BINDING? That when they break the oath - no matter if it is a president, state official, bureaucrat - they NO LONGER MEET THE LAWFUL REQUIREMENTS OF THE POSITION THEY ARE OCCUPYING? That not keeping the oath is a criminal, plus a civil, offense - not just a political one?

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order that further defines and clarifies the the law for purposes of enforcement.

18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath of office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311.

Executive Order 10450 provision specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”

Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States; and according to Executive Order 10450 plus 5 U.S. 7311, any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of government other then by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.

(Con't)

Article VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

"which shall be made in Pursuance thereof" is the keywords that most progressives leave out. Why do they leave that out? Why have they suggested that those words mean nothing so they are re writing the US Constitution without them? Because those words "which shall be made in Pursuance thereof" mean that if a law, bill, treaty, amendment, etc does not follow the US Constitution that law, bill, treaty, amendment, etc is NOT LEGAL and is "null and void".  That the ONLY federal law that is supreme is that assigned by the US Constitution and that follows it. Remember, the federal government was DELIBERATELY assigned LIMITED powers. (con't)

The Constitution of the United States of America IS the Supreme Law of this land, NOT those who serve within the federal government.

The first law statute of the United States of America, enacted in the first session of the First Congress on 1 June 1789, was Statute 1, Chapter 1: an act to regulate the time and manner of administering certain oaths, which established the oath required by civil and military officials to support the Constitution.

The wording of the Presidential Oath was established in the Constitution in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8.

‘Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”’

The Framers placed the presidential Oath of Office after the beginning clauses setting forth the organization of the executive department, and before the ending clauses that specify the contours of the President's assigned power. The President takes the oath after he assumes the office but before he executes it. The location and phrasing of the Oath of Office Clause strongly suggest that it is not empowering, but that it is limiting - the clause limits how the President's "executive power" is to be exercised.(cont)

The requirement for all Federal and State Civil officers to give their solemn and binding Oath is established in Article VI, Section 1, Clause 4.

They are bound by their Oath to support the US Constitution, and should they abrogate their Oath by their acts or inaction, are subject to charges of impeachment and censure - political remedy for a political offense; plus removal from office and civil and criminal charges.

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge.

Solemn: “Legally binding, Common legal phrase indicating that an agreement has been consciously made, and certain actions are now either required or prohibited. The other requirement for an agreement or contract to be considered legally binding is consideration – both parties must knowingly understand what they are agreeing to”.

Bound: “Being under legal or moral obligation; to constitute the boundary or limit of; to set a limit to; confine”

Legally Binding: Common legal phrase. Lawful action, such as an agreement consciously agreed to by two or more entities, establishing lawful accountability. An illegal action, such as forcing, tricking, or coercing a person into an agreement, is not legally binding. Both parties knowingly understand what they are agreeing to is the other requirement to legally establish an agreement or contract.

Consideration: “Consideration in a contract is a bargained for exchange of acts or forbearance of an act.”

Require, Requirement, Required: Mandated under a law or by an authoritative entity. "To claim or ask for by right and authority; That which is required; a thing demanded or obligatory; something demanded or imposed as an obligation."

Contract: “An agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law.”

The Framers placed the requirement for “Oaths of Office” in the Constitution. These Oaths are to function as “checks” on the powers of the federal government and protect us from usurpations.

Each Branch of the federal government has “the check of the Oath” on the other two branches. The States, whose officials also take the Oath of Office, have the same check on all three branches of the federal government. And “We the People”, the “original fountain of all legitimate authority” (Federalist 22), have the Right to overrule violations of the Constitution by elected and appointed officials.

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary says for “Constitution”: “…In free states, the constitution is paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature, limiting and controlling its power; and in the United States, the legislature is created, and its powers designated, by the constitution.”
If any Branch fails to obey the “supreme Law”, then, in order to preserve the Rule of Law, the other Branches, or failing that, the States or the people, must overrule them”.

Good points. Now if you could make your point in a short paragraph of 4-5 sentences that would be perfect for what we're going to be doing.

What about reddit? There is a lot of activity over there in libby land. I set up an account there awhile back but never got around to really using it. Maybe it's time to change that ;)

http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/new/?sort=new

So what have I missed out on? I checked out link James Untypeable posted to go to Reddit, what is that place a shrill community? I have never been there kind of creeped me out. Did you read the rules to the right? Except on Saturday, What, you can only have an opinion on that day? What kind of crap is that? Man, I am so happy to be here and not trying to survive in some place like that. ( Stepping down and turning the soap box over to someone else.)

Hey Tara. It would be really great if you helped out. Mystery too. We all just need to decide where we will have the best results for what we are trying to do. I'm going to check lexa again and find some of the bigger sites where we can reach the most people. I've been on Huffington Post for a little while but I don't know if it would be possible to coordinate with everyone there the way they have it set up. It's definitely a crowd that needs a bucket of cold water to the face though. 

Rededit is an option. I noticed what Mystery pointed out too. They also have a warning against people trolling in groups (essentially what it says) maybe there's a way we can get around that?

The way we get around this K is by hitting on different posts at the same time and maybe playing a game of swith-a-roo at some point. Not everyone on reddit is a diehard wannabe lib but the majority there are loving themselves some Obama and everything demoho. We need to bring the fair back into balance, lol.

Once we decide on a place, we then can decide upon an approach.

pik a good'n, I'll shall follow ;)

I definitely am in correspondence with this initiative. Its high time we invigorate and amalgamate the commoners against the megalomaniacal machiavellians. 

I am not familiar with any of the sites you are talking about and I do not know how to go about sp***ing sites, I have just tried to get people to listen by telling the truth. I need some help as to what is taking place Kryptonite. Please explain.  Feel free to mail me on my page on on the group room.

"Somewhere deep in libby land"?... I'm all for it. Just let me know the where and when and I'll be there :) Huffpo would be a good place to start. 

huffington post, youtube,...

Ok let's do Huff Puff to start. I'm already there and TLS just signed up. It's a quick sing up. I think the formula to begin with is simple. When you comment on an article, leave a link in this comments section. This way other members of the group know you are active, and can leave a supporting comment or post a regular comment under the article.

Here's my last comment:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/19/rush-limbaugh-background-c...

Hey J. Horne. Glad you could drop by :)  I thought you might be interested.

I tried to find your comment to no avail. Holy crap I couldn't believe some of the comments I read! What good would it do to try and reach these brain dead zombies? Why do we want to poke the rabid dog?

A friend of mine comments on these articles all the time, some of the responses he gets are so  off the hook it is almost as though they do not have any since of reason about themselves at all when it comes to logic.

Having fun now at huffpo, get on it guys and let the truth fly.

Something to listen to while posting!

music>> http://youtu.be/w0AMqrhLW3Y

Hot topic right now

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/universal-background-check...

The battle rages on

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/universal-background-check...

Latest thread, I'm hitting up

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/vernon-bowman-farmer-vs-mo...

another

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/5-broken-cameras-emad-burn...

I posted my first comment Huff Post.

but forgot to post link afterward sry

latest comment lol

Giving up liberty for security is what we all should do. Who needs rights? Only oppressed people need rights, geez.

I kind of like strangers going down your pants.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/5-broken-cameras-emad-burn...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/vernon-bowman-farmer-vs-mo...

GMO is soo goood for you Mmmmm. Eat it up and let them take the small farms. They have to consolidate the wealth and ruin you.

How dare you infringe on their right to ruin your life?

I haven't started up an account over at huffpo yet. I've got a family situation going on right now that is taking up most of time this week. I'll start one up as soon as I can and join in on the fun ;)

Oooh family first. Hope everything is ok my friend.

It is super fun haha. I try not to take it too seriously. I had some people thinking today for sure.

Ok, Greg, nice to have you in the group. Libby land is pretty fun actually. Lot's of people a lot like us surprisingly. Quite a heard of sheep too. Perfect place to make a difference huh?

PSYOPS SQUAD ENGAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DO IT! DO IT! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/nra-gun-control_n_2729865....

NRA president speaks out on gun control measures woohoooo!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/nra-gun-control_n_2729865....

"Why is this being argued, the shoot point is a moot point Libbie's, it's was set a while back in something called...The Constitution of The United States

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."shall not be infringed.shall not be infringed.shall not be infringed....
Can we discuss something important and relevant like the bernanke monopoly money rapin us???"

under review...lol

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/obama-approval-rating_n_27...
I love the title. But it should say,"Obama hits his head, and thinks he's wearing a crown like Bushy."

H link me to your profile.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Krypke_Kryptonite

I tried to post this on Huff but said it was to long. Sad face.

Link to story: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/06/israel-keyes-notes-include...

My response:

 Is it only me that thinks if he is alluding to having an unnamed victim under his control, then he probably did. What kind of control are we talking about now would be the next question? There are several different types of control and several different degrees of each type. If you swing to the most extreme type of control, confinement and dependence on him alone, when he died this person also died.
 He may have been sick and twisted but that does not mean he was crazy. People in general (not democrat or republican) just people confuse these two concepts. A sick and twisted person can be very intelligent human being. If you do reading on some of histories most famous serial killers you will find most of them had extremely high IQ's. A truly crazy person can not control their actions long enough to appear normal to society in general. This leads one back to the old saying " There is a fine line between genius and insanity."
 I would also like to put to question if the FBI was not interested in what he had to say then why would they go to the expense of restoring the tablet found underneath him, if it is just ramblings of a crazy person? Then have the audacity not tell the public what was written in his last writings. Consider we paid to have it restored with our tax dollars.
 It also merits statement this "crazy person" had fore thought enough to have kill kits hid at the crime scenes. Would a truly "crazy" person do such a thing? Crazy people usually just snap and start on a killing rampage.
 I would also like to bring to the table, if he was arrested in Texas and held in state custody in Alaska how did Samantha Koeings body go from being in a shed on Keyes property to being in a lake dismembered, while he was on a cruse or in custody? Could this be linked to the person he supposedly has in his control? Is this person, if they exist, now waiting for the opportunity to get revenge or finish Keyes plan?       
 

Mystery

Long responses won't work. You have to adapt :)

Battle for the second amendment here

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/21/las-vegas-strip-shooting_n...

Put in some work today. Over 100 comments woot! I got through to a handful of people no doubt. Got to reach them one at a time :)

just started hammering over here:

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/02/21/biden-attending-gun-violence...

i'm Cob under the discussion

Cool. I've been pounding away on the same story over at huffpo:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/21/joe-biden-gun-control_n_27...

Comment I just left:

Due to the sensitive nature of our censorship, the moderator pimps at Huffy Po, gladly delete things we do not like, but allow all comments that relentlessly harass you. Thank you for your understanding. 

Pending approval lmao

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/21/las-vegas-strip-shooting_n...

Sign up on Huffington and jump in with us. Gotta wake them up one at a time ;)

Latest comments:

Guy says, "Biden is a joke"

I'm like, Obama is the Joker"

Lmao, I shouldn't be having this much fun. It's really not right at all.