Authorities hid truth surrounding September 11 in the immediate aftermath of the attack, telling dying heroes “the air is safe to breathe,” so how on earth can asking what else they lied about be hurtful to the very victims the government stabbed in the back?
Anyone read about the Israeli El Al flight that left NY 12 hours after the bin Laden flight? While the 'No Fly' thing was still in effect? Didn't read about this? Yeah, it's breaking news but it ain't breakin' in the mainstream.
9/11 Conspiracy Theories Gaining Momentum Daily Bell | The controversy around 9/11 is nearly a decade old now but it will not subside. People like David Ray Griffin continue to be in demand from a speaking standpoint.
Who said it wasn't patriotic? Somebody compare Barry lying ass Satoro with George Washington? Whatever we ask is patriotic because we are the gov't. They work for us. They just forgot for now ;)
Top Construction Firm: WTC Destroyed By Controlled Demolition
Paul Joseph Watson | Veteran Middle East correspondent Alan Hart: Largest engineering firm studied collapse of twin towers and said there was no doubt it was a controlled explosion.
Former Utah Congressman, current Senate Candidate Merrill Cook Ques... We Are Change Utah | Merill Cook, former Utah Congressman now running for U.S. Senate, spoke with We Are Change Utah where he questioned various aspects of 9/11, comparing it in part with the JFK assassination.
Just imagine if Israel operatives were exposed as carrying out the Sept 11 2001 attacks--what would be in store for the exposed Ashkenazies controlling America? Stalin/Lenin were Crypto Jews and surrounded themselves with Ashkenazies just as USA presidents do. Over 32 million non-jews were slaughtered and starved to death. Forget about exposing the real culprits or meaningfull investigation.They have the means to turn on us---kill millions of Americans without remorse.They did the 911 attacks and they could do worse.They got what they wanted-USA to defeat their enemies and make money from it.(Jews own all the military production)
Let a mean dog sleep--it could bite you--Rabies anyone one?
Democracy Now had a full hour with michael moore. Toward the end of the show, hemade some comments about what he would tell Obama if he had his ear. He seems to imply strongly that 911 waws an inside job, though he doesn't come out and say that. Link below, view from 53:18 if you don't want to watch the whole hour.
http://www.richplanet.net/911.php
New release of a 9/11 WTC attack documentary from England
On sept 11 2001, no videos of any type of plane was shown--even though most of the major media's cameras were focused on the 2nd tower,
What is shown,a large ball heading directly into the tower and once ramming into WTC ,massive plume of diesel fuel flames bellow out. The author states from this balls projection linage, the Israelies doctored and super imposed passenger planes.Notice the under carriage hump--that is the ball.
my understanding--the ball was fired from a distance as a marker and to help guide the photo shop procedure. what was shown of planes hitting the WTC was only the next day. I been saying this for years now. Anyone pick up the news cast of a ball projectal on Sept 11 and why hasn't this been investigated?????
Ever wondered why Bush was at a day care on 9/11--Has a Presideent ever done this?
Thursday, 16 September 2010 15:13 Kourosh Ziabari .It's not unjustifiable or irrational to argue that the 9/11 attacks were designed and intended to rescue Israel from a political dissolution which was seen by many thinkers as its ultimate destiny, and to promote the cordial coalition of Bush and Bin Laden families. It's no wonder that 9 years after the attacks on New York's Twin Towers and Pentagon, Osama Bin Laden, who is introduced as an Islamic fundamentalist and terrorist that masterminded and directed the 9/11 attacks, hasn't been arrested or killed yet.
For those who are familiar with the world of journalism, it's comprehensible that Osama Bin Laden was simply a name which should have been put forward to become the target of ad hominem attacks by the mainstream media of the Bilderberg Group to appease the pain of Americans who couldn't digest the tragic loss of life in a chain of suicidal attacks which were carried out by the agents of a political entity which has so far succeeded in surviving thanks to the ignorance of taxpayers who don't know where their taxes go.
Two days after the attacks, President George W. Bush said on September 13, 2001 that finding Bin Laden is the administration's first priority. These are his words: "the most important thing for us is to find Osama bin Laden. It's our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
6 months later, everything changed. These are the words of President George W. Bush, too: "I don't know where he is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
The priority changes in 6 months. Isn't it ridiculous? No. Realistically, it's simply painful. The mission has been accomplished and Osama Bin Laden, a political scapegoat, has been vilified and stigmatized to the extent that every American would point the finger of suspicion at him. No-body would think of any other possibility. Osama Bin Laden, an internationally renowned terrorist, had carried out the attacks. So, there should be a War on Terrorism in which the culprits of 9/11 attacks would be punished categorically.
But, what is the reality behind the tragic terrorist attack on the United States?
1- Ex-President George W. Bush knew in advance that the 9/11 attack would take place. The story of President Roosevelt's being aware of the December 7, 1941 Attack on Pearl Harbor happened once again and Mr. Bush betrayed his nation reprehensibly.
Sterling D. Allan has enumerated a number of evidences and reasons which indicate that President Bush had foreknowledge of the attacks and also had planned a certain agenda for his consecutive public reaction. This is one of the most insightful arguments he puts forward: "He (Bush) is the only one who could have given permission to U.S. military jets to intercept and shoot down the hijacked planes thereby averting every target hit after the first. It is likely that he knew that other hijacked planes were in the air, and he could have given the command to intercept and shoot down if necessary. His known behavior constituted gross negligence at best, and given what he most probably knew; treason."
2- American researchers Allan Wood and Paul Thompson point to the same issue that Allan had highlighted earlier. At approximately 8:48 A.M. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first footages of the burning World Trade Center were aired on live television. "By that time, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the National Military Command Center, the Pentagon, the White House, the Secret Service, and Canada's Strategic Command all knew that three commercial airplanes had been hijacked...So why, at 9:03 a.m.-fifteen minutes after it was clear the United States was under terrorist attack-did President Bush sit down with a classroom of second-graders and begin a 20-minute pre-planned photo op? No one knows the answer to that question" they note in a research project carried out for the History Commons.
3- President Bush had planned to pay a visit to Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida on September 11 morning. The plan had been scheduled since August but was "only publicly announced on the morning of September 7", according to Allan and Thompson.
As reported by Daily Telegraph on December 16, 2001, official accounts, including the words of Bush himself, say Bush was first told of the attacks after he arrived at the school. According to reports by the ABC News and Washington Times, ex-President arrived at school shortly before 9:00 A.M. Alan Wood and Paul Thompson state that there are at least four reports which demonstrate that Bush was told of the first crash before he arrived at school. UK's Observer reported on September 16 that "Bush was driving to the school in a motorcade when the phone rang. An airline accident appeared to have happened. He pressed on with his visit."
The History Commons researchers believe that "claims of Bush's ignorance become harder to believe when one learns that others in his motorcade were immediately told of the attack."
They quoted Kia Baskerville, a CBS News producer who was traveling with Bush that morning who received a message about a plane crash "as the presidential motorcade headed to President Bush's first event." Baskerville said, "Fifteen minutes later I was standing in a second grade classroom [waiting for Bush's entrance]" which means she got the news at about 8:47, right as the story was first being reported.
3- Since the mainstream media are accustomed to withholding crucial and vital information from their addressees and usually propagate and disseminate what is in line with their imperialistic interests, not many people heard about Osama Bin Laden's taped statement which was released shortly after the 9/11 attacks took place. Here is what Bin Laden stated about the attacks. He astutely gave the clue to the main culprit behind the terrorist attacks and one could simply trace the footsteps of that perpetrator should some intelligence and cleverness were employed: "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself, to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States."
4- It is an undeniable fact that even if the War on Terrorism, sparked by the 9/11 attacks, takes decades to be accomplished as a mission on the agenda of U.S. administration, Osama Bin Laden will not be the culprit who will be arrested as the man behind the terrorist attacks. Bin Laden will beneficially serve for the United States as someone who can portray a distorted, horrifying and appalling image of Islam and what is coined by the U.S. think tanks as Islamic fundamentalism.
Although Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, which all of us know was founded and funded by CIA, has been introduced as the terrorist who directed the 9/11 attacks, we should never forget that good friends never betray each other. Bin Laden is a good friend of the United States who sacrificed his innocence at the cost of rescuing Bush administration from public scrutiny.
As reported by Denver Post's columnist Cindy Rodríguez, "in 1978, Bush and Osama bin Laden's brother, Salem bin Laden, founded Arbusto Energy, an oil company based in Texas."
The Denver Post's report includes some more interesting facts regarding the connection between Bush and Bin Laden families: "Several bin Laden family members invested millions in The Carlyle Group, a private global equity firm based in Washington, DC. The company's senior advisor was Bush's father, former President George H.W. Bush. After news of the bin Laden-Bush connection became public, the elder Bush stepped down from Carlyle."
Interestingly, on Sept. 11, 2001, members of the Carlyle Group, including Bush senior, and his former secretary of state, James Baker, held a meeting at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington, D.C., along with Shafiq bin Laden, another one of Osama bin Laden's brothers.
And finally, it's helpful to refer to Rick Wiles' investigative research in which some new dimensions of Bush family's connections to Bin Laden family has been revealed: "One of President Bush's earliest financial backers was James Bath, a Houston aircraft broker. Bath served with President Bush in the Texas Air National Guard. Bath has a mysterious connection to the Central Intelligence Agency."
"According to a 1976 trust agreement, Salem bin Laden appointed James Bath as his business representative in Houston. Revelation about Bath's relationship with the bin Laden financial empire and the CIA was made public in 1992 by Bill White, a former real estate business partner with Bath. White informed federal investigators in 1992 that Bath told him that he had assisted the CIA in a liaison role since 1976 - the same year former President George Herbert Walker Bush served as director of the CIA," notes Wiles in a 2001 American Freedom News report.
What is clear is that War on Terrorism was a project which was launched to salvage Israel from political dissolution or at least hold up its collapse. It's also a definite reality that the U.S. administration would never target the main hands behind the 9/11 attacks, because these hands have been shaken by the U.S. bigwigs several times. Osama Bin Laden was a name to entertain the global public opinion. As the Press TV columnist Mohioddin Sajedi noted in his recent article, Israel was the sole winner of 9/11 attacks. Remember those five dancing Israelis who cheered victoriously while capturing videos of the collapsing Twin Towers. That's the reality.
it is clear that 911 is an inside job, why the majority of americans still believe what the mainstream media is telling them even if they know that logicaly 911 cannot be done by hijakers who are not profossional pilots ?
the timing of 911 was perfect to seve the israeli interests and to prepare americans to the war against Iraq
they were planning to invade iraq long time before, then 911 attack happened
do you remember what bush said? he said that saddam has conections to 911 attack and to bin laden, did they prouve the existence of these connections ? did they find the mass destruction weapons?
american governmeny keep lying again and again and american keep believing it , the mainstream media ( which is owned by people who are loyal to israel more than to america) keep spreading propaganda and fabricating things that americans know now they they were lying but they still believing what that media is saying
are americans hypnotized?!!!
I started a new phrase about a year ago after pondering it. I say that people are Willingly Ignorant. Most automatically take offense and close the mind to saying stupid but nobody wants to be Willingly Ignorant, lol. Same thing really.
Dumb down, too much Kool-aid, don't care because it is not in their face yet, Me state, easier to accept official reasons then truth, might have to get out of in front of their TV and do something, comfortable they way it is and they think it is not really going to change, don't care either way!
This is the reasons I've run into!
Rant away Larry. Love the T shirt. They are about to run city water where we are... we have a well, so they can keep it, lol. Plus I think there is a law against drugging the water supply, may just mention that to them.
Dreamer Billy 1st, uncovering of 9/11 Zionists attacks will NEVER EVER happen and see day light. Do you really beLIEve that Jr. Bush, Dick Chenney, Billy Goat Clinton, Israel Sharon will hang for the dirty deed? Why Clinton ? Look at WTC 1 and 2. He authorized the development of semi nuke Bunker Concrete Busting bombs 1996. Nano Thermate was secondary. WTC7 6 were brought down by normal demo explosives.
Fact is both (pig) Fed parties were 9/11 envolved. Having the FBI CIA and MOSSAD and all the Kosher media on their side--NOTHING will come out of it. USA is a zionist controlled country--Boss and family can do anything they want. Assume some one comes out and admits and exposes the zionist RAT pack, in no time planned accidents happen. Look at some of the deaths of of folks who dared to expose or insist on lawsuites, died from planned accidents. Recall that lady who lost her husband and had numerous lawyers on the case and two months prior to the trial, her plane crashed due to baloney--icing?Only one politician dared to expose the real terrorists and she is out. How could all the other Politicians not know? Obvious--Jews did it and will stay covered :^/
Most Americans don't have a clue as to 911 and as long as they focus on those building never will. The real evidence is Flight 93 and from there the whole thing can be exposed, that one isn't covered up so well.
As to what Larry mentions on the wolf at the door, he is right. Opportunity knocks and they are happily taking advantage of it. While exposing 911 is needed we must focus and stop what is happening now, else it does no good.
To: Lawrence Edward Calcutt
Germany my dear good fellow is very much Zionist Jewish controlled. Merkel is another stooge for ISRAEL. Try questioning the Hollowcaust and see how fast you end up in a ashke'Nazi jail.
Regarding WHY docile Americans? French men with balls.Reason of difference is that in France Fluoride is banded from being injected into drinking water. Land of the free and Home of the Brave--disappeared long to ago from the American landscape. What we have wimps/docile as men. Never forget that during the Nazi regime,they discovered that Fluoride in drinking water made the general public docile.
Fluoride does NOT prevent tooth decay and is a very dangerous waste product. And you can thank the Germans for it.
You have to be very careful quoting and supporting Germans. Most of the Zionist Rat Pack 9/11 attackers are German/Russian decedents .Example-- German Bush family.
Muslims did not attack us on 911 or started WWI WWII or infested every aspect of American government.
If we make it a criminal offence in belonging to Judaism/ Christianity,this world would be better off. Note: I hate all religions because they all are different degrees of cult memberships. Please, do us a favor, look up the term Ashkenazim.Today's Jews are very dangerous. We can NOT overlook their 9/11 attacks. They are always planning such monstrous attacks--decades in advance. Never forget--there is 4 missing nuke missiles ( one USA and 3 S.A.), brace your yourselves--millions will die and blamed it on Muslims or the chinese. Israel firsters will never be happy --very dangerous ones--their major tool of trade is habitual lying :^/
jojo, advanced researchers will see that all of any group, Jews, Muslims, Christians, none believers are not to be grouped together into 1 classification. Mistake two is thinking the world would be better off without Christianity. I would recommend that you read and learn Agenda 21. Thinking all Americans drink Florinated water, think again. Some of us have wells from which we get our water.
Hate to tell you like this but time is late in this game so I'll be blunt. You have fell for one of their snares and while an enemy of my enemy is my friend, not believing is being a 1 legged man in a marathon. In others words, you will lose this battle before it ends. Time to wake up. It would be nice to have a a few more people to enter to win. Look at this world and ask yourself if your current beliefs are working out for ya.
to:Lawrence Edward Calcutt/ Gosh an I a slow dumb blonde at times. You might have read what I said about my little town. They are German/Russian decent. The sheriff I told you about taking the plane parts from last name... you ready is BRAUN... who was what Hitler's girlfriend relative or cousin???? Good grief I'm living in a town that's a hornets nest. Is it possible there is a connection? They sure are very corrupt here.
Almost 10 years and nothing has been done to expose the USA Kosher RAT PACK that did the dirty deed on 9/II. Last week, I posted a few comments of my own on 9II truthers. Got a reply--won't be posted UNLESS you prove it. Just mentioning Israel or MOSSAD seems to get alot of 911 sites really pissed. No media/politician in USA/Canada would dare to point fingers at Israel .WHY NOT? Just imagine if the crazy jews do admit to the dirty deed? Israel will vanish in no time and that is why MUMS the word. These Ashkenazim devil's rejects must be exposed before they decide to kill millions of americans and blame it on Iran or China. WTC 1 and 2 were brought down by very big explosives and very different than WTC7. Only Concrete bunker busting bombs could have done the job--from top down not like WTC7--down up
In old days, farmers got sick and tired of cattle rustlers. Vigilantes were formed and hangings were norm. Time to stop talking and get even {:^(
FEMA misrepresented the core structure of the Twin towers which invalidates the "cause of death" analysis by NIST because they did not have the plans and were deceived.
FEMA said this was the core structure.
It was not. The core of WTC 2 is seen on 9-11 and there are NO STEEL CORE COLUMNS protruding from the core.
The core FEMA presents would have a great deal of heavy structural steel protruding. This fact mandates a new analysis WITH THE REAL PLANS.
BTS Data reveal no Passenger Planes Destroyed on 9/11
If the subject were not so controversial, one might assume that a very powerful blow to the story of four hijacked airplanes on 9/11 would be Holmgren’s discovery that two of the four flights connected to that day’s events did not exist and the other two alleged participating aircraft were not destroyed until four years later. As Holmgren writes, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) keeps detailed records of flight times, tail numbers, taxi out times, wheels off times, and so on for every scheduled flight from a U.S. airport, in part for liability insurance considerations. Holmgren found that the original BTS records of take offs that day did not list flights for AA77 (Pentagon crash) and AA11 (North Tower, the first hit).[18]
Of the first hit on the WTC North Tower at 8:46, Holmgren notes that when one looks closely at the video (which wasn’t broadcast until 16 hours later "when the official story of four large planes had already been put into the public’s mind") all one can see is "a brief flash and then the explosion." Holmgren claims that whatever the object is, it "is certainly not a Boeing 767 or any kind of large passenger jet." The object is "way too small. It dive bombs into the tower in a manner which would appear to [be] impossible for a large airliner." Although, he writes, "the natural tendency is to think it is just too fast to see on the video…a frame by frame enlarged analysis…shows a very strange looking object, or possibly several objects flying in close formation. A pulsating blob or group of blobs is probably the best description."[19]
Holmgren argues that the passenger lists seem to be fabricated "because there are impossible contradictions between the lists published by different media outlets…." Nor, he claims, are there any reliable witnesses to support a large jet of the first strike. "All early reports say that it was a small plane or missile," and others who say they simply didn’t see any plane. According to Holmgren, the first strike became a "large plane after people saw the second strike live on TV, leading to the assumption that the first strike had been the same thing," and after American Airlines declared that it had lost AA11 in the crash.
I bet a case of Lager beer that no planes were used to smash into WTC 1 and 2. Show me one TV network video ,other than the 2 Quebec brothers photo shopped videos and the beer is yours Cheers {:^/
Chris--many thanks for the interest and reply. If we don't expose the real culprits of 9/II attacks,there will be million dead Canadian/Americans. Jews plot things to happen decades in advance. I been suspecting a big hit coming soon--more likely Toronto Canada a Nuke missile blast--whole EU NATO will come to it's defense and the Jewish media will blame it on Iran. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/11/gordon-duff-in-motion-the-p...
"The Israeli game with these weapons is one of the worst kept secrets in the world and has already cost the deaths of many. It will take nothing short of the detonation of one of this Hiroshima sized Israeli nukes to push America into Israel’s war with Iran, much as hunting for these nukes which Israel informed President Bush were in Iraq, led “the decider” to making one of the many blunders of his career. Our next 9/11 will be nuclear."
Old days, Cattle ranchers got fed up with cattle rustlers and Sheriffs did nothing--vigilantes got the problem solved in no time. Check this video of the guy that could talk and expose the real Who done it--Rudy can be made to talk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8
Almost 10 years gone--too many Jews in hi places, most 9/II sites don't want to go down this route--Jews could only have done 9/II and keep a lid on it.Never ever expect a new investigation--not in our life time.This week Hillary promised Israel--no matter how bad abortion Israel is/does--USA will cover her always motherly love. Sad :^(
JoJo, its all possible. My point is, "Where do we use this information? What reaction do we expect." Now I realize that it can serve as a warning, but being prepared is in its own as well done as it might be. My point is that information that can be acted on has the capcity of being proactive, PREVENTING perhaps the very worst. I have info that has that quality.
Hello Lawrence Edward Calcutt,
I read your post and have some input which is the product of many hours considering the issue of remotes or not.
It turns out the logical understanding, fairly well says there were no remotes while also developing a better understanding of what did happen.
The logic of there being no remotes hinges on one very big factor that had there been remotes, would very likely not exist. That big factor is the backwards impact/fall sequence. The first tower hit, hit hardest, burnt worst, was the last tower to go down.
The perpetrators agents downplay that factor. They come up with excuses like, "WTC 2 fires were about out so there would have been no reason for collapse if they went out so they brought it down first." I can't see the logic in that because my assertion is that if there were remotes, then why did the perps choose the backwards sequence? Remotes make last minute adjustments needed for a more credible ruse easy. Pilots are well trained and controlled. Impact sequences would be absolute.
On the other hand if there were hijackers and the wrong tower was hit first, then the remote contollers of the demolition intitiation could simply demo the first one hit by a plane first.
We don't have that. We have a backwards sequence. Based on the compromise to the ruse that represents I can only logically conclude there were pilots and the Towers detonations were on timers. There was a directional radio transmitter that worked with either tower and either plane headed towards a tower that worked with proximity. So at a preset distance from the tower and subterranean detonations occured to reduce the seismic signals at the final detonation of the building.
Recall that flight 175 showed up, and in this scenario saw its target already burning. It had to do a radical turn to reposition to hit WTC 2 which is exactly what we saw.
This makes flight 93 in a holding pattern until both towers were hit by planes. It was a backup. Imagine how much harder it would be to explain 3 towers "collapsing" but only one hit by a plane. As soon as both were hit, flight 93 was shot down.
Vincent L. Guarisco wrote:
"I am a firm beliver that both planes that hit the twin towers were flown via remote tower".
Vincent,
Belief is one thing, logic is another.
IF the planes were remoted, WHY did the perps choose to have a backwards impact/fall sequence?
That sequence seriously compromises the ruse. The perps would not want people to think that though and I was on septembereleventh.org in 2004 reading posts by the first psyops plants that the "backwards sequence" didn't mean anything to them.
Later one of the admins from that site, provided r.gage with an excuse to ban me from ae911 when I had 3 threads there asking for proof of the steel core columns and gage never responded. Here is an accounting of my efforts to get the architect to use evidence.
Lawrence, you have a solid position. Absolutely, hopefully some of the detail I can provide will provide the capacity to explain HOW, what you know happened indeed did happen. And yes, the truth is shocking. Holding on to the certainty you have will pay off because now there is reason to understand.
I'll try to answer some of Vincents questions. I'm a part time equipment operator and the control of the 757 happen to be similar so I'm bringing some very pertinant info about "remotes".
Vincent L. Guarisco wrote:
"they flew the planes into the buildings as the official excuse to bring them down. If you don't believe this to be true, please explain yourself here on this thread."
Yes, planes were flown into the Twins, but the belief that cheny and rummy flew them probably cannot be substantiated. Planes had nothing to do with the towers coming down, just like Lawrence says.
As far as what did bring them down, pay special attention to the containment issue in the thermite answer with regard to "planting". It is NOT that simple.
Back to remotes, my question never got answered?
"Why did the perps make people think that WTC 1 was first hit by a plane then blow up WTC 2 first and create a backwards impact/fall sequence?"
I don't believe there is a good reason to do that, in fact there is good reason to do everything possible within the perps power to see that the first building his is the first to go down.
I already had logically determined that there were no remotes for the same reason.
Flight 11 hit the wrong tower. The above link explains how if remotes were involved, the impact/fall sequence would be correct. Meaning the Towers were on timers. The behavior of flight 11 indicates that its pilot did not know that its target hasd already been hit so had to reposition with the radical turn which CAN be completed by one pilot and another person to operate the throttles. 757's are "hydraulic over hydraulic" servo controlled and are extremely difficult to set up for remote flight. It's been done once, and that's it. They were used because people in the world of aviation technology know this making it obvious to that knowledgeable segment that there HAD to be Muslim pilots. From the movements correct perspective, the hijacked planes can only be seen as very important to the ruse and war it enabled.
If the planes were remoted you can be sure the pilot was under complete control and well informed. On the other hand if the hijacker was a mind controlled Muslim working with the infiltrated shadow government, he might not follow orders but would still hit a tower. He would gladly leave his passport with handlers to be placed where it would be found.
Vincent L. Guarisco wrote:
"had their assets plant exposives: Nano-thermite. Afterwards, using remote access,"
Nano Thermite explosives:
This misinformation is mostly ACCEPTED by the truth movement and the attempted use of it associated with 9-11 truth causes rejection of FACTS: A recent scientific analysis of WTC dust by Mark Basile finds evidence of thermite and nano sized particles of aluminum. No where in his report does he describe nano thermite as being a military grade explosive.
No researcher into the performance of nano thermite has ever stated pressure and velocity specifications for nano thermite including Neils Harrit who first analyzed nano sized particles found near the WTC. Here are independent papers.
NOTE: The masses of molten steel underneath the WTC can ONLY be caused by ordinary thermite classed as an incendiary.
Accordingly uses of the nano thermite misinformation is not needed and any use of the nano misinformation serves to cause officials to ridicule 9-11 facts after consultations with experts reveal that nano thermite is not explosive and is not generally developed for any common uses although it may have many.
nano sized particle found at WTC:
Thermite in place immediately adjacent to detonations of conventional explosives in the basements, activated or un activated, would generate both components of iron oxide and aluminum oxide which would be reduced to extremely small particles by the high pressure gasses. This would extinguish combustion. If molten steel was present, small particulate iron would result as would aluminum which could then oxidize quickly in such small particle size.
"It’s very, very possible that different varieties were used, and I personally am certain that conventional explosives were used too, in abundance.
RT: When you say “in abundance,” how much do you mean?
Niels Harrit: Tons! Hundreds of tons! Many, many, many tons!
RT: So we are not just talking about nano-thermite. In fact, we are talking about both nano-thermite and conventional explosives used in large quantities…"
Most of the uses of nano themite misinfo in the 9-11 truth movement omit mention of Harrits information on conventional high explosives. All mentions of nano thermite omit any description of how the containment for "nano thermite" might be done. "nano thermite" is subject to this requirement to achieve destruction of the structural elements of the Twin Towers as is the use of any conventional high explosive. Optimum placement and distribution ARE required to attain total pulverization of materials near detonations.
Can someone prove to us or show one TV network's video of actual planes hitting the World Trade towers? One's they did show were from 2 Quebec brother's videos day after.
You will not find such a video shown on Sept 11 2001.Only DOCTERED videos the NEXT day.After WTC1 BLEW up,it is understandable that no TV network/NYPD cameras were filming but hundreds of cameras were pointed afterwards towards both towers. BIG ZERO were shown upto minute reporting.WHY NOT? Because there were no planes . WTC1 2 each floor had tons of high explosives--Blasting sequence was top to bottom (not like WTC7 Bottom to top)
The first Explosive laden blasts in the top upper floors,were supplemented with large stored diesel flue.
If only Nano-thermate was used, by now examples of tested range explosion would have been shown--none.
Only Concrete Bunker Busting bombs were used, If they won't show Pentagon plane hitting,then you know that WTC's smashing planes are photo shopped.
This question needs to be answered. It has the same justification for the "no planes" issue as it does for the remotes.
"Why did the perps make people think that WTC 1 was first hit by a plane then blow up WTC 2 first and create a backwards impact/fall sequence?"
There are only 2 answers that came back that had any reasoning at all, but it was flawed reasoning because to create that backwards impact fall sequence was very damaging to the credibility of the ruse.
1)WTC 2 fires were going to go out and there would be no reason for the building to go down after the fires went out so they dropped it.
2)The perps did it to make us wonder why they did it. (No kidding, somebody actually put that forth as a reason!)
The perps really needed the planes to justify war on Muslims and to make sure that they were identified the passport of Atta was planted.
I feel that 757's were used specifically because they cannot be remoted easily. In fact I have only heard of it being done once in the 1980's.
The proffesional aviation community would know for certain there were no remotes used because they know only "fly by wire" planes like the 747 can be flown remotely under those conditions.
So, accordingly the perps purposefully stayed away from planes that could be flow remotely.
at this video ?-- now this comes from very sick youtube poster.Came across it while searching for the top reference
2)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE&feature=related
BeLIEve it or Not--it's all a scam--Arabs did it--they hate our freedoms...... (to lie that is)
truth
Mar 10, 2010
truth
Mar 10, 2010
truth
Authorities hid truth surrounding September 11 in the immediate aftermath of the attack, telling dying heroes “the air is safe to breathe,” so how on earth can asking what else they lied about be hurtful to the very victims the government stabbed in the back?
Mar 14, 2010
truth
http://rawstory.com/2010/03/revealed-ashcroft-tenet-rumsfeld-warned...
Mar 17, 2010
Jeff
Click Here
Mar 17, 2010
Jeff
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/03/19/22329/
Mar 23, 2010
truth
Daily Bell | The controversy around 9/11 is nearly a decade old now but it will not subside. People like David Ray Griffin continue to be in demand from a speaking standpoint.
Apr 26, 2010
mrgone
Apr 26, 2010
truth
By: portos
Tags:
* 911
Part 1: http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=11778
Part 2: http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=11777
May 10, 2010
truth
Paul Joseph Watson | Veteran Middle East correspondent Alan Hart: Largest engineering firm studied collapse of twin towers and said there was no doubt it was a controlled explosion.
http://www.infowars.com/top-construction-firm-wtc-destroyed-by-cont...
May 26, 2010
truth
We Are Change Utah | Merill Cook, former Utah Congressman now running for U.S. Senate, spoke with We Are Change Utah where he questioned various aspects of 9/11, comparing it in part with the JFK assassination.
May 27, 2010
JoJo
Let a mean dog sleep--it could bite you--Rabies anyone one?
Jul 13, 2010
truth
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/5/michael_moore_on_his_life_his
Jul 14, 2010
truth
Jul 15, 2010
JoJo
New release of a 9/11 WTC attack documentary from England
On sept 11 2001, no videos of any type of plane was shown--even though most of the major media's cameras were focused on the 2nd tower,
What is shown,a large ball heading directly into the tower and once ramming into WTC ,massive plume of diesel fuel flames bellow out. The author states from this balls projection linage, the Israelies doctored and super imposed passenger planes.Notice the under carriage hump--that is the ball.
my understanding--the ball was fired from a distance as a marker and to help guide the photo shop procedure. what was shown of planes hitting the WTC was only the next day. I been saying this for years now. Anyone pick up the news cast of a ball projectal on Sept 11 and why hasn't this been investigated?????
Aug 7, 2010
truth
Sep 13, 2010
truth
Sep 15, 2010
JoJo
Thursday, 16 September 2010 15:13 Kourosh Ziabari .It's not unjustifiable or irrational to argue that the 9/11 attacks were designed and intended to rescue Israel from a political dissolution which was seen by many thinkers as its ultimate destiny, and to promote the cordial coalition of Bush and Bin Laden families. It's no wonder that 9 years after the attacks on New York's Twin Towers and Pentagon, Osama Bin Laden, who is introduced as an Islamic fundamentalist and terrorist that masterminded and directed the 9/11 attacks, hasn't been arrested or killed yet.
For those who are familiar with the world of journalism, it's comprehensible that Osama Bin Laden was simply a name which should have been put forward to become the target of ad hominem attacks by the mainstream media of the Bilderberg Group to appease the pain of Americans who couldn't digest the tragic loss of life in a chain of suicidal attacks which were carried out by the agents of a political entity which has so far succeeded in surviving thanks to the ignorance of taxpayers who don't know where their taxes go.
Two days after the attacks, President George W. Bush said on September 13, 2001 that finding Bin Laden is the administration's first priority. These are his words: "the most important thing for us is to find Osama bin Laden. It's our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
6 months later, everything changed. These are the words of President George W. Bush, too: "I don't know where he is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
The priority changes in 6 months. Isn't it ridiculous? No. Realistically, it's simply painful. The mission has been accomplished and Osama Bin Laden, a political scapegoat, has been vilified and stigmatized to the extent that every American would point the finger of suspicion at him. No-body would think of any other possibility. Osama Bin Laden, an internationally renowned terrorist, had carried out the attacks. So, there should be a War on Terrorism in which the culprits of 9/11 attacks would be punished categorically.
But, what is the reality behind the tragic terrorist attack on the United States?
1- Ex-President George W. Bush knew in advance that the 9/11 attack would take place. The story of President Roosevelt's being aware of the December 7, 1941 Attack on Pearl Harbor happened once again and Mr. Bush betrayed his nation reprehensibly.
Sterling D. Allan has enumerated a number of evidences and reasons which indicate that President Bush had foreknowledge of the attacks and also had planned a certain agenda for his consecutive public reaction. This is one of the most insightful arguments he puts forward: "He (Bush) is the only one who could have given permission to U.S. military jets to intercept and shoot down the hijacked planes thereby averting every target hit after the first. It is likely that he knew that other hijacked planes were in the air, and he could have given the command to intercept and shoot down if necessary. His known behavior constituted gross negligence at best, and given what he most probably knew; treason."
2- American researchers Allan Wood and Paul Thompson point to the same issue that Allan had highlighted earlier. At approximately 8:48 A.M. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first footages of the burning World Trade Center were aired on live television. "By that time, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the National Military Command Center, the Pentagon, the White House, the Secret Service, and Canada's Strategic Command all knew that three commercial airplanes had been hijacked...So why, at 9:03 a.m.-fifteen minutes after it was clear the United States was under terrorist attack-did President Bush sit down with a classroom of second-graders and begin a 20-minute pre-planned photo op? No one knows the answer to that question" they note in a research project carried out for the History Commons.
3- President Bush had planned to pay a visit to Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida on September 11 morning. The plan had been scheduled since August but was "only publicly announced on the morning of September 7", according to Allan and Thompson.
As reported by Daily Telegraph on December 16, 2001, official accounts, including the words of Bush himself, say Bush was first told of the attacks after he arrived at the school. According to reports by the ABC News and Washington Times, ex-President arrived at school shortly before 9:00 A.M. Alan Wood and Paul Thompson state that there are at least four reports which demonstrate that Bush was told of the first crash before he arrived at school. UK's Observer reported on September 16 that "Bush was driving to the school in a motorcade when the phone rang. An airline accident appeared to have happened. He pressed on with his visit."
The History Commons researchers believe that "claims of Bush's ignorance become harder to believe when one learns that others in his motorcade were immediately told of the attack."
They quoted Kia Baskerville, a CBS News producer who was traveling with Bush that morning who received a message about a plane crash "as the presidential motorcade headed to President Bush's first event." Baskerville said, "Fifteen minutes later I was standing in a second grade classroom [waiting for Bush's entrance]" which means she got the news at about 8:47, right as the story was first being reported.
3- Since the mainstream media are accustomed to withholding crucial and vital information from their addressees and usually propagate and disseminate what is in line with their imperialistic interests, not many people heard about Osama Bin Laden's taped statement which was released shortly after the 9/11 attacks took place. Here is what Bin Laden stated about the attacks. He astutely gave the clue to the main culprit behind the terrorist attacks and one could simply trace the footsteps of that perpetrator should some intelligence and cleverness were employed: "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself, to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States."
4- It is an undeniable fact that even if the War on Terrorism, sparked by the 9/11 attacks, takes decades to be accomplished as a mission on the agenda of U.S. administration, Osama Bin Laden will not be the culprit who will be arrested as the man behind the terrorist attacks. Bin Laden will beneficially serve for the United States as someone who can portray a distorted, horrifying and appalling image of Islam and what is coined by the U.S. think tanks as Islamic fundamentalism.
Although Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, which all of us know was founded and funded by CIA, has been introduced as the terrorist who directed the 9/11 attacks, we should never forget that good friends never betray each other. Bin Laden is a good friend of the United States who sacrificed his innocence at the cost of rescuing Bush administration from public scrutiny.
As reported by Denver Post's columnist Cindy Rodríguez, "in 1978, Bush and Osama bin Laden's brother, Salem bin Laden, founded Arbusto Energy, an oil company based in Texas."
The Denver Post's report includes some more interesting facts regarding the connection between Bush and Bin Laden families: "Several bin Laden family members invested millions in The Carlyle Group, a private global equity firm based in Washington, DC. The company's senior advisor was Bush's father, former President George H.W. Bush. After news of the bin Laden-Bush connection became public, the elder Bush stepped down from Carlyle."
Interestingly, on Sept. 11, 2001, members of the Carlyle Group, including Bush senior, and his former secretary of state, James Baker, held a meeting at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington, D.C., along with Shafiq bin Laden, another one of Osama bin Laden's brothers.
And finally, it's helpful to refer to Rick Wiles' investigative research in which some new dimensions of Bush family's connections to Bin Laden family has been revealed: "One of President Bush's earliest financial backers was James Bath, a Houston aircraft broker. Bath served with President Bush in the Texas Air National Guard. Bath has a mysterious connection to the Central Intelligence Agency."
"According to a 1976 trust agreement, Salem bin Laden appointed James Bath as his business representative in Houston. Revelation about Bath's relationship with the bin Laden financial empire and the CIA was made public in 1992 by Bill White, a former real estate business partner with Bath. White informed federal investigators in 1992 that Bath told him that he had assisted the CIA in a liaison role since 1976 - the same year former President George Herbert Walker Bush served as director of the CIA," notes Wiles in a 2001 American Freedom News report.
What is clear is that War on Terrorism was a project which was launched to salvage Israel from political dissolution or at least hold up its collapse. It's also a definite reality that the U.S. administration would never target the main hands behind the 9/11 attacks, because these hands have been shaken by the U.S. bigwigs several times. Osama Bin Laden was a name to entertain the global public opinion. As the Press TV columnist Mohioddin Sajedi noted in his recent article, Israel was the sole winner of 9/11 attacks. Remember those five dancing Israelis who cheered victoriously while capturing videos of the collapsing Twin Towers. That's the reality.
Sep 16, 2010
enddebtslavery
Sep 16, 2010
dhouha
the timing of 911 was perfect to seve the israeli interests and to prepare americans to the war against Iraq
they were planning to invade iraq long time before, then 911 attack happened
do you remember what bush said? he said that saddam has conections to 911 attack and to bin laden, did they prouve the existence of these connections ? did they find the mass destruction weapons?
american governmeny keep lying again and again and american keep believing it , the mainstream media ( which is owned by people who are loyal to israel more than to america) keep spreading propaganda and fabricating things that americans know now they they were lying but they still believing what that media is saying
are americans hypnotized?!!!
Sep 19, 2010
Anthony Kimbrough
Sep 19, 2010
Billy1st III%
This is the reasons I've run into!
Sep 20, 2010
JoJo
Must read--don't miss the ending about 9/11
Home of the Brave, Land of the Free--I think Not! :^(
Home of the Whimps, Land of the Fools -- I know so! :^)
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/178/722/By_Way_of_Deception,_We_Shal...
Sep 20, 2010
dhouha
what are u drinking? is it the same water that all americans are consuming?why you see the truth and they dont
Sep 21, 2010
Billy1st III%
Sep 21, 2010
Anthony Kimbrough
Sep 21, 2010
Billy1st III%
Oct 6, 2010
JoJo
Fact is both (pig) Fed parties were 9/11 envolved. Having the FBI CIA and MOSSAD and all the Kosher media on their side--NOTHING will come out of it. USA is a zionist controlled country--Boss and family can do anything they want. Assume some one comes out and admits and exposes the zionist RAT pack, in no time planned accidents happen. Look at some of the deaths of of folks who dared to expose or insist on lawsuites, died from planned accidents. Recall that lady who lost her husband and had numerous lawyers on the case and two months prior to the trial, her plane crashed due to baloney--icing?Only one politician dared to expose the real terrorists and she is out. How could all the other Politicians not know? Obvious--Jews did it and will stay covered :^/
Oct 6, 2010
Anthony Kimbrough
As to what Larry mentions on the wolf at the door, he is right. Opportunity knocks and they are happily taking advantage of it. While exposing 911 is needed we must focus and stop what is happening now, else it does no good.
Oct 15, 2010
JoJo
Germany my dear good fellow is very much Zionist Jewish controlled. Merkel is another stooge for ISRAEL. Try questioning the Hollowcaust and see how fast you end up in a ashke'Nazi jail.
Regarding WHY docile Americans? French men with balls.Reason of difference is that in France Fluoride is banded from being injected into drinking water. Land of the free and Home of the Brave--disappeared long to ago from the American landscape. What we have wimps/docile as men. Never forget that during the Nazi regime,they discovered that Fluoride in drinking water made the general public docile.
Fluoride does NOT prevent tooth decay and is a very dangerous waste product. And you can thank the Germans for it.
You have to be very careful quoting and supporting Germans. Most of the Zionist Rat Pack 9/11 attackers are German/Russian decedents .Example-- German Bush family.
Muslims did not attack us on 911 or started WWI WWII or infested every aspect of American government.
If we make it a criminal offence in belonging to Judaism/ Christianity,this world would be better off. Note: I hate all religions because they all are different degrees of cult memberships. Please, do us a favor, look up the term Ashkenazim.Today's Jews are very dangerous. We can NOT overlook their 9/11 attacks. They are always planning such monstrous attacks--decades in advance. Never forget--there is 4 missing nuke missiles ( one USA and 3 S.A.), brace your yourselves--millions will die and blamed it on Muslims or the chinese. Israel firsters will never be happy --very dangerous ones--their major tool of trade is habitual lying :^/
Oct 23, 2010
Anthony Kimbrough
Hate to tell you like this but time is late in this game so I'll be blunt. You have fell for one of their snares and while an enemy of my enemy is my friend, not believing is being a 1 legged man in a marathon. In others words, you will lose this battle before it ends. Time to wake up. It would be nice to have a a few more people to enter to win. Look at this world and ask yourself if your current beliefs are working out for ya.
Oct 23, 2010
Mary
Oct 25, 2010
Mary
Oct 25, 2010
truth
Nov 9, 2010
JoJo
In old days, farmers got sick and tired of cattle rustlers. Vigilantes were formed and hangings were norm. Time to stop talking and get even {:^(
Nov 10, 2010
Christopher A. Brown
FEMA said this was the core structure.
It was not. The core of WTC 2 is seen on 9-11 and there are NO STEEL CORE COLUMNS protruding from the core.The core FEMA presents would have a great deal of heavy structural steel protruding. This fact mandates a new analysis WITH THE REAL PLANS.
Nov 15, 2010
JoJo
BTS Data reveal no Passenger Planes Destroyed on 9/11
If the subject were not so controversial, one might assume that a very powerful blow to the story of four hijacked airplanes on 9/11 would be Holmgren’s discovery that two of the four flights connected to that day’s events did not exist and the other two alleged participating aircraft were not destroyed until four years later. As Holmgren writes, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) keeps detailed records of flight times, tail numbers, taxi out times, wheels off times, and so on for every scheduled flight from a U.S. airport, in part for liability insurance considerations. Holmgren found that the original BTS records of take offs that day did not list flights for AA77 (Pentagon crash) and AA11 (North Tower, the first hit).[18]
Of the first hit on the WTC North Tower at 8:46, Holmgren notes that when one looks closely at the video (which wasn’t broadcast until 16 hours later "when the official story of four large planes had already been put into the public’s mind") all one can see is "a brief flash and then the explosion." Holmgren claims that whatever the object is, it "is certainly not a Boeing 767 or any kind of large passenger jet." The object is "way too small. It dive bombs into the tower in a manner which would appear to [be] impossible for a large airliner." Although, he writes, "the natural tendency is to think it is just too fast to see on the video…a frame by frame enlarged analysis…shows a very strange looking object, or possibly several objects flying in close formation. A pulsating blob or group of blobs is probably the best description."[19]
Holmgren argues that the passenger lists seem to be fabricated "because there are impossible contradictions between the lists published by different media outlets…." Nor, he claims, are there any reliable witnesses to support a large jet of the first strike. "All early reports say that it was a small plane or missile," and others who say they simply didn’t see any plane. According to Holmgren, the first strike became a "large plane after people saw the second strike live on TV, leading to the assumption that the first strike had been the same thing," and after American Airlines declared that it had lost AA11 in the crash.
I bet a case of Lager beer that no planes were used to smash into WTC 1 and 2. Show me one TV network video ,other than the 2 Quebec brothers photo shopped videos and the beer is yours Cheers {:^/
Nov 15, 2010
Christopher A. Brown
Nov 15, 2010
JoJo
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/11/gordon-duff-in-motion-the-p...
"The Israeli game with these weapons is one of the worst kept secrets in the world and has already cost the deaths of many. It will take nothing short of the detonation of one of this Hiroshima sized Israeli nukes to push America into Israel’s war with Iran, much as hunting for these nukes which Israel informed President Bush were in Iraq, led “the decider” to making one of the many blunders of his career. Our next 9/11 will be nuclear."
Old days, Cattle ranchers got fed up with cattle rustlers and Sheriffs did nothing--vigilantes got the problem solved in no time. Check this video of the guy that could talk and expose the real Who done it--Rudy can be made to talk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8
Almost 10 years gone--too many Jews in hi places, most 9/II sites don't want to go down this route--Jews could only have done 9/II and keep a lid on it.Never ever expect a new investigation--not in our life time.This week Hillary promised Israel--no matter how bad abortion Israel is/does--USA will cover her always motherly love. Sad :^(
Nov 15, 2010
Christopher A. Brown
Nov 15, 2010
JoJo
http://www.infowars.com/911-activist-who-sued-government-killed-in-...
check this Utube video
MOSSAD planned accident
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8d7ot_beverly-eckert-9-11-widow-i...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hlVBcp_A6c
Nov 15, 2010
Christopher A. Brown
I read your post and have some input which is the product of many hours considering the issue of remotes or not.
It turns out the logical understanding, fairly well says there were no remotes while also developing a better understanding of what did happen.
The logic of there being no remotes hinges on one very big factor that had there been remotes, would very likely not exist. That big factor is the backwards impact/fall sequence. The first tower hit, hit hardest, burnt worst, was the last tower to go down.
The perpetrators agents downplay that factor. They come up with excuses like, "WTC 2 fires were about out so there would have been no reason for collapse if they went out so they brought it down first." I can't see the logic in that because my assertion is that if there were remotes, then why did the perps choose the backwards sequence? Remotes make last minute adjustments needed for a more credible ruse easy. Pilots are well trained and controlled. Impact sequences would be absolute.
On the other hand if there were hijackers and the wrong tower was hit first, then the remote contollers of the demolition intitiation could simply demo the first one hit by a plane first.
We don't have that. We have a backwards sequence. Based on the compromise to the ruse that represents I can only logically conclude there were pilots and the Towers detonations were on timers. There was a directional radio transmitter that worked with either tower and either plane headed towards a tower that worked with proximity. So at a preset distance from the tower and subterranean detonations occured to reduce the seismic signals at the final detonation of the building.
Recall that flight 175 showed up, and in this scenario saw its target already burning. It had to do a radical turn to reposition to hit WTC 2 which is exactly what we saw.
This makes flight 93 in a holding pattern until both towers were hit by planes. It was a backup. Imagine how much harder it would be to explain 3 towers "collapsing" but only one hit by a plane. As soon as both were hit, flight 93 was shot down.
Nov 16, 2010
bryan l
Nov 16, 2010
Christopher A. Brown
"I am a firm beliver that both planes that hit the twin towers were flown via remote tower".
Vincent,
Belief is one thing, logic is another.
IF the planes were remoted, WHY did the perps choose to have a backwards impact/fall sequence?
That sequence seriously compromises the ruse. The perps would not want people to think that though and I was on septembereleventh.org in 2004 reading posts by the first psyops plants that the "backwards sequence" didn't mean anything to them.
Later one of the admins from that site, provided r.gage with an excuse to ban me from ae911 when I had 3 threads there asking for proof of the steel core columns and gage never responded. Here is an accounting of my efforts to get the architect to use evidence.
http://algoxy.com/psych/whatis9-11disinfo_gage.html
Nov 18, 2010
Christopher A. Brown
I'll try to answer some of Vincents questions. I'm a part time equipment operator and the control of the 757 happen to be similar so I'm bringing some very pertinant info about "remotes".
Vincent L. Guarisco wrote:
"they flew the planes into the buildings as the official excuse to bring them down. If you don't believe this to be true, please explain yourself here on this thread."
Yes, planes were flown into the Twins, but the belief that cheny and rummy flew them probably cannot be substantiated. Planes had nothing to do with the towers coming down, just like Lawrence says.
As far as what did bring them down, pay special attention to the containment issue in the thermite answer with regard to "planting". It is NOT that simple.
Back to remotes, my question never got answered?
"Why did the perps make people think that WTC 1 was first hit by a plane then blow up WTC 2 first and create a backwards impact/fall sequence?"
I don't believe there is a good reason to do that, in fact there is good reason to do everything possible within the perps power to see that the first building his is the first to go down.
I already had logically determined that there were no remotes for the same reason.
Flight 11 hit the wrong tower. The above link explains how if remotes were involved, the impact/fall sequence would be correct. Meaning the Towers were on timers. The behavior of flight 11 indicates that its pilot did not know that its target hasd already been hit so had to reposition with the radical turn which CAN be completed by one pilot and another person to operate the throttles. 757's are "hydraulic over hydraulic" servo controlled and are extremely difficult to set up for remote flight. It's been done once, and that's it. They were used because people in the world of aviation technology know this making it obvious to that knowledgeable segment that there HAD to be Muslim pilots. From the movements correct perspective, the hijacked planes can only be seen as very important to the ruse and war it enabled.
If the planes were remoted you can be sure the pilot was under complete control and well informed. On the other hand if the hijacker was a mind controlled Muslim working with the infiltrated shadow government, he might not follow orders but would still hit a tower. He would gladly leave his passport with handlers to be placed where it would be found.
Vincent L. Guarisco wrote:
"had their assets plant exposives: Nano-thermite. Afterwards, using remote access,"
Nano Thermite explosives:
This misinformation is mostly ACCEPTED by the truth movement and the attempted use of it associated with 9-11 truth causes rejection of FACTS: A recent scientific analysis of WTC dust by Mark Basile finds evidence of thermite and nano sized particles of aluminum. No where in his report does he describe nano thermite as being a military grade explosive.
No researcher into the performance of nano thermite has ever stated pressure and velocity specifications for nano thermite including Neils Harrit who first analyzed nano sized particles found near the WTC. Here are independent papers.
http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/Making_Super_Thermite.pdf
http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/thermite report.pdf
http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/SolGelPyroLLNL2002.pdf
A letter from the Navy regarding "nano thermite"
http://algoxy.com/psych/images/dept.navy.indianhead.jpg
NOTE: The masses of molten steel underneath the WTC can ONLY be caused by ordinary thermite classed as an incendiary.
Accordingly uses of the nano thermite misinformation is not needed and any use of the nano misinformation serves to cause officials to ridicule 9-11 facts after consultations with experts reveal that nano thermite is not explosive and is not generally developed for any common uses although it may have many.
nano sized particle found at WTC:
Thermite in place immediately adjacent to detonations of conventional explosives in the basements, activated or un activated, would generate both components of iron oxide and aluminum oxide which would be reduced to extremely small particles by the high pressure gasses. This would extinguish combustion. If molten steel was present, small particulate iron would result as would aluminum which could then oxidize quickly in such small particle size.
Some of Niels Harrit comments on nano thermite.
http://rt.com/Politics/2009-07-09/Did_nano-thermite_take_down_the_W...
"It’s very, very possible that different varieties were used, and I personally am certain that conventional explosives were used too, in abundance.
RT: When you say “in abundance,” how much do you mean?
Niels Harrit: Tons! Hundreds of tons! Many, many, many tons!
RT: So we are not just talking about nano-thermite. In fact, we are talking about both nano-thermite and conventional explosives used in large quantities…"
Most of the uses of nano themite misinfo in the 9-11 truth movement omit mention of Harrits information on conventional high explosives. All mentions of nano thermite omit any description of how the containment for "nano thermite" might be done. "nano thermite" is subject to this requirement to achieve destruction of the structural elements of the Twin Towers as is the use of any conventional high explosive. Optimum placement and distribution ARE required to attain total pulverization of materials near detonations.
Nov 18, 2010
JoJo
You will not find such a video shown on Sept 11 2001.Only DOCTERED videos the NEXT day.After WTC1 BLEW up,it is understandable that no TV network/NYPD cameras were filming but hundreds of cameras were pointed afterwards towards both towers. BIG ZERO were shown upto minute reporting.WHY NOT? Because there were no planes . WTC1 2 each floor had tons of high explosives--Blasting sequence was top to bottom (not like WTC7 Bottom to top)
The first Explosive laden blasts in the top upper floors,were supplemented with large stored diesel flue.
If only Nano-thermate was used, by now examples of tested range explosion would have been shown--none.
Only Concrete Bunker Busting bombs were used, If they won't show Pentagon plane hitting,then you know that WTC's smashing planes are photo shopped.
Nov 18, 2010
Christopher A. Brown
This question needs to be answered. It has the same justification for the "no planes" issue as it does for the remotes.
"Why did the perps make people think that WTC 1 was first hit by a plane then blow up WTC 2 first and create a backwards impact/fall sequence?"
There are only 2 answers that came back that had any reasoning at all, but it was flawed reasoning because to create that backwards impact fall sequence was very damaging to the credibility of the ruse.
1)WTC 2 fires were going to go out and there would be no reason for the building to go down after the fires went out so they dropped it.
2)The perps did it to make us wonder why they did it. (No kidding, somebody actually put that forth as a reason!)
The perps really needed the planes to justify war on Muslims and to make sure that they were identified the passport of Atta was planted.
I feel that 757's were used specifically because they cannot be remoted easily. In fact I have only heard of it being done once in the 1980's.
The proffesional aviation community would know for certain there were no remotes used because they know only "fly by wire" planes like the 747 can be flown remotely under those conditions.
So, accordingly the perps purposefully stayed away from planes that could be flow remotely.
Nov 18, 2010
JoJo
;Please do see this video first- whole affair 9/II is all pre planned acting
1) http://www.youtuhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoEbe.com/wa...
at this video ?-- now this comes from very sick youtube poster.Came across it while searching for the top reference
2)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE&feature=related
BeLIEve it or Not--it's all a scam--Arabs did it--they hate our freedoms...... (to lie that is)
Nov 19, 2010
illuminated-dj
Nov 19, 2010
illuminated-dj
Nov 19, 2010