Comment
Paul explained his position on the bill at the time by saying, in part, "I don't think it's a good idea to conflate someone who has an altercation, where they had minor bruises, with lynching. We think that's a disservice to those who were lynched in our history, who continue to have, we continue to have these problems. And I think it's a disservice to have a new 10-year penalty for people who have minor bruising. We've tried to exclude that part from the bill, and we've been working with the authors to try to make the bill better."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/02/politics/rand-paul-emmett-till-antil...
This looks like what was left out of the statement made by Charles Booker. Rand Paul didn't want any fight be considered a lynching. After reworking the bill, he help pass it.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
© 2024 Created by truth. Powered by
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network