Comment

Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on November 17, 2010 at 2:27am

ae911truth has done all the work, compiled the evidence and documented in proper academic forms, presented it to congress and the Attorney General.
It is now time to hold AG Holders feet to the front burner.

Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on November 17, 2010 at 1:06am

I don't claim to know the technology. Yet to be revealed or defined. It is intended to be inexplicable.
The means in which it was actually implemented is not as important as who did it.
And the biggest question is who actually ordered it and why.
Building What will bring us to the next questions, Buildings Why.
What is becoming known worldwide is that the official story is a fairy tale and that there is a cover-up. And the perpetrators, we will find, are the ones that have the power to do so.
Along this line of thinking ---> @ 7:50 in Mr X

Comment by Christopher A. Brown on November 17, 2010 at 12:00am

Relating to "particle beam". Not sure we can show those exist. I am very interested in high power lasers and have watched their development closely for over 20 years.

The most mobile "laser cannons", a name closely appropriate, or "ray gun", I like even better, are recently graduated from a ford f650 truck w/2" dia. beam, to a 3" (?) beam on a c-130 transport.
Must have HUGE electrical power source.

It had been in "battlefield testing" or some early status since 2006.

This is a very long way from being capable of having a role in 9-11.

Comment by Christopher A. Brown on November 16, 2010 at 11:54pm

The above shows high explosives acting. They were encapsulated and protected from oxidation and evaporation with paraffin plugs to set detonators later.

This is all very logical and needed in order to make the event seen. There really is only one way to do that.





No matter what kind of explosives, containment is required to increase pressures to absolute maximum with an associated and proportional shockwave.

Paint has no containment.


High explosives produce very high frequencies (some lows too) at high "sound pressure levels".

=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5860825099435530591&q=5860825099435530591&total=1&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

What we hear in the above is muffled as in "containment"

Below are links to papers about "nano" or "super" thermite. No pressure or velocity specifications are provided anywhere.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/Making_Super_Thermite.pdf
http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/thermite report.pdf
http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/SolGelPyroLLNL2002.pdf


There were tons of ordinary thermite incendiary in the basement and perhaps a little up on the NE corner of WTC 2, 68th maybe. The confusion that nano causes as it is hyped is really not good for the quest for truth.

The picture at top is a result of precision engineered concrete containers for high explosives in the shape of architectural elements detonating with complex delays.

Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on November 16, 2010 at 10:50pm

Wild as it may seem, energetic nano-engineered material mixed in paint, triggered by particle beam from high altitude platform in concert with other precision timed hyper-cutting charges. A technology yet to be explained. But on 911 was displayed, unbelievable?
That is the desired effect.