A Retake of Oath of Office in Private for Obama

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28780417/?gt1=42003

Anybody catching this? Obama redoes the oath in private. Another lie to fabricate this web of disaster? Since it is in private, we are to believe a man whom has flip flopped in lie after lie? They are definitely aware some people such as us are going over the event with a fine tooth comb. And rightfully so. Anyone out there a buff that knows about this matter? We are to believe this is so, because they say its so? Gotta quote Scarface. "You want me to believe that Omar was a stooly? Maybe you and Sosa know some thing i don't?" "Like what Frank? You callin me a liar?" "Let's just say I want things to stay the same. You stall this deal with Sosa!" "Okay Frank, you the boss!" "I am the boss!" "Sure, you the boss."

Views: 143

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on April 20, 2012 at 1:23pm

And now we know why this sleight of hand trick was performed. He's a Bastard Usurper!!!

Comment by truth on July 18, 2010 at 11:07pm

Comment by Burbia on January 22, 2009 at 10:49am
boy, the plot thicken. now nationally and internationally he's called an oaf! not even his first day and he is down graded. yes we can, change the oath of office. wouldn't it be something if the change he's talking about was a paid promotion for adult diapers, Depends©...
Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on January 22, 2009 at 9:46am
Comment by truth on January 22, 2009 at 5:01am

Obama retakes oath of office after flub

President stumbled after Chief Justice John Roberts blundered

Image: John Roberts administers oath
Rick Wilking / Reuters
Barack Obama takes the oath of office as the 44th president of the United States as he is sworn in by U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts in Washington on Tuesday. Jan. 21, 2009

WASHINGTON - After the flub heard around the world, President Barack Obama has taken the oath of office. Again. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the oath to Obama on Wednesday night at the White House — a rare do-over.

The surprise moment came in response to Tuesday's much-noticed stumble, when Roberts got the words of the oath a little off, which prompted Obama to do so, too.

Don't worry, the White House says: Obama has still been president since noon on Inauguration Day.

Nevertheless, Obama and Roberts went through the drill again out of what White House counsel Greg Craig called "an abundance of caution."

A quieter setting This time, the scene was the White House Map Room in front of a small group of reporters, not the Capitol platform before the whole watching world.

"We decided that because it was so much fun ...," Obama joked to reporters who followed press secretary Robert Gibbs into the room. No TV camera crews or news photographers were allowed in.

Roberts put on his black robe.

"Are you ready to take the oath?" he said.

"Yes, I am," Obama said. "And we're going to do it very slowly."

Roberts then led Obama through the oath without any missteps.

The president said he did not have his Bible with him, but that the oath was binding anyway.

The original, bungled version on Tuesday caught observers by surprise and then got replayed on cable news shows.

It happened when Obama interrupted Roberts midway through the opening line, in which the president repeats his name and solemnly swears.

Next in the oath is the phrase " ... that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States." But Roberts rearranged the order of the words, not saying "faithfully" until after "president of the United States."

Obama thrown off That appeared to throw Obama off. He stopped abruptly at the word "execute."

Recognizing something was off, Roberts then repeated the phrase, putting "faithfully" in the right place but without repeating "execute."

But Obama then repeated Roberts' original, incorrect version: "... the office of president of the United States faithfully."

Craig, the White House lawyer, said in a statement Wednesday evening: "We believe the oath of office was administered effectively and that the president was sworn in appropriately yesterday. Yet the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of the abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice John Roberts will administer the oath a second time."

The Constitution is clear about the exact wording of the oath and as a result, some constitutional experts have said that a do-over probably wasn't necessary but also couldn't hurt. Two other previous presidents have repeated the oath because of similar issues, Calvin Coolidge and Chester A. Arthur.

Article 2, Section 1, Clause 8 of the Constitution states:

"Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


Comment by TheLasersShadow on January 22, 2009 at 4:16am
CNN made a lame joke about him having to take the oath again because of conspiracy theorists thinking he wasn't president ... well if it didn't matter then wtf was the reason for him doing it over again??????????

Anything that they want to hide or make people think isn't real they label Conspiracy theory, the people continue to buy it.

No bible under hand when the REAL oath was taken ... don't think initial oath mess up was planed but not having the bible under hand for the real one shows intent. There are many many bibles around everywhere and him not having his hand on it for the real only plays into me thinking that he feels no real obligation to be in a real binding contract with God and that Christianity is just a cover for him as was Bohemian Bush. There is Mans Law and theres God's Law, swearing in hand on bible is a contract with God and saying it in front of the Supreme Justice is a contract with Mans Laws.

Double Headed Eagle represents Mans Law (Government) and Gods Law (the Church) Its what The Roman Catholic Church used as a symbol for many years and as Everyone whom is worth listening to knows the priests (the church) are always behind the Kings and Governments. Go back and look at the scepter that precedes the House of Reps main body as they are introduced for the inauguration its a single eagle with a crown representing the union of the Gods law and Mans law. Now this isn't new but i want everyone to realize that the US Gov. is the 2nd most deeply rooted in secret society beliefs of all the other Governments and Obama not having the bible under hand signifies that he only sees the one set of Laws the secret societys laws (NWO and the US Gov.) and only intends to uphold those laws ( abortion - gay marriage, destruction of family )

Now i could be wrong as i'm not a mind reader and i wasn't there but just not having it because they "forgot" it or didn't think it was important doesn't fly with me.
Comment by C on January 22, 2009 at 12:00am
"The president said he did not have his Bible with him, but that the oath was binding anyway.'

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted a blog post

Elon Weighs in on Charlie Kirk's Assassination and How it is an Instrument of Social Control

For a very long time now there has been in place mass population behavioral control operations that…See More
11 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post The Forest Devil
"Less Prone Thanks Buddy I worked on it for 3 days! "
yesterday
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post The Forest Devil
yesterday
Less Prone commented on Doc Vega's blog post The Forest Devil
"You have spun a great story, congratulations!"
yesterday
cheeki kea commented on Bob of the Family Renner's photo
yesterday
Doc Vega posted a blog post
Thursday
tjdavis posted blog posts
Thursday
Doc Vega posted photos
Wednesday
tjdavis posted a blog post
Wednesday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Is this proof that the story about Charlie Kirk's assassination is false?
"Les prone, Thanks Buddy! "
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post
Tuesday
tjdavis posted a photo
Tuesday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Is this proof that the story about Charlie Kirk's assassination is false?
"Less Prone as usual the official version of the truth does not match the evidence and is labeled…"
Oct 4
Less Prone commented on Doc Vega's blog post This Memorable Anthem Given by Nick Freitas Hit the Nail on the Head Please Listen!
"Charlie Kirk was getting very critical against Israel and had turned down a lucrative deal from the…"
Oct 4
Doc Vega's blog post was featured

The Army of Government Launched Psychopaths

They walk among us in most college towns. They seem relatively reasonable until political…See More
Oct 4
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post Is this proof that the story about Charlie Kirk's assassination is false?
Oct 4
Less Prone commented on Doc Vega's blog post Is this proof that the story about Charlie Kirk's assassination is false?
"Have to sign in to YT for this. So. What I do is to go to https://ytdown.io/en/ and download…"
Oct 4
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Was a Planned Civil War Averted?
"cheeki kea, you are spot on. The old guard is about to collapse! "
Oct 2
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Alligator Creek and a Japanese Massacre
"cheeki kea, the Japanese thought they could expand their empire and exact enough damage on the US…"
Oct 2
Michelle Reichert favorited Burbia's video
Oct 1

© 2025   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted