Bill C-6 last chance to exercise your rights "Use em or lose em"‏

We only have rights as long as we chose to exercise them, if we don't then we have no rights here is your opportunity to exercise your rights, as well as preserve them for your children and future generations.

Sent to me by Wes (Thanks Wes) incidentally this has been getting very little mainstream media exposure, so how about that Tiger Woods eh!

Begin:

Sorry to hit you with yet another URGENT request! (Seems they are hitting us from all angles right now!!) For those of you not in Canada, if this has not come your way already - it soon will be! We must retain the right to control our own health!!

Bill C-6 = Legislative Disaster

Please, act now to prevent this disaster. Call and fax your senators today and let them know we do not want them to pass Bill C-6. The Senate has now adjourned their debate on Bill C-6 until Monday night (December 14th)

That means, there is a window of opportunity here to fax or e-mail the Senators AGAIN over the weekend, as well as to call their offices on Monday!!

http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/senmemb/senate/isenator.asp?Language=E

You may want to have a look at the critique of Senator Tommy Banks, contained in this article:

http://www.canadiansforhealthfreedom.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/why-t...

Canada has four supreme laws that protect the rights of individuals: the Constitution Act1867, the Canadian Bill of Rights, and the Constitution Act, 1982 (which includes the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.) Interweaving together, these inviolable agreements make up our “Constitution”.

They do what every constitution is supposed to do: limit the powers of government to protecting our inalienable rights, rather than violating them. In other words, our Constitution ensures that we, the people, own the government (rather than vice-versa).

A Supreme Court decision in 1950 ruled that the Constitution belongs to the people and not the government. Every parliamentarian, upon taking office, needs to swear an oath to uphold our Constitution. Apparently, that doesn’t happen. If it did, Bill C-6 would never have seen the light of day.

Canada also needs a Scrutiny of Bills Committee to make sure that each bill conforms to the Constitution before it is permitted to proceed any further. A Scrutiny of Bills Committee would clearly have prevented C-6 from getting off the ground.


Constitutional Violations

Thanks to the testimony of Shawn Buckley, constitutional lawyer,( www.nhppa.org ), it is now a matter of public record [25-11-09] that Bill C-6 violates our Constitution in at least eight different ways. Mr. Buckley’s testimony was made before the Social Affairs/Science/Technology Committee, none of whose members have any background or training in law. Somehow, C-6 went before the wrong committee. It should have been presented to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee.

Senator Joseph Day (a lawyer) brought another voice of reason to the Social Affairs Committee [2-12-09]. Senator Day proposed a number of amendments that would put in place some checks and balances to limit Health Canada’s ability to abuse the sweeping powers granted to it under C-6. In writing about this event afterward, Senator Elaine McCoy (also a lawyer) stated: “At the heart of the amendments was a sincere attempt to balance the power of the state against the rights of citizens, whether they be innocent consumers or innocent entrepreneurs ... several of the senators appeared not to have the benefit of intimate familiarity with legal principles of natural justice and other traditional aspects of the common law ... What is at stake here is how far the state (read civil servants) should be empowered to impose their will upon citizens.”


Most of Senator’s Day’s 14 amendments were agreed to by the Committee; however, the senate has the power to reject any or all of these amendments. The senate can pass C-6 into law at any time, without making any changes to it.


Party Loyalties

Senators are able to vote independently, regardless of party lines. Whether they will, or not, remains to be seen. Thus far in the C-6 proceedings, relatively few senators have broken ranks with their parties.

Senator Hugh Segal (Conservative) has gone on record as saying [with respect to Senator Day], “He always has been on the side of protecting the innocent. Tories are not quite as taken up with that proposition as the Liberals.”

Health Canada Misleads

If the senate amends C-6, then the bill goes back to the House of Commons, which may or may not accept those amendments. None of this back-and-forth is necessary. Health Canada has led us down an inappropriate legislative route.

Senator Day’s astute and timely amendments are trying to make the best of a bad situation. However, it is rather like trying to patch leaks in a rowboat that is floundering in only six inches of water. We don’t have to be in that boat. We can get out and walk ashore at any time.

Health Canada has been misleading Parliament. During the presentation of Senator Day’s amendments, three Conservative senators were seen passing notes back and forth to Health Canada officials. These same three senators (plus one other) adamantly opposed every single one of Senator Day’s 14 amendments, including those that merely clarified wording. This fourth dissenting senator (also a Conservative) was on the steering committee that pre-selected 16 witnesses to speak in favour of C-6 and only one against. [The same thing happened in the House: no witnesses against C-6 were allowed to testify before the Standing Committee on Health.]

Health Canada has been leading a parade (read “charade”) under the banner of “safety”. As the blinders come off, more of us are dropping out of that parade. Bill C-6 is entirely unnecessary; it does not serve any legitimate purpose.

False Fear

Of course we all want our country to be safe from hazardous products. But let’s not get suckered into believing that Health Canada’s radical departure from our constitutional form of government is the only way to do it. There are simpler ways to accomplish Health Canada’s professed objectives without trampling on our individual rights. We want consumers to be safe - without making business owners unsafe.

C-6 is the most protested piece of legislation in our entire 142-year history. Over 100,000 letters/faxes/emails received by senators and MPs attest to this fact. Listen to the people. We don’t want legislation that violates our rights, especially when there are viable options which respect those rights.

Health Canada isn’t telling the whole story. Yes, hazardous products do find their way into Canada. Yes, we need ways of minimizing these hazards. What Health Canada neglects to mention is that the Hazardous Products Act is working just fine. Voluntary recalls are up this year over last. What business person in his right mind isn’t going to recall a dangerous product when asked to? Killing or injuring your customers isn’t good for business.

Health Canada claims that they need mandatory recalls in order to do their job of protecting the public. If so, there is an incredibly simply solution: update the Hazardous Products Act to include mandatory recalls.

The Impasse

Our constitutional rights and freedoms cannot be voted away. Yet that is exactly what Health Canada is asking the senate to do. Senator Day’s amendments (if accepted) would have the effect of toning down the unreasonableness of searches and seizures facilitated by C-6; however, these changes are unable to correct the deeper unconstitutionalities of this unprecedented bill.

Bill C-6 combines both criminal and administrative penalties into a single piece of legislation. This is expressly forbidden by the Constitution Act, 1867 which divides powers between federal and provincial governments. The federal government has jurisdiction over crime, but not over products, as such. Health Canada is trying to criminalize mere noncompliance with regulations in order to acquire powers that aren’t legitimately theirs. Under the guise of keeping Canada safe from criminals, Health Canada wishes to penalize business owners far in excess of anything that a court would allow – such as fines of up to $5 million per day – and prohibiting the defences of due diligence and honest but mistaken belief.

Once you are charged with an offence under the proposed Act, you are presumed guilty no matter what. The Health Ministry becomes both police and judge. You have no recourse. Your private property may be seized, never to be returned. You and your business can be ruined financially over matters that have nothing do with safety.

If crime is of real concern here, Senator Elaine McCoy has wisely suggested (on record) that a new criminal code be created around consumer products. That would be the constitutional way to approach the problem – if, indeed, there is any actual problem.

C-6 is unconstitutional at its very core, because of the false premises on which it is based. There is no number of surface amendments that can make it constitutional. Here is the impasse: C-6 is unlawful. It is unenforceable in any court of law. If passed, no one has to pay any attention to it; and injunctions will be issued against it. Clearly another solution is required if we are to avoid this legislative disaster.


The Solution

Once you have identified the problem, the solution becomes apparent. The real problem in this case is that Health Canada has created false fear in order to offer itself as the remedy for that fear. To get ourselves back on the proper legislative track, this is what must be done:

1. Withdraw or defeat Bill C-6.

2. If mandatory recalls are required, then amend the Hazardous Products Act accordingly.

3. If warranted, create a new criminal code around consumer products.

The above three steps will provide the optimal product safety levels required by consumers and also give Health Canada all of the legitimate powers it needs to do its proper job.

There is one other step needed to prevent future constitutional infringements:

4. Establish a Scrutiny of Bills Committee.

Step #1 needs to happen right now, before it is too late. The others can come in due course.

Watch video on C6 with Dee Nicholson...

Or contacy the following
ConspiracyKing.com
PO Box 660
Parksville, BC
Canada, V9P 2G7
Order at http://www.conspiracyking.com
or call 1-800-294-5250

Views: 41

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Sandy posted a video

Captain fantastic scene (Bill of rights)

Scene from the movie "Captain fantastic"Uploader does not claim ownership of any of the footage used in this video. All credit goes to the respective owners ...
6 hours ago
tjdavis posted photos
yesterday
tjdavis posted a video

The UK Has Just Reached It's Boiling Point - Ricky Gervais

Ricky Gervais - Frustration still there a year on.Nicholaswatt reports what he has been told by a parliamentary veteran, who warns: "'My constituents feel th...
yesterday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Terrorized on a 3 Day Weekend

 We had a holiday weekend coming up. My ex, whom I was sharing custody with was off for her…See More
yesterday
Sandy posted videos
Thursday
Sandy replied to Sandy's discussion Sick sci-fi sex fantasy written by Epstein's first benefactor people say inspired his twisted island... before author's SON ended up arresting him
"Interesting. I always thought he was still alive. Probably given some plastic surgery and a witness…"
Thursday
WIllow is now a member of 12160 Social Network
Thursday
Burbia commented on Less Prone's video
Thumbnail

Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans - Outrage AI Parody Song

"Props to Schottenstein on his foray out of the woods that was DEI and wokeness. "
Thursday
Burbia replied to Sandy's discussion Sick sci-fi sex fantasy written by Epstein's first benefactor people say inspired his twisted island... before author's SON ended up arresting him
"One of the theories floating around was Hilary Clinton's brother Hugh, was the one…"
Thursday
Sandy posted a discussion
Thursday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Wednesday
Less Prone favorited Sandy's video
Wednesday
Less Prone favorited tjdavis's video
Wednesday
Less Prone posted a video

Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans - Outrage AI Parody Song

AI Parody Music Video poking fun at the online hysteria surrounding Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle jeans campaign.✅ Blue jeans✅ Blonde panic✅ DEI gone wild✅...
Wednesday
tjdavis posted a video

How "Free" P*rn Sites Really Work (and Who Runs Them)

Excerpt from This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von #559 Laila MickelwaitFull Episode: https://youtu.be/9J7187j4PO4?si=2GUNymssKJpe6nEvFind Theo Von:Website: https://...
Wednesday
tjdavis posted a blog post
Wednesday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Tuesday
Doc Vega commented on Ragnarok's video
Thumbnail

Charles Manson Talks About The Global Elite

"I've had my account with YouTube terminated before over bullshit excuses because they…"
Tuesday
Doc Vega commented on Ragnarok's video
Thumbnail

Charles Manson Talks About The Global Elite

"Remember, though he makes his points, this man used the Beatles White Album as his own manifesto of…"
Tuesday
Sandy posted videos
Monday

© 2025   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted