Canadian Prime Minister publicly declares right to break Canadian law!

I will post the video link. But first, the transcript.

Justin Trudeau: "Regardless of the fact that we are attacking your fundamental rights or 'limiting' your fundamental rights....and the Charter (Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms) says that's wrong .. we're STILL going ahead and doing it! It's basically a loophole that 'allows' a 'majority' to override fundamental rights of a 'minority'!"

So....there you have it. Canada's pedophile 'chief in command' and head jesuit luciferian satanist is saying...it's 'legal'....to 'break the law'...a 'loophole'...that can be used by a 'majority'!

But hey, DON'T just take my word for it. Hear it straight from the jesuit horse's mouth...

https://rumble.com/vr4vu9-msm-is-panicking-trying-to-cover-this-one...

Now in case you are wondering which law?

The 'Canadian Human Rights Act' R.C.S., 1985, c. H-6

Short Title

Marginal note:Short title

1 This Act may be cited as the Canadian Human Rights Act.

1976-77, c. 33, s. 1

Now it just so happens that yesterday I was inspired to google search "Medical discrimination law Canada" and this was the very first link I was given. So, I began reading it.

We will begin with the 'purpose' of this law...

Purpose of Act

Marginal note:Purpose

2 The purpose of this Act is to extend the laws in Canada to give effect, within the purview of matters coming within the legislative authority of Parliament, to the principle that all individuals should have an opportunity equal with other individuals to make for themselves the lives that they are able and wish to have and to have their needs accommodated, consistent with their duties and obligations as members of society, without being hindered in or prevented from doing so by discriminatory practices based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, disability or conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered.

R.S., 1985, c. H-6, s. 2
1996, c. 14, s. 1
1998, c. 9, s. 9
2012, c. 1, s. 137(E)
2017, c. 3, ss. 9, 11, c. 13, s. 1

It lists the 14 grounds by which one is not allowed to be discriminated against which is found under Part 1: Proscribed Discrimination.

PART I

Proscribed Discrimination

General

Marginal note:Prohibited grounds of discrimination

3 (1) For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, *GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS, DISABILITY* and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered.

and when it comes to 'medical discrimination', idem 3 concerns us ..

Idem

(3) Where the ground of discrimination is refusal of a request to undergo a genetic test or to disclose, or authorize the disclosure of, the results of a genetic test, the discrimination shall be deemed to be on the ground of genetic characteristics.

R.S., 1985, c. H-6, s. 3
1996, c. 14, s. 2
2012, c. 1, s. 138(E)
2017, c. 3, ss. 10, 11, c. 13, s. 2

Next we have 'Multiple Grounds of' and 'Orders regarding' discriminatory practices.

Multiple grounds of discrimination

3.1 For greater certainty, a discriminatory practice includes a practice based on one or more prohibited grounds of discrimination or on the effect of a combination of prohibited grounds.

1998, c. 9, s. 11

Marginal note:Orders regarding discriminatory practices

4 A discriminatory practice, as described in sections 5 to 14.1, may be the subject of a complaint under Part III and anyone found to be engaging or to have engaged in a discriminatory practice may be made subject to an order as provided in section 53.

R.S., 1985, c. H-6, s. 4
1998, c. 9, s. 11
2013, c. 37, s. 1

Being denied goods and services, housing, access to, or lost your job or being threatened with the prospect?

Denial of good, service, facility or accommodation

5 It is a discriminatory practice in the provision of goods, services, facilities or accommodation customarily available to the general public

(a) to deny, or to deny access to, any such good, service, facility or accommodation to any individual, or
(b) to differentiate adversely in relation to any individual,

on a prohibited ground of discrimination.

1976-77, c. 33, s. 5

Marginal note:Denial of commercial premises or residential accommodation

6 It is a discriminatory practice in the provision of commercial premises or residential accommodation

(a) to deny occupancy of such premises or accommodation to any individual, or
(b) to differentiate adversely in relation to any individual,

on a prohibited ground of discrimination.

1976-77, c. 33, s. 6

Marginal note:Employment

7 It is a discriminatory practice, directly or indirectly,

(a) to refuse to employ or continue to employ any individual, or
(b) in the course of employment, to differentiate adversely in relation to an employee,

on a prohibited ground of discrimination.

1976-77, c. 33, s. 7
1980-81-82-83, c. 143, s. 3(F)

Marginal note:Employment applications, advertisements

8 It is a discriminatory practice

(a) to use or circulate any form of application for employment, or
(b) in connection with employment or prospective employment, to publish any advertisement or to make any written or oral inquiry

that expresses or implies any limitation, specification or preference based on a prohibited ground of discrimination.

1976-77, c. 33, s. 8

Discriminatory policy or practice

10 It is a discriminatory practice for an employer, employee organization or employer organization

(a) to establish or pursue a policy or practice, or
(b) to enter into an agreement affecting recruitment, referral, hiring, promotion, training, apprenticeship, transfer or any other matter relating to employment or prospective employment,

that deprives or tends to deprive an individual or class of individuals of any employment opportunities on a prohibited ground of discrimination.

R.S., 1985, c. H-6, s. 10
1998, c. 9, s. 13(E)

I haven't even looked in to Canada's Anti Terrorism laws, being as this is also an Economical and a Socio- Psychological 'terrorist attack' from the nation's own government no less!

There's no# 12

Publication of discriminatory notices, etc.

12 It is a discriminatory practice to publish or display before the public or to cause to be published or displayed before the public any notice, sign, symbol, emblem or other representation that

(a) expresses or implies discrimination or an intention to discriminate, or
(b) incites or is calculated to incite others to discriminate

if the discrimination expressed or implied, intended to be expressed or implied or incited or calculated to be incited would otherwise, if engaged in, be a discriminatory practice described in any of sections 5 to 11 or in section 14.

1976-77, c. 33, s. 12
1980-81-82-83, c. 143, s. 6

...and no#14

Harassment

14 (1) It is a discriminatory practice,
- (a) in the provision of goods, services, facilities or accommodation customarily available to the general public,
- (b) in the provision of commercial premises or residential accommodation, or
- (c) in matters related to employment,
to harass an individual on a prohibited ground of discrimination.

Section 6 of the Charter deals with Mobility Rights.

Provision

6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.

(2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right:

to move to and take up residence in any province; and
to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.

So as you can see, it's multiple laws being broken here.

Now finally, let's deal with the criminal's 'illusion' of a 'majority', because whoever is signing his prescriptions is giving him some high dose narcotics!

Canada has a population of 38 million. It just so happens we had an election here. Only 5.6 million voted for Trudeau, giving him a 32.62%. The Conservatives got 5.7 million for 33.74%. In all 11.2 million DID NOT vote for Trudeau. As well only 67% of eligible voters turned out, leaving 33% that did not vote at all. So what you need to fully understand is that when they say Trudeau got 32.62%, that is NOT 32.62% out of 100% of eligible voters, it's 32.62% if 67% of eligible voters, which makes his over all 'pie share' even smaller. Talk about laughable.

So.....WHAT 'majority' is he talking about? He won a 2nd MINORITY government. And a pitiful minority at that. Truly showing he knows the international bankers and pharma fiends have his back, because close to 70% of the Canadian population REJECT HIM OUTRIGHT!

Favorite

0 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by DTOM on December 21, 2021 at 8:56pm

Because rather than taking on the real enemy, most would rather fall for honeypot BS and distractions like this...

https://vancouver.craigslist.org/van/evg/d/vancouver-seeking-profes...

(N.B at the time of posting this comment, the ad below has been on Craigslist for 4 day and was updated 1 day ago.)

---

Seeking Professional Protesters - F@@k the Feds Friday (Vancouver)

1075 W Pender

(google map)

compensation: $200 per day in cash

"If you believe in Anonymous, and call yourself Anonymous, you are Anonymous."

We are Anonymous. We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.

Due to overwhelming interest, protest is being delayed until early January as volumes of masks and shirts are arriving to meet the demand. Also, special effects are being manufactured for the event.

Professional protesters needed to lead a protest at the United States consulate in Vancouver for one day, and a townhouse complex in Surrey the second day. Responsibilities will include wearing a theatre mask and trying to remain anonymous, dancing and singing to heavy metal music, holding picket signs/banners while communicating peacefully and responsibly, but standing your ground with any law enforcement officer; communicating with the media; shouting and chanting phrases; leading unpaid protesters; and reading a speech through a megaphone.

The protest topic involves the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and their crimes committed against innocent civilians, such as a drone attack in Pakistan that intentionally killed twelve innocent people including women and children, U.S. soldiers killing reporters and innocent people because a telephoto lens vaguely resembled a rocket launcher, the recent murders of innocent women and children in an Afghani drone strike, and other targeted illegal killings of non-Americans the United States perceives as a threat (Whether true or not).

The second day will involve a protest in Surrey of a suspected CIA operative, who has for certain committed serious crimes in Canada, including seriously injuring and almost killing a Canadian climate scientist.

The protests are to be lawful and peaceful only. Hired protesters will be briefed and provided material on their rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and how to stand their legal ground against the police if necessary. Also, unless you are suspected of committing a crime, you have no obligation to identify yourself to a police officer. They will threaten you with Obstruction of Justice for not identifying yourself, but it will be explained to you how to successfully sue for well over $10,000 if you are arrested.

Hired protesters will be required to sign a non-disclosure agreement regarding certain details, so asking further questions ensures you will be a volunteer protester and not paid.

Interested individuals should submit a summary of all related education and experience, with references that can be verified by a person at local places of business. You will also have to provide a valid photo ID upon hiring, however that information will be kept strictly confidential.