by Prof. Marjorie Cohn

In 1934, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a new treaty with Cuba that allows the United States to remain in Guantánamo Bay until the U.S. abandons it or until both Cuba and the United States agree to modify their arrangement. According to that treaty, “the stipulations of [the 1903] agreement with regard to the naval station of Guantánamo shall continue in effect.” That means Guantánamo Bay can be used only for coaling or naval stations. Additionally, article III of the 1934 treaty provides that the Republic of Cuba leases Guantánamo Bay to the United States “for coaling and naval stations.” Nowhere in either treaty did Cuba give the U.S. the right to utilize Guantánamo Bay as a prison camp.

President Barack Obama said a year ago that he was committed to closing Guantánamo because it was a symbol that was “probably the No. 1 recruiting tool” on terrorist websites. But Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which bars any transfer of detainees to U.S. prisons, even for trial. The act also restricts the President’s authority to transfer detainees to other countries. Of the 171 men remaining at Guantánamo, 89 have been cleared for release by a review conducted by the CIA, FBI, military, and Department of Homeland Security. But those men will likely die at Guantánamo because Obama refused to put the brakes on Congress’s use of the issue as a political football in the NDAA.

In a recent op-ed in The New York Times, Harvard lecturer Jonathan M. Hansen wrote, “It is past time to return this imperialist enclave to Cuba,” adding, “It has served to remind the world of America’s long history of interventionist militarism.”

Obama should heed Hansen’s words. For the abiding presence of the Guantánamo gulag is not simply illegal and immoral. It also continues to be a symbol of U.S. hypocrisy, and makes us a target for more terrorist attacks.

Full story here: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28677


Views: 66

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Christopher on May 9, 2012 at 10:06pm

The following is a message that I later sent to "Global Research" and, Prof. Marjorie Cohn, in reference to their article:

Just this morning, I was reading your story, that was titled: Close the Guantánamo Gulag - by Prof. Marjorie Cohn - and as usual; I found it to be interesting and, educational.


When, as I do at most times, decided to do the research into the claims made by your article - I entered into time consuming searches, which typically did not result in information that could match exactly, what was in your story.


In particular; I speak of the paragraph that stated the following: "In 1934, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a new treaty with Cuba that allows the United States to remain in Guantánamo Bay until the U.S. abandons it or until both Cuba and the United States agree to modify their arrangement - Additionally, article III of the 1934 treaty provides that the Republic of Cuba leases Guantánamo Bay to the United States “for coaling and naval stations.” Nowhere in either treaty did Cuba give the U.S. the right to utilize Guantánamo Bay as a prison camp."


What I was able to find, did however, contain the importance of your paragraph: "for use as COALING or NAVAL STATIONS ONLY - AND FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE".

The statement above, does not however, appear in Article III of the 1934 Treaty - as stated in your story.


But rather; it is contained in the "Agreement Between the United States and Cuba for the Lease of Land... and in Article II of the said Agreement (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/dip_cuba002.asp).


I found that ARTICLE III (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/dip_cuba001.asp) of the "Treaty Between the United States of America and Cuba; May 29, 1934"(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/dip_cuba001.asp) only stated the following:


"Until the two contracting parties agree to the modification or abrogation of the stipulations of the agreement in regard to the lease to the United States of America of lands in Cuba for coaling and naval stations signed by the President of the Republic of Cuba on February 16, 1903, and by the President of the United States of America on the 23d day of the same month and year, the stipulations of that agreement with regard to the naval station of Guantanamo shall continue in effect. The supplementary agreement in regard to naval or coaling stations signed between the two Governments on July 2, 1903, also shall continue in effect in the same form and on the same conditions with respect to the naval station at Guantanamo. So long as the United States of America shall not abandon the said naval station of Guantanamo or the two Governments shall not agree to a modification of its present limits, the station shall continue to have the territorial area that it now has, with the limits that it has on the date of the signature of the present Treaty."


As I mentioned earlier - the essence, and or importance of the point made in your story, is still clearly stated - and more than likely - unchanged from the 1903 Agreement, to 1934 Treaty - "for use as COALING or NAVAL STATIONS ONLY - AND FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE".


I just felt a need to advise you of this - it was only in an effort to remove any fuel, which may have been used in the fires, that would surely have been set by those wishing to dispel any truths, other that what 'they' perceive as so, and would have us believe too, at all costs.

 

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

tjdavis posted a photo
10 hours ago
Sandy posted a video

KILL THE MESSENGER - Hero Journalist Featurette - In Theaters Friday

In this featurette “Gary Webb: Hero Journalist,” Jeremy Renner (Webb), director Michael Cuesta, Sue Webb and others explore the real man, investigative journ...
yesterday
Sandy posted a photo
yesterday
Less Prone commented on Burbia's blog post A Masterclass Is Being Played Out For Those Who Have The Eyes To See
"Yes. One of their functions is distraction, but they also bring chaos and crime and change…"
yesterday
Less Prone favorited Burbia's blog post A Masterclass Is Being Played Out For Those Who Have The Eyes To See
yesterday
Burbia posted a blog post

A Masterclass Is Being Played Out For Those Who Have The Eyes To See

A question can be asked, why do Jews want a multicultural community in a host society? It is to…See More
Saturday
tjdavis posted a video

City of Joel - Official Trailer

Now Available on Digital - http://bit.ly/2uxDibn50 miles north of New York City, the town of Monroe is a microcosm for a hyper-partisan and divided nation as...
Friday
Doc Vega favorited omegamann's photo
Friday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Death Threats for Assisting ICE?
"Less Prone excellent points and I've seen that video too. Very informative! "
Friday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post In the Political Realm They've Gone One Step Too Far!
"Less Prone thanks for your support! "
Friday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Modern Day Cannibalism?
"Less Prone, you are exactly right! They have been harvesting fetal tissue in vaccines for quite…"
Friday
Doc Vega commented on cheeki kea's photo
Thumbnail

DEAR SANTA...

"Ha ha! Good one! "
Friday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post GROK Acknowledges the Co-existence of Humans and Dinosaurs
"Less Prone, thank you very much for your input/ I always appreciate your insights! "
Friday
Less Prone favorited cheeki kea's photo
Wednesday
Doc Vega's 9 blog posts were featured
Wednesday
Less Prone commented on Doc Vega's blog post Modern Day Cannibalism?
"You may be consuming human tissue unknowingly in vaccines, food or drink. One of the cruellest…"
Wednesday
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post Modern Day Cannibalism?
Wednesday
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post Death Threats for Assisting ICE?
Wednesday
Less Prone commented on Doc Vega's blog post Death Threats for Assisting ICE?
"Democrats pretend to be icons of democracy, but what kind of rule do they have in mind? When they…"
Wednesday
Less Prone commented on Doc Vega's blog post GROK Acknowledges the Co-existence of Humans and Dinosaurs
Wednesday

© 2026   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted