Democrats Subpoena Rove, Testing Their Clout and Obama - WSJ 1-27-09
Source: Wall Street Journal
Jan. 27, 2009
By EVAN PEREZ
WASHINGTON -- House Democrats renewed their effort to force former White House aide Karl Rove to testify in a probe into Justice Department controversies, presenting a challenge to President Barack Obama, who will have to decide whether to defend his predecessor's legal arguments.
Michigan Rep. John Conyers, Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, on Monday issued a subpoena to Mr. Rove, seeking his appearance at a deposition Feb. 2. Mr. Conyers wants the former aide to President George W. Bush to answer questions on the Justice Department's firings of U.S. attorneys in 2006, among other matters.
For more than a year, the Bush administration blocked congressional demands for testimony from Mr. Rove and other Bush aides. The White House's assertion of executive privilege prompted the aides to refuse even to show up for a hearing. A judge last year, in a limited ruling, said the privilege didn't protect the aides from having to appear, even if they refused to answer questions.
"Change has come to Washington, and I hope Karl Rove is ready for it," Mr. Conyers said. "After two years of stonewalling, it's time for him to talk."
President Obama previously criticized the Bush executive-privilege claims. But presidents have a history of guarding the principle of executive privilege, even when it is claimed by a predecessor of a different political stripe. President Bush angered Republicans early in his term by using privilege to block several congressional inquiries into decisions by the administration of President Bill Clinton.
Robert Luskin, Mr. Rove's attorney, said Mr. Rove recently received a renewed privilege assertion from President Bush, before the president left office. Mr. Luskin said he would consult with Mr. Obama's White House counsel to determine the Obama administration's stance.
There is some dispute in legal circles over whether a president's executive privilege claim continues to be in force after he leaves office if his successor doesn't enforce it.
"At the end of the day Rove will do what he is told," Mr. Luskin said.
Jan. 27, 2009
By EVAN PEREZ
WASHINGTON -- House Democrats renewed their effort to force former White House aide Karl Rove to testify in a probe into Justice Department controversies, presenting a challenge to President Barack Obama, who will have to decide whether to defend his predecessor's legal arguments.
Michigan Rep. John Conyers, Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, on Monday issued a subpoena to Mr. Rove, seeking his appearance at a deposition Feb. 2. Mr. Conyers wants the former aide to President George W. Bush to answer questions on the Justice Department's firings of U.S. attorneys in 2006, among other matters.
For more than a year, the Bush administration blocked congressional demands for testimony from Mr. Rove and other Bush aides. The White House's assertion of executive privilege prompted the aides to refuse even to show up for a hearing. A judge last year, in a limited ruling, said the privilege didn't protect the aides from having to appear, even if they refused to answer questions.
"Change has come to Washington, and I hope Karl Rove is ready for it," Mr. Conyers said. "After two years of stonewalling, it's time for him to talk."
President Obama previously criticized the Bush executive-privilege claims. But presidents have a history of guarding the principle of executive privilege, even when it is claimed by a predecessor of a different political stripe. President Bush angered Republicans early in his term by using privilege to block several congressional inquiries into decisions by the administration of President Bill Clinton.
Robert Luskin, Mr. Rove's attorney, said Mr. Rove recently received a renewed privilege assertion from President Bush, before the president left office. Mr. Luskin said he would consult with Mr. Obama's White House counsel to determine the Obama administration's stance.
There is some dispute in legal circles over whether a president's executive privilege claim continues to be in force after he leaves office if his successor doesn't enforce it.
"At the end of the day Rove will do what he is told," Mr. Luskin said.
Comment
-
Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on January 30, 2009 at 12:24am
-
-
He will do the Washington wiggle worm squirm and...... most likely claim immunity
He might even purger himself. But I want to see the so called "change" in action.
I hope that Conyers holds his feet to the fire. This is one to watch.
Remember Rep Wexler reminded the Committee that it was only after the Watergate hearings began that they learned how much criminal activity had occurred.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
The Escape
The dreamland comes as I close my eyesTake me from the forbidden lands that I despiseWhere all…See More
FB_IMG_1775463256193
"ahh yes but one must be well practised in the art of double think for such occasions as these…"
You’ve Heard of Champ, right? This Aint it!
CHAMP, you might be thinking of is a legendary cryptid supposedly existing in the waters of Lake…See More
Truth or Fiction? You Figure it Out
Working for the federal government, specifically, the Pentagon. I was, what you might call a…See More
GOLDSPHINCTER - Donald J Trump is Acrid Goldsphincter (James Bond Music Parody)
In this James Bond parody, Donald J Trump is Acrid Goldsphincter in our version of the classic Bond "Goldfinger" theme song. All voices and singing performed...
How Long does Destabilization Take?
How long does it take to topple a society targeted by the left? What ingredients go into this toxic…See More
"cheeki kea you are spot on. It won't be until the elephant on Wall Street is as high as the…"
© 2026 Created by truth.
Powered by
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network