Elderly 'must expect to sell their homes to pay for care'
Pensioners should expect to sell their homes to pay for care, a Government commission has been told.
Figures last year disclosed that nearly 60 pensioners a day were forced to sell their homes Photo: ALAMY
The Commission on Funding of Care and Support collated evidence on the system from hundreds of organisations and concluded that free care is unrealistic.
Andrew Dilnot, the commission's chairman, said the only solution which was truly sustainable "is going to come from responsibility being shared between the individual and the state".
But the commissioners were told that urgent reform is needed because young people are taking so long to get onto the property ladder that future generations could be less able to pay for their care.
The commission voiced concerns that more people are retiring before their mortgages have been paid off while people with debilitating conditions and disabilities are living longer.
Spending cuts are also threatening services for the vulnerable, the commission noted.
The so-called "sandwich generation" is faced with a triple challenge of attempting to fund children through university or into their first home, saving for their own care, and paying for assistance for elderly relatives, the evidence to the commission said.
In February, Lord Warner, a Labour peer who is part of the commission, said the post-war baby boom generation, which "had done pretty well for itself", needed to use its property wealth to pay for care in old age.
The commission, which is an independent body, was set up by the Government to recommend improvements to the care system.
More than 250 organisations and powerful individuals, including local authorities, charities and think tanks, responded to its call for evidence, the results of which were published yesterday.
It said: "In terms of the use of housing, some voiced the view that individuals should expect to use some of their housing assets to pay for care."
The responses identified severe flaws in the system, including: inefficient links between health and social care services; a lack of information and support to help people plan for care; no national framework for assessment and eligibility; inflexibility in the delivery of services; and insufficient recognition of the contribution of carers.
"The current structure of the adult social care system is unfair, as people may have to use up most of their income and assets paying for care and can be left with very little income to live on," it said.
The report noted "the increasing number of people with outstanding mortgage debt at retirement; and those renting properties in retirement".
One particular challenge is "the difficulty younger people now face in buying property", it said, noting that this could mean "future cohorts could have less housing wealth".
Debt is increasingly being spread "across generations", with parents helping their children with mortgages and some housing debts taking more than one generation to pay off.
A place in a nursing home costs an average of £36,000 per year but people with assets of over £23,250 currently receive no assistance from the Government.
Many in the system also fear that Government cuts will remove more vulnerable people from care, as well as reduce funding for preventative measures which keep elderly people in their own homes, such as mobility programmes.
Further, there were claims of problems between the care services and the NHS and there was evidence of "poor working relationships, a lack of understanding between professionals, and disputes between the NHS and local authorities".
There were also concerns that the Coalition's proposed health reforms might undermine integration.
In the current system, "the negative aspects outweighed the positive", it said, adding that there is a "sense that the status quo could not continue and urgent form was required".
The Commission is due to report back to the Government by the end of July with its recommendations.
Before the election, all three main parties pledged to stop pensioners having to sell their homes to pay for social care but figures last year disclosed that nearly 60 pensioners a day were doing so.
One of the pressures on social care is that people are living longer. An estimated 17million of those alive today will live to be 100 and experts predict that by 2026 the care system will be suffering a shortfall of £6billion without reform.
Story here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8451651/Elderly-must-e... Comment
-
Comment by DHUK on April 19, 2011 at 3:30pm
-
this has become common practice in england people just seem to accept it.Especially when placed in a care home for the elderly [if thats what you want to call them].the fees are extortionate so they sell your house to pay and when the money is gone the government pay the fees.With the house prices falling, a hundred thousand pound house will pay fees for about 2yrs after so called admin charges.This does not happen in scotland or wales the government pay from the off unless you can pay to go to higher end care home,also englands prescription charges have just risen[to about £7.20] whilst wales have been scrapped and scotland have not had to pay for years. its great in england.Keep smiling. DHUK
-
Comment by Sweettina2 on April 19, 2011 at 12:48pm
-
They are doing this right here in America. When I had to quit nursing because of arthritis they came to my house and wanted me to sign papers that if they helped me they would get my house when I died. I have heard of others they did the same way. We tried to help an elderly lady on year before last, she had a beautiful home, they physically removed her, put her in a nursing home where she died...they got her house. It's happening to many others right this minute. You are right, its cruel and they couldnt care less.
-
Comment by youhavetoforgiveme on April 19, 2011 at 7:26am
-
I'm not sure which is worse....the cruelty of the government knowingly allowing this to happen, or the cruelty of them actually telling seniors that it will likely happen before it does. They talk, and they talk, and they talk, but in the end, the politicians do nothing except serve themselves first, their corporate sponsors second, their political cronies third, and their constituents last-- dead last.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
The Federal Government Shell Game
We Americans have the biggest opportunity in, perhaps the last 100 years, to crack the code on the…See More
First World Order
"Ah ha Truth hidden in plane sight. Notice the map depicted on this 'world order' book…"
Iyah May Karmageddon Lyric Music Video
While ‘Karmageddon’ has sparked significantconversation and controversy, Iyah has stood her ground. She refused to compromise her vision when asked to change...
Steven Wilson - PERSONAL SHOPPER (Official Video)
"The song PERSONAL SHOPPER sits somewhere between being a love-letter to shopping (which I love to do!) and the uneasiness I feel about the more insidious si...
propaganda: DIVIDE & CONQUER (1942) - Warner Bros. vs Hitler
Not to be confused with the much drier Frank Capra film from 1943.A "Broadway Brevity", released August 1, 1942. Vitaphone #1022-1023A.Transferred from 16mm.
Thumbs down - ship gone.
" So this sort of stupidity has occurred before. Norway or NZ - Who did it better? Cast your…"
© 2024 Created by truth.
Powered by
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network