Enemy Expatriation Act (HR 3166) is the final link in our chain of bondage.

If this bill passes, Enemy Expatriation Act (HR 3166), and if precedence is any indication, it will, we will officially be living in a “Brave New World”. While the Patriot Act and the NDAA of 2011 are scary, they still had enough left out to give U.S. citizens limited protection. This bill fills in all the loopholes of NDAA 2011 and for all intents and purposes WILL allow janet reno, eric holder, “el presidente”, any governmental enforcement agency, bureaucrats, etc to define enemies of the state!!

Wording from the bill: “the power to brand Americans as hostiles for “engaging in, or purposefully and materially supporting, hostilities against the United States,” where “the term ‘hostilities’ means any conflict subject to the laws of war.”

This is really it folks!! The stage is now set for members of our government to officially start rounding up their ideological enemies. The only thing left is the American version of the Nuremberg Laws. I have seen it coming for a number of years yet I still have a hard time believing it now that its this close to fruition. I am not sure how long it will take but in the near future, even the act of reading an article such as this will get you on “The List.”

The time has come to face the horrifying reality, our future, our freedom, and our lives are going to, sooner rather than later, become severely threatened.

---

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-3166&tab=sum...

H.R. 3166: Enemy Expatriation Act

112^th Congress: 2011-2012

To add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality.

Summaries

Congressional Research Service Summary

The following summary was written by the Congressional Research Service, a well-respected nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress. GovTrack did not write and has no control over these summaries.

10/12/2011--Introduced.

Enemy Expatriation Act - Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to include engaging in or purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which U.S. nationals would lose their nationality. Defines "hostilities" as any conflict subject to the laws of war

HR 3166 IH

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 3166

To add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 12, 2011

Mr. DENT (for himself and Mr. ALTMIRE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Enemy Expatriation Act’.

SEC. 2. LOSS OF NATIONALITY.

(a) In General- Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481) is amended--

(1) in subsection (a)--

(A) in each of paragraphs (1) through (6), by striking ‘or’ at the end;

(B) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘; or’; and

‘(8) engaging in, or purposefully and materially supporting, hostilities against the United States.’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

‘(c) For purposes of this section, the term ‘hostilities’ means any conflict subject to the laws of war.’.

(b) Technical Amendment- Section 351(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1483(a)) is amended by striking ‘(6) and (7)’ and inserting ‘(6), (7), and (8)’.

Favorite

1 member favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by DTOM on January 19, 2012 at 4:18am: Both 'United States' and 'hostilities/ laws of war' would have to be defined clearly . The latter seems to be very general these days, and subject to the discretion of the authorities.

Does the Fed even possess the authority to strip Americans of their nationality?

By all accounts, criminals in Govt. who have acted illegally, esp. with regards to PNAC, 9/11, TWAT, should be the first to be prosecuted if the bill were to pass.

Good point Tommy, plus if states were to secede, it wouldn't mean a thing.

It reminds me of excommunication to a certain extent...protestors or those critical of Govt. are certainly treated like heretics in these times.