Comment

Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on September 24, 2010 at 1:49pm

Is history doing that loop thing again? At the end of the CNN clip $107 billion (from US) to multinational corporations doing business with Iran despite sanctions.
War preps for profits?

Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on September 24, 2010 at 1:35pm

FAUX NEWZ adds it's spin. Pathetic, but I am glad that the world sees the 911 issues are getting world attention. The propaganda playbook does not work like it did back in the day of previous Nazi rise to world tyranny. (even though the old men in diapers think it will.)

Comment by fireguy on September 24, 2010 at 12:55pm

Too bad the usurper in chief Obama/Soetoro does not have the guts that Iran's president has to tell the truth about 9/11 and a lot of other subjects.

Why do we have to have Ahmadinejad be the one to deliver the message?

How many times has he been demonized by the NWO press so that the average sheeple will blow him off and say he is the anti-American dictator of a terrorist loving nation and follow Beck, Lindbaugh and the rest of the controlled talking heads.

Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on September 24, 2010 at 12:39pm

Establishment Feigns Outrage At Ahmadinejad’s 9/11 Rant
No amount of feigned outrage can put the 9/11 truth genie back in the bottle – all the king’s horses and all the king’s men cannot put the official 9/11 story back together again.
Neo-Cons still embrace the official explanation behind the event that tripled the size of government and led to the feds targeting conservative Americans as domestic terrorists

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, September 24, 2010

The spectacle of a minority of UN diplomats walking out on a speech by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in which he questioned the official story behind 9/11 was instantaneously seized upon by the establishment media and exploited as a way of demonizing any inquiry into the terror attacks.

The media hyped the event as a massive walkout even though the majority of diplomats remained seated during the speech, and launched a talking point centered around feigned outrage in an effort to characterize skepticism of the 9/11 official story as an extremist, fringe viewpoint held by vulgar people.
READ MORE ---> http://www.prisonplanet.com

Comment by 7R33SandR0P3S on September 24, 2010 at 10:53am

Rudy Giuliani, who was outside at an anti-Ahmadinejad demonstration when the Iranian president was speaking, said he was "startled" by the remarks.

"I'm surprised that he would make a comment as insane as that before the United Nations," Giuliani told the Daily News. "This is yet another indication why this man and Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons."

Source: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/09/23/2010-09-23_mahm...

----------------------------------------------------------
INSTEAD OF ADDRESSING THE CONTENT - INVOKE NAME CALLING and THREATS.
----------------------------------------------------------
From Ahmadinejad's Speech:
1-Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?

2-Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group?

Source: http://www.picassodreams.com/picasso_dreams/2010/09/us-boycotts-un-...