Judge drops sex-assault charge against Muslim doctors in landmark female genital mutilation case

Judge drops sex-assault charge against doctors in landmark female genital mutilation case

Jan. 15, 2018, By LEO HOHMANN

https://leohohmann.com/2018/01/15/judge-drops-most-severe-charge-ag...

A case being closely watched by Muslim-rights activists around the Western world has not gotten off to a good start for the Trump administration.

A federal judge has dismissed the most severe charge in the U.S. Justice Department’s first-ever prosecution of a case of female genital mutilation, which involves two Detroit-area doctors who allegedly victimized girls brought in from Minnesota by their parents.

jumana-nagarwala-md

Dr. Jumana Nagarwala was charged in Detroit Wednesday with mutilating the genitalia of young girls.

Count six in the case charged Dr. Jumana Nagarwala and another male doctor with criminal sexual activity. That charge carried a penalty of up to life in prison but has now been dropped, leaving only the less-severe charges of violating a federal statute against FGM.

The ruling, released late Sunday night by U.S. District Court Judge Bernard Friedman, is seen as a victory for the defense team. It’s also a major blow to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who waded into territory no other attorney general had been willing to enter under previous U.S. administrations.

Congress passed a law banning female genital mutilation in 1996 but the feds had not prosecuted a single case until Donald Trump took office, even though the grisly practice is widely observed among some U.S. Muslim immigrant communities such as the Somalis and Sudanese.

A case for the ages

The case is being watched closely around the world to see how the world’s biggest Western democracy responds to female genital mutilation, a practice that is common in Third World cultures throughout Africa and parts of the Middle East but only beginning to show up in Western societies due to mass migration.

The two doctors charged in Detroit are part of the Dawoodi Bohra, a Shia Muslim sect based in western India who practice female genital mutilation as a religious ritual.

Dr. Nagarwala, one of the two Detroit-area doctors charged with mutilating the genitals of young girls in violation of federal law, walked out of jail in late November after her lawyer was able to arrange the largest unsecured-bond in the jurisdiction’s history.

Nagarwala, 44, posted a $4.5 million unsecured bond after some 15 friends and family members put their homes and other assets on the line. If she flees, they lose their property.

Most of those who pledged their assets are believed to be fellow members of the Dawoodi Bohra, a sect within the Ishmaelite community of Shia Muslims.

There are 22 Dawoodi Bohra mosques across the United States [see list below].

Atlanta Jamaat

Bakersfield Jamaat

Boston Jamaat

Chicago Jamaat

Dallas Jamaat

Detroit Jamaat

Detroit Masjid Jamaat

Houston Jamaat

Los Angeles Jamaat

Miami Jamaat

New York City Jamaat

Philadelphia Jamaat

San Antonio Jamaat

San Diego Jamaat

San Francisco Jamaat

San Jose Jamaat

Seattle Jamaat

Tampa Markaz Jamaat

Washington DC Jamaat

New Jersey State Jamaat

Orange County Markaz (california) Jamaat

South Jersey Jamaat

Nagarwala was arrested after prosecutors say two 7-year-old girls from Minnesota were cut at Nagarwala’s clinic in Livonia, a suburb of Detroit, in February 2017. She was arrested in April.

Dr Fakhruddin Attar

Dr. Fakhruddin Attar of Farmington Hills, Michigan, is also a member of the Shia Muslim sect that requires young girls to have their genitals ritually cut.

Count Six charged Nagarwala and Dr. Fakhruddin Attar with conspiring to engage in criminal sexual activity.

In ruling to dismiss the count, Judge Friedman wrote:

“To prove their guilt on this charge, the government must show that defendants transported a minor ‘with intent that (the minor) engage in … any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense. … The facts alleged in the indictment do not support this charge because, as a matter of law, FGM, while a prohibited criminal act, is not “criminal sexual activity.”

No definition of “sexual activity” is provided in the law underpinning the count, Friedman wrote. It provides “a precise definition of ‘illicit sexual conduct’ but does not define (or even mention) the phrase ‘sexual activity’,” he said.

The government argued that while the law does not define sexual activity, the charge should stand “because the cutting and penetration alleged in the indictment constitute violations of Michigan’s criminal sexual conduct statute.”

“We respect the opinion of the court and are reviewing our options for a potential appeal,” U.S. Attorney’s Office spokeswoman Gina Balaya told the Detroit News. “Moreover, we stand ready to proceed with the remaining charges against the defendants.”

Nagarwala and Attar face up to 20 years if convicted of the remaining charges.

Judge’s ‘mind-numbing analysis’ blasted by anti-FGM activist

Liz Yore
Children’s advocate Liz Yore

“We are perplexed by the Court’s mind-numbing analysis,” said Elizabeth Yore, a lawyer and international children’s advocate who started the #EndFGMToday movement. “The victims in this case did not have their ears, nose or face mutilated, rather the defendants intentionally mutilated the genitals, the sexual organs of little girls, by penetrating them.”

Yore added:

“The Court found that although FGM was a criminal act, it was not ‘criminal sexual activity.’ Because the transportation statute did not specifically define sexual activity, the court found that this statutory omission voided the charge. We do not agree with the Court’s legalistic jujitsu, which, as a result, leaves young victims who are transported across state lines at great peril to this barbaric procedure. We agree with the government’s argument that the jury should be left to decide this important fact issue.”

Congress passed the federal FGM law in 1996, yet it has taken 21 years for a federal prosecution.

“Why is that?” Yore asked. “The facts alleged in the prosecution’s case demonstrate the secret underground network of FGM conspirators, who in the dark of night carry out their secret scheme to sexually assault unsuspecting little girls.”

Those conspirators often include the girls’ parents. The parents of the two girls brought to Nagarswala’s clinic in Michigan have lost custody for the time being.

“This is what the underground FGM trafficking networks looks like and, frankly, why it is so difficult for the government to bring FGM prosecutions under the federal law,” Yore said. “Like the mafia omertà, the code of silence among the community of FGM practitioners makes it extraordinarily difficult to save little girls from this hideous practice and to arrest and prosecute mutilators. This is exactly why the public—including teachers, pediatricians and the child welfare community — must be aware and vigilant about this torturous practice. The defense, by imposing a manufactured fact requirement of sexual gratification, attempted to obfuscate and rewrite legislative history of criminal sexual assault.”

Yore also observed that FGM also has no health benefits and that its trauma does come under the abuse (physical pain and psychological trauma), degrade (reduction of female sexuality) and humiliate (inability to perform basic biological functions) criteria.

“As an attorney in the child welfare system where every imaginable child abuse injury has crossed my desk, the genital mutilation and physical abuse inflicted on Dr. Nagarwala’s victims would be evidence that the defendant engaged in ‘torture’ and ‘sexual penetration with a foreign object’ under most state child welfare laws,” Yore said. “We must ask ourselves — did the women and girls who endured the horrors of FGM feel assaulted, both at the time of the procedure and for years after? I’m sure they did. Female genital mutilation is sexual assault, a sexual activity, a criminal sexual conduct perpetrated to suppress, inhibit, and destroy sexual pleasure. plain and simple, and it’s time to call FGM what it actually is.”

The Centers for Disease Control estimates that 513,000 women and girls in the U.S. are at risk for this gruesome procedure.

Despite the fact that the World Health Organization and the United Nations declared FGM a violation of human rights, more than 200 million women and girls are subjected to this torture around the world. Although the practice has been outlawed under federal law since 1996, about half the states in the country are enacting their own laws. At least 59 countries around the world outlaw FGM, including the United States.

The prosecution considers Nagarwala a flight risk because she has wealth and was arrested at the international terminal of the Detroit Airport.

Federal investigators believe Nagarwala may have “cut” upwards of 100 young girls over 12 years, most of them brought to her by a parent or other family member within the Shia sect.

The investigations have spread from Michigan and Minnesota to include New York, Chicago and Los Angeles.

Only a ‘nick’, says defense attorney

Whether Nagarwala and seven other defendants are ultimately convicted in the Detroit FGM case may come down to which expert testimonies are more convincing to a jury. Both sides will undoubtedly bring forth experts to explain exactly what type of procedure the girls were subjected to.

attny-profile-shannon-1

Attorney Shannon Smith specializes in defending people against sex crime charges.

Nagarwala’s attorney, Shannon Smith, specializes in defending people against sex-crime charges. She said in an email that her client did not “mutilate” any girl’s genitals, but rather “nicked the outer foreskin, not the clitoris or labia,” as part of her sect’s ancient religious custom.

“I can appreciate that some people would still be against the nick to the foreskin,” said Smith, a self-described feminist, in the email. “I do want to point out, however, that the nick only amounts to Type 4 under the World Health Organization and is not prohibited by law.”

She said this “nick” was deemed OK by a hospital in Seattle that attempted to do it for Somali Muslim immigrants – the so-called Seattle Compromise put out by a group of multiculturalist medical professionals – and the American Academy of Pediatrics at one time released a paper supporting doing the nick in a safe way.

“Because of the pushback from the advocacy groups (and people quite frankly who over-sensationalize the topic like Ms. Yore), the hospital that was going to do the procedure chose not to and the AAP retracted their position paper,” Smith said.

“There is such a range when it comes to genital cutting that it is very unfair to classify all of it under the term ‘mutilation,’” she continued. “Everyone involved in this case, including my client, is against ‘mutilation.’

“Further, the nick to the foreskin removes far less than what is removed during a male circumcision which has been an accepted religious tradition for centuries. Although we tend to be egocentric and many people in the U.S. are not familiar with the thought of female circumcision or nicking the foreskin … that does not make it wrong.

“The bottom line is that female genital mutilation is not accepted (nor should it be), it’s not religious, it causes injury, it’s harmful and there are many bad side effects. The nick of the foreskin, on the other hand, is based on religious beliefs, more symbolic than anything else, causes no injury, no harm and there are zero side effects.”

Yore said the procedure is barbaric, painful, and has no place in America – no matter what the multiculturalists wish to call it.

“That’s what defense lawyers do. We saw this linguistic game played in the pro-life realm. It’s not a baby being killed, it’s a fetus being terminated. Likewise, it’s not a mutilation but a mere scraping, a mere nicking, we’ve even heard it called a ‘wiping.’ It’s the lies to defeat us, using nuanced language. If you read the forensic description in the criminal complaint it certainly was not a nicking, scraping or wiping. But Shannon is going to soft-pedal what this is. She can’t silence the truth.”

Tuesday’s scheduled hearing on a motion by Smith to dismiss one of the charges having to do with sexual assault, has been postponed till Dec. 4.

“They’re going to fight every step of the way,” Yore said. “She says I am sensationalizing it. I call what she is doing, linguistic lies.”

And at the first step on Monday, they won.

Leo Hohmann is a veteran journalist and author of the 2017 book “Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad.” Donate to this website and help support his investigative reporting on topics most journalists are afraid to touch.

Views: 225

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by DTOM on January 18, 2018 at 11:12am

The ruling, released late Sunday night by U.S. District Court Judge Bernard Friedman, is seen as a victory for the defense team.

There's a surprise.

Friedman has already proven on several occasion that he believes himself to be above the Constitution, Bill Of Rights and the voting decisions of the people of Michigan.

Friedman said the constitutional amendment known as the Michigan Marriage Act, passed by 2.7 million state voters in 2004, was unconstitutional because it denied gays and lesbians equal protection under the law.

He presumes himself to be an arbiter of his own form of justice. 

---

Judge Bernard A. Friedman Makes Man His Slave


Post by WaTcHeR on Apr 13, 2006 9:10:00 GMT -5
http://policecrime.proboards.com/thread/557

04/13/2006 - DETROIT -- On Thursday, William Schramm of West Bloomfield reported to the Detroit federal courthouse, sat all day on a hallway bench and stared at the wall.

It's the same way the 31-year-old retirement planner has spent his Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays every other week since the end of January.

Schramm is charged with no crime but is serving an unusual and indefinite sentence for allegedly lying to a federal judge.

When Schramm, who is self-employed, balked at sitting on a grand jury, Chief U.S. District Judge Bernard A. Friedman told him he wouldn't have to serve. He would, however, have to sit on the first-floor bench every day the jury sits. He wouldn't be allowed to read. And he wouldn't receive the $40-a-day pay or the mileage reimbursement jurors get for trips to the Detroit courthouse.

Legal experts say Friedman's order -- which was not put in writing and did not result from finding Schramm in contempt of court -- is highly unusual and of questionable legality.

"My initial impression is this is an incredible abuse on the part of the judge," said Ralph Lindeman, a lawyer and justice reporter with legal publisher BNA Inc. in Washington, D.C., who spent 15 years as a Department of Justice trial attorney. Schramm "is effectively being imprisoned and there has been no process to determine whether the judge has made the right kind of call."

Friedman said he has inherent authority to administer justice that is not spelled out in any specific statute.

The chief judge conducts a question-and-answer session with prospective grand jurors and said Schramm responded to a question or questions in an inappropriate and apparently untruthful manner. As a result, "he had to contemplate his behavior and his interference with the administration of justice."

"The message is that when you are summoned to jury duty you must tell the truth," he said.

Friedman would not specify what Schramm said that was objectionable and acknowledged Schramm also sent him a letter stating why he did not want to sit on the grand jury. He said he was surprised Schramm had obeyed his direction for the last eight weeks without complaining.

The grand jury -- which meets in secret and issues indictments in federal criminal felony cases -- is scheduled to sit until July and could be extended another six months. Friedman said his order to Schramm was for an indefinite time period, but "all he has to do is come in and talk about it."

"I expected him to come in and I still do," Friedman said. "Every time I know he's out there it goes through my mind. He knows how to send me a letter and he knows how to contact me."

Schramm said he spoke to lawyer friends who told him Friedman has the power to issue the order, which requires him to stay at the courthouse from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day the grand jury sits.

Though the penalty has significantly hampered his ability to work, Schramm said he has not complained because he is afraid of further upsetting the judge and being found in contempt, which he said could put his license to sell securities at risk.

After being noticed by court visitors and agreeing to an interview, Schramm later changed his mind and asked that the story not be printed, saying he was too afraid of further repercussions from Friedman. But The News had already contacted Friedman's office, and he confirmed the story.

"I've lost respect for the court system," Schramm said as he passed the time at the courthouse Thursday. "It's a joke. If you're going to punish me, have me do something productive … let me work with cancer patients instead of sitting here staring at the wall."

Schramm, who offers retirement planning for teachers, said he "freaked out" when he learned of the time commitment serving on the grand jury would entail and he wrote Friedman a letter Jan. 17 saying he did not respect law enforcement or believe in the court system.

Friedman summoned him to a meeting about two weeks later and said "your letter is all bs-- I don't believe it," according to Schramm. That's when Friedman made his verbal order.

Legal experts contacted by The News said the lawfulness of the order is questionable at best.

Paul Zwier, a law professor at Emory University School of Law in Atlantasaid he's heard of cases in which federal judges believed a prospective juror told a lie to get out of jury duty and the judges responded by requiring the prospective jurors to continue to report and listen, but not serve.

Schramm's case appears unique due to the requirement he sit in the corridor and the sanction of having his juror pay withheld, Zwier said.

"I don't know of any rule that expressly provides that kind of authority or any kind of sanction if the guy would not show up," he said. Judges often will excuse prospective jurors if serving will create a hardship.

People who are self-employed and say that serving on a jury would create severe economic hardships also are frequently excused, Zwier said.

Thomas Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a nonpartisan group that promotes judicial accountability, said Schramm's punishment is inappropriate.

"If the chief judge is going to mete out punishment, he ought to do it through the court process," Fitton said. Lindeman, of BNA, said since Friedman's order was not a formal or written one, it does not appear Schramm has to abide by it. "This is a pretty incredible story," he said.

Lawrence Dubin, a law professor at University of Detroit Mercy School of Law, also said it is questionable whether Schramm is bound to comply.

"Since the judge's reputation is as a fair jurist, it seems reasonable for this individual to approach the judge and request clarification … and possible release from having to maintain his presence at the courthouse during the grand jury sessions," Dubin said.

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

MAC posted videos
yesterday
tjdavis posted photos
yesterday
Doc Vega posted photos
yesterday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Veteran’s Day a Time That Should Be Honored

 At a time in our confusing and idiotic history when a Democrat can’t define a woman when being…See More
yesterday
Michael A. Pinson posted a photo
yesterday
cheeki kea commented on tjdavis's blog post Mountain Miracle
"Thumbs up to this awesome school. Isn't it amazing that some of the greatest teachers are to…"
Sunday
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
Sunday
cheeki kea commented on Doc Vega's blog post This is Incredible! Trump is Already releasing Plans to Dismantle the Deep State and Purge the Corrupt Players
"Oh wow he is not wasting any time. May the power of the words he just spoke resonate across America…"
Sunday
tjdavis favorited cheeki kea's video
Sunday
tjdavis favorited rlionhearted_3's photo
Sunday
tjdavis posted a blog post
Sunday
Doc Vega's 4 blog posts were featured
Saturday
cheeki kea's 2 blog posts were featured
Saturday
Doc Vega commented on tjdavis's blog post Mountain Miracle
"A creative way to get hands on participation with students and the community."
Saturday
Doc Vega favorited tjdavis's blog post Mountain Miracle
Saturday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

The Perfect Lies

The Perfect Lies Time is like an ocean with its secrets running deepLike all the lovers you’ve…See More
Saturday
tjdavis posted blog posts
Saturday
tjdavis posted a blog post
Friday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Thursday
rlionhearted_3 posted a photo
Thursday

© 2024   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted