Kurt Haskell: The Truth About Flight 253 Has Been Revealed

Kurt Haskell: 'The Truth About Flight 253 Has Been Revealed'

by Flight 253 passenger Kurt Haskell

Please note that in the article that follows, I am not claiming that the U.S. Government knew Mutallab
had a bomb or intended to hurt anyone on Flight 253 when the U.S.
Government let him board.

THE SHARP DRESSED MAN WHO AIDED MUTALLAB ONTO FLIGHT 253 WAS A U.S.
GOVERNMENT AGENT.

Since our flight landed on Christmas Day, Lori and I have been doing
everything in our power to uncover the truth about why we were almost
blown up in the air over Detroit. The truth is now finally out after
the publication of the following Detroit News article:

http://detnews.com/article/20100127/NATION/1270405/Terror-suspect-k...

Let me quote from the article:

“Patrick F. Kennedy, an undersecretary for management at the State
Department, said Abdulmutallab’s visa wasn’t taken away because
intelligence officials asked his agency not to deny a visa to the
suspected terrorist over concerns that a denial would’ve foiled a
larger investigation into al-Qaida threats against the United States.

“Revocation action would’ve disclosed what they were doing,” Kennedy
said in testimony before the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Allowing Adbulmutallab to keep the visa increased chances federal
investigators would be able to get closer to apprehending the terror
network he is accused of working with, “rather than simply knocking out
one solider in that effort.”‘

Now it all becomes apparent. Let me detail everything we know about the
“Sharp Dressed Man” (SDM).

1. While being held in Customs on Christmas Day, I first told the story
of the SDM.

2. My story has never changed.

3. The FBI visited my office on December 29, 2009, and showed me a
series of approximately 10 photographs. None were of the SDM. I asked
the FBI if they brought the Amsterdam security video to help me
identify the SDM, but they acted as though my request was ridiculous.
The FBI asked me what accent the SDM spoke in and I indicated that he
had an American accent similar to my own. I further indicated that he
wore a tan suit without a tie, was Indian looking, around age 50, 6′0″
tall and 250-260 lbs. I further indicated that I did not believe that
he was an airline employee and that he was not on our flight.
4. During the first week of January, 2010, Dutch Military Police and
the FBI indicated that over “200 Hours” of Amsterdam airport security
video had been reviewed and it “Shows Nothing”.

5. The mainstream media picked up the “Shows nothing” story, which
slanders my story. After visiting my office twice for a flight 253
special, Dateline NBC and Chris Hanson indicated that my story was
“Unsubstantiated rumor dispelled as myth” and our story did not air
during the tv special.

6. On January 2, 2010, I receive a call from a flight 253 passenger who
indicated to me that it may be in my best interest to stop talking
publicly about the SDM because he believes I am “wrong” in what I saw.
He did not make any claim that he saw the SDM boarding gate incident at
all. This call was made out of the blue after he made a “revelation”
of this event on January 1, 2010. I later discover that this caller has
ties to the U.S. Government.

7. On January 20, 2009, current Director of the National
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Michael E. Leiter, made a startling
admission. Leiter indicated that: “I will tell you, that when people
come to the country and they are on the watch list, it is because we
have generally made the choice that we want them here in the country
for some reason or another.”

8. On January 22, 2010, CongressDaily reported that intelligence
officials “have acknowledged the government knowingly allows foreigners
whose names are on terrorist watch lists to enter the country in order
to track their movement and activities.”

CongressDaily also reported, citing an unnamed “intelligence official”
that Michael E. Leiter’s statement on January 20, 2010, reflected
government policy and told the publication, “in certain situations it’s
to our advantage to be able to track individuals who might be on a
terrorist watch list because you can learn something from their
activities and their contacts.”

9. On Janury 22, 2009, ABC News published an article that shoed a
change of position in the government’s official story. Please see the
following blog post for more information:

http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/initially-discounted.html

The U.S. government provided no explanation for the reason my story was
initially discounted.

10. The SDM could not be from Al Qaeda. When speaking at the counter in
Amsterdam, the SDM said the following “He is from Sudan, we do this
all the time”. Who is “we”? If it is Al Qaeda, you surely don’t make
such a statement to an airposrt security official.

11. The SDM could not be from airport security. The SDM did not dress
in any secuirty uniform and did not appear to have any security badge.
The SDM did not speak with a Dutch accent. The SDM dressed in a suit
coat and pants. If the SDM was a higher up security official, he would
not have to convince the ticket agent to let Mutallab on the plane
without a valid passport. Instead, he would just order her to do it.

12. Could the SDM have been a U.S. Government official? He dressed in a
suit and not a security uniform. Check. He indicated we do this all
the time. Could “we” be the U.S. Government? Check. He spoke Enlish
with an American accent. Check. Would he need to convice the ticket
agent that this was a normal procedure to allow boarding without a
passport? Check. Would he have the ability to obtain such clearance?
Check. Could he enter this security area even though he wasn’t a
passenger? Check. Would the ticket agent likely refer this request to a
manager? Check. Would the U.S. Government not want this information
public and try to hide it? Check.

13. The Amsterdam security video has not been released. A much more
minor airport security violation occurred at the Newark New Jersay
airport several days after the flight 253 incident. That video was
released shortly thereafter.

14. Senators Levin and Stabenow, as well as Congressman Dingle, all
refuse to discuss the matter with me.

With the information we already knew and the admission from the above
referenced Detroit News article, we have evidence and claims made by
government officials that the U.S. Government wanted Mutallab to
proceed into the U.S. in order to obtain information on other
terrorists involved with him. Once we take this statement and add it to
my eyewitness account of a “Sharp Dressed Man” escorting Mutallab
through the boarding process and allowing him to baord without a valid
passport we can make the connection that the “Sharp Dressed Man” was a
U.S. Government offical/agent.

The reasoning behind the following events now becomes very clear:

1. The reason Mutallab got through security despite the numerous
warnings for months before our flight.

2. The reason why there have been so many lies from the U.S. Governemnt
attempting to discredit my eyewitness account.

3. The reason why the Amsterdam airport security video is being hidden
from the public.

4. The reason why the government is proposing a “Failed to Connect the
Dots” account of the failure. The truth is too damning.

5. The reason why Mr. Wolf of the Obama administration indicated on the
Keith Olberman Show that the White House was investigating a possible
“intentional act” from within the U.S. Government as the reason for the
Christmas Day attack.

6. The explanation for the cameraman and why he hasn’t been identified
(Obviously, he was another U.S. Government agent) whose job was to film
Mutallab for some governmental purpose.

7. The reason for the lax security after landing, which can be
attributed to foreknowledge of the possible suspects involved.

8. The reason for the failure to search or secure the plane and
passengers after landing, which can also be attributed to foreknowledge
of the possible suspects involved.

9. The corporate media’s attempt to bury my eyewitness account.

10. Carl Levin’s, Debbie Stabenow’s and John Dingle’s intentional
avoidance of my story and failure to return my calls/emails.

11. Janet Naploitano’s statement that “The System Worked”. From her
point of view it probably did as this WAS PART OF THE SYSTEM!

This article is the big center piece of the puzzle that has been missing
and was needed to finish the entire puzzle.

http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com

Latest Articles
in: Cover-Up/Deceptions
- Freedom
Watch:
Gitmo Suicides Were Actually Homicides?
- Former CIA
Officials Admit To Faking Bin Laden Video
- Deepwater Horizon
survivors allege they were kept in seclusion afte...
- Wikileaks founder:
Very big leaks to come... ''Right now we are sit...
- Media promotes
far-fetched 'bin Laden in Iran' report
- Kent State
Killings Triggered by FBI Agent Provocateur
- Times Square Bomb:
Faisal Shahzad's Pakistani family calls arrest a...
- New York Car Bomb
Incident: Another False Flag?.

Favorite

0 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by JoJo on February 17, 2012 at 9:39am: Everyone must see Edge of Darkness by Mel Gibson. Corrupt Police, Politicians and worse co-workers.

most folks will find it cheeesie about his daughter's death but it's only meant as dressings.

I'll bet this movie is the last for Mel :^(

RSS

Welcome to
12160 Social Network

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

"Destroying the New World Order"

Latest Activity

Top News
·
Everything

Doc Vega posted a blog post

What Will happen When Robot Brides Replace Human Marriage?

With the rapidly approaching prospect of singularity and artificial intelligence dominance taking…See More

6 hours ago

0 Comments 0 Favorites

MAC posted a video

TRUMP ADVOCATING FOR PEACE, CABINET PICKS ADVOCATE WAR

The Trends Journal is a weekly magazine analyzing global current events forming future trends. To access our premium content, subscribe to the Trends Journal...

23 hours ago

0 Comments 0 Favorites

Doc Vega posted a blog post