New Mexico Town Wants Everyone Armed At City Council Meetings

New Mexico Town Wants Everyone Armed At City Council Meetings

new mexico guns

This is a refreshing change of pace from the city councils and county boards in Democratic-dominated parts of the country that are regularly banning lawfully possessed firearms from government property. In the tiny town of Estancia, New Mexico outside of Albuquerque, the town council recently voted to require that all those attending future meetings be armed.

Mayor Nathan Dial says the vote was meant to send a message to Democrats in Santa Fe, who’ve been busy passing gun control laws like universal background checks and extreme risk protection orders over the past few years while ignoring the voices of rural residents.

“RURAL NEW MEXICO IS JUST TIRED OF BEING PUSHED AROUND,” DIAL TOLD THE ALBUQUERQUE JOURNAL AS HE SAT IN TOWN HALL WITH A SNUB NOSE .357 ON HIS HIP. “THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT. THIS IS ABOUT ALL CIVIL LIBERTIES.”

BUT MORROW HALL, ONE OF THE TWO ESTANCIA BOARD OF TRUSTEE MEMBERS WHO VOTED AGAINST THE RULE, SAID IT’S JUST A STUNT, A STAGED EVENT, THE MAYOR’S REACTION TO A BAN ON BRINGING DEADLY WEAPONS INTO THE STATE CAPITOL BUILDING.

“I TOLD THE MAYOR, ‘I CAN’T SUPPORT YOUR RULE. IT’S CRAZY,’” HALL SAID LAST WEEK. “HE SAID, ‘I KNOW IT’S CRAZY. BUT IT’S ALSO CRAZY I CAN’T CARRY A GUN INTO THE ROUNDHOUSE.’ ”

HALL SAID HE DOESN’T UNDERSTAND WHY ANYONE WOULD NEED TO BEAR ARMS IN THE ROUNDHOUSE.

“TO ME, THAT MEANS GOING IN TO FIGHT,” HE SAID. “I DON’T KNOW WHO YOU WOULD FIGHT AT THE ROUNDHOUSE THAT YOU WOULD NEED A FIREARM.”

Let’s count the absurdities here. First, if someone is going in to the state capitol building looking for armed combat, I doubt they’re going to be dissuaded by the presence of a “no guns allowed” sign. Secondly, it’s ridiculous to assume that all those lawfully carrying a firearm are doing so because they’re looking for a fight. It’s quite the opposite, actually. We’re looking to protect ourselves.

So why would any one need to protect themselves in the Roundhouse in Santa Fe? I’ll admit that the likelihood of being the victim of a violent crime inside the capitol building is far lower than on a downtown street in Albuquerque, but don’t forget that those individuals who are (or were) legally carrying in the capitol were doing so in many cases because they were concerned for their safety on their way to and from the building itself. A staffer may be perfectly comfortable being unarmed in her office, while still wanting to be able to protect herself as she walks to her car after a late night at the office.

As for the new requirement that attendees of the Estancia Town Council be armed, Dial says the language is broad enough to encompass someone who’s only “armed with knowledge,” but that’s not stopping the threat of a lawsuit if the language takes effect.

NOV. 30 IS THE DEADLINE THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICO HAS SET FOR ESTANCIA TO RESCIND THE RULE OR GET SUED “FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY VIOLATIONS.”

“THIS NEW RULE PUT FORTH BY THE TOWN OF ESTANCIA UNEQUIVOCALLY VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT,” READS A LETTER SENT BY ACLU NEW MEXICO TO DIAL AND THE TOWN’S BOARD OF TRUSTEES. “THE LAW WILL DETER COMMUNITY MEMBERS FROM ATTENDING TOWN COUNCIL MEETINGS TO PETITION THEIR LOCAL GOVERNMENT, THUS CREATING A CHILLING EFFECT ON THE EXERCISE OF THEIR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT.”

… THE RULE READS: “IN ORDER TO ATTEND AN ESTANCIA TOWN COUNCIL MEETING, ONE MUST BE LEGALLY ARMED. BY ENTERING THIS MEETING, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU ARE PREPARED TO DEFEND YOURSELF AND BELIEFS WITH WHAT YOU BELIEVE IS NECESSARY TO DO SO. (THIS DEFINITION IS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH.)

“ANY AND ALL RELIGIOUS, MEDICAL OR ETHICAL EXCEPTIONS WILL BE HONORED WITHOUT QUESTION.”

DIAL SAID HE NEVER INTENDED FOR THE RULE TO KEEP PEOPLE FROM EXERCISING THEIR RIGHT TO ATTEND PUBLIC MEETINGS.

“I DON’T WANT ANYONE TO BE AFRAID TO SHOW UP,” HE SAID. “IF THEY DON’T WANT TO CARRY A FIREARM THAT’S THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.”

THE MAYOR SAID THE RULE IS INTENDED ONLY TO MAKE CLEAR THAT THE TOWN HAS NO INTENTION OF ENACTING A BAN ON WEAPONS AT PUBLIC MEETINGS AS THE STATE HAS DONE AT THE CAPITOL.

You’d think the ACLU would have better things to do (like actually defending the Second Amendment, for example), but I guess Dial isn’t the only one looking to make some headlines.

I have no idea what the courts will do with Estancia’s rule if it does take effect, but I’m looking forward to seeing the ACLU argue that it somehow has standing to sue over language that is largely symbolic and provides plenty of reasons to opt out. Even if the ACLU does somehow force the town to remove the new rule, however, it can’t make the town council adopt a gun ban of its own. The Democrats in Santa Fe may be obsessed with limiting the right to keep and bear arms, but the Second Amendment is alive and well in Estancia and many other communities across New Mexico.

Views: 48

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted blog posts
2 hours ago
tjdavis posted a video

CHARLIE KIRK VIDEO THAT KEEPS GETTING REMOVED OFF OF SEVERAL PLATFORMS

I had not planned to share this publicly, but I believe Advar, who spoke with Charlie Kirk while I was very ill, would have wanted me to. After my interview ...
16 hours ago
pohonemas33 team commented on Chris of the family Masters's photo
Thumbnail

Gold-Coast-Message

"untuk bermain slot, kamu cukup kunjungi situs kacang99 pasti langsung gacor"
23 hours ago
Doc Vega posted blog posts
yesterday
Burbia posted a blog post

Former President Trump?

When was this article written? It is attributed to Victor Davis Hanson. He is a Fellow at Hoover…See More
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Don’t Go Hunting For Bigfoot

It is October 19, 2019 at 5:46 AM. This will be the last time any visual evidence of Mark is seen…See More
Monday
tjdavis posted a video

Most Corrupt Series: Elizabeth Warren | Forgotten History

Elizabeth Warren has built her reputation as a "reformer", but her political career has also drawn sharp criticism. Questions have been raised about her fina...
Saturday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Ashrams and Moonies Perfect Case for Mind Control
"less prone, Thanks for your support Buddy! "
Sep 18
Doc Vega posted a photo

main-thumb-ti-6724328-100-cnsgqkrgkrhyeyyerazynmuwoplecnbx

When will they put Trump on Mt. Rushmore?
Sep 18
Doc Vega's 4 blog posts were featured
Sep 18
Burbia's blog post was featured

Charlie Kirk Assassination

September 10th 2025 in Utah Turning Point USA CEO has been assassinated. Coincidentally,  answering…See More
Sep 18
Charles Magus's blog post was featured

FURTHER PROOF OF WALK-INS! Prisoners of the Dulce Base by Sherry Shriner

There is a real connection between the Cabal and what is happening at this Undergroung…See More
Sep 18
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post Ashrams and Moonies Perfect Case for Mind Control
Sep 18
Less Prone commented on tjdavis's blog post Sentient World Simulation
"Cannot open the link"
Sep 18
Tina Sullivan is now a member of 12160 Social Network
Sep 18
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Sep 17
Sandy posted a video

We’re cooked

We’re cooked
Sep 17
Sandy posted a photo
Sep 17
tjdavis posted a video

Tom Horn discusses Masonic view of 2025

Startling perspective by Tom Horn of the upcoming year: 2025
Sep 16
cheeki kea posted a photo
Sep 16

© 2025   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted