(NaturalNews) For years, natural health proponents have been sounding the alarm about the dangers of new drugs being pushed on consumers. But is that a one-sided, inaccurate view? Not
at all. In fact, new research now shows the problems with Big Pharma's
hugely hyped medications are far worse than most people have even
dreamed. Independent reviewers found that about 85 percent of new
drugs offer few if any new benefits -- but they carry the risk of
causing serious harm to users.

According to Donald Light, Ph.D., a professor of comparative health policy at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey who authored the study, the pharmaceutical industry is a "market for lemons" and Big Pharma spends a fortune to sell those lemons to the public.

"Sometimes drug companies hide or downplay information about serious side effects of new drugs and overstate the drugs' benefits," Dr. Light, who presented his findings on August 17 in Atlanta at the
105th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, said in a
press statement. "Then, they spend two to three times more on marketing
than on research to persuade doctors to prescribe these new drugs. Doctors may get misleading information and then misinform patients about the risks of a new drug. It's really a two-tier market for lemons."

Dr. Light's paper, Pharmaceuticals: A Two-Tier Market for Producing 'Lemons' and Serious Harm, is an institutional analysis of the pharmaceutical industry and how it works. He based his conclusions on a wide range of data from independent sources and studies, including the Canadian Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, the Food and Drug Administration, and Prescrire International (a French language journal which publishes extensive research on
pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics ). Much of research for the
study was conducted for a forthcoming book Dr. Light edited, The Risk of Prescription Drugs, which is slated for publication this fall by Columbia University Press.

In both his paper and his book, Dr. Light emphasizes what he dubs the
"Risk Proliferation Syndrome", which refers to the way Big Pharma has
grossly maximized the number of people exposed to new drugs with
relatively low effectiveness but a heightened risk of adverse and often severe side effects. The pharmaceutical giants have accomplished this by failing to put each new medication on the market using a controlled, limited launch which would allow evidence to be gathered about the drug's effects, positive and negative. Instead, Big Pharma builds hugely hyped drug launches based on clinical trials
that were designed in the first place to minimize evidence of harm and
are published in the medical literature to only emphasize a drug's
advantages.

Pharmaceutical companies spend millions of dollars on massive campaigns to sell a new prescription med, recruiting leading doctors to use the drug for conditions other than those for which it is
approved, Dr. Light revealed. By promoting such off-label or unapproved
uses, Big Pharma goes after even more sales and physicians inadvertently
become what Dr. Light calls "double agents" -- they work to push sales
of the new drug while they are supposed to be stewards of their
patients' well-being.

And what happens when patients complain that the drug is making them sicker and/or producing side effects?
Studies show their doctors usually just discount or dismiss these
complaints, Dr. Light said.

According to the new study, the big drug companies are successful in getting away with selling their "lemon"
drugs because of three main reasons: Big Pharma is in charge of testing
their own new drugs; the pharmaceutical companies have invested millions in building "firewalls" of legal protection to hide information about a drug's dangers
or lack of effectiveness; and the bar for drug efficacy is set fairly
low to make it easier for Big Pharma to get a new drug approved.

Dr. Light pointed out that despite the extensive requirements for testing
the efficacy and safety of each new medication, drug companies use a
strategy of "swamping the regulator" with large numbers of incomplete,
partial, and substandard clinical trials. For instance, in one study of
111 final applications for approval, 42% lacked adequately randomized
trials, 40% had flawed testing of dosages, 39% lacked evidence of
clinical efficacy, and 49% raised concerns about serious adverse side
effects.

"The result is that drugs get approved without anyone being able to know how effective they really are or how much
serious harm they will cause," he said. "The companies control
the making of scientific knowledge and then control which findings will
go to the FDA or be published."

As Mike Adams recently reported in NaturalNews, statin drugs are a prime example of the Big Pharma push to market drugs
as safe and effective while glossing over the fact they often harm far
more people than they help -- in the case of statins, causing everything
from liver damage, acute kidney failure, and extreme muscle weakness to
cataracts (http://www.naturalnews.com/028988_s...).

For more information:
http://www.asanet.org/meetings/2010...
http://www.naturalnews.com/Big_Phar...