Op-Ed: The hijacking of 12160

http://m.digitaljournal.com/article/328978

Favorite

3 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Michael Clair on August 4, 2012 at 1:11am: I think going around claiming to "know" or claiming 9/11 is an inside job as "fact" is reckless and destroys credibility. Be aware and consider the possiblities but bear in mind that trickery is easy for a motivated human and just as the video shown to us via Mass Media can be altered so can other's you tube video of such recordings. I've seen some very interesting videos as well and read a lot of good arguments but I'll only claim to know that we were lied to and there was a cover up but I don't know this to be a fact.
I don't even see enough to know that it was an inside job either, perhaps awareness and lack of action very plausible and likely but not planned out by the government and than hidden. No that is to messy, just allow all controls that would have stopped them to be relaxed and let it happen. Not what I would classify as an inside job, just people not doing the job we paid them to do. For me, and others which is why I'm offering this to ya'll, an inside job would be anywhere from them planning it out and crashing thing into these buidlings or them compeletely making the attacks up and feeding the media fake videos.
I don't see the latter as provable by anything over the internet and could only be sorted out in a court in which we can attack all data in the open. Until that time though it should be enough for the people if you present the evidence that shows how there was a likely cover up and get an investigation whilsy outing the sort of people that would do as such.

Comment by Michael Clair on August 4, 2012 at 1:02am: As I noticed some reacted in anger and this is hardly something you should be mad about I figured I'd point that out too...
Vincent, either the guy is a liar and thus not "crying" just being a jack ass or he is not lying and he was banned for having a different opinion. Either way your comment seems to try to hard to put the guy down so I figured I'd point out the illogical nature of such a comment. And ... what is that "hollywood"?... it sure doesn't seem like he went through many artciles from what I can tell but cutting anything off him also seems rather inappropriate.

Comment by Michael Clair on August 4, 2012 at 12:57am: A lot of groups are falling from grace. This is a decent warning to make sure everyone is still staying critical and open minded. This doesn't mean believing or spreading or acting upon everything you hear with an open mind, far from it.
It doesn't seem to me that this article was accurate but if there is an Admin reading and ya'll banned an person for his thoughts (assuming not being repeatively insulting or spam) than that would be pathetic. Don't get your panties in a bunch, like I said if that was the case yes shame but I've voiced (typed) my thoughts openly and I've never had an issue. I suppose I'm not that active blogging here though.

Comment by Ragnarok on August 4, 2012 at 12:36am

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on August 3, 2012 at 7:59pm: Who's Cal Burns???..i like the cut of his jib ;)

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on August 3, 2012 at 7:57pm: just by reading his crap, I can tell he's clueless on what 12160's really all about ;)

Comment by Dianne Stallark on August 3, 2012 at 3:31pm: what DRIVEL coming out of Alexander's mind! he seems to have "foot in mouth" disease as well. what happened...did someone bruise his EGO?

@Patriot Horse....LOL...