Pro-gun Democrats oppose new assault weapon ban
Pro-gun Democrats oppose new assault weapon ban
By JIM ABRAMS
The Associated Press
Wednesday, March 18, 2009; 5:27 PM
WASHINGTON -- Sixty-five House Democrats said Wednesday that they would oppose any attempt by the Obama administration to revive a ban on military-style weapons that President Bill Clinton signed into law in 1994 and President George W. Bush let expire.
The pro-gun Democrats, led by Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark., wrote Attorney General Eric Holder that they would "actively oppose any effort to reinstate the 1994 ban, or to pass any similar law."
They urged the administration to avoid a "long and divisive fight over a gun control issue" at a time when Washington needs to concentrate on the economic crisis.
The House letter came a day after Montana's two Democratic senators, Max Baucus and Jon Tester, wrote a similar letter to Holder saying the Justice Department should enforce existing laws before considering new gun ownership restrictions. "We will strongly oppose any legislation that will infringe upon the rights of individual gun owners," they said.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/18/AR2009031802870.html
By JIM ABRAMS
The Associated Press
Wednesday, March 18, 2009; 5:27 PM
WASHINGTON -- Sixty-five House Democrats said Wednesday that they would oppose any attempt by the Obama administration to revive a ban on military-style weapons that President Bill Clinton signed into law in 1994 and President George W. Bush let expire.
The pro-gun Democrats, led by Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark., wrote Attorney General Eric Holder that they would "actively oppose any effort to reinstate the 1994 ban, or to pass any similar law."
They urged the administration to avoid a "long and divisive fight over a gun control issue" at a time when Washington needs to concentrate on the economic crisis.
The House letter came a day after Montana's two Democratic senators, Max Baucus and Jon Tester, wrote a similar letter to Holder saying the Justice Department should enforce existing laws before considering new gun ownership restrictions. "We will strongly oppose any legislation that will infringe upon the rights of individual gun owners," they said.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/18/AR2009031802870.html
Comment
-
Comment by fireguy on March 30, 2009 at 4:29pm
-
Most Dempublicans and Republicrats are so caught up in the left right phalicy that they don't know what their parties really stand for or against. We need to elect people regardless of their party affiliation that will honor the oath of office and "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America" and stand for national soverignty.
-
Comment by Marklar on March 29, 2009 at 11:00pm
-
Yep, even if I was anti-gun I would be smart enough to know that it's a horribly bad idea to pick and choose which parts of the bill of rights you are going to defend no matter how you feel about individual portions of it.
I'm no democrat but no republican either. I do however live in one of the most democratic leaning cities in America and a large number of the democratic voters I know are armed to the teeth, and while they may not fight against gun control as fervently as many republicans, they are certainly not for it.
-
-
Good! The number of democrats that believe in gun control is rather small in my experience but they are almost all the most irrational and vocal tree hugging zombie types amongst the party - the left wing's analogue to right wingers who think that anyone who actually USES the first amendment should be rounded up and shot.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
"Les prone, Thanks Buddy! "
"Less Prone as usual the official version of the truth does not match the evidence and is labeled…"
"Charlie Kirk was getting very critical against Israel and had turned down a lucrative deal from the…"
The Army of Government Launched Psychopaths
They walk among us in most college towns. They seem relatively reasonable until political…See More
"Have to sign in to YT for this. So. What I do is to go to https://ytdown.io/en/ and download…"
"cheeki kea, you are spot on. The old guard is about to collapse! "
"cheeki kea, the Japanese thought they could expand their empire and exact enough damage on the US…"
NEW DOCUMENTARY - Dissent Into Madness
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: https://www.corbettreport.com/dissent-into-madness/What if the delusions of the dissidents are in fact real? What if their paranoid f...
"Japan served themselves up no favours by inching out into the South Pacific as they soon found out.…"
"Their plans did not work out because we are the news now, and the old news is the enemy. "
Alligator Creek and a Japanese Massacre
The year is 1942 just a few months after the Pearl Harbor disaster. Despite losses suffered by the…See More
CHARLIE KIRK WAS CNP! JOSH REEVES 9-11-25
"With all due respect this guy comes off as a drunken asshole and he didn't even know who…"
© 2025 Created by truth.
Powered by
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network