Startling Revelations. More going on in The Gulf Of Mexico Than An
Oil Spill!
Added: Sunday, June 20th 2010 at 8:39pm by JoAnneMor
~~~The team is at it again!~~~
In the course
of our investigation into the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, we
have uncovered some startling information.
What I am about to tell
you will knock you out of your seats.
There is a lot more going
on in the Gulf of Mexico than the oils spill.
This administration
and many other entities like BP, Citi, Nalco, GM, GE, Goldman Sachs,
University of Chicago, holding companies along with Dept of Defense,
Billionaires and Politicians are all vested in biofuels.
What is
going on in the Gulf is directly related to this new industry.
There
is an Algae these companies are interested in.
From the mouth of
the Mississippi river, all along the Gulf coast and spreading down to
the Everglades is prime area for growing this Algae. Crist is aware of
this. He's funding it.There is a couple of other prime spots too.
Chesapeake is one area and the Great Lakes is another. (Funny, we
already had a Great Lakes Czar and a Chesapeake Czar.) (Now we have a
Gulf Czar too!)
As you know, the oil continues to flow in the Gulf.
It looks incompetent when assessing the response to the crisis. It is not incompetence. It is intentional and willfull
destruction.
They are spraying dispersants that are toxic to sea
life. The dispersants hold the oil below the surface. Ask yourselves why
you would want that. Wouldn't it be easier to vacuum the oil if it were
floating?
They are not letting foreign tankers in to help. Even
the few barges Jindal got his hands on were stalled, citing they need to
be inspected to see if they carried enough life vests. They did.
They
even pass the buck as to who is in charge. BP says they were in charge.
O says he's in charge. The Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen says he's in
charge. They run us in circles to divert the real questions.
If
you have noticed, most of their news conferences have very little to do
with action response, instead focusing on claims processing.
This
is not incompetence. It is an intentional strategy. They don't want to
clean it up or even try to contain it.
What they are doing is in
three steps.
First get rid of oil industry in Gulf.
Then
turn Gulf into a dead zone. A dead zone is free of life or ability to
sustain it. The oil, dispersants and fertilizers deplete oxygen. It
kills animals and fish, also turning their remains into fertilizer.
Finally,
use Gulf as a giant Algae farm. Algae grows on water surface, getting
oxygen from air, not water. Fertilizers like Urea supply much needed
nitrogen. The Mississippi and the other rivers that empty into Gulf also
pick up fertilizers from the many farms along the way. This feeds the
Algae at the mouths of these rivers.
The oil in the water won't
hurt the Algae. It will only promote it's growth and burn factor.
Algae
costs about $2. a Barrel to refine. This is potentially very
profitable.
The down side is , there isn't enough Algae to sustain the demand. It takes a lot of Algae to produce a single barrel.
That means they need a huge place to grow and multiply the supply of
this Algae. Right now they don't have this enormous Algae farm location.
They have the desire, the technology, the investments and companies all
set up.They have even taken the steps to map out the plan.
That
plan involves projects in the Great Lakes., Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf
of Mexico.
This oil spill whether
sabotage, negligence, accident or design is the perfect way to eliminate
fossil fuels such as oil and to advance his biofuel agenda..
They
will sacrifice the Gulf and all who live in or around it for this multi
Trillion Dollar industry.
This also ties in with Carbon capture
and exchange. You all know about the Chicago Carbon Exchange, Cap &
Trade and even O's support of Kyoto, so I won't bore you with history.
For
those who don't know details on those Bills and international climate
agreements, please refer to back posts of mine, or those of others who
have researched and posted.
There is a proposal to store Carbon
that has been captured by industries, in the Gulf. The Carbon will enhance the
Algae
growth while making a fortune for companies like O's Chicago Carbon
Exchange.
All the usual players as well as a few new ones are involved. There is everything from lies deceit, government stealth,to
insider trading and intentional destruction going on.
My friend
and research teammate has compiled a short summary. Please read this,
then I will pick it up from there.
Via: Spongedocks:
Step
by Step Chicago to the Gulf of Mexico
The lawsuit lists potential damage claims of
about $2.5 billion to the Gulf fishing industry; $3 billion to tourism;
$700 million in remediation efforts so far; $6 million a day in
continuing costs and "incalculable damages to BP's reputation."
We have all heard it said, carbon is a bad thing for our environment.
Where did all begin? Junk Science, Al Gore, Maurice Strong, Barack
Obama, Joel Rogers, Van Jones. Bill Clinton, John Podesta, Vivek Kundra,
Carl Pope, need we go on?
So what is the motivation of eliminating Carbon? MONEY!! Consider for a moment how wealthy these people and
countless others are getting by promoting this carbon offset science and
forcing alternative biomass science and technology. Frankly,
determining the wealth of these people is an angry task. Yet, how do
these people profit from this forced change from oil to bio-fuels?
Stimulus money, see 'Bombshell Expose', insider trading, government
legislation, corporate shakedowns.
Let's examine some events and people:
Okay lets chat a moment about what happened.
What the well explosion due to human error, was it on purpose by a
human, was it the work of military for hire groups like Xe, Blackwater,
DynCorp or Triple Canopy? We will never really know. Since SAIC has full
control, they know the answer, but in the end, does it matter? The well
exploded. Now the question is why? Destroy big oil and American
business and jobs. What will takes it place? Ah hah, glad you asked,
algae. Who is behind this? Crime, Inc. which by the way is much bigger
than Beck is able to report and for that matter than we can report, but
we are gonna try.
British Petroleum, one of the world's largest oil producers. BP has had the
most safety violations but why is that? Enter MMS, Minerals Management
Service. http://www.mms.gov/
MMS is an Agency of the Department of the Interior. MMS gave many
waivers to BP for this DeepWater Horizon
rig, not to mention a safety award.
Why did MMS give waivers to BP? http://www.allbusiness.com/company-activities-management/company-st... Enter SAIC. http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_Applications_International_Corp...
Ok, who was head of SAIC while this agenda was being drafted and put
into action? Robert Gates, you know they guy that is now the Secretary
of Defense. But what qualifies Gates for this job? Hummm, good
question. but why is he really on the payroll? Gates has a resume that
includes: Head of SAIC,Council of Foreign Relations and he served of
the Board of Parker Drilling, an American offshore rig owner with HQ in
Houston. Now Parker Drilling has 75 international land rigs, 15 deep
gas land rigs, 34 barge rigs, 7 platform rigs, 7 offshore jack-up rigs.
Parker is also a specialist in deep well, arctic and geo-thermal
drilling. Gates too was the Deputy director of the CIA. Who are
members of SAIC? http://www.saic.com/about/companies/
Here are some other attached facts:
* MMS gave a $5.5 million contract to SAIC to conduct a 5 year study of the Gulf Loop Current.
* SAIC awarded a $21.0 million blanket purchase agreement for Biomass Engineering coming from the Department of
Energy and Golden Field Office. This was done to support the Office of
Energy, Efficiency and Renewable Energies Biomass program.
* SAIC handles all technology for BP and that
includes security logs and surveillance data. Ever wonder about video
via closed circuit on offshore rigs?
* SAIC has had contracts with BP going back as far as 2002 to include a $750 million contract for Global IT
services. SAIC is an employee owned company with $6.1 Billion in revenue
and has offices in 150 cities around the globe. The revenue comes from
* National Security
* Homeland Defense
* Energy
* Environment
* Telecommunications
* Healthcare
* Transportation
Even more Federal action on this. Obama has
awarded $80.0 in research grants for algae and bio-mass fuels. The
Pentagon has mandated that the Air Force be 50/50 in use of fossil fuels
and bio-fuel by 2012.
If Cap and Trade or any new name they attached to this 'junk' legislation and life altering bill does not
pass, understand, it really doesn't matter except it would be cheaper
for taxpayers in the end to pass this bill. What??? You Ask? Well,
understand, Obama is having to look like a fool spending TARP and
Stimulus money to back-door the bio-fuel, algae, urea agenda. He would
look better if he did not have to spend this money but rather force Cap
and Trade to generate tax revenue. Either way, taxpayers and just
violated and scammed in the end.
Contract With BP
Has Clause To Limit Anadarko Liability-Source
By Isabel Ordonez, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
HOUSTON -(Dow Jones)- BP PLC's (BP) contract to operate the
leaking Macondo well contains a clause that could limit the liability of
minority partner Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (APC), a person familiar with
the agreement said.The contract, the person said, is similar to others
used in offshore drilling in which the operator assumes the cost of
mistakes in case of gross negligence, the person said.Anadarko, which
owns 25% of the well, has seen its shares hit hard in recent weeks as
investors brace for the possibility that the Houston-based company could
be on the hook for a proportional share of the costs resulting from the
leak--an amount that could reach tens of billions of dollars. The
confirmation that the joint operating agreement with BP contains a gross
negligence clause could substantially reduce the company's potential
liability andthatoffellow minority partner Mitsui & Co. Ltd.
(
8031.TO).BP
could be liable for 100% of damages if gross negligence is
proven, said Jacqueline Weaver, who teaches energy law at the University
of Houston Law Center. U.S. lawmakers said this week that BP made
decisions that increased the risk of a blow-out at the well to save the
company time or expense. BP didn't immediately respond to requests for
comment.The uncertainty about Anadarko's liability underscores the
unprecedented nature of the crisis that began in April, when a
Transocean Ltd. (RIG) drilling for BP in the U.S. Gulf exploded and
sank, unleashing the largest offshore spill the country has ever seen.
BP so far has spent more than $1.6 billion dollars in cleaning up the
spill, and its ultimate liability could be much higher. On Wednesday,
the company agreed to establish a $20 billion escrow account to pay for
damages.
Anadarko said Wednesday it had been invoiced by BP for its share of clean-up costs, although it didn't disclose the
amount.Analysts with investment bank UBS estimate that the total cost of
the operation could reach between $20 billion and $50 billion, a figure
based on what Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) paid for the 1989 Exxon Valdez
spill. But the analysts said that if Anadarko ends up paying a quarter
of that cost, it could survive.
If Anadarko's liability comes in at the low end of the range, or $5 billion, the company could
"easily" afford it, UBS analyst William Featherston said. Anadarko
currently has $3.7 billion in cash and an unused credit capacity of $
1.3 billion. Additionally, it has assets that are not producing cash in
the onshore U.S. and offshore Africa with an estimated value of $14
billion.If
the price tag is larger than that, Anadarko would have to
issue equity and sell a large percentage of its international and U.S.
Gulf of Mexico nonproducing discoveries. But even if it had to pay $12.5
billion, the company will be able to bear the financial burden,
Featherston said.
Investors have been bracing for a worse outcome
than what analysts have imagined. Anadarko's shares have tumbled 40%
since April 20, the day the rig exploded. The decline sharpened last
week--Anadarko was down 19% on Wednesday alone--in a move that Barclays
Capital analysts said was "disproportionate" to the highest amount of
money Anadarko could be liable for. The stock was trading Wednesday
afternoon at $42.70, down 4.5% from the previous session. BP has said it
won't be limited by the $75 million cap on oil spill economic damages
established under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and that it won't seek
reimbursement from a federal trust fund. But Anadarko has refrained from
openly joining BP in that stance: Spokesman John Christiansen said in
an emailed statement that the company will do what is "right" and that
questions regarding itsliabilitywillbe answered "at the appropriate
time."
Now lets visit some of Obama's Czars:
Steve Chu, this is the guy who wants all homes to have white roofs
How about John Holdren who wants to fertilize
the oceans?
Ok what else?
DARPA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency They testing for production of refined algae into jet fuel.
DARPA expects to produce 50 million gallons by 2011. So who tells and
pays DARPA? Yep you guessed it, SAIC and General Atomics.
Lets go back to the Gulf of Mexico. MMS is responsible for the offshore
drilling leases in ALL Federal waters. Under that 2009 contract to SAIC
to study the loop current, it seems knowledge is only good to 3000'.
Beyond 3000' there are highly significant larger stresses put on
drilling platforms, anchoring systems and risers. Below 10,000' the
pipe must be flexible because of variations in the strength and
direction of the currents and the pipes are quite likely to break.
Because engineers topside cannot see or predict currents but they often
feel them, they must shut down the rigs until conditions become safer.
Technology yet has not reached the depths and associated currents to
measure the whole risk. Currently, all conditions are measured by SAIC
through satellite remote sensing but only to 3000'.
@
~~~
Now I will add to it. Please bear with me on all the links. I will outline each to save time. Links are to source and
reference so you can all see where we got the info.
BP Ponies Up $10M For Algae Biofuels
The investment numbers are small compared to the oil giant’s overall capital
expenditure budget. BP invested $1.4 billion in alternative energy in
2008
~~~
Exxon’s algae
Exxon, the west’s biggest oil
company, has launched a new research programme into producing biofuels
from algae, in a break from its general antipathy towards alternative
energy.
~~~
CEO envisions a Gulf Coast algae boom
When Paul Woods looks at the Texas Gulf Coast, with its
heavy industry, large tracts of flat land and muddy salt water, he
thinks two words: algae farms.
~~~
Entrepreneurs
Wade Into the 'Dead Zone'
Ambitious Bid to Turn Algae Into Biofuel Taps Mother Nature
Every spring, fertilizer
runoff from the U.S. Mississippi River floods into the Gulf of Mexico,
causing a massive algae bloom that leads to a giant oxygen-deprived
"dead zone" where fish can't survive.
Now, this annual problem is
getting new attention, not from marine scientists but from entrepreneurs
looking for a new domestic source of fuel. And one start-up sees fish
themselves being part of the process.
The algae blooms are spawned
each year as the farmland runoff from as far away as Montana flows into
rivers, eventually reaching the Mississippi and flowing into Louisiana
bayous and out into the Gulf of Mexico. These nutrients are a buffet for
the floating algae, or phytoplankton, which are simple sea organisms
that eat and reproduce quickly. This algae bloom eventually sinks and
feeds an array for bacteria, which suck up so much oxygen that fish and
plants either move away or perish.
These so-called hypoxic areas
exist around the world, and there were as many as 200 in North America
in the spring, says Robert J. Diaz, a professor of marine science at the
College of William & Mary in Virginia. The Gulf of Mexico dead zone
is the second largest in the world, after one in the Baltic Sea.
~~~
A Breakthrough Technology to Transform Algae into Oil
Executive
Summary
OriginOil, Inc. is a public company trading on the NASDAQ
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
(OTCBB) market under the symbol
"OOIL.”
Overview
OriginOil, Inc. is developing a breakthrough
technology that will transform algae, the most
promising source of
renewable oil, into a true competitor to petroleum.
A perfect storm
has brought algae to the forefront in the biofuel arena.
A host of
factors, including rising oil prices, global warming, and the rapid
industrialization
of China and India, have greatly increased the
demand for a renewable alternative to
petroleum.
Worldwide
investment in biofuels rose from $5 billion in 1995 to $38 billion in
2005 and is
expected to top $100 billion by 2010, thanks to investors
like Richard Branson and George
Soros, GE and BP, Ford and Shell,
Cargill and the Carlyle Group. Renewable fuels have
indeed become a
rallying cry for the green movement.
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network