recently in chat i was asked to research the Constitution because of my belief that the founding fathers were not NWO. WHEN i pointed out several locations within just the first 2 Federalist Papers that the authors of the Constitution for these United States did not sound like globalist, my UNworthy opponent continuues to express the belief that i was reading it wrong and started referring to something called the "Antifederalist Papers". I call my opponenet UNworthy because every time he referred to said papers, i would ask for a URL LINK to same and his response was ALWAYS the same..."do your own research".

My opponent also asked if the founding fathers were not NWO, why were the original Articles of Confederation abandoned in favor of the newer Constitution. i suggested they were concerned that the AoC was written in a time of trouble and not THOROUGHLY thought out. HIS argument to that was that if that were the case, then the Declaration of Independence was the same. On that point, i neglected to defend that the Declaration of Independence was NOT a binding document for/of the new government. After FURTHER READING the FP, i came upon proof that the reason the AoC was left for the Constitution WAS IN FACT that the AoC proved to be flawed in several aspects...according to the AUTHORS.

i am STILL waiting for my opponent to VERIFY his statements with documented evidence FROM THE AUTHORS of the Constitution for these United States of America