Since logic is no longer taught as a required subject in schools, the door is open to all sorts of bizarre reactions to the presence of information.

Here are three favorites:

One: grab the headline or the title of an article, make up your mind about how you "feel," and ignore everything else.

Two: Actually read the article until you find a piece of information that appeals to you for any reason; latch on to it, and run with it in any direction.  In all cases, the direction will have nothing to do with the intent of the article.  

Three: From the moment you begin to read the headline of the article, be in a state of "free association."  Take any word or sentence and connect it to an arbitrary thought or feeling, associate that thought with yet another arbitrary thought...and keep going until you become tired or bored.

You might be surprised at how many people use these three "methods of analysis."

The very idea that the author of the article is making a central point doesn't really register.  And certainly, the notion that the author is providing evidence for the central point and reasoning his way from A to B to C is alien.  

A college liberal education?  These days it could be imparted in a matter of weeks, simply by hammering a small set of values into students' skulls---along with requisite guilt and fear at the prospect of wandering off the reservation.

Logic as a subject is viewed with grave suspicion, as if it might involuntarily take a person down the wrong track and dump him in a politically incorrect ditch---a fate to be avoided at all costs.  

Therefore, the practice of rational debate is on the way out.  Too risky.  Besides, the preferred method of dealing with opponents is screaming at them, shoving them off stage, and whining about "being triggered."

If you think obtaining what's called a liberal college education is vastly overrated (and absurdly expensive), you're right.  Learning logic, instead, would be a good start down a different road.

And an analysis of the principle of "greatest good for the greatest number" would be very, very useful---since it underpins so much of values-centered education these days.

What does greatest good mean, specifically?  How would it be achieved?  Who would implement it?  How would the implementation affect individual freedom?  

Wrestling with these questions would open up whole new territories of insight.

As I've mentioned in past articles, when I taught a few basics of logic to middle-school students, the clutter in their minds receded.  They found the ability to follow a line of thought---for the first time, they recognized there was such a thing as a connected flow of reasoning from A to B to C to D.  The lights went on.

The world may be sinking into deeper levels of know-nothing non-rationality, but that's not a good excuse for trailing along down into the swamp.  It should be a wake-up call to go the other way.

No matter what anyone says, it's not a crime to be smarter than other people.
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
Jon Rappoport

Views: 67

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by cheeki kea on December 15, 2019 at 7:47am

True and knowing all this on the bright side can be an advantage, particularly upon mild debate in Formal situations. Even acknowledging tiny inconsistency of their "facts" or how they ~"feel"~about it, can cause them to become unhinged and erupt into emotional outburst. ( always to their determent, and in front of others ) That's when a debate is won or meeting closed with successful conclusion.  

Comment by Diana on December 14, 2019 at 11:24am

People don't seem to care about truth anymore, that's why they are able to "identify" as whatever they want and it's okay because "feelings".  

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Chris of the family Masters posted a blog post

Gary Barnett: Freedom Starts by Not Wearing a Mask

September 22, 2020"As bad as the ruling and political class's totalitarian response to this…See More
30 minutes ago
Mr. Sizzle posted a photo
2 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle posted videos
2 hours ago
Mr. Sizzle favorited Aaron's photo
3 hours ago
Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
5 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post New Zealand Commie.
"I recon they all are related to Stasi operatives."
7 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters posted a discussion

Calling the FDA, AMA and Big Pharma: What the Term “Medical Mafia” Means

Calling the FDA, AMA and Big Pharma: What the Term “Medical Mafia” MeansBy…See More
9 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Freedomrox's blog post Cornholio Virus? 200,000 deaths... Doctors, hospitals, and prescriptions kill 786,396 people every year!
"The medical mafia video is spot on. This man is highly qualified to make such statements."
10 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters favorited Freedomrox's blog post Cornholio Virus? 200,000 deaths... Doctors, hospitals, and prescriptions kill 786,396 people every year!
10 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters favorited James Roberts's blog post Something Big Is Coming
10 hours ago
Freedomrox posted blog posts
11 hours ago
Aaron posted blog posts
12 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer posted a video
13 hours ago
Aaron posted photos
15 hours ago
Aaron posted photos
15 hours ago
MAC posted a discussion

BIOWARFARE: Chinese communists “intentionally” unleashed “Frankenstein” COVID-19, says Wuhan scientist.

BIOWARFARE: Chinese communists “intentionally” unleashed “Frankenstein” COVID-19, says Wuhan…See More
15 hours ago
Aaron posted photos
15 hours ago
Aaron posted videos
16 hours ago
Larry Flinchpaugh posted a photo
17 hours ago
Larry Flinchpaugh posted blog posts
17 hours ago

© 2020   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted