I reported this story in May of 2018. I'm reprinting that story here. You'll see it's still relevant in several ways---not least of which is the failure of the press to dig into the meaning behind the headlines.
Some lies are so big, many people can't accept the fact that they're lies. Their minds are boggled. "No," they say, "that couldn't be." But yes, that could be, and is.
The mainstream press is mentioning them, here and there, but without any intent to raise alarms, dig in, investigate, and get down to the core of the problem.
So I'll get to the core.
The first scandal revolves around the flu vaccine for the current year. The CDC and other "experts" have admitted the vaccine has a very low effectiveness rate.
Why is it a dud?
Because the vaccine is produced using chicken eggs, and in that medium, the flu virus---which is intentionally placed in the eggs---mutates. Therefore, it isn't the same virus which is causing flu this year. Therefore, no protection against the flu.
FiercePharma reports: "Based on data from Australia, which already had its flu season, scientists warn that this season's flu shot might be only 10% effective. And the reason for such a low level of protection might lie in the method by which the majority of flu vaccines are made: in eggs."
Ten percent effectiveness. Now that's ridiculous. And it's assuming you accept the whole model of how vaccines work---that they actually do protect (safely) against disease, rather than, at best, repressing the visible symptoms of the disease.
Amidst their spotty coverage of this scandal, here is what the press is failing to mention: the problem with the flu vaccine isn't just a 2017-2018 flaw.
It would be the same problem ever since chicken eggs have been used to manufacture the vaccine.
Are you ready?
Healthline.com: "The majority of flu vaccines are grown in chicken eggs, a method of vaccine development that's been used for 70 years."
Hello? Anyone home?
Seventy years. The same problem.
The same "low effectiveness" problem.
That's a page-one story with a giant headline. That's the lead item on the nightly news. That's a pounding investigative series about the lunatic promotion of a massively ineffective---but universally promoted---vaccine going back decades and decades.
But it isn't a giant headline. It isn't an investigation. It's a here-today-gone-tomorrow piece. That's all.
The second scandal keeps unfolding in the Philippines, where drug giant Sanofi's Dengvaxia, given to prevent Dengue Fever, is facing enormous pushback from government officials, who stopped the national vaccination campaign, after thousands of children already received the shot.
The issue? Safety.
FiercePharma: "The Philippines stopped vaccinations shortly after the company warned that Dengvaxia can cause more serious infections in those who previously hadn't had exposure to the virus. The country also kicked off a probe and plans legal action, according to health secretary Francisco Duque."
Did you get that? The company (Sanofi) itself warned that vaccine might not be safe.
FiercePharma: "...the [Philippine] Department of Health didn't heed warnings from an advisory group of doctors and pharmacologists, who concluded early last year that the vaccine's safety and efficacy were unproven."
But let's dig even deeper. Sanofi saying is saying the vaccine might be dangerous for those who haven't been exposed to the Dengue virus before getting the shot. What on Earth does that mean?
It means a child who had naturally come in contact with the virus would have developed his own antibodies to it. And later, those antibodies would protect him against the Dengue virus IN THE VACCINE. Otherwise, the virus in the vaccine could give him a case of Dengue or cause some other form of damage.
This is saying, "If a child is ALREADY immune to Dengue Fever, because his immune system has successfully dealt with the virus, then the vaccine won't damage him."
And THAT is saying, "If the child has naturally developed an immunity to Dengue, then the vaccine, WHICH HE DOESN'T NEED, won't harm him."
Of course, the press isn't getting the picture. If any reporters are seeing the light, they're keeping their mouths shut. The scandal is too big and too crazy.
Between the lines, a vaccine company is admitting their vaccine is only safe for children who don't need it.
A tree just fell in the forest. Who heard it?
Mainstream reporters don't want to uncover the true meaning of vaccine scandals. Therefore, they cultivate ignorance as a defense against admitting their own unconscionable bias. And that's the essence of their own mental "vaccine," which works very well. For them.
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
If you dont like big bro's vaccines you're a terrorist.
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network