It's being asked; why did the police "lie" and in some cases completely fabricate evidence when it couldn't have really happened that way in the BBC Madness in the Fast Lane doc?

The comments made in the documentary by Det. Sup. Dave Mellor, Det. Supt Garrett and PC Richard Elliott, have been questioned by the Hollinshead family. They want to know, why did these officers say what they did, when our evidence contradicts this? In this short piece we can here what D.C. Mellor has to say.
According to the BBC's Madness on the Motorway documentary, the following was said, the wording is verbatim:

Det. Sup. Dave Mellor: "Sabina was a woman who lived in Ireland with her partner and two children, with no convictions or any evidence that she suffered from psychological or mental problems. Sabina has a twin sister Ursula. Ursula lived in America and during 2008 visited Sabina in country Cork in Ireland".

Narrator Michael Usher: "Sabina's partner told police the sister became inseparable, and then disappeared. A day later, the sisters turn up in Liverpool. Witnesses see them on a National Express coach bound for London. But they never make it that far".

Det. Sup. Dave Mellor: "The reason for their visit to the UK, remain unclear, we still don't truly understand why these sisters chose to catch that bus for London. Sabina in particular never gave us any indication during any of the interviews that might have helped us to understand the true reason why her, and her sister were visiting the UK." The Hollinshead family proclaim; YES THEY DID! They knew Sabina had hours earlier dashed into the St Anne's Police Station and said they fled for their lives from a gang of men connected to her partner. She also incredibly reports her children as being "kidnapped". So why did D.C. Mellor say these untruths - "...we have no idea why she was 'over here.' ?

Here we have the very same words that have been extracted from the statement made by Det. Constable Gaskell, from the Merseyside Police. It was sent to us on the 2nd October 2012, by Merseyside's PSD. It was first prepared for the Crown Court in 2009, for they had been warned to attend court, then de-warned due to Sabina's guilty plea, so this statement was never heard in court.

At approximately 08:40hrs on Saturday 17th May 2008, Det. Constable Gaskell was on duty at St Anne Street CID, when they were informed by Enquiry Officer 9709 McKetterick that Sabina and Ursula Eriksson were at the front office and that Sabina had informed him that her "partner" Michael Dossou had 'kidnapped' her two children in County Court, Ireland, the previous evening at their home address [we won't print the door number], The Crescent, College Wood, County Cork, ROI. Sabina had felt frightened and left the children with Dossou who is the children's father. Extract from A Madness Shared by Two - www.amadnesssharedbytwo.com

Madness in the Fast Lane - 2nd Police Officer "Caught Lying" - Why? 

Again the Hollinshead family ask why is the the second police officer appearing to be blatantly lying and acting in the same process for the film. In the BBC Madness in the Fast Lane documentary a second officer's [check out the first officers statement on this channel] statement by PC Elliott is even odder than D.S. Mellor's; as it can only have been totally fabricated by the police. - He claims in the film to have just spoken to Sabina's partner in Ireland, - who then allegedly says; 'it is the first he had heard she and her sister Ursula had left Ireland.' Here's what's said in the brief clip;

Narrator: "Later that night PC Eliott rings Sabina's relatives and partner living in Ireland to tell them the news"

PC Elliott: "They found it strange that this person who Sabina lived with had no idea where she was or what she doing or why she was over here."

Though this cannot be true and prove this in the book A Madness Shared by two and supply the verbatim copy of the police officers statement from Liverpool. The female officer claims she called police officers in Ireland on the same morning in question and whilst the twins were still in St Anne's police station reporting her children had been kidnapped by her partner in Ireland. - Then in reply to her request to checkout the partner the Guarda confirmed sending officers to the home of the partner and spoke directly to him and telling of what Sabina had claimed had took place. - This was around 10am - 11am in the morning.

So this "farce" film footage of PC Elliott supposedly talking to the partner - was supposedly done so at least 10 hours after the partner had already been informed that by the police that Sabina was now in Liverpool. - Thus already fled Ireland!

So why did PC Eliott say it was the 'first her partner was aware she had left the country?'

Is this not 100% proof that lies and fabrications riddle this entire case and why there's a police cover-up and the Staffordshire Police force still refuse to hand over the court bundle of evidence - and nor does the hospital in question with to hand over a copy of Sabina's hospital admittance records - for it will expose the edited-out Section 136 of the 1896 Mental Health Act - arrest and confirm they police and hospital made a gigantic error for releasing Sabina for hospital after only five hours after her mad dash into the oncoming traffic and whilst her twins sister lay seriously ill in intensive care. Again - almost confirming the authors suspicious that these girls were under "Obbo" police observation and before they run onto the M6 motorway.

It cannot be disputed the Hollinshead family are entitled to compensation - especially his children.

BBC Madness in the Fast Lane - Police Cover-UP! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xqHT2jiD6c

The "Edited-Out" Evidence from the BBC Madness in the Fast Lane doc - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbusYLYRfiY

Windows on the World: Dave McCann interview - Police Corruption - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FnZfAb2hYk

In the BBC's Madness in the Fast Lane documentary, first aired on TV in 2010, it clearly showed two deranged women; known as Ursula and Sabina Eriksson, running into the oncoming traffic on the M6 motorway, in what can only be conceived as a suicide bid.  

Following their crazed actions they were both sedated before being taken away for hospital treatment.  Ursula was airlifted to hospital and Sabina went by road in an ambulance.  Sabina was then remarkably discharged from the University Hospital of North Staffordshire [UHNS] after only five hours of this major incident.

Ursula makes the first dash into the oncoming traffic - Sabina soon follows her...

It’s then alleged she went on the stab Glenn Hollinshead to death within 36hrs from being released from police custody.  She was duly sentenced to five years for his manslaughter. 

However, following the release of the book; A Madness Shared by Two on the 12-12-12; it exposes for the very first time numerous new findings; among which is the ‘edited-out’ 27seconds of film footage that proves the twin sisters were originally arrested under ‘Section 136’ of the Mental Health Act.  Millions of viewers and particularly the Hollinshead family were kept in dark about this “special arrest”.  From the onset their local MP Rob Flello asked for an inquiry into why was Sabina released so early from hospital?  Had the Hollinshead family known of the existence of this film footage that confirms they were arrested as such, then it goes without saying they would have sued both police and the hospital involved for dereliction of duty and care and negligence - for releasing Sabina so soon, and in which they are now doing due the evidence that has been revealed in this new book.  It’s further believed that those involved and behind the scenes decided to have it edited out of the film in the first place, for they must have realised what a serious error was made when she was released so soon and now a man lay dead.   

Here is the transcript of what is being said in this brief conversation between PC Finlayson and his superior officer, this has laid secret for over four years and until now!

Narrator: "Now the woman is safely restrained, PC Finlayson updates his senior officer." 
PC Finlayson: "This one, has gone over the bonnet of that car, she's then got up, punched Tracey and gone over there."

Inspector: "This one, - is she arrest note..." - [Meaning has she been 'notified' of arrest]. 

PC Finlayson: "Well 136 and she is..."

Police Inspector: "Well she needs to be, but, but if nothing else being on the carriageway, and err, for her safety."

Section 136 of the 1983 Mental Health Act, under the section: - Police Power to Remove to a Place of Safety, and that his superior clearly agreed with his analysis.  

There are some interesting points made in regards to the significance of the Section 136 being edited out of the BBC Madness in the Fast Lane documentary. Often people wonder why we highlight the "edited out" section 136 from the BBC Madness in the Fast Lane documentary - they may say; "I'm not getting how this excerpt being edited-out is part of a 'cover-up, since the information it contains was actually shown in the online video. The answer to this question follows; As in the case of the Eriksson twins - the Police, "BBC" via Mentorn Productions - colluded in helping to suppress the truth in this case. They all know about the editing out of the Section 136 in the main Madness in the Fast Lane BBC documentary - knowing it was in the original Dicing with Death film they first made on this subject, however, the public didn't know - nor did the film makers - that 72hrs later Sabina Erikksson would be charged with Glenn Hollinshead murder.

Here's where the problem is - those who doubt the significance of the "editing-out" Section 136 probably see the very first original film - Dicing with Death that actually shows this "edited out" version. For it was sixteen months later and when the main BBC Madness in the Fast Lane documentary was made. Officers from the Staffordshire police attended Mentorn Productions offices in London and asked them to edit out this Section 136 from the original film. So it no longer appears in the "main film" on this subject that now revealed Sabina had also been charged with murder - and that it then came to light Sabina was released from hospital after only five hours. The family asked why, as did the media, members of the public and the local MP - was Sabina released so early? At no time was it mentioned the girls were arrested under Section 136. - The police have since removed it from their own records yet the hospital records show they were indeed arrested under Section 136.

If anything - the reason a cover-up may have taken place after the original film was made and this Section 136 edited out of the main documentary - was because the police and hospital involved know they made a major boob by releasing Sabina so early from hospital and against all the rules, regulations and recommendations set-up and provided under Section 136. Put lightly - the Hollinshead family - the murdered victims children - are entitled to compensation to say the least. This is fully covered in the book and this Section 136 was edited out of the film in question and you only have to watch any of them online now. The one online you see showing the section 136 - is also mentioned in the book and we were the first to upload it and mention this film. All your other questions and wondering's are also found in the eBook as opposed to the paperback - as there are 26,000 plus more words in the eBook.

Original Source: http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/police-cover-up-exposed-edited-out...