Since the dramatic release of a US military film of a US airborne shooting of unarmed journalists in Iraq, Wiki-Leaks has gained global notoreity and credibility as a daring website that releases sensitive material to the public from
whistleblowers within various governments. Their latest “coup” involved
alleged leak of thousands of pages of supposedly sensitive documents
regarding US informers within the Taliban in Afghanistan and their ties
to senior people linked to Pakistan’s ISI military intelligence. The
evidence suggests however that far from an honest leak, it is a
calculated disinformation to the gain of the US and perhaps Israeli and Indian intelligence and a coverup of the US and Western role in drug trafficking out of Afghanistan.

Since the posting of the Afghan documents some days ago the Obama White House has given the leaks credibility by claiming further leaks pose a threat
to US national security. Yet details of the papers reveals little that
is sensitive. The one figure most prominently mentioned, General
(Retired) Hamid Gul, former head of the Pakistani military intelligence
agency, ISI, is the man who during the 1980’s coordinated the
CIA-financed Mujahideen guerilla war in Afghanistan
against the Soviet regime there. In the latest Wikileaks documents, Gul
is accused of regularly meeting Al Qaeda and Taliban leading people and
orchestrating suicide attacks on NATO forces in Afghanistan.

The leaked documents also claim that Osama bin Laden, who was reported dead three years ago by the late Pakistan candidate Benazir Bhutto on BBC,
was still alive, conveniently keeping the myth alove for the Obama
Administration War on Terror at a point when most Americans had
forgotten the original reason the Bush Administration allegedly invaded
Afghanistan to pursue the Saudi Bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks.

Demonizing Pakistan?

The naming of Gul today as a key liaison to the Afghan “Taliban” forms part of a larger pattern of US and British recent efforts to demonize the
current Pakistan regime as a key part of the problems in Afghanistan. Such a demonization greatly boosts the position of recent US military ally, India. Furthermore, Pakistan
is the only muslim country possessing atomic weapons. The Israeli
Defense Forces and the Israeli Mossad intelligence agency reportedly
would very much like to change that. A phoney campaign against the
politically outspoken Gul via Wikileaks could be part of that
geopolitical effort.

The London Financial Times says Gul’s name appears in about 10 of roughly 180 classified US files that allege Pakistan’s intelligence service supported Afghan militants fighting Nato forces. Gul told the newspaper the US has lost the war in Afghanistan, and that the leak of the documents would help the Obama administration deflect blame by suggesting that Pakistan was responsible. Gul told the paper, “I am a very favourite whipping boy of America. They can’t imagine the Afghans can win wars on their own. It would be an abiding shame that a 74-year-old general living a retired life
manipulating the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan results in the defeat of America.”

Notable, in light of the latest Afghan Wikileaks documents, is the spotlight on the 74-year-old Gul. As I wrote in a previous piece, Warum Afghanistan? Teil VI:Washingtons Kriegsstrategie in Zentralasien, published this June on this website, Gul has been outspoken about the role of the US military in smuggling Afghan heroin out of the country via the top-security Manas Air Base in Kyrgyzstan.

As well, in a UPI interview on September 26, 2001, two weeks after the 9-11 attacks, Gul stated, in reply to the question who did Black Sept.
11?, “Mossad and its accomplices. The US
spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies. That’s $400
billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it was taken by
surprise. I don’t believe it. Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower
being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said Osama bin Laden had done
it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real
perpetrators...” [1] Gul is clearly not well liked in Washington. He claims his request for travel visas to the UK and to the USA have repeatedly been denied. Making Gul into the arch enemy would suit some in Washington nicely.

Who is Julian Assange?

Wikileaks founder and “Editor-in-chief”, Julian Assange, is a mysterious 29-year-old Australian about whom little is known. He has suddenly
become a prominent public figure offering to mediate with the White
House over the leaks. Following the latest leaks, Assange told Der
Spiegel, one of three outlets with which he shared material from the
most recent leak, that the documents he had unearthed would “change our
perspective on not only the war in Afghanistan, but on all modern wars.”
He stated in the same interview that ‘”I enjoy crushing bastards.”
Wikileaks, founded in 2006 by Assange, has no fixed home and Assange
claims he “lives in airports these days.”

Yet a closer examination of the public position of Assange on one of the most controversial issues of recent decades, the forces behind the September 11, 2001 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center shows him to be curiously establishment. When the Belfast Telegraph interviewed him on July 19, he stated,

"Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. So there are conspiracies everywhere. There are also crazed
conspiracy theories. It's important not to confuse these two...." What
about 9/11?: "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false
conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real
conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." What about the
Bilderberg Conference?: "That is vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking
sense. We have published their meeting notes." [2]

That statement from a person who has built a reputation of being anti-establishment is more than notable. First, as thousands of physicists, engineers, military professionals and airline pilots have testified, the idea that 19 barely-trained Arabs armed with
box-cutters could divert four US commercial jets and execute the
near-impossible strikes on the Twin Towers and Pentagon over a time
period of 93 minutes with not one Air Force NORAD military interception,
is beyond belief. Precisely who executed the professional attack is a
matter for genuine unbiased international inquiry.

Notable for Mr Assange’s blunt denial of any sinister 9/11 conspiracy is the statement in a BBC interview by former US Senator, Bob Graham, who
chaired the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence when
it performed its Joint Inquiry into 9/11. Graham told BBC, "I can just
state that within 9/11 there are too many secrets, that is information
that has not been made available to the public for which there are
specific tangible credible answers and that that withholding of those
secrets has eroded public confidence in their government as it relates
to their own security." BBC narrator: "Senator Graham found that the
cover-up led to the heart of the administration." Bob Graham: "I called
the White House and talked with Ms. Rice and said, ‘Look, we've been
told we're gonna get cooperation in this inquiry, and she said she'd
look into it, and nothing happened.’”

Of course, the Bush Administration was able to use the 9/11 attacks to launch its War on Terrorism in Afghanistan and then Iraq, a point Assange conveniently omits.

For his part, General Gul claims that US intelligence orchestrated the Wikileaks on Afghanistan to find a scapegoat, Gul, to blame. Conveniently, as if on cue, British Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron, on a state visit to India,
lashed out at the alleged role of Pakistan in
supporting Taliban in Afghanistan, conveniently lending further
credibility to the Wikileaks story. The real story of Wikileaks has
clearly not yet been told.

Notes

[1] General Hamid Gul, Arnaud de Borchgrave 2001 Interview with Hamid Gul, Former ISI Chief, UPI, reprinted July 2010 on http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/28/arnaud-de-borchgrave-2001-interview-with-hamid-gul-former-isi-chief/

[2] Julian Assange, Interview in Belfast Telegraph, July 19, 2010.